Madiga Jagan vs. The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd.
Court:High Court, Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Y. Lakshmana Rao
Case Status:Compromise
Order Date:28 Apr 2025
CNR:APHC010346562010
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Final Hearing
Before:
Hon'ble Y. Lakshmana Rao
Listed On:
16 Apr 2025
Order Text
HIGHCOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No: Crl.R.C.No.2211 of 2010
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl.<br>No. | DATE | ORDER | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05. | 28.04.2025 | Dr.YLR,J | NOTE | ||||
| I.A.No.1<br>of 2025 | |||||||
| As<br>per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme | |||||||
| Court<br>in<br>Jagjeet<br>Singh<br>and<br>others<br>v.<br>Ashish | |||||||
| Mishra1<br>,<br>the<br>victim<br>has<br>to<br>be<br>impleaded<br>as<br>a | |||||||
| respondent at every stage in criminal proceedings. | |||||||
| The<br>Criminal<br>Revision<br>Case<br>has<br>been<br>filed | |||||||
| challenging the concurrent conviction for the alleged | |||||||
| offence under Section 354 of 'the IPC'. | |||||||
| In<br>this<br>revision<br>case,<br>the<br>victim/de-facto | |||||||
| complainant was not arrayed as respondent No.2. | |||||||
| Therefore, she is required to be added as respondent | |||||||
| No.2 for hearing her contention/version. | |||||||
| I.A.No.1<br>of<br>2025<br>is<br>allowed,<br>impleading<br>the | |||||||
| victim/de-facto complainant as respondent No.2. | |||||||
| Registry is directed to carry out the necessary | |||||||
| amendments in the petition. | |||||||
| _________ | |||||||
| Dr.YLR,J | |||||||
| Crl.R.C.No.2211 of 2010 | |||||||
| Post on 05.05.2025,<br>as the learned counsel for |
| the petitioner submits that the matter may likely be | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| compromised. | ||||
| _________ | ||||
| Dr.YLR,J | ||||
| RSI | ||||
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search