[{"_1":2,"_359":-5,"_360":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4},"routes/cnr.$cnr.$order",{"_5":6,"_167":168,"_357":358,"_243":261,"_245":-5},"caseData",{"_7":8,"_226":227,"_235":236,"_338":339,"_356":-5},"courtCaseData",{"_9":10,"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":22,"_23":24,"_25":26,"_103":104,"_105":106,"_108":109,"_110":111,"_112":113,"_114":115,"_116":117,"_167":168,"_169":170,"_171":170,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":177,"_178":179,"_180":181,"_182":183,"_184":185,"_186":187,"_188":39,"_189":39,"_190":191,"_192":193,"_195":196,"_198":199,"_201":202,"_204":205,"_206":207,"_208":209,"_210":211,"_212":213,"_214":215,"_216":217,"_224":225},"caseNumber","200200000352023","district","VISAKHAPATNAM","state","AP","causelistType","CAUSE LIST MOTION HEARING","courtName","APHC","courtNo",3441,"firDetails",{},"judicialSection","UNKNOWN","historyOfCaseHearings",[27,36,41,44,46,49,51,54,57,61,63,65,68,70,72,74,77,79,81,83,85,87,89,92,94,96,98,101],{"_28":29,"_30":31,"_32":33,"_34":35},"causeListType","DAILY LIST","judge","A V SESHA SAI","hearingDate","2023-07-21","purposeOfListing","FOR ADMISSION",{"_30":37,"_38":39,"_34":40},"DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR","businessOnDate","2025-03-21","Disposed",{"_28":29,"_30":31,"_38":33,"_32":42,"_34":43},"2023-08-18","ADMISSION",{"_28":29,"_30":37,"_38":42,"_32":45,"_34":43},"2023-09-01",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":47,"_32":48,"_34":43},"2023-11-04","2023-11-17",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":48,"_32":50,"_34":43},"2023-11-24",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":52,"_32":53,"_34":43},"2023-12-01","2023-12-04",{"_28":55,"_30":37,"_38":53,"_32":56,"_34":43},"FRESH MOTION HEARING","2023-12-15",{"_28":58,"_30":37,"_38":59,"_32":60,"_34":43},"SUPPLEMENTARY LIST","2023-12-23","2023-12-29",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":60,"_32":62,"_34":43},"2024-01-05",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":62,"_32":64,"_34":43},"2024-01-12",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":66,"_32":67,"_34":43},"2024-02-16","2024-02-23",{"_28":58,"_30":37,"_38":67,"_32":69,"_34":43},"2024-03-15",{"_28":58,"_30":37,"_38":69,"_32":71,"_34":43},"2024-03-22",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":71,"_32":73,"_34":43},"2024-04-12",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":75,"_32":76,"_34":43},"2024-05-03","2024-07-05",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":76,"_32":78,"_34":43},"2024-08-02",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":78,"_32":80,"_34":43},"2024-08-30",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":80,"_32":82,"_34":43},"2024-09-20",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":82,"_32":84,"_34":43},"2024-11-15",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":84,"_32":86,"_34":43},"2024-11-29",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":86,"_32":88,"_34":43},"2025-02-04",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":90,"_32":91,"_34":43},"2024-12-04","2024-12-13",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":91,"_32":93,"_34":43},"2024-12-20",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":93,"_32":95,"_34":43},"2025-01-03",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":95,"_32":97,"_34":43},"2025-01-31",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":99,"_32":100,"_34":43},"2025-02-07","2025-02-21",{"_28":16,"_30":37,"_38":102,"_34":43},"2025-02-28","filedDocuments",[],"judgeCode",[107],"1043","subordinateCourt",{},"linkCases",[],"benchName","Single Bench","purpose","FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT","interimOrders",[118,124,127,129,131,133,135,137,139,141,143,145,147,149,151,153,155,157,159,161,163,165],{"_119":33,"_120":121,"_122":123},"orderDate","description","View Court Proceedings","orderUrl","order-1.pdf",{"_119":33,"_120":125,"_122":126},"View Spl Cell Orders","order-2.pdf",{"_119":42,"_120":121,"_122":128},"order-3.pdf",{"_119":47,"_120":121,"_122":130},"order-4.pdf",{"_119":48,"_120":121,"_122":132},"order-5.pdf",{"_119":52,"_120":121,"_122":134},"order-6.pdf",{"_119":53,"_120":121,"_122":136},"order-7.pdf",{"_119":59,"_120":121,"_122":138},"order-8.pdf",{"_119":62,"_120":121,"_122":140},"order-9.pdf",{"_119":67,"_120":121,"_122":142},"order-10.pdf",{"_119":71,"_120":121,"_122":144},"order-11.pdf",{"_119":75,"_120":121,"_122":146},"order-12.pdf",{"_119":78,"_120":121,"_122":148},"order-13.pdf",{"_119":80,"_120":121,"_122":150},"order-14.pdf",{"_119":82,"_120":121,"_122":152},"order-15.pdf",{"_119":84,"_120":121,"_122":154},"order-16.pdf",{"_119":86,"_120":121,"_122":156},"order-17.pdf",{"_119":90,"_120":121,"_122":158},"order-18.pdf",{"_119":91,"_120":121,"_122":160},"order-19.pdf",{"_119":93,"_120":121,"_122":162},"order-20.pdf",{"_119":95,"_120":121,"_122":164},"order-21.pdf",{"_119":99,"_120":121,"_122":166},"order-22.pdf","cnr","APHC010318792023","cnrCourtCode","APHC01","courtCode","cnrCaseNumber","031879","cnrYear","2023","caseType","ABA","caseStatus","DISMISSED","filingNumber","25828/2023","filingDate","2023-07-05","registrationNumber","35/2023","registrationDate","2023-07-06","nextHearingDate","decisionDate","judges",[37],"petitioners",[194],"Ms.gr Constructions","petitionerAdvocates",[197],"K B RAMANNA DORA","respondents",[200],"The State of Andhra Pradesh","respondentAdvocates",[203],"GP FOR ARBITRATION","actsAndSections","05-ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT - 11(5)","taggedMatters",[],"earlierCourtDetails",[],"interlocutoryApplications",[],"listingDates",[],"notices",[],"judgmentOrders",[218,222],{"_119":39,"_219":220,"_122":221},"orderType","Final Order","order-23.pdf",{"_119":39,"_219":220,"_122":223},"order-24.pdf","caveatDetails",[],"entityInfo",{"_167":168,"_228":229,"_230":229,"_231":232,"_233":234},"nextDateOfHearing","2025-03-21T00:00:00Z","lastDateOfHearing","dateCreated","2025-07-03T17:32:11.940257Z","dateModified","2025-08-23T06:43:51.640272Z","files",{"_235":237},[238,246,250,254,258,262,266,270,274,278,282,286,290,294,298,302,306,310,314,318,322,326,330,334],{"_239":240,"_241":242,"_243":244,"_245":-5},"pdfFile","APHC010318792023-order-1.pdf","markdownFile","APHC010318792023-order-1.md","markdownContent","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE: Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDINGS SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 01. | 21.07.2023 | Notice.
Learned counsel for the applicant
is permitted
to take out personal notice to
the respondents by
Registered post with acknowledgement due and file
proof of service into the registry.
Post after four (04) weeks. | |\r\n| | | A.V.SESHA
SAI, ACJ | |\r\n| | | VTS | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |","aiAnalysis",{"_239":247,"_241":248,"_243":249,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-10.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-10.md","APHC010318792023\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)\r\n\r\n#### IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)\r\n\r\nFRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n#### PRESENT\r\n\r\n# HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR\r\n\r\n## ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 OF 2023\r\n\r\nBetween:\r\n\r\nMS.GR CONSTRUCTIONS ...APPLICANT(S)\r\n\r\nAND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)\r\n\r\nCounsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. K B RAMANNA DORA\r\n\r\nCounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ARBITRATION\r\n\r\n## The Court made the following:\r\n\r\nAwait appearance of learned counsel for the applicant.\r\n\r\nList on 15.03.2024.\r\n\r\n# DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ\r\n\r\nDNV",{"_239":251,"_241":252,"_243":253,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-11.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-11.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-64 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35/2023**\r\n\r\nMs.gr Constructions ...APPLICANT\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nSri Challa Srinivas, learned counsel for Sri K. B. Ramanna Dora, Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s)\r\n\r\nGP for Arbitration, Advocate(s) for Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n### **DATE : 22nd March 2024**\r\n\r\n# **P.C :**\r\n\r\nAdjourned at the request of Sri Challa Srinivas, learned counsel, due to the non-availability of Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the petitioner.\r\n\r\nList on 12.04.2024.\r\n\r\n# **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\n**AMD**",{"_239":255,"_241":256,"_243":257,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-12.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-12.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No. Arbitration Application. No.35 of 2023**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|-----------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| | 03.05.2024 | Due
to
paucity
of
time,
the
matter
is
adjourned. | |\r\n| | | List on
05.07.2024. | |\r\n| | | DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | AKN | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_239":259,"_241":260,"_243":261,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-13.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-13.md","**APHC010318792023**\r\n\r\n## **IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)\r\n\r\n### **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\n...Applicant\r\n\r\nMs.gr Constructions\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nK B RAMANNA DORA, Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s)\r\n\r\nGP FOR ARBITRATION, Advocate(s) for Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n#### **DATE : 2nd August 2024**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nAdjourned at the request of learned counsel for the applicant.\r\n\r\nList on 30.08.2024.\r\n\r\n## **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\nakn",{"_239":263,"_241":264,"_243":265,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-14.