Chakalai Eranna vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Revenue)
Before:
Hon'ble Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
24 Dec 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$\sqrt{32091}$
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY
IA No. 1 OF 2020
IN
WP NO: 24918 OF 2020
Between:
Chakalai Eranna, S/o Late Madanna, aged about 53 years, Occupation: Agriculture, resident of H. No.2, Ibrahimpuram Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P. ...Petitioner/Petitioners
(Petitioner in WP 24918 OF 2020 on the file of High Court)
AND
-
- State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi-522 237(A.P.), Guntur District, A.P.
-
- The District Collector, Kurnool District, KURNOOOL 518 001(A.P)
-
- The Revenue Divisional Officer, ADONI 518 301(A.P), Kurnool District.
-
- The Tahsildar, Nandavaram Mandal, NANDAVARAM 518 345(A.P), Kurnool District.
...Respondents/Respondents (Respondents in-do-) $\frac{1}{2}$
Counsel for the Petitioner : Counsel for the Respondents :
SRI K.RAJANNA GP FOR REVENUE
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to dispossess the Petitioner from his agricultural land in Sy.No.200-2(extent Ac.1-63 cents) situated at Nadi Kairavadi Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of WP No. 24918 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.
The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order. (The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). The Court made the following.
ORDER:
"Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, who submits as per his instructions that the land was resumed long back and compensation in respect of the same was paid. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that insofar as the present land is concerned, no acquisition was made nor any compensation paid.
The matter requires further examination on filing of counters by the concerned respondents.
Since it is specifically averred that there is a threat of dispossession, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner, without following due process of law.
List after four (4) weeks."
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- M.Suryanadha Reddy ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
-
- The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi-522 237(A.P.), Guntur District, A.P.
- The District Collector, Kurnool District, KURNOOOL 518 001(A.P) The Revenue Divisional Officer, ADONI 518 301(A.P), Kurnool District.
-
- The Tahsildar, Nandavaram Mandal, NANDAVARAM 518 345(A.P), Kurnool District. (Addresses 1 to 4 By RPAD)
-
- One CC to Sri. K.Rajanna, Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- One spare copy
$M\hspace{-1pt}M$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2$ $\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \math$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L}$ $\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \math$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}{\mathcal{L}}$ $\label{eq:1} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}})$ $\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{A})$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}})$ $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} }$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$
HIGH COURT
NJSJ
ORDER
DATED:24/12/2020
IA No. 1 OF 2020 $\overline{IN}$ WP NO: 24918 OF 2020