Revunuru Prabhakar Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Interlocutory
Before:
Hon'ble K Suresh Reddy , K Sreenivasa Reddy
Listed On:
2 Dec 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.Crl.A.No.823 of 2019
PROCEEDING SHEET
| SI.<br>No. | <b>DATE</b> | ORDER | OFFICE<br><b>NOTE</b> |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8. | 02.12.2024 | KSR,J & SRK,J | |
| <i>(per Hon'ble Sri Justice K.Sreenivasa Reddy)</i> | |||
| <b>I.A.No.2 of 2024</b> | |||
| The present application is filed by the | |||
| petitioner/appellant/Accused under Section 430(1) of | |||
| Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking | |||
| his release on bail by suspending the sentence of | |||
| imprisonment imposed by the learned Principal | |||
| District & Sessions Judge, Nellore, <i>vide</i> S.C.No.14 of | |||
| 2018, dated 19.02.2019, pending the present Criminal | |||
| Appeal before this Court. | |||
| $2.$<br>The learned counsel for the petitioner/ | |||
| appellant/Accused contends that immediately after | |||
| pronouncement of judgment, the petitioner/appellant/ | |||
| Accused was taken into custody and he is undergoing | |||
| imprisonment in Central Prison, Nellore. He further | |||
| contends that the petitioner/appellant/ Accused has | |||
| already served five $(05)$ years of actual sentence. The | |||
| learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant/ Accused | |||
| further contends that as the appeal is of the year- | Contd., |
2019, it takes some more time to come up for "Final Hearing". As such, he requests this Court to enlarge the petitioner/appellant/Accused on bail in terms of the order dated 02.11.2016 passed by the Combined High Court in Batchu Rangarao and others Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh (Crl.A.M.P.No.1687 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.607 of 2011).
-
On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, states that the case of the petitioner/appellant/Accused has not fallen within the prohibitory categories envisaged in the above referred order.
-
In view of the same, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail by suspending the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned Sessions Judge pending the present Criminal Appeal.
-
The petitioner/appellant/Accused is directed to be released on bail on his executing personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two (02) sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore.
Contd.,
| 6.<br>The petitioner/appellant/Accused is directed to | |
|---|---|
| report before the Station House Officer concerned, | |
| 1st<br>once<br>in<br>a<br>month<br>i.e.,<br>of<br>every<br>month.<br>The | |
| petitioner/appellant/Accused<br>is<br>also<br>directed<br>to | |
| appear before this Court whenever the case stands | |
| posted<br>for hearing. | |
| 7.<br>Accordingly, with the above directions, this | |
| application is allowed. | |
| __________________<br>K.SURESH REDDY,J | |
| _______________________<br>K. SREENIVASA REDDY,J | |
| SAB / TSNR | |