IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22419 OF 2022

Between:

M.Aruna Kumari, W/o M. Ananda, aged about 52 years, Occ: Court Employee, R/o.-D.No.5-12-M18-177, S.D Road, Old material hospital, Tirupathi Urban, Chittoor District

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Municipality and Urban Development), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati.
• 2. The Tirupati Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tirupati, Chittoor District
• 3. The Town Planning Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the provisional order cum notice vide Notice No. 87/1012/TPT/UC/2022, dated 06-07-2022 issued by the Respondent No.2 and there by not allowing the petitioner to construct the building as per the sanction plan dated 16-06-2021, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitutional of India and consequently set-aside the Notice No. 87/1012/TPT/UC/2022, dated 06-07-2022 issued by the Respondent No.2 and further direct the respondents no 2 and 3 not to obstruct the petitioner in construction of building constructing as per sanction plan dated 16-060-2021.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in Notice No. 87/1012/TPT/UC/2022, dated 06-07-2022 by directing the Respondents No. 2 and 3 not to interfere with the construction of the building, pending disposal of WP No.22419 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ramineni Sudheer Advocate for the Petitioner(s), GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for the Respondent No. 1 and Sri. K. Suresh Kumar Reddy, Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 2 &3 and the Court made the following.

ORDER

"Sri K. Suresh Kumar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 seeks time for obtaining instructions.

Post on 28.07.2022 in motion list.

In the meanwhile, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner."

Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Municipality and Urban Development), Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati.

• 2. The Tirupati Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tirupati, Chittoor District
• 3. The Town Planning Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District (No's 1 to 3 by RPAD)
• 4. One CC to Sri. Ramineni Sudheer, Advocate [OPUC]
• 5. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
• 6. One CC to Sri. K. Suresh Kumar Reddy, Standing Counsel [OPUC]
• 7: One spare copy

KPR

HIGH COURT

RRRJ

$\langle \ell$

DATED: 25/07/2022

NOTE: POST ON 28.07.2022

ORDER

WP.No.22419 of 2022

DIRECTION