J. Bhaskar vs. Pakala Devakanth
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati
Judge:Hon'ble G.Narendar
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:28 Sept 2021
CNR:APHC010336872021
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Arup Kumar Goswami , Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
28 Sept 2021
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No: W.A.Nos.556, 590 and 591 of 2021
PROCEEDINGS SHEET
| Sl.<br>No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.09.2021 | (Through Video-Conferencing) | ||
| W.A.No.556 of 2021 | |||
| Heard Mr. A. Prabhakar Sarma, learned standing counsel for | |||
| the appellants. | |||
| Also<br>heard<br>Mr.<br>P.V.<br>Krishnaiah,<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for | |||
| respondent Nos.1 to 5/writ petitioners and Ms. P. Rajani, learned | |||
| Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing for respondent | |||
| Nos.6 & 7. | |||
| It is submitted by Mr. A. Prabhakar Sarma that though appeal | |||
| is filed, in the meantime, order of the learned single Judge has | |||
| been implemented. However, such implementation is subject to<br>result of the appeal. | |||
| Issue notice, returnable on 10.11.2021. | |||
| No formal steps are called for with regard to respondent Nos.1 | |||
| to 7 as they are duly represented.<br>However, extra copies be | |||
| furnished. | |||
| Steps on respondent Nos. 8 to 13 by registered post with | |||
| acknowledgment due. | |||
| Learned standing counsel for the appellant is permitted to take | |||
| out personal notice on respondent Nos.8 to 13 by registered post | |||
| with acknowledgement due. | |||
| W.A.No.590 of 2021 | |||
| Heard Mr. G.R. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the appellants. | |||
| Also<br>heard<br>Mr.<br>P.V.<br>Krishnaiah,<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for | |||
| respondent Nos.1 to 5/writ petitioners, Ms. P. Rajani, learned | |||
| Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing for respondent | |||
| No.6,<br>Mr.<br>A.<br>Prabhakar<br>Sarma,<br>learned<br>standing<br>counsel<br>appearing<br>for<br>respondent<br>Nos.7<br>and<br>9<br>to<br>14<br>and | |||
| Mr. V. Maheswara Reddy, learned Government Pleader for | |||
| G.A.D., appearing for respondent No.8. | |||
| Issue notice, returnable on 10.11.2021. | |||
| No formal steps are called for with regard to respondent Nos.1 | |||
| to 14 as they are duly represented.<br>However, extra copies be | |||
| furnished. | |||
| Sl.<br>No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent Nos.15 to 18 are not necessary parties as | |||
| submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants. | |||
| Hence, notice need not be issued to respondent Nos.15 to 18. | |||
| I.A.No.2 of 2021<br>in | |||
| W.A.No.591 of 2021 | |||
| This is an application for grant of leave to prefer appeal | |||
| against the order dated 15.02.2021 passed in W.P.No.467 of<br>2020. | |||
| Heard Mr. J. Sudheer, learned counsel for the applicants. | |||
| It is submitted by him that the impugned order affected the | |||
| interests of the applicants as the writ petition came to be disposed | |||
| of without impleading them as parties. | |||
| Mr. P.V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel appearing for respondent | |||
| Nos.1 to 5/writ petitioners, submits that he does not have any | |||
| objection for grant of leave to the applicants to prefer appeal. | |||
| However, it is submitted by him that at the time of institution of the | |||
| writ petition, applicants were not appointed and, therefore, there | |||
| was no question of arraying them at the first instance. | |||
| Ms. P. Rajani, learned Government Pleader for Endowments, | |||
| accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.6. | |||
| Mr. A. Prabhakar Sarma, learned standing counsel, accepts | |||
| notice<br>on<br>behalf<br>of<br>respondent<br>Nos.7<br>and<br>9<br>to<br>14<br>and | |||
| Mr. V. Maheswara Reddy, learned Government Pleader for | |||
| G.A.D., accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.8. | |||
| Respondent Nos.15 to 18 are not necessary parties as | |||
| submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants. | |||
| Hence, notice need not be issued to respondent Nos.15 to 18. | |||
| Learned counsel for the respondents do not object to the | |||
| prayer made for grant of leave to appeal. | |||
| Perused the averments made in the I.A. | |||
| On due consideration, leave to prefer appeal is granted. | |||
| Accordingly, I.A. is allowed and disposed of. | |||
| W.A.No.591 of 2021 | |||
| Also heard learned counsel for the parties on the appeal. | |||
| Issue notice, returnable on 10.11.2021. | |||
| No formal steps are called for with regard to respondent Nos.1 | |||
| to 14 as they are duly represented.<br>However, extra copies be | |||
| furnished. |
2
| Sl.<br>No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent Nos.15 to 18 are not necessary parties as<br>submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants.<br>Hence, notice need not be issued to respondent Nos.15 to 18. | |||
| ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CJ<br>NINALA JAYASURYA, J<br>MRR | |||
3
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search