Sai Q vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble B Krishna Mohan
Listed On:
24 Sept 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 18498 OF 2024
Between:
Sai Q And S Solutions, Daruvrui prudhvi raj, Rep. By its Managing director D.No-11-5-45/3, Raghuram Nagar, Sattenapalli Guntur District
...PETITIONER
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchyat Raj Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi-523238.
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi-523238.
-
- The Supperinteding Engineer, P.R. Circle, Guntur.
-
- The Executive Engineer, (P.R) PIU Division, Guntur.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents and in nonpayment of dues Rs 14,52,355/- pertaining to the work of Road from Rentapalla - DD Palem road to Kattamuru R & B road via Komperlapadu in Sattenapalli Mandal executed under Agreement, even after submission of bill which is illegal, arbitrary and Violation of Art.14, Art.15, Art.19(1)(g), Art.21, Art.23 and Art.300A of Constitution of India and violation of clause and 68 & 69 of AP Standard Specifications and
^ consequently direct the respondents to pay dues of Rs. 14,52,355/ pertaining to the work Road from Rentapalla - DD Palem road to Kattamuru R road via Komperlapadu in Sattenapalli Mandal executed under , A^nint along with 12% Interest from the date of expiry of one month from the date of submission of bill to till the date of payment.
lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2024
Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the peWion, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider 8i process the payment of dues of Rs. 14,52,355/- pertaining to the work Road from Rentapalla- DD Palem road to Kattamuru R & B road via Komperlapadu in Sattenapalli Mandal executed under Agreement, expeditiously within <sup>4</sup> weeks pending final disposal of the Writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 & 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010313172024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3233]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRUUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 18498/2024
Between:
i
...PETITIONER Sai Q And S Solutions
AND
...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLl
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
l.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
<sup>i</sup> 2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not paying the due amount of Rs.14,52,355/- pertaining to the work of Road from Rentapalla - DD Palem road to Kattamuru R & B road via Komperlapadu in 2.
Sattenapalli Mandal., executed under the Agreement, even after submission of the bill.
$\overline{ }$
$3.$ On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions, produces the undertaking given by the petitioner dated 11.09.2024 stating that it has already received the due amount for the above said work executed.
In view of the same, no cause survives in this matter as the payment $4.$ was already received. The written instructions shall be made as part of the Court record.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. $5.$ There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
-
- One CC to Sri Ramalakshmana Reddy Sanepalli Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Dev, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- Two CCs to GP for Finance and Planning, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- Three CD Copies
TF
And Allery
To,
$\mathbf{Z}$
HIGH COURT
DATED:24/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.18498 of 2024