Dr M Naveen Kumar vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Animal Husbandary)
Before:
Hon'ble D Ramesh
Listed On:
6 Jul 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 16112 OF 2023
Between:
-
- Dr M Naveen Kumar, S/o M. Konda Reddy, aged about years, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, ISDP Kadapa, YSR District.
-
- Dr. M. Sundara Singh, S/o M. Emmanyelu, aged about years, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Pig Breeding Station, Gopanna Palem, Eluru District (Both are working as Veterinary Assistant Surgeons in Animal husbandry Department Under Govt. of AP)
...Petitioners
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries (AH. I) A.P Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Director of Animal Husbandry Department, Vijayawada, A.P.
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Joint Director of Animal Husbandry Kadapa, YSR District.
... Respondents
WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through their Advocate SRI KALEEMULLA SYED presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, or a direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not fixing the seniority of the service of the petitioners from the date of completion of appointment of candidates selected in notification dated.25.01.2012 in terms of the rule 33 of A.P Subordinate Service rule 1996 and the Honourable A.P High Court Order in P. Muralidhar and Ors. vs Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission decided on 27.12.2004 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional,
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KALEEMULLA SYED Advocate for the Petitioners, GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted.
You viz:
- The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Andhra Pradesh, Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries (AH. I) A.P Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh
${ \psi_i }{i=1}^n$ $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{M}1, \mathcal{A})$ $\sim \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \right)$ $\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}$
-
- The Director of Animal Husbandry Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, A.P.
-
- The Joint Director of Animal Husbandry, State ofAndhra Pradesh, Kadapa, YSR District.
I
are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the Circumstances Set Out in the Petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT I PETITION should not be admitted, within four (4) weeks
The Court made the following: ORDER
Notice before admission.
Post after four (4) weeks. a-
Sd/-B.CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/
`/ITRUE COPY//
--. . \ |f__
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
-
- The Principal Secretary to Government, State ofAndhra Pradesh, Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries (AH. I) A.P Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh
-
- The Director of Animal Husbandry Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, A.P.
-
- The Joint Director ofAnimaI Hu`sbandry, State ofAndhra Pradesh, Kadapa, YSR District (Addressees 1 to 3 by RPAD-along with a copy of petition and Affidavit)
-
- One CC to SRl. KALEEMULLA SYED Advocate [OPUC]
-I+. ,.
-
- Two CCs to GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- One spare copy
PSR
$\mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) = \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(t) + \mathcal{L}_{\text{max$
$\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L$
$\label{eq:1} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) & = \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}(x) + \mathcal{L}{\text{max}}($
HIGH COURT
DR,J
DATED:06/07/2023
NOTE.I POST AFTER FOUR (4) WEEKS
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
WP.No.16112 of 2023