IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENT

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

WRIT PETITION Nos: 10997, 18746, 19757, 23203, 23262, 23762, 26117, 26233, 26397, 26717, 29463, 30029, 30072, 31045, 31301, 31322, 31451, 32146, 33603, 33900, 33974, 35006, 36644, 37133 of 2014; 1677, 3402, 5609, 6082, 6838, 7022, 7173, 12726, 13990, 14041, 14051, 14391, 16349, 17217, 17774, 20384, 21848, 23074, 25102, 27840, 28627, 29181, 31213, 31620, 36392, 34071 of 2015; 87, 2015, 3486, 6609, 15393, 15835, 15841, 15870, 15835, 15841, 15870, 17618 of 2016 and 16809 of 2022

WRIT PETITION No: 10997 of 2014

Between:

Ande pedda Bujji, S/o. Pothu Raju, aged about 46 years R/o. Vekanuru Village, Avanigadda Mandal, Krishna District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of A.P., Represented by its Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krihna District
• The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Avanigadda, Krishna District
• 3. The Station House Officer, Avanigadda Police Station, Avanigadda, Krishna District

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioners in the 3^rd respondent police station is contrary to A.P. Police Standing Orders and also illegal, arbitrary and violate of the Rights Guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet forthwith.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 13841 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to summon the petitioners to the police station without following due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G VAASUDEVUDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18746 OF 2014

Between:

Pothula Poorna Chandra Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, aged about 31 years, R/o. D.No. 26-25-23, Durga Vari Street, Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada.
• Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. 3.
• 4. Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening a Rowdy Sheet pursuant to the proceedings of 3^rd respondent vide C.No. 27/ACP-WZ/2014, dated 03.06.2014 as illegal arbitrary and consequently call the records and set aside the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 23520 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of 3^rd respondent vide C.No. 27/ACP-WZ/2014, dated 03.06.2014 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 19757 OF 2014

Between:

Saka Rajarao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 39 years, Resident of D.NO. 18-165, Srinivasa Peta, Kothapeta village & Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, At Kakinada.

2. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Amalapuram Division, East Godavari District.

3. The Circle Inspector Of Police, Ravulapalem Circle, East Godavari District.

4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kothapeta Police Station, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequential direct the respondents to delete the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheet on the file of the $4^th$ respondent station.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 24746 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to delete the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheet on the file of the 4^th respondent station, pending disposal of above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.NARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 23203 OF 2014

Between:

• 1. Boya Thirumala, S/o. B.Thimmanna, Aged about 32 years, Agricutlurist,

• Boya Hindinala, S. B. Hindinala, Aged about 29 years, Agriculturist. Boya Hussain, S/o. B. Hindinala, Aged about 29 years, Agriculturist. Boya Pampaiah, S/o. Yapilaiah, Aged about 42

• 5. Boya Hanumanthu, S/o. Pedda Gunteppa, Aged about 32 years, Agriculturist.<br>Boya Gunteppa, S/o. Yapilaiah, Aged about 54 years, Agriculturist.

• Boya Guilleppa, S/G. Tapilalari, Aged about 3- years, Agriculturist. Boya Eranna, S/o. Pedda Gunteppa, Aged about 33 years, Agriculturist. Boya Chukka Paramesh, S/o. Peddaiah, Aged ab

AND

...Petitioners

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary.
• The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. $\overline{2}$ .
• The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 3.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Nandavaram Police Station, Nandavaram, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing Rowdy Sheets dated 01.12.2007 bearing Nos. 35 to 42 against the petitioners respectively as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheets dated 01.12.2007 bearing Nos. R.D. 35 to 42 opened against petitioners respectively and remove their names in the rowdy sheets.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 29081 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheets dated 01.12.2007 bearing Nos. 35 to 42 opened against petitioners respectively, by removing their names in the rowdy sheets, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

WRIT PETITION NO: 23262 OF 2014

Between:

• 1. Bhuma Veera Bhadra Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, aged 45 years, Occ; Cultivation, R/o. W.Kottapalle, Dornipadu Mandal, Kurnool District.
• Yeruva Prasad Reddy, S/o. Lakshmi Narayan Reddy, aged 40 years, Occ: Cultivation,<br>Rio. Kothapalli, Kurnool District
• 3. Narreddula Maheswara Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, aged 40 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Kothapalli, Kurnool District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. The S.H.O., Dornipadu Police Station, Kurnool District.
• 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
• 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
• 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare action of the respondents in opening rowdy sheet against the petitioners based on involvement in one Crime No. 33/2008 on the file of the 1st respondent police station and continuing the rowdy sheet even in spite of acquittal in the said crime in the year 2010 itself as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners in the 1^st respondent police station forthwith in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 29149 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disturb the personal liberty of the petitioners on the ground of pendency of the rowdy sheet in the $1^{st}$ respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 23762 OF 2014

Between:

Syed Zilani @ Jhon, S/o. Khadar Valli, Muslim, aged about 30 years, R/o. Lambadipet, Vijayawada.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad.

• The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada. Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Vijayawada.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening a Rowdy Sheet pursuant to the proceedings of 3^rd respondent vide C.No. 43/ACP-WZ/2014, dated 11.06.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently call the records and set aside the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 29785 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of 3^rd respondent vide C.No. 43/ACP-WZ/2014, dated 11.06.2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 26117 OF 2014

Between:

Jinnala Jayaraju, s/o. late Mahalaxmi, Aged about 37 years, $R/o.$ D.No.34-2-16. Ravulapalliveedhi, Gnanapuram, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Govt. of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North, Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam. 2
• 3. The Inspector of Police, CCRB, Visakhapatnam.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned orders of the 2nd respondent in opening the rowdy sheet in C.No. 17/CCRB/ACP-N/2012 dated 30.09.2012 against the petitioner and continuing the same without application of mind in flagrant disregard to law, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 32649 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Police not to interfere with the freedom of life and liberty of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 26233 OF 2014

Between:

Bantupalli Nagendra Ashok Shiva Kumar, S/o. Suryanarayana, aged: 32 years, Occupation: Business, R/o. H.No.9-50, Opposite Shivalayam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam - 530028

...Petitioner

• AND
• 1. The Govt. of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. Inspector of Police, III Town Police Station, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
• Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in opening rowdy sheet in the name of the petitioner in the III Town police station Rajahmundry in the year 2007 is highly arbitrary, bad and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to remove the rowdy sheet opened in the name of the petitioner from the III Town Police Station Rajahmundry.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 32807 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents and 2 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioner to remove rowdy sheet from the III Town police station Rajahmundry.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 26397 OF 2014

Between:

P.Phanikrishna Reddy, S/o. Seshagiri Reddy, Aged about 34 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No. 7-201, Main Bazar, Atmakur Town & Mandal, Nellore District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
• The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, Nellore District. 2.
• 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakuru, Nellore District.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Atmakur Police Station, Atmakur, Nellore District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, Direction more particularly one the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not closing the Rowdy Sheet No. 36 opened on 17-03-2000 in spite the petitioner not being involved in any criminal case since past 13 years as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 33026 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to close the Rowdy Sheet No. 36 opened on 17-03-2000 on the file of the 4th respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 26717 OF 2014

Between:

Biradavolu Vishnuvardhan Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Madamanur Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• $\overline{2}$ . The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District, Nellore
• 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District.

4. The Station House Officer, Manubolu Police Station, Manubolu, SPSR Nellore District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 3rd respondent in directing the 4th respondent to open a rowdy sheet in his proceedings C.No. 925/ GL-SDOG/2001 dated 16.6.2001 and the further action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner though there are no criminal cases pending against him and the trivial cases filed against him ended in acquittal as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the fundamental rights quaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner consequently to set aside the above said order and close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 33397 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station pursuant to the opening of the rowdy sheet in the proceedings of the 3rd respondent herein in C.No. 925/GL-SDOG/2001 dated 16.6.2001 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 29463 OF 2014

Between:

Makineedi Sridhar, S/o.M.Nageswara Rao, Aged about 28 years, Occ: Agriculture Krishnapuram Village, Thondangi Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. Station House Officer, Thondangi PS, East Godavari District.
• $2.$ Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram, East Godavari District
• 3. Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada.
• The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its, Principal Secretary, Home $4.$ Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet No.1 against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, against law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently direct the $1^{st}$ and $2^{nd}$ respondents not to call and harass the petitioner under the guise of rowdy sheet being registered against petitioner.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 36823 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1^st and 2^nd respondents not to call and harass the petitioner under the guise of rowdy sheet being registered against petitioner.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 30029 OF 2014

Between:

Nadimidoddi Chakali Thirupataiah, S/o N.Ganganna, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No.13-2-416, Ramachandra Nagar, Anantapuram, Anantapuram Dist.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.
• $2.$ The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu Dist.
• $\overline{\mathbf{3}}.$
• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District.<br>The Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapuramu 4. District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to remove the name of the Petitioner from the Register of History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) of III Town Police Station Anantapuram, Anantapuram District declaring that the opening of History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) and the continuation of Petitioner name in the History Sheet of III Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District is arbitrary contrary to the Police Standing Orders and violative of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India besides violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 37522 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2^nd Respondent to dispose of the Representation dt:10.03.2014 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 weeks, in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 47013 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the Document i.e.,

Photo copy of the Judgment in S.C.No.173 of 1991 (P.R.C.No.30/90 of A.J.F.C.M., Anantapuram Cr.N0.5/90 of S.H.O. I Town Police Station, Anantapuram), dt:29.01.1992 by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapuram, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 30072 OF 2014

Between:

M.Riyaz Basha, S/o Ali Saheb, APSRTC Employee, D.No.21/207/19/B, Mandagiri, Adoni, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary.
• The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 3.

4. The Station House Officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, Adoni, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in opening Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner and not deleting name of the petitioner in rowdy sheet as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 37583 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet opened against petitioner, pending disposal of above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 31045 OF 2014

Between:

C.Sanjeeva Kumar Reddy, S/o. Padmanabha Reddy, aged about 35 years, R/o. Gangavaram Village, Sirvel Mandal, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

The Station House Officer, Sirvel Police Station, Sirvel, Kurnool District. 1.

• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District 3.
• $4.$ The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station on the ground that he is accused in crime No. 54/2014on the file of the 1st respondent police station as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 38808 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the ground of opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1^st respondent police station pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 31301 OF 2014

Between:

Vipparthi Phani Kumar, S/o.Late Prabhakar Rao, Occ:contractor, R/o.D.No.1-49, Vemagiri Kadiam Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada.
• 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Rural, East Godavari District.
• 4. The Station House officer, Kadiam Police Station, Kadiam, E.G.District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioner to the 4th respondent police station and threatening with dire consequences of opening of rowdy sheet against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner except under due process of law.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 39123 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to summon him to the 4^th respondent police station without following due process of law.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 31322 OF 2014

Between:

SAV Prasad, S/o Sivarama Krishna, Advocate, R/o Kothapeta Street, Yellamanchili post Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Govt. of A.P. rep. by Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
• $\mathsf{2}$ .
• The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam.<br>The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3.
• 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Yellamanchili Town.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the 3rd respondent dated 11-08-2014 by directing the 4th respondent to open rowdy sheet against the petitioner in spite of acquittal In all 3 cases as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of the Police Standing Orders.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 39149 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to delete the petitioner name from the Rowdy Sheet.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 31451 OF 2014

Retween:

Dadda Brahmanandam, R/o Yanamadala village Yeddanapudi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner

• 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam Dsitrict.
• 3. The Station House Officer, Yeddanapudi Police Station, Prakasam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No.9 in the 3rd respondent police station, inspite of acquittal from the criminal cases and submitting the representation dt.9.6.2014, as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to forthwith close the rowdy sheet No.9 opened against the petitioner in the 3rd respondent police station.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 39318 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3^rd respondent herein not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein in any manner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 32146 OF 2014

Between:

Peru Somula Ramakrishna, S/o. Yerranna, Aged About 52 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 1-293, Belum Singavaram(V), Kolimigundla(M), Kumool(D).

AND

...Petitioner

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District.
• 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda, Kumool District.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent no. 2 in continuing the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner on the file of the 4th respondent Police Station, Kolimigundla(M), Kumool District as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also Standing Order 602-1 of the A.P. Police Manual Part-1 Volume 2 and the consequently set aside the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 40190 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner on the file of the 4^th respondent Police Station, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool District; pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RACHNA S WADDEPALLI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 33603 OF 2014

Between:

Usman Gani Basha, S/o Umar Ali, aged about 42 years, R/o H.No. 44/143, 1^st Line, Prakash Nagar, Kurnool Town.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• $\mathsf{2}$ . The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
• 3. The Station House Officer Kurnool II Town Police Station, Kurnool.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in not removing the rowdy sheet No. 757 opened against the petitioner in the 3^rd respondent police station, even after his acquittal from the criminal cases in Cr.No. 62/2007 and 356/2011, and no case is registered against the petitioner after the year 2011, as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to remove the rowdy sheet No.757 opened against the petitioner herein.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 42032 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3^rd respondent herein not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein in any manner, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT Y RATNA PRABHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 33900 OF 2014

Between:

Bhuma Venkata Nagi Reddy, S/o Bali Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Occ: MLA R/o Nandyal Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Station House Officer II Town Police Station Nandyal, Kurnool District
• 2. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal Kurnool District.
• 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool
• 4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal, Secretary (Home Department) Secretariat, Hyderabad

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1^st respondent Police Station even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to Police Standing Order No. 601 and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to close rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in the 1st respondent Police Station forthwith in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 42411 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner in the 1^st respondent Police Station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 33974 OF 2014

Between:

• 1. Sri Chowkala Brahmaiah @ Naga Brahmaiah, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H No.4-140, Therala Village, Durgi Mandal Guntur District, A.P.
• Korangi Sivaiah @ Shiva, S/o. Lalaiah, Occ:Agriculture R/o. H No.4-151/B, Therala Village, Durgi Mandal Guntur District, A.P. 2.

...Petitioners

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Prl., Secretary, Department of Home, A.P Secretariat, Hyderabad,
• The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh Office at Guntur, A.P $\overline{2}$ .

AND

• The Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Gurajala Division, Guntur District, A.P The Station House Officer, Durgi Police Station, Durgi, Guntur District, A.P-522 612

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening the Rowdy Sheet vide No.21 & 23, dated. 28-11-2013 of Durgi Police Station, Guntur District, A.P., against the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary and violating the articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet vide No.21 & 23 in Durgi Police Station, Guntur District, AP, opened against the petitioners and not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioners.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 42503 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioners in connection with the Rowdy sheet vide No. 21 & 23, dated.28-11-2013 of Durgi Police Station, Guntur District, A P, opened against the petitioners, pending disposal of the above W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BETHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 35006 OF 2014

Between:

Chimata Anand Kumar @ Anand, S/o Ramarao, Occ: Attender, R/o Vengalrao Nagar, Peddakakani Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural Division, Guntur, Guntur District.
• 3. The Station House Officer, Peddakakani Police Station, Peddakakani, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein, in continuing the Rowdy Sheet No.37 against Petitioner is illegal, improper, unjust, contrary to law and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to discontinue the Rowdy sheet.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 43796 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to compel the petitioner herein to come to the Police Station, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIMHACHALAM BARAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 36644 OF 2014

Between:

Pydimalla Madhu, S/o.Raja Rao, Hindu Aged 27 years, Occ:Lorry Driver R/o.Yeclidha Village Near R.C.M. Church, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad.
• $\overline{2}$ . The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada.
• The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram, E.G.District. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Rural Police Station Mandapeta, E.G.District. Responde.......................

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in opening a rowdy sheet in Mandapeta Rural Police Station, E.G.District Andhra Pradesh as per the proceedings No.32/H.S/SDPO-RCPM/2014 dt.10-092014 issued by the 3rd respondent and continuing the same as contrary to the A.P. Police Standing Orders and violative of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 45861 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.4 not to insist or summon the petitioner to the police station without any reason or cause under the quise of opening of the rowdy sheet pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 37133 OF 2014

Between:

Kambala Lakshmana Rao, S/o. Sathiraju, Hindu, aged about 33 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Moolapeta Village, U.Kothapalli Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• $\overline{2}$ . The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada.
• The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (Deputy Superintendent of Police) Kakinada Sub-<br>Division, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. The Station House Officer, U.Kothapalli Police Station, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening a rowdy sheet as against the petitioner on the basis of Crime No.70 of 2008 of U.Kothapalli Police Station, East Godavari District as illegal arbitrary and in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently; (a) set-aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner; (b) award such reliefs including award of compensation for violation of the petitioner fundamental rights; and (c) and to grant such other reliefs in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 46460 OF 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4^th respondent not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the basis of the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 1677 OF 2015

Between:

Ganjikunta Adheppa, S/o.Late G.Narsimappa, Aged about 54 years, R/o.Chintapali village, Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, (Home) Rep By its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of police, Anantapur, Anantapur District. $\overline{2}$ .

3. The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural P.S Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not closing the Rowdy Sheet No.146 opened on the petitioner name in Guntakal Police Station, Ananthapur District as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14,19,19(1)(g) and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close Rowdy Sheet No.146 opened on the petitioner name in Guntakal Police Station, Ananthapur District

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 2242 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the main Writ Petition

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 3402 OF 2015

Between:

D.Madhu s/o D.Jangaiah, R/o.H.No. 45/24 K-17-5 Sri Krishna Colony Opp: Trinity School Kurnool, Kurnool district

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad rep. by its Secretary.
• The Superintendent of Police Kurnool District, Kurnool.
• The Superintendent of Police Kurnool district. The sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kurnool district. 4. The Inspector of Police IV Town Police station, Kurnool.
• 5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police station, Kurnool.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet No.203 against the petitioner in the $4^th$ respondent police station and subsequently transferred to 5^th respondent police and renumbered as Rowdy Sheet No. 778 and continuing the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, Article $19(1)(g)$ and Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 4513 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist for the presence of the petitioner in the police station by suspending the rowdy sheet No.203 of 4^th respondent police station and transferred to 5^th respondent police station and renumbered as Rowdy Sheet No. 778 pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 5609 OF 2015

Between:

Shaik Subhani, S/o. Mohammad Hussain, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Tailor, R/o. Door No.6-14, Nidumukkala village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, Guntur District.
• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur West Division, Guntur District. 4.
• 5. The Station House Officer, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur Urban District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4^th respondent in opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner and interfering with the life and liberty, as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently quash the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner by the $4^th$ respondent.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 7464 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 6082 OF 2015

Between:

Boya Hanumappa, S/o B. Thimmappa, Aged about 30 years, Paramandodi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool District. $\overline{2}$ .
• The Circle Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.<br>The Sub- Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur Rural Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool $4.$ District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct more particularly one in the nature of the WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in calling to the police station very frequently without there being any justifiable reason and not furnishing the particulars of the rowdy sheet opened if any against the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g), and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to call the petitioner to the police station on and off and also close the rowdy sheet if any opened against the petitioner as he is not involved in any criminal case.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 8117 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 herein not to call the petitioner to the police station on and off pending disposal of the W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 6838 OF 2015

Between:

M.Pulla Reddy, s/o. M.Siva Reddy, Aged about 32 years, Occ:Agriculturist, ex-Director KDCC Bank, R/o. Krishnapuram village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The District Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool.
• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakur Division, Kurnool District.<br>The Station House Officer, Atmakur P.S., Kurnool District. 3.
• $4.$

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in opening the rowdy sheet No. 134 dated 24.12.2012 against the petitioner and continuing the same even though petitioner is not habitual offender nor committed any offences causing disturbance to public peace and tranquility whereas only by succumbing to political pressures, as illegal, violation of Article 14, 19 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 9103 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to harass, interfere with the personal life & liberty of the petitioner.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

WRIT PETITION NO: 7022 OF 2015

Between:

J. Babuji Rao @ J. Babij, S/o J. Prasad Aged 40 years, R/o Rarnannapalem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its, Principal Secretary Home Department, A.P. 1 Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru. $2.$
• Dy. Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District. 3.
• 4. Station House Officer, Jeelugumilli Police Station, West Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the police authorities in opening and continuing a rowdy sheet / history sheet against the petitioner as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the authorities to close the rowdy sheet/ history sheet against the petitioner and inform the same to the higher authorities and to compensate him for the agony and torture he underwent.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 9343 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondent authorities from summoning the petitioner to police station to sign on documents and from taking photograph of the petitioner for displaying it widely etc or for any other reason.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 7173 OF 2015

Between:

Bhimavarapu Kotireddy, S/o Prasadareddy, aged about 49 years, resident of Kollipara Village and Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District. 2.
• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur District. 3.
• 4. Sowmya Mishra, W/o Not known Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur District.
• 5. The Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural, Guntur District.
• 6. The Station House Officer, Kollipara Police Station, Guntur Dist.
• 7. Rambabu, S/o Not known Sub Inspector of Police, Kollipora Police Station Kollipara Village and Mandal, Guntur District.
• 8. Tahsildar Cum Mandal Executive Magistrate, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 7 in calling the petitioner to police stations without issuing any summons, notices or memos etc and harass the petitioner in the name of counseling by taking signatures on blank papers and making to wait in the stations every time without any reference to time on the day when called or taken police stations without any or specific purpose as the same is arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and award damages/compensation against respondent no. 1 to 7 for their unlawful actions including opening of rowdy sheet and also against respondent No.8 for illegal and unauthorized binding over of the petitioner for good behavior Under Section 110 (e) of Cr.P.C. without any legal cause and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to 7 not to call the petitioner to the police stations.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 9560 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 7 not to call the petitioner to the police stations pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

WRIT PETITION NO: 12726 OF 2015

Between:

J.Jayaraju, S/o. J. Prakash Rao, Occupation - Self Employed Powerpeta, Ambica Vari Street Eluru 524002 West Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By Its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District At Eluru.
• The Superintendent of Police, vvest Gouavan Discussion. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division, At Eluru.
• 4. The SHO, Eluru II Town P.S., Eluru.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents including the Orders in C.No. 02/SPDOE(E)/SHEETS/2015 Dtd. 15-01-2015 issued by the 3^rd respondent the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division, Eluru, in directing the 4th respondent SHO of Eluru II Town PS to open a Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner, and the Rowdy Sheet so opened and maintained, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also being violative of Standing Order 601 (A)(13)(E)(F) of the A.P. Police Manual Part-1 Volume 2 and consequently quash.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 16761 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order in C.No. 02/SPDOE(E)/SHEETS/2015 dtd. 15-01-2015 issued by the 3rd respondent - the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division, Eluru, in directing the 4th respondent SHO of Eluru II Town PS to open a Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner, including suspension of the operation of the Rowdy Sheet so opened and maintained by the SHO., Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.PATTABHI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 13990 OF 2015

Between:

Shaik Lateef S/o Karim, R/o. Tipparla Bazar, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by, its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• $\begin{array}{c} 2. \ 3. \end{array}$ The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur.

The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in continuing Rowdy Sheet bearing No. 647/2003 opened against the petitioner basing on two criminal cases which were also ended in acquittal vide judgment in C.C.No. 280/2003 dt. 4-2-2003 and C.C.No. 364/2002 dt. 7-2-2005, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith

close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein in the 3rd respondent police station bearing Rowdy Sheet No. 647/2003.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 18326 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3^rd respondent herein not to call the petitioner to the police station or interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT P.HEMALALITHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 14041 OF 2015

Between:

Nettembaku Polaiah S/o.Venkata Subbaiah, Occ: Retd. RTC employee, R/o Peduru Village, T.P Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its, Principal Secretary to Home Department,
• Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore Dist. $\overline{2}$ .
• 3. Divisional Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore, Dist. $4.$
• Inspector of Police, Krishnapatnam, SPSR Nellore Dist. 5. Station House Officer, T.P Gudur Police Station, SPSR Nellore District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in retention of the rowdy-sheet No. 26 of 2012 vide C.No.107/GL-SDO.N(R)/2012 dated 04.07.2012 on the petitioner respectively as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjustified and without jurisdiction and violative of the Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash the rowdy sheet and direct the respondents not to interfere with my liberty in any manner in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 18399 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to enforce in any manner the Rowdy -Sheet No. 26 of 2012 dt. 04-07-2012 opened against me respectively including calling to the Police Station and not to pay domiciliary visits to my house, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 14051 OF 2015

Between:

Reddy Kiran Kumar @ Reddy Venkata Kiran Kumar, S/o. Jwala Narasimha Rao, aged 28 Years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/ o. H. No. 1-151, Savalyapuram Village & Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District.
• 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Narasaraopet, Guntur, Guntur District.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet vide No. 793/ SDPO/NRT/2014, dated 01.11.2014, by the 3rd Respondent under provisions of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Order No. 601 against the petitioner at Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District and its continuation as

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 18411 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the rowdy sheet vide No. 793/SDPO/NRT/2014, dated 01.11.2014, by the 3rd Respondent under provisions of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Order No. 601 against the petitioner at Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District, pending disposal of the Writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K V R KRISHNA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 14391 OF 2015

Between:

Meejuru Mallikarjuna Rao @ Malli, S/o. Subramanyarn, Aged about 32 years, Occ: News Reporter, R/o. Harijanawada, Kota village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department,
• Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Director General of Police, Andhra, Pradesh, Hyderabad. ?
• The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudur Division, SPSR Nellore District.
• 5. The Station House Officer, Kota Police Station, SPSR Nellore District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in threatening the petitioner to come down to police station for taking finger prints, to take photograph by placing slate on the petitioner which will be written as rowdy sheeter to display in the police station and in other public places as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 18807 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd to 5th respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 16349 OF 2015

Between:

Pilli Posa Rao, S/o.late Venkat Rao, Aged about 46 years, Tupakalagudem Village Tallapudi Mandal, W.G.District, A.P.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to, the Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

• The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesn. The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Kovvur, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh. The Station House Officer, Tallapudi P.S,

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or a direction more particularly in a nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondents in opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner in 4^th respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheets list in the $4^{th}$ Respondent's Police Station.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 21239 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARASIMHA RAO DAVULURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17217 OF 2015

Between:

Atchi China Narasimha Rao @ China Babu, S/o Venkateswarlu, aged about 27 years, R/ o. BC Colony, Nandigama, Krishna District.

...Petitioner

AND

• The Station House Officer Nandigama Police Station, Krishna District. 1.
• $2.$ The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama, Krishna District.
• $3.$ The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.
• 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station and thereafter renewing the rowdy sheet and continuing the same by renewing mechanically without recording any reason even in spite of quashing in all the cases and no case is pending against the petitioner at the present as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to close the rowdy sheet pending against the petitioner in the $1^st$ respondent police station forthwith in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 22323 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 1 not to summon the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law merely on the ground of pendency of the rowdy sheet pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17774 OF 2015

Between:

Seelam Mohan Kumar, S/o late Laxrnaiah, aged 39 years, R/o Lam Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Superintendent of Police (Urban), Guntur, Guntur District.
• 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, North Sub-Division, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein in $4^{th}$ respondent police station as illegal, contrary to law and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to withdraw the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 22984 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the rowdy sheet

opened and pending against the petitioner herein in 4^th respondent police station, pending disposal of writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K V VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 20384 OF 2015

Between:

Thumma Babul Reddy, S/o. Brahma Reddy, aged 45 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Railpet, Bapatla, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur. $\overline{2}$ .
• 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bapatla, Guntur District.
• 4. The Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town Police Station, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in retaining the rowdy sheet No. 75 dated : 30.01.2004 opened against the petitioner in the 3^rd respondent Police Station as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 26258 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet No.75 dated : 30.01.2004 opened against the petitioner in Bapatla Town P.S., Guntur District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT A.GAYATRI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 21848 OF 2015

Between:

Adaka Rattalu S/o. Venkaiah, Occ: Business, R/o.20-20-266, 9^th Lane, Chuttugunta, Guntur City, Guntur District.

AND

• ...Petitioner
• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its, Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. Sub-Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem P.S. Guntur.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ/order/direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not closing the Rowdy Sheet No.185/93 continuing against the petitioner in Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur District pursuant to representation dt.10.12.2014 of him is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove the Rowdy Sheet No.185/93 on the file of Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur against the petitioner.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 28147 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dt.10-12-2014 of the petitioner for removing the Rowdy Sheet No. 185/93 on the file of the Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 23074 OF 2015

Between:

Jangam Jagadeesh @ Matam Jagadeesh Swamy, S/o.Basavaraju Swamy, Age 32 years R/o.H.No 9-104, Siddappapalem, Kosigi (V) (M), Kurnool District-518313.

$\Omega$

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
• The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool The Station House Officer, KOSIGI Police Station, Kosigi (V) (M), Kurnool District-518313.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs particularly in the nature of 'WRIT OF MANDAMUS' to declare the action of respondents in opening and continuing the rowdy sheet No.392 of 2008 of Kosigi Police Station, Kurnool District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and against the provisions as per the A.P. Police Manual and Article 14, 19 $(1)$ $(g)$ and 21 of the Constitution of India.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 29840 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the rowdy sheet No.392 of Kosigi Police Station, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 25102 OF 2015

Between:

Valaparla Ramesh, S/o. Late Sri V.Mariyadasu, Aged about 36 years, R/o. D.No. 69-5-13/A, Ambedkar Nagar, Patamata, Vijayawada - 520008

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of A.P., Rep. by Prl. Secretary, Home Department, A.P.Secreteriat, Hyderabad.
• 2. Deputy Commissioner of Police(D.C.P.), Law & Order, Police Commissionerate, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Assistant Commissioner of Police (A.C.P.), Central Zone, Patamata Jurisdiction, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 4. Sub-Inspector of Police, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in opening rowdy sheet and being continued by the Respondents authorities against the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires of the Police Standing Orders, as otherwise the petitioner will suffer grave and irreparable loss.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 32573 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith stop harassing the Petitioner to make his presence every week before the Respondents and task force office and to stop the Respondents authorities to harass the family members of the Petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHATRATI RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 27840 OF 2015

Between:

P. Subramanyam, S/o Subba Rayudu, Aged about 43 years R/o 28/1042, Saibaba Nagar Nandyal Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The station House Officer II, Town Police Station, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
• The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nano The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
• 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in opening Rowdy Sheet in the year 2006 on the ground that the petitioner is an accused in Cr.No. 51/2005 and continuing Rowdy Sheet in the $1^st$ respondent's police station by routinely extending the Rowdy Sheet without recording sufficient reasons as arbitrary and illegal and violation of Article 21 of Constitution. of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner in the 1^st respondent's police station in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 36121 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the ground of pendency of the Rowdy Sheet in the 1^st respondent's police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 28627 OF 2015

Between:

Khaleel, S/o.Sikindar, Aged about 22 years, Occ:Daily wage labour, R/o.Mosque Street, V.Kota Village and Mandal, Chittoor District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 2.
• 3. The Station House Officer, V. Kota Police Station, V.Kota, Chittoor District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction declaring the action of the Respondent in opening a Rowdy Sheet and exhibiting the photograph of the petitioner in the list of Rowdy sheeters Board in the 3rd Respondent Police station as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and violation of the fundamental Rights quaranteed to the petitioner under Chapter III of Constitution of India and also violation of Andhra Pradesh Police Manual Board Standing Orders and consequently direct the Respondents to close/quash the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner forthwith.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 37109 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct stay of all further proceedings pursuant to opening of Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in V.KOta Police Station, V.Kota, Chittoor District pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Hon'ble Court. pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 29181 OF 2015

Between:

M. Lokeswararao S/o. Nageswararao, Occ: Self Employment R/o. N.P. Raju Colony, Chataparraju road, Venkatapuram Panchayat, Eluru rural and Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner

• 1. The State of A.P. rep by its Principal Secretary, Home, department, secretariat Buildings, A.P. Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police West Godavari District, Eluru. 2.
• 3. The Divisional Superintendent of Police Eluru, Eluru Sub, Sub Division, West Godavari District.
• $\frac{4}{2}$ The Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru, West Godavari Dist.
• The Station House officer Eluru Rural Police Station, Eluru, West Godavari District. 5.
• 6. The Station House Officer, I- Town Police Station Eluru, West Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the impugned rowdy sheet proceedings dt. 15.01.2015 is highly illegal arbitrary and violative of the article 14, 16 21 of the constitution of India apart from contrary to the police manual and set aside the same and consequently to suspend the impugned proceedings of the rowdy sheet dt. 15.01.2015.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 37823 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings of the rowdy sheet dt. 15.01.2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T S N SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 31213 OF 2015

Between:

Tunga Nageswara Rao, S/o Thirumurthulu, Setti Balija by caste, Native of Gumparru Village, Yalamanchili Mandal, West Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• $\overline{2}$ .
• Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru.<br>Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapuram Sub-Division, Narsapuram, West Godavari $\overline{3}$ District.
• 4. Inspector of Police, Palakollu Rural Circle, Pallakollu, West Godavari District.

5. Station House Officer, Elamanchili Police Station, Elamanchili, West Godavari District. ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring action of Respondents 4 & 5 in registering of false criminal cases repeatedly against petitioner, interfering into his personal life and liberty and also threatening to opening of rowdy sheet without following due process of law as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative Provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 4 & 5 not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of Law.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 40346 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 & 5 not to interfere their personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 31620 OF 2015

Between:

S.Durga Prasad, S/o Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 35 years, Occ:Business, R/o D.No.41 / 13/37, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District. $\overline{2}$ .

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.2 / Police in not closing the Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner inspite of closure of C.C.No.136/ 2007, on the file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada vide Lok Adalat award dt.20-06-2011 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 /police to close the Rowdy Sheet opened against the Petitioner in connection with FIR No. 18/2007.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 23671 OF 2017)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the direction petition vide WPMP No. 40883 of 2015 in WP 31620 of 2015.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 40883 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No.2/Police not to insist for appearance of the Petitioner before the Police Station in connection with the Rowdy Sheet opened against him pending disposal of the above writ petition.

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 44988 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased amend the cause title by substituting the "Machavaram Police Station" with that of "Krishnalanka Police Station" in Respondent No.2.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)

WRIT PETITION NO: 36392 OF 2015

Between:

• 1. M/s Sri Chaitanya Real Estates, (Registered Partnership Firm) (Regd.No.06747/1991), Represented by its Managing Partner. Avula Veera Sekhar Rao, S/o. Veeraswamy, Hindu, Aged about 54 Years, R/o. H.No.3-30-40/A, Brundavan Gardens, 6^th Line, Yadav Complex. Guntur, Guntur District. PIN:522006
• 2. Avula Veera Sekhar Rao, S/o.Veeraswamy, Hindu, Aged about 54 Years, R/o. H.No.3-30-40/A, Brundavan Gardens, 6^th Line, Yadav Complex. Guntur, Guntur District. PIN:522006

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Director General of Police Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
• 3. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur, District.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Arundalpet Police, Station, Guntur District.
• 5. Ala.Suhasini., W/o.Uday Kiran, Hindu, Aged 34 Years, Rio. Poranki Village, Near Sai Baba Temple, Vijayawada Rural., Krishna District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any Appropriate Writ by declaring the Second And Third Respondents in not Considering the representation made by the Petitioner, Dated 03-11-2015, in which they requested to take Action against the Respondent No-4, who is threatening the Petitioner, to Settle the Civil Dispute, which was turned into a Crime by registering the F.I.R.No. 418/2015, Dated 17-10-2015, Before the Fourth Respondent, and Threatening the Petitioner by saying that, they will Register 40 to 50 similar Crimes by tracing out all those defaulters of Petitioners Firm, and also will Open a Rowdy sheet against the Petitioner, is illegal, Contrary to Provisions of Cr.P.C, Contrary to Articles 14, 16, 19,20 and 21 of Constitution of India, contrary to the Judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of India, and against the principals of natural justice, Consequently to direct the fourth Respondent, not to harass the Petitioner to Settle the Disputes with the Fifth Respondent in connection with Civil Dispute, which was Colored as Criminal in nature and Registered as F.I.R.No.418/2015.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 46866 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the Fourth Respondent, not to harass the petitioner to Settle the Disputes with the Fifth Respondent in connection with Civil Dispute, which was Colored as Criminal in nature and Registered as F.I.R.No.418/2015.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 34071 OF 2015

Between:

• 1. K. Ramalinga Reddy, S/o Rami Reddy, Aged about 43 Yrs, R/o Matherimitta Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.
• 2. K. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj, S/o Munirathnam Reddy, Aged about 25 Yrs, R/o Matheiimitta Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.
• 3. Krishnamurthy, S/o Govinda Reddy, Aged about 42 Yrs, R/o Chilamathur Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.
• 4. K. Munirathnam Reddy, S/o Chenga Reddy, Aged about 56 Yrs, R/o Matherimitta Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,

• Secretariat, Hyderabad.

• The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor District. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban Police District, Chittoor District.

• The Sub-Division Police Officer, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. The Sub-Division Police Officer, Puttur, Chittoor District. The Station House Officer, Varadaiah Palem Police Station

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheets against the petitioners vide Proceeding No. C.No.94/SDPO(K)/09, dt.25.07.2009 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheets against the petitioners.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 43866 OF 2015)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station for signing the register and not to exhibit the photos of the petitioners in the police station, pending disposal of Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 87 OF 2016

Between:

D. Nagaraju, S/o. D. Narayanaswamy, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Business, Proprietor of Nandavanam Chowdeshwari Silks Pvt. Ltd., R/o. 4/497, Santhinagar, Dharmavaram Town, Anantapur District.

AND

...Petitioner

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor District.

• The Sub-divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalle, Rural Police Station, Madanapalle, Chittoor District.

• 5. The Station House Officer, Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu Chittoor District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in opening rowdy sheet vide No.482 on the file of the Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu, Chittoor District against the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and consequently quash the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 119 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5, not to call the petitioner to Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu, Chittoor District under the guise of rowdy sheet No.482, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 2015 OF 2016

Between:

Garaga Veera Ganeswara Rao @ Ganesh, S/o Venkateswara Rao, aged about 29 years; Caste: Kapu, occu: Finance Badness; R/o D.No.13-07-09, Kondapalli Mari Street, Mandapeta, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari at Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh.
• The Circle Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Circle, Mandapeta, East Godavari District. The Station House Officer, Mandapeta Town P.S., Mandapeta, East Godavari District.
• The Station House Officer, Mandapeta Town P.S., Mandapeta, East Godavari District. The Station House officer, Manda peta I Town PS., Mandapeta, East Godavari District. ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the Police Stations of Mandapeta town, East Godavari District and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet kept against the petitioner in the police stations of Mandapeta, East Godavari District in the interest of justice

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 2553 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police stations of Mandapeta, East Godavari District frequently and make his to wait for hours together pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SWARNA SRINIVAS BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 3486 OF 2016

Between:

P. Surya Narayana Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, aged 55 years, Occ: Advocate, R/o. Balaji Nagar, Allagadda, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Town Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
• The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda, Kurnool District. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
• 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents in intending to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No. 157/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police station as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to police standing order No.601 and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner contrary to the procedure prescribed in Police standing Order No. 601 in the interest of justice.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 4455 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner contrary to the procedure prescribed in Police standing Order No. 601 pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 6609 OF 2016

Between:

Y. Bali Reddy, S/o Nagireddy, Aged about 28 years, R/o D No; 3/43, Badsha Banda Street, Patha Kadapa, Kadapa City, YSR Kadapa District.

AND

...Petitioner

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal, Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
• 2. The Sub Inspector of Police, C K Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District
• The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue appropriate Writ or order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in opening and continuing of Rowdy Sheet No. 74 against the petitioner in the 2^nd Respondent C K Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unfair, unjustified and direct the Respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet forthwith against the petitioner.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 8415 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents not to act upon the Rowdy Sheet No. 74, against the petitioner maintained in the 2^nd Respondent C.K. Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 15393 OF 2016

Between:

Kakaraparthi Rama Rao S/o Ramanjaneyulu @ Hanumahtha Rao, Resident of Machavaram village, Machavaram Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The state of A.P rept by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Sub- Divisional Police, Officer Machavaram Sub Division Guntur District..
• 3. The S.H.O. Machavaram P.S., Machavaram Mandal, Gutnur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 &3 herein, in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet bearing No.157, dt.1.11.2014, on the file of Machavaram P. S, against the petitioner herein, as illegal,

arbitrary, in breach of Police Standing Orders, discriminatory, in violation of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and. contrary to the settled legal principles and consequently direct the respondents herein, to close the Rowdy Sheet bearing No.157, dt.1.11.2014, in Machavaram police station against the petitioner herein forthwith.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19076 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to summon the petitioner herein, to the police station, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA RAO MAVIDI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 15835 OF 2016

Between:

Korukonda Srinivas, S/o Abbal (late), aged about 31 years, Occ:Cultivation, Cultivation, R/o Maminipalem village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
• 3. The Addl.Superintendent of Police (Administration), HAC Anakapalli Sub. Division. Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Anakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

...Respondents

...Petitioner

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the 3^rd respondent in permitting the 4th respondent to open a rowdi sheet against the petitioner vide order in C.No.19/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AF.P-2011 dt.19-11-2014 as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to law and police manual and also violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to discontinue the rowdy sheet and pass

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19575 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with my life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet against me pending disposal of the above W.P. pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 15841 OF 2016

Between:

Pudi Ramana, S/o Chinna Raju, aged about 38 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Mamidipalem Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

• AND
• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
• The Addl. Superintendent of Police (Administration), HAC Anakapalli Sub. Division, 3. Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
• 4. The Station House Officer, Anakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, AP.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the 3^rd respondent in permitting the 4^th respondent to open a rowdy sheet against the petitioner vide order in C.No.18/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP-2014 dt.19-11-2014 as highly illegal, arbitrary

exercise of power, contrary to law and police manual and also violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to discontinue the rowdy sheet.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19581 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with petitioner life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet pending disposal of the above W.P. pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 15870 OF 2016

Between:

$\bullet = \mathbb{R}_{-k}$

Korukonda Kondala Rao, S/o Raju Naidu, aged about years Occ:cultivation, R/o. Marniciipalem Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• The Superintendent of Police Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District, A.P
• 3. The Addl. Superintendent of Police (Administration), HAC Anakapalli Sub. Division, Visakhapatnam District, A.P
• 4. The Station House Officer, Arakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalii, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the $3^{rd}$ respondent in permitting the $4^{th}$ respondent to open a rowdy-sheet against the petitioner vide order in C.No.21/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP-2014 dt.19-11-2014 as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to law and police manual and also violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to discontinue the rowdy sheet.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19624 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct petition respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with petition life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet against petition pending disposal of the above WP., pending disposal of the above WP.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17618 OF 2016

Between:

Alla Bala Krishna Murthy @ Bala Krishna, S/o. Sri Narayana Murthy, Hindu; Age 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No.70-14-313-A, Siddartha Nagar, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, aA.P. Secretariat at Hyderabad - 500 022.
• The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada 533 005, East Godavari District. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada 533 005, East Godavari District.

4. The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram PS, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District. ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in keeping the 'Rowdy Sheet' against the Petitioner on the file of the 4^th respondent even though no cases are pending against him as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and for o a

consequential direction to the Respondents to drop all further proceedings including the withdrawal of 'Rowdy Sheet' against the Petitioner forthwith.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 21645 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station pursuant to the 'Rowdy Sheet' pending against him on the file of the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 16809 OF 2022

Between:

Atluri Punesh, S/o. Rambabu, Aged about 31 years, D.No. 1-6/1, Saibaba Temple Road. Nidamanuru, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Home Affairs, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District,
• 2. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.
• 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.
• 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, East Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District. 5. The Station House Officer, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 6. The Station House Officer, Thotlavalluru Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 7. The Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Appropriate Writ, Order or Direction declaring the actions of the respondents herein in opening the rowdy sheet vide C.C.No.44/ACP.CD/2018 dated 25/03/2018 and continuing the Rowdy Sheet vide H.S.No. 3/2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, null and void, in violation to the very spirit and object of Police Standing Order No.601 and 742, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet vide H.S.No. 3/2018 opened against the Petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station at odd hours under the grab of surveillance and further direct the respondents not to resort to unwarranted actions such as cleaning the police station, bathrooms and the premises in and around the police station.

IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet vide H.S.No. 3/2018 against the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON ORDER:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

I

Writ Petition Nos. 10997, 18746, 19757, 23203, 23262, 23762, 26117, 26233, 26397, 26717, 29463, 30029, 30072, 31045, 31301, 31322, 31451, 32146, 33603, 33900, 33974, 35006, 36644, 37133 of 2014; 1677, 3402, 5609, 6082, 6838, 7022, 7173, 12726, 13990, 14041, 14051, 14391, 16349, 17217, 17774, 20384, 21848, 23074, 25102, 27840, 28627, 29181, 31213, 31620, 36392, 34071 of 2015; 87, 2015, 3486, 6609, 15393, 15835, 15841, 15870, 17618 of 2016 and 16809 of 2022

COMMON ORDER:

In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners sought either to quash the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets that are opened against them or to direct the respondent police officials to close the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/historysheets.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

These Writ Petitions are being disposed of without going into the merits of the cases on the ground of legal validity of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened by invoking the provisions of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, in view of the recent common order of this High Court, dated 15.07.2022, in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, whereby this Court held that the Standing Orders of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuatio n of rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and keeping 3.

surveillance on the individuals sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, ⁱ the aforesaid Standing Orders, on the basis of the said rowdyin terms of Chapter-37 of are void.

4. The rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history -sheets were opened against the petitioners in all these Writ Petitions ⁱ Chapter-37 of the A.P. in terms of Police Standing Orders or A.P. Police Manual.

5. The legal validity of Chapter-37 of the said A.P. Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, said Police on the basis of which the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened, has been questioned and challenged before W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and are being this Court in batch. This court, by its common passed in the above batch order, dated 15.07.2022, Petitions, after of Writ considering the law on the issue elaborately with reference to the earlier judgments rendered by the Apex Court and. more particularly, with reference to the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of Indiai, held that Chapter-37 of the A.P Police Manual A.P. Police Standing Orders on the basis of wh.ch the rowdy-sheets/suspect-shects/histoiy-sheets are being opened and surveillance is being kept on the individuals or on the basis of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, void. At para.45 of the said as common order, it is held as follows:

45. Hence, the Writ Petition No.3568 declaring the Standing Orders Police Standing Orders to the of 2022 is allowed Police Manual / A.P. extent of opening/continuation of A.P.

(2017) ¹⁰ see ¹

of Rowdy Sheet, Suspect Sheet, History Sheet etc., and on that basis the surveillance of the individual (in terms of Chapter 37 of the above said Standing Orders) as void. All the other Writ Petitions are also allowed. All the rowdy sheets opened in this batch of Writ Petitions are directed to be closed immediately. The police cannot open or continue a rowdy sheet or collect data pertaining to a person without the sanction of "law". Collection of personal data and its usage for prevention of crimes also can only be in accordance with a "law" which crosses the thresholds mentioned in the Constitution of India and the various judgments including K.S.Puttaswamy case (2 supra) since 'privacy' is now a Fundamental Right as per Part-Ill of the Constitution of India. It is reiterated that the police cannot (under the existing orders) indulge in night visits; domiciliary visits to the houses of a suspect or accused. They cannot take or demand the photographs, fingerprints etc., except under the procedure established by a 'law' and if the conditions laid down are satisfied. Accused or suspects cannot be summoned or called to the Police Station or anywhere else either during festivals/elections/weekends etc. They cannot be made to wait at the Police Stations for any reason or seek permission to leave the local jurisdiction."

6. Therefore, as the very Chapter-37 in the A.P. Police Manual and A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which adl the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets are opened and surveillance is being kept on the petitioners on the basis of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the same are being continued, is now declared as void, the opening of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners and continuing the same is clearly unsustainable under law. They have no legal sanctity and they cannot be sustained under law and they cannot be allowed to be in force and continued any longer.

V. \ 3

Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid common order, dated 7. 15.07.2022, of this Court and for the reasons stated therein, these Writ Petitions are allowed declaring the opening of the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners, which are all impugned in these Writ Petitions, as illegal and unconstitutional. Consequently, all the rowdy-<pre>sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets,</pre> opened against the petitioners in these Writ Petitions, stand closed forthwith. The respondents in all these Writ Petitions are directed to close the the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets in their records which are opened against the petitioners. No surveillance shall be kept on the petitioners herein on the basis of the said the rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the petitioners shall not be called to the Police Station in connection with any such rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, which are now declared as illegal and unconstitutional and which are closed. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

To

• 1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police (A.C.P.), Central Zone, Patamata Jurisdiction, Vijavawada, Krishna District.
• 2. M/s Sowmya Mishra, W/o Not known Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur District.
• 3. Mr. Rambabu, S/o Not known Sub Inspector of Police, Kollipora Police Station Kollipara Village and Mandal, Guntur District.
• 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.
• 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, East Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.
• 6. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North, Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam.
• 7. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada.
• 8. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada.

• The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 9.

• 10. The Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru, West Godavari Dist.
• 11. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalle, Rural Police Station, Madanapalle, Chittoor District.
• 12. The Circle Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Circle, Mandapeta, East Godavari District.
• 13. The Circle Inspector Of Police, Ravulapalem Circle, East Godavari District.
• 14. The Circle Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.
• 15. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.
• 16. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam.
• 17. The Deputy Commissioner of Police(D.C.P.), Law & Order, Police Commissionerate, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 18. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Gurajala Division, Guntur District, A.P
• 19. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool District.
• 20. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
• 21. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District.
• 22. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakur Division, Kurnool District.
• 23. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakuru, Nellore District.
• 24. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bapatla, Guntur District.
• 25. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudur Division, SPSR Nellore District.
• 26. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur West Division, Guntur District.
• 27. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama, Krishna District.
• 28. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapuram Sub-Division, Narsapuram, West Godavari District.
• 29. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, North Sub-Division, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
• 30. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram, East Godavari District
• 31. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Rural, East Godavari District.
• 32. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural Division, Guntur, Guntur District.
• 33. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur District.
• 34. The Director General of Police Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada.
• 35. The District Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool.
• 36. The Divisional Superintendent of Police Eluru, Eluru Sub, Sub Division, West Godavari District.
• 37. The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore, Dist.
• 38. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District.
• 39. The Inspector of Police IV Town Police Station, Kurnool.
• 40. The Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town Police Station, Guntur District.
• 41. The Inspector of Police, CCRB, Visakhapatnam.
• 42. The Inspector of Police, III Town Police Station, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
• 43. The Inspector of Police, Krishnapatnam, SPSR Nellore Dist.
• 44. The Inspector of Police, Palakollu Rural Circle, Pallakollu, West Godavari District.
• 45. The Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural, Guntur District.
• 46. The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
• 47. The Station House officer, Machavaram P.S., Machavaram Mandal, Gutnur District.
• 48. The Station House officer, Dornipadu Police Station, Kurnool District.
• 49. The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, A.P Secretariat, now at Amaravati, Guntur District.
• 50. The Station House officer, Eluru II Town P.S., Eluru, West Godawari District.

51. The Station House officer, Eluru Rural Police Station, Eluru, West Godavari District.

52. The Station House Officer II Town Police Station Nandyal, Kurnool District

53. The Station House Officer Nandigama Police Station, Krishna District.

54. The Station House Officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, Adoni, Kurnool District.

55. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Town Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool District.

56. The Station House Officer, Arakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalii, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

57. The Station House Officer, Arundalpet Police, Station, Guntur District.

58. The Station House Officer, Atmakur Police Station, Atmakur, Nellore District.

59. The Station House Officer, Avanigadda Police Station, Avanigadda, Krishna District

60. The Station House Officer, Durgi Police Station, Durgi, Guntur District, A.P-522 612

• 61. The Station House Officer, Elamanchili Police Station, Elamanchili, West Godavari District.
• 62. The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural P.S Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District.
• 63. The Station House Officer, I- Town Police Station Eluru, West Godavari District.

64. The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada.

65. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Kurnool.

66. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Vijayawada.

67. The Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapuramu District.

68. The Station House Officer, Jeelugumilli Police Station, West Godavari District.

69. The Station House officer, Kadiam Police Station, Kadiam, E.G.District.

70. The Station House Officer, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool District.

The Station House Officer, Kollipara Police Station, Guntur Dist.

72. The Station House Officer, KOSIGI Police Station, Kosigi (V) (M), Kurnool District-518313.

73. The Station House Officer, Kota Police Station, SPSR Nellore District.

74. The Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

75. The Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

76. The Station House officer, Manda peta I Town PS., Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 77. The Station House Officer, Mandapeta Town P.S., Mandapeta, East Godavari District.

77. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District.

78. The Station House Officer, Manubolu Police Station, Manubolu, SPSR Nellore District.

79. The Station House Officer, Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu Chittoor District.

80. The Station House Officer, Nandavaram Police Station, Nandavaram, Kurnool District.

81. The Station House Officer, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur Urban District.

82. The Station House Officer, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

83. The Station House Officer, Peddakakani Police Station, Peddakakani, Guntur District.

84. The Station House Officer, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam.

85. The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram PS, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District.

• 87. The Station House Officer, Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District.
• 88. The Station House Officer, Sirvel Police Station, Sirvel, Kurnool District.

89. The Station House Officer, T.P Gudur Police Station, SPSR Nellore District.

90. The Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District

91. The Station House Officer, Tallapudi P.S, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

92. The Station House Officer, Thondangi PS, East Godavari District.

93. The Station House Officer, Thotlavalluru Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

94. The Station House Officer, U.Kothapalli Police Station, East Godavari District.

95. The Station House Officer, V. Kota Police Station, V.Kota, Chittoor District.

96. The Station House Officer, Varadaiah Palem Police Station, Chittoor District.

97. The Station House Officer, Yeddanapudi Police Station, Prakasam District.

98. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Amalapuram Division, East Godavari District.

99. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Avanigadda, Krishna District

100. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division, At Eluru.

101. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.

102. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kovvur, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

103. The Sub- Divisional Police, Officer Machavaram Sub Division Guntur District..

104. The Sub Inspector of Police, C K Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District

105. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kothapeta Police Station, East Godavari District.

106. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Rural Police Station Mandapeta, E.G.District.

107. The Sub Inspector of Police, Yellamanchili Town.

108. The Sub- Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur Rural Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.

109. The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram, E.G.District

110. The Sub-Division Police Officer, Puttur, Chittoor District.

111. The Sub-Division Police Officer, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District.

112. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (Deputy Superintendent of Police) Kakinada Sub-Division, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 113. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 114. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District.<br>115. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District. 116. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District.<br>117. The Sub-divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 118. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal Kurnool District.<br>119. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 120. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Narasaraopet, Guntur, Guntur District.

113. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem P.S. Guntur.

114. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Patamata Police Statio 123. The Superintendent of Police Kurnool District, Kurnool. 124. The Superintendent of Police Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District, A.P 125. The Superintendent of Police West Godavari District, Eluru. 126. The Superintendent of police, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 127. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 128. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari at Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh. 129. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. 130. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, State of A.P., Machilipatnam, Krihna District 131. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore Dist. 132. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam Dsitrict.

115. The Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District.

116. The Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban, E 132. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam Dsitrict. 133. The Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District.<br>134. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban Police District, Chittoor District. 182. One CC to SRI. V NARAYANA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 183. One CC to SRI. V NARATANA REDDT Advocate [OPO<br>183. One CC to SRI. V PATTABHI Advocate [OPUC]<br>184. One CC to SRI. V VINOD K REDDY Advocate [OPUC]<br>185. One CC to SRI. A Gayatri Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]<br>186. One CC to SRI. 187. One CC to SRI. G VAASUDEVUDU Advocate [OPUC]<br>188. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]<br>189. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

117. Two CD Copies

RAM SOP

HIGH COURT

DATED: 20/07/2022

COMMON ORDER

WRIT	PETITION Nos:	10997,	18746,
	19757, 23203, 23262, 23762, 26117,
	26233, 26397, 26717, 29463, 30029,
	30072, 31045, 31301, 31322, 31451,
	32146, 33603, 33900, 33974, 35006,
	36644, 37133 of 2014; 1677, 3402, 5609,
	6082, 6838, 7022, 7173, 12726, 13990,
	14041, 14051, 14391, 16349, 17217,
	17774, 20384, 21848, 23074, 25102,
	27840, 28627, 29181, 31213, 31620,
	36392, 34071 of 2015; 87, 2015, 3486,
	6609, 15393, 15835, 15841, 15870,
	15835, 15841, 15870, 17618 of 2016 and
16809 of 2022

ALLOWING ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS