T.Vijay Kumar vs. P. Niranjan Reddy
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Ravi Cheemalapati
Listed On:
23 Dec 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATR (Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3185 OF 2024
Between:
$\mathcal{N}^{\bullet}$
-
- T.Vijay Kumar, S/o. T.Bhaskar rao, Aged 41 years, H.No.25/251A. Srinivasa Nagar, Syndicate Bank Building, Nandyal, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh- 518501.
-
- T.Jagadesh, S/o. T.Bhaskar rao, Aged 38 years, H.No.25/251A, Srinivasa Nagar, Syndicate Bank Building, Nandyal, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh- 518501.
-
- T Shasi Kumar, S/o. T.Bhaskar rao, Aged 39 years, H.No.25/251A, Srinivasa Nagar, Syndicate Bank Building, Nandyal, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh-518501.
-
- T Annapurna, W/o. T.Naresh, Aged 45 years, H.No.25/251 A, Srinivasa Nagar, Syndicate Bank Building, Nandyal, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh- 518501.
...Petitioners
AND
P. Niranjan Reddy, Commissioner, Nandyal Municipality, Nandyal, Nandyal District.
...Contemnor/Respondent No.2
WHEREAS the Petitioners have presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, above case through their counsel Mr. T.Ashok Srivastava Reddy, praying the High Court to punish the Respondents for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the order in W.P.No.7438 of 2024 dated 19.04.2024;
WHEREAS the said case coming on for hearing on this day and whereas the High Court upon perusing the affidavit filed herein and the orders of High Court dated 05.08.2024 & 23.11.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. T.Ashok Srivastava Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of M/s Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, Advocate for Respondent, Court made the following
ORDER:
"As per the directions of this Court dated 23.11.2024, sole respondent appeared before this Court and sought time for filing counter.
$\sim 12 \times 10^4$
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for respondent/contemnor, the personal attendance of the contemnor on this day is dispensed with.
Post on 27.01.2025."
SD/- G. SRINIVASA REDDY DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY
$\mathcal{A} = \mathcal{A} \cup \mathcal{A}$
SECTION OFFICER
To,
-
P. Niranjan Reddy, Commissioner, Nandyal Municipality, Nandyal, Nandyal District. (by RPAD)
-
One CC to SRI T.ASHOK SRIVASTAVA REDDY, Advocate[OPUC]
$\cdot \cdot \cdot$
-
- One CC to M/S SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI, Advocate[OPUC]
-
- One spare copy.
PSD
HIGH COURT
RC,J
DATED:23/12/2024
NOTE: POST ON 27.01.2025
ORDER
CC.No.3185 of 2024
DISPENSED WITH