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-14.md","**APHC010318792023**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)\r\n\r\n## **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs. GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nK B RAMANNA DORA, Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s)\r\n\r\nGP FOR ARBITRATION, Advocate(s) for Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n## **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n## **DATE : 30th August 2024**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for the parties seeks time to take instructions in the matter.\r\n\r\nList on 20.09.2024.\r\n\r\n**DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\n**AMD**",{"_239":267,"_241":268,"_243":269,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-15.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-15.md","**APHC010318792023**\r\n\r\n### **IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)\r\n\r\n### **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\n...Applicant\r\n\r\nMs.GR Constructions\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nMr. Challa Srinivas, Counsel, for Mr.K B Ramanna Dora, Advocate(s) for Petitioner(s)\r\n\r\nNone for the respondents.\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n#### **DATE : 20th September 2024**\r\n\r\n# **P C :**\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to obtain instructions in the matter.\r\n\r\nList on 15.11.2024.\r\n\r\n**DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\nakn",{"_239":271,"_241":272,"_243":273,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-16.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-16.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-38 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs.gr Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Applicant: Mr. K B Ramanna Dora\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Respondent: Mr. T. S. Rayalu - GP for Arbitration\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n**DATE : 15th November, 2024.**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nAdjourned at the request of learned counsel for the respondents.\r\n\r\nList on 29.11.2024.\r\n\r\n## **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.**\r\n\r\nSSN",{"_239":275,"_241":276,"_243":277,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-17.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-17.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-50 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs.gr Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Applicant: K B RAMANNA DORA\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Respondent: GP FOR ARBITRATION\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n### **DATE : 29th November 2024**\r\n\r\n# **P C :**\r\n\r\nDue to paucity of time, the matter is adjourned.\r\n\r\nList on 04.12.2024.\r\n\r\n# **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\nakn",{"_239":279,"_241":280,"_243":281,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-18.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-18.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-61 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs.gr Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Applicant: K B RAMANNA DORA\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Respondent: GP FOR ARBITRATION\r\n\r\n## **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n## **DATE : 4th December 2024**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to go through papers.\r\n\r\nList on 13.12.2024.\r\n\r\n**DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\nakn",{"_239":283,"_241":284,"_243":285,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-19.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-19.md","### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-57 [3441]**\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs. GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\n| Advocate for Applicant | : | Sri Challa Srinivas, learned counsel |\r\n|-------------------------|---|--------------------------------------------|\r\n| | | representing Sri K.
B.
Ramanna Dora. |\r\n| Advocate for Respondent | : | Learned G.P. for Arbitration |\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n# **DATE : 13th December 2024**\r\n\r\n# **P C :**\r\n\r\nAdjournment is sought on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, who is not present on account of personal difficulty.\r\n\r\nAdjourned.\r\n\r\nList on 20.12.2024.\r\n\r\n# **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ**\r\n\r\n**AMD**",{"_239":287,"_241":288,"_243":289,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-2.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-2.md","## (SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAMATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE\r\n\r\n:PRESENT:\r\n\r\nTHE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI A. V. SES\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 OF 2023**\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\nMs.GR Constructions, Rep by its Prop: K.Gangadhara Rao Plot No.104, MIG-II/A, Opp. Coromandel Gate, Sriharipuram Visakhapatnam – 530011\r\n\r\n### **AND**\r\n\r\n- 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Engineer-in-Chief (R&B) Admn and State Roads, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, AP.