The State Of Ap vs. Mohammad Nafeeza Sultana

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble G.Narendar
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:2 Apr 2024
CNR:APHC010333252023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Admission

Before:

Hon'ble G.Narendar , Harinath.N

Listed On:

2 Apr 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

APHC010333252023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3480]

TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT APPEAL No: 715/2023

Between:

The State of A.P and Others ...Appellant(S)

AND

Mohammad Nafeeza Sultana ...Respondent

Counsel for the Appellant(S):

GP for Village and Ward Secretariats

Counsel for the Respondent:

MASTAN VALI SHAIK

The Court made the following:

Sl.DATEORDEROFFICE
No.NOTE
02.04.2024GN, J & HN, J
I.A. No.1 OF 2023
1.<br>We have heard the learned Government
Pleader for Village & Ward Secretariats
appearing<br>for<br>the<br>appellants<br>and<br>theContd
02.04.2024learned counsel for the respondent.
(contn)2.There is a delay<br>of 38 days in filing the
present Writ Appeal.
3.We examined the pleadings with regard
to the delay in filing the Appeal and we
are<br>also<br>satisfied<br>with<br>the<br>reasons
assigned. Therefore, the delay of 38<br>days
in<br>filing<br>the<br>present<br>Writ<br>Appeal<br>is
condoned<br>and<br>this<br>Interlocutory
Application is ordered.
________
GN, J
_________
HN, J
I.A. No.2 of 2023
1.We have heard the submissions of the
learned Government Pleader for Village &
Ward<br>Secretariats<br>representing<br>the
appellants<br>and<br>the<br>learned<br>counsel
representing the sole respondent.
2.The learned Government Pleader for the
appellants has drawn the attention of this
Court to page No.144 of the Writ Appeal,
which is the screenshot of the webpage
and<br>pointed<br>out<br>the<br>publication<br>of
addendum<br>whereby<br>the<br>authoritiesContd…
amended the qualification of Intermediate
with<br>Biology/Vocational<br>Course<br>in
02.04.2024<br>(contn)Fisheries notified in the notification dated
26.07.2019 and by the amendment, the
word "Biology" was deleted and retained
the<br>qualification<br>Intermediate<br>with
vocational course in Fisheries.
3.<br>It is the case of the respondent that no
such addendum was published and that
the amendment to the recruitment rules
only came to be notified on 21.11.2019<br>and
hence<br>the<br>same<br>is<br>inapplicable.<br>The
challenge in the<br>writ petition is not to the
addendum,<br>but<br>on<br>this<br>ground,<br>the
selection/appointing<br>authority<br>has<br>no
right to change the eligibility criteria in
the midway after the process for selection
has been commenced. In other words, the
learned counsel would contend that the
rules cannot be changed in the midway
after the process for selection has been
commenced.
4.<br>In the case on hand, it appears that the
last date for submitting the applications
was 10.08.2019, the applicant (respondent
herein) submitted her application only on
31.07.2019 and the addendum published
on the webpage on 29.07.2019 that isContd…
02.04.2024<br>(contn)much before the applicant (respondent<br>herein) could submit her application.
5.Mere issuance of a hall ticket allowing the
applicant<br>(respondent herein)<br>to sit for an
examination or verification of testimonials
does not automatically make the applicant
eligible if she does not meet the eligibility
criteria.<br>Since there was no challenge to
the notification of the addendum, it is not
open for the respondent to contend that
the selection/appointing authority did not
have the right to change the eligibility
criteria.
6.Needless to say, it is no longer res integra
that deciding the eligibility criteria is the
sole domain of the appointing authority.
The<br>appointing<br>authority<br>changed<br>the
eligibility<br>criteria<br>even<br>before<br>the
respondent<br>submitted<br>her<br>application.
The<br>same<br>criteria<br>applicable<br>to<br>all
candidates<br>and<br>not<br>discriminatory<br>in
nature.<br>However, the learned single Judge
considered<br>the<br>case<br>of<br>the<br>respondent
granting prayer in the writ petition.
7.Hence, prima<br>facie,<br>this Court deems itContd…
just<br>and<br>appropriate<br>to<br>grant<br>interim
suspension of the order impugned in the
Writ<br>Appeal<br>and<br>accordingly,<br>this
02.04.2024<br>(contn)interlocutory application is ordered.
________
GN, J
________
HN, J
W.A. No.715 OF 2023
List the matter in usual course.
________<br>GN, J
________
HN, J
BV

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 26 Nov 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 2 Apr 2024

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(5) - 2 Apr 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 31 Jul 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 24 Jul 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 14 Jul 2023

Interim Order

Click to view