Acme Solar Holdings Limited vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:22 Apr 2022
CNR:APHC010391962019
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra , Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
15 Mar 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE: W.A. No. 383, 384, 388, 392, 393, 394, 396, 401, 423, 424, 433, 435, 436, 440, 441, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 452, 463, 470 and 477 of 2019; W.A. Nos.6, 70, 75, 105, 110, 114, 138, 143, 156, 168, 172, 174, 175, 176, 190, 191 of 2020; W.P. No.11461 of 2021; W.A. Nos.880, 909, 910, 935 and 936 of 2021.
PROCEEDINGS SHEET
| Sl.<br>No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Through Physical Mode) | |||
| 22.04.2022 | Registry has pointed out some typographical mistakes in the<br>common judgment dated 15.03.2022 passed in this batch, which are<br>required to be corrected as under: | ||
| (i) In para No.71, in 13th line, the word 'Commission' has been<br>wrongly typed instead of the word 'DISCOMS'. Accordingly, the word<br>'Commission' should be replaced with the word 'DISCOMS'. | |||
| (ii) In para No.86, 6th line starts with the word 'To'. As it is not<br>the beginning of the sentence, the same should be in small letter i.e.,<br>'to'. Accordingly, the word 'To' should be replaced with the word 'to'. | |||
| (iii) In para No.66, in 11th line, instead of 'periodic', it has been<br>mentioned as 'period'.<br>Hence, the word 'period' should be replaced<br>with the word 'periodic'. | |||
| The aforesaid typographical mistakes shall be corrected as<br>indicated above before issuance of certified copy of the judgment. | |||
| It is also pointed out that in the web copy of the judgment<br>available in the High Court website, in the operative portion, at para<br>No.101, the number of the O.P. has been mentioned as O.P. No.27 of<br>2019 whereas it should be mentioned as O.P. No.67 of 2019.<br>However, in the original copy of the judgment signed by us, there is<br>no such mistake of mentioning of O.P. No.27 of 2019 instead of O.P.<br>No.67 of 2019. | |||
| The Registry shall take steps to get the corrected order<br>uploaded. | |||
| PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ<br>NINALA JAYASURYA, J | |||
| GM |
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search