(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$ :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1880 OF 2021

Between:

Donka Atchayamma, W/o late Donka Adinarayana, Aged about 56 Years, Kotlamadappa Street, Vizianagaram District Petitioner

AND

• 1. K.Santhosha Rao, The Chairman and Managing Director, AP Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
• S. Maseelamani, The Superintendenting Engineer, Operation circle, APEPDCL, Vidyut $2.$
• Bhavan, Dasannapeta, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. P.Venkateswara Rao, The senior accounts officer, Operation circle officer, APEPDCL, Vidyut Bhavan, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.</l
• 4. N.Krishna Murty, The Divisional Engineer, Operation Division, APEPDCL, Vidyut Bhavan, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.

Respondents

Sd/- P. Venkata Ramana DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

$\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$

WHEREAS the petitioner has presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the above case through her counsel Sri KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR, praying the High Court to punish the Respondents herein, for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dt. 17.03.2021 passed in WP No. 15956 of 2020 passed by the High Court.

WHEREAS the said case coming on for orders on admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KANAKALA DEVI PRASANNAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner, directed issuance of notice before admission to the respondents, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted.

Therefore, you namely;

• 1. K.Santhosha Rao, The Chairman and Managing Director, AP Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
• 2. S. Maseelamani, The Superintendenting Engineer, Operation circle, APEPDCL, Vidyut
• Bhavan, Dasannapeta, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. P.Venkateswara Rao, The senior accounts officer, Operation circle officer, APEPDCL, Vidyut Bhavan, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.
• 4. N.Krishna Murty, The Divisional Engineer, Operation Division, APEPDCL, Vidyut Bhavan, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.

be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 01-12-2021, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte.

//TRUE COPY//

$To$

• 1. The District Judge, Visakhapatnam District, at Visakhapatnam, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No. 1 and return to this Court before 01-12-2021).
• 2. The District Judge, Vizianagaram District, at Vizianagaram, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondents No. 2 to 4 and to return to this Court before 01-12-2021).
• 3. K.Santhosha Rao, The Chairman and Managing Director, AP Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
• S. Maseelamani, The Superintendenting Engineer, Operation circle, APEPDCL, Vidyut<br>Bhavan, Dasannapeta, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. $4.$
• 5. P.Venkateswara Rao, The senior accounts officer, Operation circle officer, APEPDCL, Vidyut Bhavan, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.
• 6. N.Krishna Murty, The Divisional Engineer, Operation Division, APEPDCL, Vidyut Bhavan, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.

(Addressee Nos. 3 to 6 By RPAD with a copy of petition and affidavit) 7. One Spare Copy.

HIGH COURT MSM,J DATE: 03.11.2021 NOTE: POST ON 01-12-2021 NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION CC. No. 1880 of 2021 16 NOV 2021 $\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)$