S.Bhaskar vs. T.Lakshmi Narayanamma
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble B Syamsunder
Listed On:
21 Dec 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAYA, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. SYAMSUNDER
SECOND APPEAL No. 755 of 2000
Between:
-
- Solleti Bhaskar, S/o. Solleti Peda Kondaiah, Aged 30 years, R/o. Kota Village and Mandal. Nellore District.
-
- Solleti Venkataramanaiah, S/o. Solleti Peda Kondaiah. Aged 24 years, R/o. Kota Village and Mandal, Nellore District
...Appellants
AND
Thanneeru Lakshmi Narayanamma, W/o. Venkata Krishnaiah. $\mathbb{C} \ni \mathbb{C}^1 \times \mathbb{C}^2$ Hindu, aged about 35 years, R/o. Bazzar Street, Kota. Nellore District.
...Respondent
Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 28-04-2000 passed in A.S. No. 37 of 1996 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 19-09-1996 passed in O.S. No. 30 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kota, SPSR Nellore District.
$\mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{R}_\mathcal{L})$
The Appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the Memorandum of Appeal, the Judgments and Decrees of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court evidence on record and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. Ganga Rami Reddy. Advocate for the Appellants and Sri M.P. Chandra Mouli, Advocate for the respondent, this Court Doth Order and Decree as follows:-
- That the Second Appeal be and hereby is allowed.
-
- That the decree and judgment dated 28/04/2000 in A.S. No. 37 of 1996 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur be and hereby is set aside.
-
- That the Judgment and decree dated 19/09/1996 in O.S. No.30 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif, Kota be and hereby is restored.
-
- That the appellants right in respect of 'B' Schedule property be and hereby is declared and consequential relief of permanent injunction is also granted in addition to the relief of recovery of possession granted by the trial Court and the said reliefs granted inconformity with the judgment of the trial Court.
- That the parties be and hereby are directed to bear their own costs throughout.
$\omega \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$
$\cdots \cup \mathcal{I}_{\mathcal{S}^{(1)} \cup \mathcal{S}^{(2)}}$
- That there is no order as to costs to this Appeal.
Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
$To$
The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District The District Munsif Court, Kota, SPSR Nellore District. Two CD Copies.
$\cdot \cdot \cdot$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}$
$\cdot$ .
//TRUE COPY//
$\mathcal{L}_{\mathbf{1}}$
$\label{eq:1} \begin{split} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}}{\partial \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} \end{split}$
$\hat{c}_{\alpha\beta}^{\alpha\beta}$
$\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}$
$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}_{\mathcal{L}}$
$\mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{A}}_{\mathcal{A}}(x)$
$\mathcal{L}^{-1}$ $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{A}}(\mathcal{A})$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$
. . . $\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}$ $\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$
$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \cup { \mathcal{L} }$
$\begin{array}{c} \text{MSR} \ \text{MSR} \ \text{VNA} \end{array}$
K.ch.chowdooy
HIGH COURT DATED:21/12/2022
DECREE
SA.No.755 of 2000 4 Copies<br>Luc
SECOND APPEAL IS ALLOWED
$\overline{191}$