Madiga Jagan vs. The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd.
Court:High Court, Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Y. Lakshmana Rao
Case Status:Compromise
Order Date:26 Mar 2025
CNR:APHC010346562010
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Final Hearing
Before:
Hon'ble Y. Lakshmana Rao
Listed On:
26 Mar 2025
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.: Crl.R.C.No.2211 of 2010
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl.No | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04. | 26.03.2025 | Dr. YLR,<br>J | |||
| The<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for<br>the<br>petitioner | |||||
| submits<br>that<br>the<br>matter<br>is<br>likely<br>to<br>be | |||||
| compromised. | |||||
| The revision is against a concurrent finding | |||||
| of the conviction and sentence for the offence | |||||
| punishable under Section 354<br>IPC. | |||||
| At request, list the matter on 16.04.2025,<br>as a last chance. | |||||
| In<br>this<br>case,<br>the<br>defacto | |||||
| 2nd | |||||
| complainant/victim<br>is<br>not<br>arrayed<br>as | |||||
| respondent. | |||||
| As per the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme | |||||
| Court in Jagjeet Singh and others vs. Ashish | |||||
| Mishra1<br>,<br>the learned counsel for the petitioner is | |||||
| permitted to add the defecto-complainant/victim | |||||
| 2nd<br>2nd<br>as<br>respondent<br>and<br>serve<br>notice<br>on | |||||
| respondent. | |||||
| _________ | |||||
| Dr. YLR, J | |||||
| SNI | |||||
1 (2022) 9 SCC 321
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search