Y.Rama Chandra Reddy vs. Nayuni Balaji
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Extension Of Interim Orders
Before:
Hon'ble J K Maheshwari
Listed On:
5 Oct 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$[3181]$
AN7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY : PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI JITENDRA KUMAR MAH
IA No. 1 OF 2018 $$
CRLP NO: 1724 OF 2016
Between:
Sri Y.Rama Chandra Reddy, S/o Y. Nagi Reddy,
...Petitioner / Accusec No.1 (Petitioner in CRLP 1724 OF 2016) on the file of High Court)
AND
- Sri Nayuni Balaji S/o Subbarayudu, Aged about 44 years, Advocate, R/o Chitvel Post & 1. Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.
- The State of A.P., rep. by PP, High Court at Hyderabad $2.$
$...$ Respondent(s) (Respondents in-do-)
Petition under Section 482 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to extend the stay order dated 22.08.2016 granted by this Hon'ble Court in Crl.M.P. No. 1637 of 2016 in Crl.P.No. 1724 of 2016, in the interest of Justice.
IA NO. 1 OF 2016 (CRL.M.P. NO. 1637 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 482 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 38f / 2011 of the file of the Judicial magistrate First Class, Rajampet, YSR Kadapa District, including appearance of the Peitioner, pending disposal of Crl.P.No. 1724 of 2016, in the interest of Justice.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 15.02.2016 and 30.10.2018 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.S.P. Kamaraju, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused No. and of KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and of Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. for the respondent NO. 2, the Court made the following order
ORDER
"(Through Video Conferencing)
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation until further orders. Immediately on resumption of physical hearing, case be listed for further
orders."
Sd/-Ch.V.Subramanya Sarma ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
-
- The Judicial magistrate First Class, Rajampet, YSR Kadapa District
One CC to SRI M S P KAMARAJU Advocate [OPUC] One CC to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of AP [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Advocate [OPUC]
- One spare copy
MSR
HIGH COURT
$HCJ$
DATED:05/10/2020
ORDER
CRLP.No.1724 of 2016
EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER