(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER.

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE.

: PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY /

WRIT PETITION NO: 19853 OF 2021

Between:

• 1. B.Krishna Murthy, S/o.Late B.Venkata Ramanappa, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o.Mothukapalli village, Hindupur Mandal, Ananthapuram District
• 2. B.Sankar, S/o.Late B.Venkata Ramanappa, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o.Mothukapalli village, Hindupur Mandal, Ananthapuram District
• 3. B.Dhanjaya, S/o.Late B.Venkata Ramanappa, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o.Mothukapalli village, Hindupur Mandal, Ananthapuram District
• 4. B.Venkatappa, S/o.B.Vemanna, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o.Mothukapalli village, Hindupur Mandal, Ananthapuram District
• 5. B.Praveen Kumar, S/o.B.Vemanna, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o.Mothukapalli village, Hindupur Mandal, Ananthapuram District

...Petitioners

सत्यमंथ

AND

• 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
• 2. District Collector, Ananthapuram District at Ananthapur.
• 3. Revenue Divisional officer, Penukonda Revenue Division, Penukonda Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 4. Tahsildar, Parigi Mandal, Ananthapuram District.
• 5. Circle Inspector of Police, Hindupuram Rural, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 6. Station House Officer, Parigi Police Station, Parigi village and Mandal, Ananthapuram District.
• 7. The Sarpanch, Kadiginahally Gramapanchayat, Kadiginahally village, Parigi Mandal, Ananthapuram District.
• 8. Y.Ravi Prakash, S/o.Y.Ramudu, Aged about 50 years, R/o.D.No.13-15-475, Vidyanagar, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 9. V.Gopalachari, S/o.Late Vaidyam Ramappachari, Aged about 65 years, R/o.D.No.7-5-89, Kamsalapeta, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 10. P.Munni Kumari, D/o.Pokala Venkata Muni, Aged about 48 years, W/o. Sankarappa, R/o.D. No. 13-15-455, Vidyanagar, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.

...Respondents-

WHEREAS the Petitioners above named through their Advocate Sri S Krishna Reddy presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.59/200/(B), dated 05-02-2020 passed by the 4th respondent observing that the petitioners have no land of Ac.7.37 cents in Survey No.304-1 and 302 of Kadiginahally revenue village in Parigi Mandal of Ananthapuram District by giving a direction to the respondent No.5 for taking precautionary measures on the ground of law and order problem against the petitioners, as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary and without any authority and consequently to set aside the said proceedings and direction.

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Krishna Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners, GP for Revenue for Respondent No.1 to 4 & 7, GP for Home for _ Respondent No.5 & 6 directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted. You viz:

• 1. Y.Ravi Prakash, S/o.Y.Ramudu, Aged about 50 years, R/o.D.No.13-15-475, Vidyanagar, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 2. V.Gopalachari, S/o.Late Vaidyam Ramappachari, Aged about 65 years, R/o.D.No.7-5-89, Kamsalapeta, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 3. P.Munni Kumari, D/o.Pokala Venkata Muni, Aged about 48 years, W/o. No .13-15-455, Vidyanagar, Hindupuram Town, $R/o.D$ Sankarappa, Ananthapuram District

are directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted, within three(03) weeks. The Court made the following: ORDER

"Issue notice to respondents 8 to 10. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents 8 to 10 by registered post with acknowledgement due and file proof of service within two weeks.

Post after two weeks."

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/-M.RameshBabu ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

To.

• 1. Y.Ravi Prakash, S/o.Y.Ramudu, Aged about 50 years, R/o.D.No.13-15-475, Vidyanagar, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 2. V.Gopalachari, S/o.Late Vaidyam Ramappachari, Aged about 65 years, R/o.D.No.7-5-89, Kamsalapeta, Hindupuram Town, Ananthapuram District.
• 3. P.Munni Kumari, D/o.Pokala Venkata Muni, Aged about 48 years, W/o. .No $.13-15-455$ , Vidyanagar, Town, Hindupuram Sankarappa, $R/o.D$ Ananthapuram District (1 to 3 by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and affidavit)
• 4. One CC to Sri S Krishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
• 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] –
• 6. One spare copy

SP

HIGH COURT

MSMJ

$\mathbb{E}[\mathcal{M}_\mathcal{M}]$ $\cdots, \varepsilon$

DATED: 09/09/2021

POST AFTER TWO WEEKS

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

WP.No.19853 of 2021