\r\n- 2. The Project Manager and Chief Engineer, APDRP, PIU (R&B) Government of \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ Andhra Pradesh D No.50-1 -258/A, Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam -530013. $\\angle$\r\n- 3 The Project Director, PMU, APDRP, Revenue (DM) Department Government of Andhra Pradesh Genius JR Towers, Kunchanapalli Tadepalli, Guntur District.\r\n\r\n## ...Respondents\r\n\r\n...Applicant\r\n\r\nWHEREAS the Applicant above named through its Advocate Sri K B Ramanna Dora presented this Application filed under Section 11 (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying that in the circumstances stated in the -affidavit filed in support of the application, the High Court may be pleased to appoint Sole Arbitrator preferably a Retired High-Court Judge for adjudicating the disputes and the counter disputes arising out of and in relation to the Contract Agreement No. 05/APDRP/R&B/E.G/2016-17 dated.24.03.2017.\r\n\r\nAND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K B Ramanna Dora Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this ARBITRATION APPLICATION should not be admitted.\r\n\r\n## You viz:\r\n\r\n- The Engineer-in-Chief (R&B), Admn and State Roads, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijavawada, AP.\r\n- 2. The Project Manager and Chief Engineer, APDRP, PIU (R&B) Government of Andhra Pradesh D No.50-1 -258/A, Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam -530013.\r\n- 3, The Project Director, PMU, APDRP, Revenue (DM) Department Government of Andhra Pradesh Genius JR Towers, Kunchanapalli Tadepalli, Guntur District.\r\n\r\nare be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the Application and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this ARBITRATION APPLICATION should not be admitted, on or before 18.08.2028, on which date the case stands posted for hearing.\r\n\r\n## The Court made the following\r\n\r\nORDER:\r\n\r\n-+.-----,--\\_>>\\\r\n\r\nf'Notice. ,\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for the applicant iS Permitted tO take Out Personal ,I notice to the respondents by Registered pcet~with acknowledgement due and file proof of service into the registry. ,.\r\n\r\npost after four (o4) weeks,\",~ sd/\\_ p. VENKATA RAMANA\r\n\r\n# 7fo:foG ISTRAR JOINT /fo\r\n\r\n# SECTION OFFICER /ITRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nTo]\r\n\r\n- rf. The Engineer-in-Chief (R&BrAdmn and State Roads, lbrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, AP.\r\n- # TGhoevePrrno#eec: tMoi nAangdehrraa nPdraCdh::fh EDn givi: :5eOr: 1A\\_P2g8R/a I, 3 :uet(hRa&mB+ a d h a ra Visakhapatnam -530013.\r\n- grthe project Director, PMU, APDRprfRevenue (DM) Department ~ Government of Andhra Pradesh Genius JR Towers, Kunchanapall'I Tadepalli, Guntur District.(Addressee-nos.1 to 3 by RPAD-along with a copy of petition and affidavit)\r\n\r\n4. One CC to SRl. K B Ramanna Dora, Advocate [OPUC]\r\n\r\n5. Onespare copy\r\n\r\nCVSS\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathcal{I}}\\subseteq \\mathcal{M}_{\\mathcal{I}}\\backslash \\mathcal{L}_{\\mathcal{I}}$ \r\n\r\n**ACJ** \r\n\r\nDATED:21/07/2023\r\n\r\nPOST ON 18.08.2023.\r\n\r\nNOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION\r\n\r\nARBAPPL.No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_6.jpeg)",{"_239":291,"_241":292,"_243":293,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-20.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-20.md","## **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-64 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n## **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs.GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s)\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\n| Advocate for Applicant: | Mr. Challa Srininvas appearing vice
Mr. K.
B.
Ramanna Dora |\r\n|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|\r\n| Advocate for Respondent: | GP FOR ARBITRATION |\r\n\r\n## **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n**DATE : 20th December, 2024.**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for the petitioner to place on record any document, which would show that arbitration clause has been invoked for purposes of maintaining the present petition.\r\n\r\nList on 03.01.2025.\r\n\r\n**DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.**\r\n\r\nSSN",{"_239":295,"_241":296,"_243":297,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-21.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-21.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-56 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs. GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Applicant: Mr. K. B. Ramanna Dora\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Respondent: GP for Arbitration\r\n\r\n## **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n#### **DATE : 3 rd January, 2025.**\r\n\r\n### **P C :**\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to comply with the previous order.\r\n\r\nList on 31.01.2025.\r\n\r\n**DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.**\r\n\r\nSSN",{"_239":299,"_241":300,"_243":301,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-22.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-22.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-8 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nMs.GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\n| Advocate for Applicant: | Mr. Challa Srinivas appearing vice
Mr. K.
B.
Ramanna Dora |\r\n|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|\r\n| Advocate for Respondent: | GP for Arbitration |\r\n\r\n# **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n### **DATE : 7 th February, 2025.**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nAdjourned at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner.\r\n\r\nList on 21.02.2025.\r\n\r\n## **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.**\r\n\r\nSSN",{"_239":303,"_241":304,"_243":305,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-23.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-23.md","#### **APHC010318792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-25 [3441]**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_2.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023**\r\n\r\nM/s. GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents\r\n\r\n**\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\***\r\n\r\n| Advocate for Applicant: | Mr. ChallaSrinivas appearing vice
Mr. K. B. Ramanna Dora |\r\n|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|\r\n| Advocate for Respondents: | GP for Arbitration |\r\n\r\n## **CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR**\r\n\r\n**DATE : 21st March, 2025.**\r\n\r\n## **P C :**\r\n\r\nThis is an application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (for short, \"the Act of 1996\") seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes arising out of and in connection with Agreement, dated 24.03.2017.\r\n\r\n2. It is stated that since disputes have arisen between the parties, the same have to be adjudicated in terms of GCC Clause 25.3, which reads as under:\r\n\r\n### *\"4. ARBITRATION (GCC Clause 25.3)*\r\n\r\n*The procedure for arbitration will be as follows: 25.3 (a) …*\r\n\r\n- (b) ...\r\n- $(c)$ ...\r\n\r\n(d) Arbitration proceedings shall be held at Hyderabad. India, and the language of the arbitration proceedings and that of all documents and communications between the parties shall be English.\r\n\r\n- $(e)$ ...\r\n- $(f)$ ...\r\n- $(g)$ ...\"\r\n\r\n $3.$ Although, no objection has been taken with regard to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the present application, yet, considering the language of Clause 25.3 (d), which specifically envisages the \"arbitration proceedings\" to be held at Hyderabad, I am of the opinion that this Court would have no jurisdiction, considering the view already taken in the case of **M/s. V.V.R.** \r\n\r\nAssociates vs. M/s. Larsen & Tourbo Limited, Infrastructure IC¹.\r\n\r\n $\\mathbf{4}$ Reliance, in the aforementioned judgment, was placed on the Apex Court judgment in **Brahmani River Pellets Limited vs. Kamachi Industries Limited²** as also the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of **BGS** SGS Soma JV v. NHPC Limited³.\r\n\r\nIn **Brahmani River Pellets Limited** (supra), the Apex Court held:\r\n\r\n $18$ Where the contract specifies the jurisdiction of the court at a particular place, only such court will have the jurisdiction to deal with the matter and parties intended to exclude all other courts. In the present case, the parties have agreed that the \"venue\" of arbitration shall be at Bhubaneswar. Considering the agreement of the parties having\r\n\r\n^<sup>1ARBAPPL No.11 of 2021, decided on 02.08.2024.\r\n\r\n $^{2}$ (2020) 5 SCC 462\r\n\r\n $^{3}$ (2020) 4 SCC 234\r\n\r\n*Bhubaneswar as the venue of arbitration, the intention of the parties is to exclude all other courts. As held in Swastik[(2013) 9 SCC 32], non-use of words like \"exclusive jurisdiction\", \"only\", \"exclusive\", \"alone\" is not decisive and does not make any material difference.\"*\r\n\r\nIn **BGS SGS Soma JV**(supra), it was held:\r\n\r\n*\"82. On a conspectus of the aforesaid judgments, it may be concluded that whenever there is the designation of a place of arbitration in an arbitration clause as being the \"venue\" of the arbitration proceedings, the expression \"arbitration proceedings\" would make it clear that the \"venue\" is really the \"seat\" of the arbitral proceedings, as the aforesaid expression does not include just one or more individual or particular hearing, but the arbitration proceedings as a whole, including the making of an award at that place. This language has to be contrasted with language such as \"tribunals are to meet or have witnesses, experts or the parties\" where only hearings are to take place in the \"venue\", which may lead to the conclusion, other things being equal, that the venue so stated is not the \"seat\" of arbitral proceedings, but only a convenient place of meeting. Further, the fact that the arbitral proceedings \"shall be held\" at a particular venue would also indicate that the parties intended to anchor arbitral proceedings to a particular place, signifying thereby, that that place is the seat of the arbitral proceedings. This, coupled with there being no other significant contrary indicia that the stated venue is merely a \"venue\" and not the \"seat\" of the arbitral proceedings, would then conclusively show that such a clause designates a \"seat\" of the arbitral proceedings….\"*\r\n\r\n5. In the backdrop of the aforementioned settled legal position, it can be seen that the parties had clearly agreed that the \"arbitration proceedings\" would be held at Hyderabad, which would make Hyderabad the \"seat\" of arbitral proceedings, more so, when there was nothing in the agreement which would suggest, to the contrary, that Hyderabad was merely a venue and not the seat of arbitral proceedings.\r\n\r\n6. Considering the view already taken by this Court in **M/s. V.V.R. Associates (supra)**and following the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases supra, the present application is held to be not maintainable on the ground of jurisdiction and is, accordingly, dismissed. The applicant is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum having jurisdiction.\r\n\r\nNo order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.\r\n\r\n#### **DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.**\r\n\r\nSSN",{"_239":307,"_241":308,"_243":309,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-24.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-24.md","### IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n### FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE\r\n\r\n### PRESENT\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)\r\n\r\n#### HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE\r\n\r\n### ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\nr\r\n\r\nMs. GR Constructions, Rep by its Prop. K.Gangadhara Rao, Plot No. 104, MIG-II/A, 0pp. Coromandel Gate, Sriharipuram, Visakhapatnam - 530011.\r\n\r\n...Applicant\r\n\r\n### AND\r\n\r\n- 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Engineer-in-Chief (R & B), Admn and State Roads, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, AP.\r\n- 2. The Project Manager and Chief Engineer, APDRP, PIU (R & B) Government of Andhra Pradesh, D.No.50-1-258/A, Seethammadhara^ Visakhapatnam -530013.\r\n- 3. The Project Director, PMU, APDRP, Revenue (DM) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Genius JR Towers, Kunchanapalli, Tadepalli, Guntur District.\r\n\r\n#### ...Respondents\r\n\r\nApplication under Section ¹¹ (5) & (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 R/w para (3)(i)(c) of scheme for Appointment of Arbitrators, 2006 to appoint Sole Arbitrator preferably ^a Retired High Court\r\n\r\nJuclge',for adjudicating the disputes and the counter disputes arising out of ■f \\*'■ and in relation to the Contract Agreement No. 05/APDRP/R&B/E.G/2016-17 dated 24.03.2017.\r\n\r\nCounsel for the Petitioner : Sri Challa Srinivas, representing on behalf of Sri K B Ramanna Dora\r\n\r\nCounsel for the Respondents: GP for Arbitration\r\n\r\nThe Court made the following:\r\n\r\nr\r\n\r\nf\r\n\r\nr\r\n\r\n#### APHC010318792023 Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ^r AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\nSr.Noi-Tv' [3441]\r\n\r\n### ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023\r\n\r\nM/s. GR Constructions ...Applicant\r\n\r\nVs.\r\n\r\nThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents\r\n\r\n\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Applicant: Mr. ChallaSrinivas appearing vice Mr. K. B. Ramanna Dora\r\n\r\nAdvocate for Respondents: GP for Arbitration\r\n\r\n### CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR\r\n\r\nDATE :\r\n\r\n### PC :\r\n\r\nThis is an application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (for short, \"the Act of 1996\") seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes arising out of and in connection with Agreement, dated 24.03.2017.\r\n\r\n2. It is stated that since disputes have arisen between the parties, the same have to be adjudicated in terms of GCC Clause 25.3, which reads as under:\r\n\r\n#### '4. ARBITRATION (GCC Clause 25.3)\r\n\r\nThe procedure for arbitration will be as follows: 25.3(a) ...\r\n\r\n(b) ...\r\n\r\n(C) ...\r\n\r\n(d) Arbitration proceedings shall be held at Hyderabad, India, and the language of the arbitration proceedings and that of all documents and communications between the parties shall be English.\r\n\r\n- (e) ...\r\n- (f)...\r\n- (9)\r\n\r\n3. Although, no objection has been taken with regard to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the present application, yet, considering the language of Clause 25.3 (d), which specifically envisages the \"arbitration proceedings\" to be held at Hyderabad, ^I am of the opinion that this Court would have jurisdiction, considering the view already taken in the case of M/s. V.V.R. Associates vs. M/s. Larsen & Tourbo Limited, Infrastructure IC\\ no\r\n\r\n4. Reliance, in the aforementioned judgment, was placed on the Apex Court judgment in Brahmani River Pellets Limited vs. Kamachi Industries Limited^ as also the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of BGS SGS Soma JV v. NHPC Limited^.\r\n\r\nIn Brahmani River Pellets Limited (supra), the Apex Court held:\r\n\r\nWhere the contract specifies the jurisdiction of the court at a particular place, only such court will have the jurisdiction to deal with the matter and parties intended to exclude all other courts. In the present case, the parties have agreed that the \"venue\" of arbitration shall be at Bhubaneswar. Considering the agreement of the parties having 18.\r\n\r\n^{^}ARBAPPL No.11 of 2021, decided on 02.08.2024. ^(2020) 5 see 462 ^2020) 4 see 234\r\n\r\nBhubaneswar as the venue of arbitration, the intention of the parties is to exclude all other courts. As held in Swastik[(2013) ⁹ SCC 32], non-use of words like \"exclusive jurisdiction\", \"only\", \"exclusive\", \"alone\" is not decisive and does not make any material difference. \"\r\n\r\n#### In BGS SGS Soma JV(supra), it was held;\r\n\r\n''82. On ^a conspectus of the aforesaid judgments, it may be concluded that whenever there Is the designation of a place of arbitration in an arbitration clause as being the \"venue\" of the arbitration proceedings, the expression \"arbitration proceedings\" would make it clear that the \"venue\" is really the \"seat\" of the arbitral proceedings, as the aforesaid expression does not include just one or more individual or particular hearing, but the arbitration proceedings as a whole, including the making of an award at that place. This language has to be contrasted with language such as \"tribunals are to meet or have witnesses, experts or the parties\" where only hearings are to take place in the \"venue\", which may lead to the conclusion, other things being equal, that the venue so stated is not the \"seat\" of arbitral proceedings, but only a convenient place of meeting. Further, the fact that the arbitral proceedings \"shall be held\" at ^a particular venue would also indicate that the parties intended to anchor arbitral proceedings to a particular place, signifying thereby, that that place Is the seat of the arbitral proceedings. This, coupled with there being no other significant contrary indicia that the stated venue is merely a \"venue\" and not the \"seat\" of the arbitral proceedings, would then conclusively show that such ^a clause designates a \"seat\" of the arbitral proceedings....\"\r\n\r\nIn the backdrop of the aforementioned settled legal position, it can be seen that the parties had clearly agreed that the \"arbitration proceedings\" would be held at Hyderabad, which would make Hyderabad the \"seat\" of arbitral proceedings, more so, when there was nothing in the agreement which 5.\r\n\r\n3\r\n\r\nSd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY\r\n\r\nwould suggest, to the contrary, that Hyderabad was merely a venue and not the seat of arbitral proceedings.\r\n\r\n4\r\n\r\n6. Considering the view already taken by this Court in M/s. V.V.R. Associates (supra)and following the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases supra, the present application is held to be not maintainable on the ground of jurisdiction and is, accordingly, dismissed. The applicant is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum having jurisdiction.\r\n\r\nNo order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.\r\n\r\n# JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nTo SECTION OFFICER\r\n\r\n- 1. The Engineer-in-Chief (R & B), State of Andhra State Roads, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, AP. Pradesh, Admn and\r\n- 2. The Project Manager and Chief Engineer Government of Andhra Pradesh, D.No.50-1-258/A Visakhapatnam -530013. APDRP, PIU (R & B) Seethammadhara\r\n- 3. The Project Director, PMU APDRP, Revenue (DM) Department^ Government of Andhra Pradesh, Genius JR Towers Kunchanapalli, Tadepalli, Guntur District.\r\n- 4. One CC to Sri K B Ramanna Dora, Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 5. Two CCs to GP for Arbitration, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n- 6. Three CD Copies\r\n\r\nTK sree\r\n\r\n# HIGH COURT\r\n\r\n### DATED:21/03/2025\r\n\r\n# ORDER\r\n\r\n## ARBAPPL.No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n![](_page_6_Picture_4.jpeg)\r\n\r\n-X\r\n\r\n## DISMISSING THE ARBITRATION APPLICATION",{"_239":311,"_241":312,"_243":313,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-3.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-3.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No. Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n| S1.
$\\mathbf{No}$ | $\\operatorname{DATE}$ | ORDER | OFFICE
$\\operatorname{NOTE}$ |\r\n|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|\r\n| 02. | 18.08.2023 | | |\r\n| | | Government Pleader for Arbitration
causes | |\r\n| | | appearance on behalf of the respondents. | |\r\n| | | Registry to reflect the name of Government | |\r\n| | | Pleader for Arbitration in the cause list. | |\r\n| | | List on 08.09.2023. | |\r\n| | | Response be filed in the meantime. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | Vjl | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET",{"_239":315,"_241":316,"_243":317,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-4.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-4.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE: Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDINGS SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE |\r\n|-----|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|\r\n| No. | | | NOTE |\r\n| 03. | 04.11.2023 | Learned
Government
Pleader
for
Arbitration | |\r\n| | | prays for and is granted two weeks time for filing | |\r\n| | | response. | |\r\n| | | List on 17.11.2023. | |\r\n| | | DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | SSN | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_239":319,"_241":320,"_243":321,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-5.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-5.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No. Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|-----------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 04. | 17.11.2023 | Sri K. B. Ramanna Dora, learned counsel
appears for the applicant.
Adjourned at the request made by learned
Government Pleader for Arbitration for filing
response.
List on 24.11.2023.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | AKN | |",{"_239":323,"_241":324,"_243":325,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-6.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-6.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No. Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n## Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 5. 01.12.2023 None appears. List on 04.12.2023. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ AKN\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET",{"_239":327,"_241":328,"_243":329,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-7.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-7.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No. Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDINGS SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.
$\\mathop{\\mathrm{No}}\\nolimits$ | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|----------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 06. | 04.12.2023 | Adjourned
the
$\\quad\\text{at}\\quad$
request
$\\quad\\text{ of }\\quad$
Mr.
V.Ch.Naidu, learned counsel representing Mr.
K.B. Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the
applicant, due to non availability of the arguing
counsel on account of his personal difficulty.
List on $15.12.2023$ . | |\r\n| | | DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | Vjl | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_239":331,"_241":332,"_243":333,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-8.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-8.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE Nos.: Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|-----------|------------|-------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 07. | 23.12.2023 | None for the parties. | |\r\n| | | List on 29.12.2023. | |\r\n| | | DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | kbs | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n\r\n![](_page_1_Picture_0.jpeg)",{"_239":335,"_241":336,"_243":337,"_245":-5},"APHC010318792023-order-9.pdf","APHC010318792023-order-9.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE: Arbitration Application No.35 of 2023\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDINGS SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| | | | |\r\n| 08. | 05.01.2024 | Adjourned
at
the
request
of
Mr.
Sambangi
Mallikharjuna Rao, learned counsel appearing
vice
Mr. K. B. Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the | |\r\n| | | petitioner. | |\r\n| | | List on 12.01.2024. | |\r\n| | | DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ | |\r\n| | | SSN | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |","descriptions",{"_340":341,"_344":345},"enumFields",[176,178,171,23,342,343],"caseCategory","benchType","enumLookup",{"_176":346,"_178":348,"_171":350,"_23":352,"_342":354,"_343":355},{"_177":347},"Anticipatory Bail Application",{"_179":349},"Dismissed",{"_170":351},"High Court of Andhra Pradesh",{"_24":353},"Unknown Section",{},{},"caseAiAnalysis","order","order-13","actionData","errors"]

Ms.Gr Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

AI Summary

Order Issued After Hearing

Original Order Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO: 35 of 2023

CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR

DATE : 2nd August 2024

P C :

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ

Share This Order

Order(23) - 21 Mar 2025

Order(24) - 21 Mar 2025

Order(22) - 7 Feb 2025

Order(21) - 3 Jan 2025

Order(20) - 20 Dec 2024

Order(19) - 13 Dec 2024

Order(18) - 4 Dec 2024

Order(17) - 29 Nov 2024

Order(16) - 15 Nov 2024

Order(15) - 20 Sept 2024

Order(14) - 30 Aug 2024

Order(13) - 2 Aug 2024

Order(12) - 3 May 2024

Order(11) - 22 Mar 2024

Order(10) - 23 Feb 2024

Order(9) - 5 Jan 2024

Order(8) - 23 Dec 2023

Order(7) - 4 Dec 2023

Order(6) - 1 Dec 2023

Order(5) - 17 Nov 2023

Order(4) - 4 Nov 2023

Order(3) - 18 Aug 2023

Order(1) - 21 Jul 2023

Order(2) - 21 Jul 2023

Same Parties

Lawyers

Judges

Acts & Sections

Search in District Courts Data