M Krishna Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Mines And Industries)
Before:
Hon'ble Dhiraj Singh Thakur , R Raghunandan Rao
Listed On:
20 Feb 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATION
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
:PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRL.P.No. 233 of 2019
Between:
Presingu Paramananda Rao, S/o. P.V.Narayana
Petitioner/Accused No.1.
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
-
- D.V.S.Suri Babu, S/o. Govardhan Rao, R/o. D.No. 29/46, Ramanaidupet, Machilipatnam.
Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC.No. 332 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Machilipatnam. IA.No. 1 of 2019:
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC.No. 332 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Machilipatnam, pending disposal of Crl.P.No. 233/2019 on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and orders of High Court dt. 25-01-2020 & 01.10.2020 & 29.01.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ch. N. Mehar Baba, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following. ORDER :-
"The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice on the 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent/complainant through registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
$\sim$ $\sim$ $\sim$ $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{L}}$ $\mathcal{A} \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A}$
5.19 $\therefore$ iv $\mathbb{I}{{\mathcal{I}{\mathcal{M}}^{(i)}}}$
Learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to take out notice on the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant in the trial Court.
Post the matter after three(03) weeks.
Interim order granted earlier is extended till then."
//TRUE COPY//
$\mathbb{R} \geq \mathbb{R}$ SDI-A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
- TCLK
To
-
- The II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Machilipatnam, Krishna District. $\mathcal{C} \cup \mathcal{C}$
-
- Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court, A.P.(OUT)
$z \in \mathbb{R}^+$
$\gamma_{\rm eff}$
$111$
$\mathbb{N} \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{A}}$ SEC
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
$\mathcal{H} \subset \mathcal{L}$ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}_{\mathcal{M}}$
$\mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$
-
- One CC to Sri Ch.N.Mehar Baba, Advocate (OPUC)
-
- One Spare Copy.
PSK
HIGH COURT
$\mathcal{L} \subset \mathcal{L}$
$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}\mathcal{L}$
$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$ $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{L}}$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$
$\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}$ $\mathbb{L}^{\mathbb{C}}\neq$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
TRR,J
DATED: 20/02/2024
POST AFTER THREE WEEKS
ORDER
CRL.P.No.233 of 2019
INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED