IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION Nos: 22180, 21579, 21585, 21587, 21588, 21589, 21591, 21597, 21604, 21606, 21609, 21677, 21697, 21699, 22972 of 2022; 28896 16862, 18832, 8768 and 13311 of 2021; 24419, 23863, 4976 of 2020

WRIT PETITION No: 22180 of 2022

Between:

G. Anjaneyulu, S/o. G. Venkata Ramana, Aged about 57 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyandurgam, Ananthapuram district, R/o. D.No. 10-1-6/37-1, NTR Colony, Raidurgam, Ananthapuramu District - 515 865.

1. K. Babaiah, S/o. Nalla Peddanna, years, Occ: Technical Assistant, aged about 55 O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyandurgam, Ananthapuram district R/o. 3/96/1, Mucchirami Dharmavaram, Mucchurami, Ananthapur, A.P. 515672.
1. D. Muniswamy, S/o. Late Devaraju, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, M.F.T.U, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District, R/o. D.No. 1-659, Gutti Taluq, Ananthapuram -515 401.
1. A.Ravindra Babu, S/o. Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, R/o. D.No. 15-47, Sai Nagar, Madakasira, Ananthapuram, Andhra Pradesh 515 301.
1. N. Chalapathi Naidu, S/o. Narasimha Naidu, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Asst. O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu district, R/o. D.No. 15-216-C, Main Road, Kuttagala, Kedari Taluq, Ananthapur -515 541.
1. D. Rasool, S/o. Musthafa, age: 59 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, Office of Assistant Director of Sericulture, LRSA, Gorantla, Sree Satya Sai District.

1. P. Uttanna, S/o. Ganganna, aged about 58 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, Office of Assistant Director of Sericulture, Hindupuram, Sree Satya Sai District.
1. Gaddam Anjaneyulu, S/o. Gaddam Ramayya, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Technical Asst. O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District, R/o. D.No. 28-7-11, Hamali Colony, Housing Board, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 515001.
1. Midathala Chandrasekhar, S/o. M. Mallappa, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. TSC, Kandurpi, Ananthapuramu district, R/o. H.No. 28-6-878, Hamali Colony, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District -515001.
10.M.P. Babaiah, S/o. Muthyalappa, Aged aboiut 55 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, R/o. H.No. 8-650-1, Marammapalli, 8th Ward, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapur District 515 761.
1. Kundala Subramanyam, S/o. K. Narayana, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Penukonda, Ananthapuramu District. $R/o. 6/47$ , Chenne Kothapalle, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh 515 101.
1. Shaik Maha Boob Peera, S/o. Late Vali Saheb, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District. $R/o.$ D,No, 5-278, B.C. Colony, Kothacheruvu, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh 515 133.
- 1. K. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o.Late Ramaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Hindupuram, Ananthapuramu District. $R/o. D.N. 5-3-191/1,$ DR Colony, Hindupur, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh - 515 201.

Nagasamudram Venkateswarlu,

S/o. Narayanappa, aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, Hindupuram, Ananthapuramu District. $R/o. 1-236-24,$ Vajralapeta, Penukonda Mandalam, Ananthapuramu District, A.P. 515.110.

S.Md. Akbar, S/o.Lal Ahamed, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Technical Assistant Occ: Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District. R/o. D.No. 28-1-594, Buddappa Nagar, Ananthapuram -515 001.

1. J.Amruthamall, D/o. Jinarajdas, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Assistant Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District 515001.
1. S.Shaheeda Banu, W/o. (Late) S. Basha, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu -515001.

B. Venkatesulu, S/o. B. Venkataswami Aged about 60 years, Occ:Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu, R/o. D.No. 1-103A, P. Yaleru, Atmakur, Ananhapuramu, 515 751. Ananthapuramu District.

1. S. Imam Saheb, S/o. Mabusab, Aged about 59 years: Occ: Technical Assistant, O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu district, R/o. D.No. 9-276-21, Masanam Peta, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu district.
1. G. Basava Raju, S/o. G. Narayanappa, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Technical Assistant O/o. Asst. Director of Sericulture, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu district, R/o. D.No. 1-52, Salakam Cheruvu, Singanamalai, Ananthapuramu district.
1. K. Parvathamma, W/o.D. Nagaraju, years, Occ: Technical Assistant Aged about 58 O/o. The Deputy Director of Sericulture, Hindupur, Satyasai district, R/o. D.No. 3-71, Mukkadipeta. Hindupur, Ananthapur district (presently Satyasai District).
1. T. Krishna Murthy, S/o. (late) Subbanna, Aged about Soyears, Occ: Technical Assistant O/o. The Director of Sericulture, APSSRD, Hindupuram, Ananthapur District (presently Satyasai district).
1. K.Ravindra Babu, S/o. (Late) Satyanarayana, Aged about Syears, Occ: Technical Assistant O/o. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Tadakalapalli, Madakasira Mandal, Ananthapuramu district (presently Satya sai district) R/o.D.No. 15/47, Sai Nagar, Madakasira, Ananthapuramu district (presently Satya sai district)

And

..Petitioners

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Guntur, Guntur District.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District.
1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Penukonda. Ananthapuramu District.
1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu District.
1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District.
1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Tadakalapalli, Madakasira Mandal, Ananthapuramu district (presently Satya sai district)

.. Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years/or before 25-11-1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularisation of petitioners service as held by the Honourable Supreme Court in civil appeal no. 6318/2015 dt. 17-08-2015 and also followed by the combined Honourable AP High Court in WP No. 33936/2011 and batch dt. 02-05-2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25-11-1993 as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in civil appeal no. 6318/2015 dt. 17-08-2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No. 33936/2011 and batch dt. 02-05-2018.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for retrospective regularisation from the date of completion of 5 years/ or before 25.11.1993 in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6318/2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble A.P. High Court in WP No. 33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No. 414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners; SRI K.SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - I

WRIT PETITION NO: 21579 OF 2022

Between:

1. D.Seethaiah, S/o Bangariah, aged about 58 years
1. Smt.N.Chandramma, W/o Gopal, aged about 59 years.
1. Smt.M.Damayanthi, W/o Sudharshan Rao, aged about 57 years.

$\mathcal{L}$

1. Smt.N.Lalithamma, W/o Poll Naidu, aged about 55 years
1. Smt.K.Malathi, D/o Kamalaiah, aged about 52 year.
1. Smt.K.Bhanumathi, W/o Kondal Rao, aged about 54 years.
1. Smt.K.Savitri, W/o Karanna, aged about 58 years.
1. Smt.M.Pentamma, W/o Appala Naidu, aged about 55 years.
1. Smt.T.Narsamma, M. Appa Rao, aged about 58 years.
1. Smt.U.Savithri, W/o Thirupathi Rao, aged about 56 years.
$11.$ Smt.D.Usha Rani, W/o Chakrapani, aged about 53 years.
$12.$ Smt.M.Subhadramma, W/o Kondal Rao, aged about 55 years.
$13$ D.Rama Rao, S/o Pentaiah, aged about 56 years.
$14.$ D.Simhachalam, S/o Polaiah, aged about 56 years.
$15$ D Laxmana Rao, S/o Bangaraiah, aged about 60 years.
G.Gopi, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 59 years. 16.
17 P.Guruvulu, S/o Chittaiah, aged about 59 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Vijayanagaram District, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

5 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 , dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021. dt. 27.8.2021 on

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition. in

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC r/w Rule 12 (2) of Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the respondent No.3 in the WP.No. 21579 of 2022 to file counter affidavit behalf of all the respondents in the writ petition. on

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21585 OF 207?

Between:

1. J.Venkata Reddy, S/o Narayan Reddy, aged about 60 years.
1. B.Rubenu, S/o Subbaiah, aged about 57 years.
1. K.Krishna Rao, S/o K.Purnachandra Rao, aged about 57 years.
1. P.Rama Mohana Rao, S/o Sambaiah, aged about 56 years.
1. M.Nagaseshulu, S/o Sowri, aged about 56 years.
1. N.Krishna, S/o Nageswar Rao, aged about 58 years.
1. A.Yacob, S/o Musalaiah, aged about 58 year.
1. Smt.Samrajyam, W/o Lutherpaul, aged about 57 years.
1. G.Nooka Raju, S/o Papaiah, aged about 54 years.
Smt.P.Rajamma, W/o Gurumurthy, aged about 59 10. years.
O.Jayaram, S/o Gangaiah, aged about 60 11. years.
V.Rajendraprasad, S/o Suryanarayana, aged about 54 12. years.

P.Kondaiah, S/o Nagaiah, aged about 57 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 grant

dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21587 OF 2022

Between:

1. J.Laxmi Narayana, S/o Ramanna, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt.S.Ramanamma, W/o Venkat Rao, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.P.Jeevarathnam, D/o Venkataswamy, aged about 60 years
1. Smt.K.Thirunadam, W/o Babu Rao, aged about 60 years.
1. Smt.A.Kalarani, W/o Ramchandra Rao, aged about 52 years.
1. Smt.K.Sarojini, W/o Appa Rao, aged about 54 years.
1. Smt.B.Venkatamma, W/o Dharma Rao, aged about 53 years.
1. Smt.N.Vijaya, W/o Varahalu, aged about 57 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh )

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, , Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 22.1.2021. in dt.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the as and writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21588 OF 7099

Between:

K. Gangaraju, S/o Pullaiah, aged about 53 years.
A. Raja Rao, S/o Krishna, aged about 59 years. (Both are working as Field Assistantfrech.Assistant under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in

WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

$14$

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21589 OF 2022

Between:

1. B Gopi, S/o Achu Babu, aged about 58 years.
1. M.Demudu, S/o Chinnaiah, aged about 59 years. (Both are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistant under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi', Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which on were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP

No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 22.1.2021. dt.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 before 25.11.1993 for the years on or purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal writ petition. of the

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -1

WRIT PETITION NO: 21591 OF 2022

Between:

1. K.Siva Nayak, S/o Laxmi Nayak, aged about 59 years.
1. A.Sreeramachandrudu, S/o Subbaraidu, aged about 61 years.
1. S.Panduranga Reddy, S/o Venkata Rangareddy, aged 55 yrs.
1. K.Pola Raju, S/o Pedda Raghavaiah, aged about 59 years.
1. T.Venkateswarlu, S/o Subba Rangaiah, aged about 57 years.
1. D.Satyanarayana, S/o Narsimhulu, aged about 57 years.
1. Y.S.V.Prasada Rao, S/o Venkatanarasimha Rao, aged about 57 yrs.
1. M.Hanumantha Rao, S/o Narayana, aged about 56 years.
1. I.Anji Reddy, S/o Nagi Reddy, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.G.Vijayanirmala Devi, W/o Guravaiah, aged about 54 years.
Smt.P.Asiyakhathun, S/o Sk.Iqbal Hussain, aged about 55 years. 11.
B.V.Sivaramaiah, S/o Chinna Ramaiah, aged about 53 years. 12.
B.Devaiah, S/o Kondaiah, aged about 59 years. 13.
D.Nemalaiah, S/o Peeraiah, aged about 58 years. 14.
D.Gurumurthy, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 60 years. 15.
Smt.M.Mariyamma, W/o Paul, aged about 58 years. 16.
Smt.S.Suryakumari, W/o Thirupathaiah, aged about 60 years. 17.
G.V.Subba Reddy, S/o Papi Reddy, aged about 55 years. 18.
A.Venkateswarlu, S/o Chennakesavulu, aged about 53 years. 19.
K.Papa Rao, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 60 years. 20.
P.K.Narsimha Rao, S/o Penchalaih, aged about 57 years. 21.
A.V.Ranga Reddy, S/o Ranga Reddy, aged about 60 years. 22.
D.Guru Murthy, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 56 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Prakasham District, Andhra Pradesh) 23.

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2.
The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur. 3.
The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapur district. 4.

...Respondents

years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders

passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21597 OF 2022

Between:

1. S Dharma Raju, S/o Soma Raju, aged about 59 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. T.Subramanyam, S/o P.Krishna Murthy, aged about 59 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. M.Musalaiah, S/o Bullappi, aged about 56 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. D.Venkata Ramana, S/o Ramaswamy, aged about 52 years, working Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh as
1. Smt.V.Lakshmi, W/o Paramasundar Rao, aged about 60 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. P.Venkat Rao, S/o Satyam, aged about 60 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. L.Veera Raju, S/o Nookaraju, aged about 58 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. Smt.B.V.L.Kumari, W/o Eliya, aged about 53 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. Smt.K.Jayalakshmi, W/o Venkateswar Rao, aged about 57 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. P.Mallu Dora, S/o Balu Dora, aged about 52 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
Smt.D.Ramalakshmi, W/o Vishnu Raju, aged about 57 years, $11.$ working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. Smt.N.Ganga Devi, W/o Chinna Rao, aged about 55 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
$13$ Smt.K.Ramana, W/o Nookaraju, aged about 55 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
$14.$ Smt.D.Parvathi, W/o Shivaram, aged about 58 year, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
Smt.P.Satyavathi, W/o Satyanarayana, aged about 56 years. 15. working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1. M.Venkatagiri, S/o Raja Bai, aged about 54 years, working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
Smt.S.Chandramma, W/o Gavarraju, aged about 58 years, 17. working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
M.Ramana, S/o George, aged about 53 years, working as Field 18. Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service may or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits Hon'ble Supreme on as held by the Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021. WA

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for years on or purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 •before 25.11.1993 for the

terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the . writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21604 OF 2022

Between:

1. T.Venkata Seshaiah, S/o Thiru Vengalaiah, aged about 56 yrs.
1. P.Nagaraju, S/o Gurumuthi, aged about 56 yrs.
1. S.Abdul Rawoof, S/o Mahabub Saheb, aged about 58 yrs.
1. Smt.E.Narayanamma, W/o Sanjanna, aged about 56 yrs.
1. K.Fathima, W/o Rajasekhar, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.P.Jayamma, W/o P.Rajasekhar, aged about 59 years.
1. K.Rajgopal, S/o Narayanappa, aged about 54 years.
1. P.Shankaraiah, S/o P.Ramaiah, aged about 55 yrs.
1. K.Shankar, S/o Pedda Eswaraiah . , aged about 60 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. Finance
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh; Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Anananthapur district.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court 'WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and • also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021. in

Ifk lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in . 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt.6.11.2020 WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition. on or and

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION No: 21606 of 2022

Between:

1. Y.Venkatasubbaiah, S/o Gangaiah, aged about 54 years.
1. Smt.G.Sarojini Devi, W/o Harikumar, aged about 56 years.
1. N.Chennaiah, S/o N.Chennaiah, aged about 59 years.
1. L.Shivarami Reddy, S/o Chinna Oblareddy, aged about 59 yrs.
1. V.Gurrappa, S/o Pedda Venkatesu, aged about 53 years.
1. K.M.D.Rasulla, S/o Pedda Rasul Saheb, aged about 57 years.
1. M.Rama Mohan Rao, S/o Late M.Bayannasetty, aged about 57 yrs.
1. N.Satyanandam, S/o Vedanayakam, aged about 60 years.
1. P.Yesanna, S/o Jakkaraiah, aged about 59 years.
M.Venkat Rama Raju, S/o M.Naga Raju (Late), aged about 55 10. yrs.
1. M.Anwar Ul Haq, S/o Ibrahim, aged about 58 years.
A.Ramasubba Reddy, S/o Chenna Reddy, aged about 55 12. years.
^ 13. C.Chandrasekhar Raju, S/o Rama Raju, aged about 60 yers.
- C.Viswanadham, S/o Chinnappa, aged about 56 years. 14.
- G.Narayana, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 59 years. 15.
- P.Venkat Rama Raju, S/o Chinna Ganga Raju, aged 56 years. 16.
- S.Khasim Saheb, S/o Naseeruddin Saheb, aged about 59 years. 17.
- M.Rama Murthy, S/o Laxmaiah, aged about 56 years. 18.
- S.Saheb Peer, S/o Ghouse peer, aged about 58 years. 19.
- Smt.V.Narayanamma, W/o Late Kondaiah, aged about 57 years. 20.
- I.Venkataramana Reddy, S/o Seetharami Reddy, aged about 59 years (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh) 21.

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor, Chittoor District

...Respondents

Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

$\mathcal{F}$

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21609 OF 2022

Between:

1. Ch.Sesha Rao, S/o Ch.Venkaiah, aged about 58 years.
1. Smt.P.Nirmala, W/o Elisha, aged about 58 years.
1. N.Prasad, S/o Devid, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.K.Swaroopa Rani, W/o Prakasham, aged about 58 years.
1. T.V.Vasantha Rao, S/o Anjaiah, aged about 58 years.
1. Smt.M.Kondamma, W/o Nagar, aged about 58 years.
1. M.Ajit Kumar, S/o Devaraju, aged about 58 years.
1. P.Venkateswar Rao, S/o Krishna, aged about 64 years.
1. Smt.N.Vijaya Rani, W/o Joseph, aged about 53 years.
Ch.Samuel, S/o Aseervadam, aged about 53 years. 10.
Smt.P.Nageswaramma, W/o Ramaswamy, aged about 53 years. 11.
Smt.P.Durga, W/o Pandaiah, aged about 60 years. (All working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh) 12. are

...Petitioners

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 1.
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2.
The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh Guntur. 3.
The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District. 4.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may

be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 in the in years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court i;: WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported ALD P.422 and also in in 2021 (5) per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and as WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

lA NO: 1 OF 2079

Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim praying that in the circumstances of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of before 25.11.1993 for the 5 years on or purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined

41 Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21677 OF 2022

Between:

1. G.Ramalinga Reddy S/o G.P.Narsimha Reddy, aged about S6 years.
1. G.Ahandakumar S/o G.Anand, aged about 60 years.
1. P.Obula Reddy S/o P.Ramaiah, aged about 55 years.
1. B.Srinivasulu S/o Satyanarayanappa, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt.C.Varalakshmi W/o Late C.Sivaiah, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt.B.Krishna Veni W/o Late B.Radhakrishna, aged about 55 years.
1. K.KriShna Murthy S/o K.Venkatappa, aged about 59 years.
1. C.Adinarayana Reddy S/o Ranga Reddy, aged about 56 years
1. Smt. H.K.Vijayalakshmi'W/o T.Niyazullah, aged about 56 years.
1. P.Gangulappa, S/o P.Kadirappa, aged about 60 years.
1. G.Chandrasekhar S/o G.Ch.Buddanna, aged 60 years.
1. C.Nagaraju S/o C.Pullanna, aged about 60 years.
1. P.Inayatullah S/o Allah Baksh, aged about 54 years.
1. M.Suryanarayana S/o Subbanna, aged about 59 years.
1. D.Hanumantha Reddy S/o D.Rami Reddy, aged 60 years.
1. P.Ghani Khan S/o Ghouse Khan, aged about 60 years.
1. S.Mahaboob Basha S/o Modhin Saheb, aged about 57 years.
1. V.Bava Fakruddin S/o Bavaiah, aged about 54 years.
1. R.Chandrasekhar S/o Krishnappa, aged about 53 years.
1. G.Sambashiva S/o Sai Prasad, aged about 53 years.
1. S.Narayana S/o Ramanna, aged about 54 years.
1. Smt.B.Saroja W/o Late B.Lakshminarayana, aged about 53 years. /
1. G.Reddeppa Reddy S/o G.Venkat Reddy, aged about 54 years.

1. P.Nagamallu S/o P.Gangulappa, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt.P.Kamalamma W/o P.Nagamallu, aged about 53 years.
1. S.Baba Fakuruddin S/o Khadarvalli, aged about 58 years.
1. Smt.B.Anjanamma W/o Santappa, aged about 58 years.
1. Smt.B.Kanthamma W/o Chinna Appalla, aged about 60 years.
1. P.Sudhakar S/o Ganganna, aged about 60 years.
1. P.Srinivasulu S/o P.Pedda Obulesu, aged about 57 years.
1. B.Venkataramana S/o Narayana, aged about 54 years.
1. T.Chandrasekhar S/o T.N.Ramu, aged 54 years.
1. S.Anjanappa S/o Uttappa, aged about 60 years.
1. Smt.M.Venkataramanamma W/o Ganganna, aged about 59 years
S.B.Mahabub Basha S/o Nanne Sab, aged about 56 years. 35.
T.Srinivasulu S/o T.Krishnanna, aged about 58 years. 36.
Smt.G.Venkata Narasamma W/o Jayaraj, aged about 56 years. 37.
Smt.A.Mary D/o Late Joseph, aged about 59 years. 38.
^.Moddin Sab S/o Rehman Sab, aged bout 56 years. 39.
Smt.G.Venkatalakshmamma W/o Late Krishna Murthy, aged 56 40.
1. M.Narayana Swamy S/o Narayana, aged about 53 years.
1. P.SreeramuluS/o Mandanna, aged about 60 years.
1. S. Ourangajub S/o Khareem Sab, aged about 58 years.
1. M.N.Bhaskar Reddy S/o Narayan Reddy, aged about 58 years.
1. S.Nageswaraiah S/o Chenchanna, aged about 56 years.
1. Y.Srinivasulu S/o Y.Chinna Nagappa, aged about 57 years.
1. D.Eswaraiah S/o Sanjappa, aged about 54 years.
1. K.Adinarayana S/o Kondappa, aged about 60 years.
1. Smt.K.Syamalamma W/o Adinarayana, aged about 58 years.
1. R.Nanji Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 60 years.
1. S.Prabhakar S/o Sreeramulu, aged about 53 years.
1. P.Pulla Reddy S/o Narayanappa, aged about 59 years.
1. A.B.Veerabhadraiah S/o Chinna Nagaiah, aged about 59 years.
1. S.Ramesh S/o Narayanappa, aged about 53 years.
1. L.Balakrishna S/o Musalappa, aged about 58 years.
1. D.Keshava Reddy S/o Chenna Reddy, aged about 53 years.

1. M.Sreenivasulu, S/o Narayanappa, aged about 58 years.
1. P.Masthan Reddy S/o Ndrappa Reddy, aged about 54 years.
1. G.Narasimha Reddy, S/o Nagi Reddy, aged about 53 years.
1. K.Ramesh Babu S/o Sadasiva Murthy, aged about 54 years.
1. K.Narasimhulu S/o Narasappa, aged about 55 years.
1. K.Adinarayana S/o Venkatramudu, aged about 56 years.
1. V.Ramchandra S/o Nagappa, aged about 54 years.
1. B.Nagarjuna S/o Venkatappa, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.E.ObuIamma W/o Narayana Swamy, aged about 59 years.
1. Smt.V.Renuka W/o Ramakrishna Rao, aged about 53 years.
1. R.Nagi Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 59 years.
1. G.Prasad S/o Nagappa, aged about 56 years.
1. G.Lakshminarasappa S/o Narasappa, aged about 55 years.
1. Smt.N.Jayarryna W/o Narasirnha Murthy, aged about 56 years.
1. J.Suresh Babu S/o J.Subrahmanyam, aged about 56 years.
1. T.Ramana Reddy S/o Uttam Reddy, aged about 54 years.
1. C.Mohan S/o C.M.Narasirnha Murthy, aged about 59 years.
1. V.V. Raghava Naidu S/o V.Pullaiah Naidu, aged about 60 years.
1. B.Thimma Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 54 years.
1. B.Kariyappa S/o Narasppa, aged about 54 years.
1. Smt.R.Uma Devi W/o Thippe Swamy, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.B.Lakshmi Devi W/o Rarnachandrappa, aged about 57 years.
1. L.Nagaraju S/o Lingappa, aged about 57 years.
1. K.Ramanjineyulu S/o K.Gangappa, aged about 60 years.
1. K.Thippe Swamy S/o Kariyanna, aged about 58 years.
1. A.Venkataramana Reddy S/o A.Subba Reddy, aged about 54 yrs
1. H.Shankarappa, S/o Hanumantharayappa, aged about 56 years.

1. P.Ramanjineyulu S/o P.Papanna, aged about 54 years.
L.Riyazulia S/o Waheed Sab, aged about 55 years. 85.
T.Mudlagiriyappa S/o Pedda Timmappa, aged about 55 years. 86.
S.Hanumantha Rayappa S/o S.Hanumappa, aged about 55 years 87.
1. P.Narasimha Reddy S/o Sanjeev Reddy, aged about 60 years.
1. K.Aswartha Narayana S/o Nagappa, aged about 54 years.
1. C.S.Mallappa S/o C.Beerappa, aged about 55 years.
91 S.Siddappa S/o Siddappa, aged about 53 years.
1. K.Sivappa S/o Mylarappa, aged about 55 years.
1. C.NarasimhIu S/o Chandrayappa, aged about 57 years.
1. G.Venkatesh S/o Govindappa, aged about 56 years.
1. P.Gopalappa S/o Thimmayya, aged about 55 years.
1. G.Nagappa, S/o Gurrappa, aged about 57 years.
1. T.H.Ramanji^eyulu S/o Hanumaiah, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt. N.Subhadra W/o G.V.K.Subbaiah, aged about 56 years.
1. V.Hanumantha Rayappa S/o Sanjeevappa, aged about 56 years
1. K.Nagaraju S/o K.Thippanna, aged about 54 years.
1. T.Jayaramappa S/o Thimmanna, aged about 54 years.
1. N.Chandrappa S/o Narasimhappa, aged about 60 years.
1. L.Kariyappa S/o Laxmappa, aged about 54 years.
1. R.Narasimha Murthy S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 56 years.
1. B.Sajja Raju S/o Ramakistappa, aged about 56 years.
1. P.Lakshminarayana S/o Narsaiah, aged about 57 years.
1. B.Govindappa S/o N.Kariyanna, aged about 55 years.
1. P.Vijaykumar S/o P.Madhava Rao, aged about 56 years.
1. Smt.N.Lakshmi Bai W/o Anjaneyulu Naik, aged 57 years.
1. Smt.P.Prameelamma W/o Nagi Reddy, aged about 53 years.
1. R.Thimma Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy, aged about 59 years.
1. Smt.K.Ramlakshmamma W/o K.Narayanachary,aged 55 yrs
1. C.Muthappa S/o C.DolIappa, aged about 54 years.
1. D.Venkataramana S/o Venkatappa, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt.R.Ramalakshmamma W/o Nandeesh,:-.aged about 54 years.
13/5. Smt.V.Rangamma W/o Sreeramappa, aged about 57 years.
1. S.Srinivasulu S/o Ramadass, aged about 53 years.

33

(All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh ) ...Petitioners

And

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture &. Co.operation (H&S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Anantapur District ...Respondents

Petition under Article'226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal may in

No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. $22.1.2021.$

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21697 OF 2022

Between:

1. B.Ganesh Gowdu, S/o Chinna Baba Gowdu, aged about 59 yrs.
1. P.Pandu, S/o Ramaiah, aged about 60 years.
1. N.Ramesh Reddy, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 54 years
1. S.Reddeppa, S/o Gangaiah, aged about 59 years.
1. B.Ramana, S/o B.Nallappa, aged about 60 years.
1. N.Anjaneyulu, S/o Seethapathi, aged about 59 years.
1. B.Gopal, S/o Mallappa, aged about 52 years.
1. T.Anand, S/o Krishna Swamy, aged about 54 years.
1. G.Srinivasulu Reddy, S/o Govinda Reddy, aged about 58 years.
1. A.V.Subrahmanyam, S/o Venkataswamy Achary, aged 60 yrs
$11.$ V.Shanmugam, S/o Vajravelu Shetty, aged about 59 years.
1. S.Madirubaraja, S/o Sadayappan, aged about 52 years.
1. Sivabala Singam, S/o Soundappan, aged about 54 years.
S.Sella Durai, S/o Sengamalai, aged about 58 years. 14.
1. I.Yesunadhan, S/o Irudhayam, aged about 58 years.
1. S.Selvaraj, S/o Sellaiah, aged about 60 years.
1. K.Tamil Selvim, S/o Kandaiah, aged about 54 years.
S.Subrahmanyam, S/o Sivanu, aged about 59 years. 18.
1. S.Rajendran, S/o Sivalingam, aged about 56 years.
1. V.Rangappa, S/o Venkatappa, aged about 58 years.
$21.$ K.Jayaram, S/o Munivenkatappa, aged about 53 years.
1. M.Narayana Swamy, S/o Krishnaiah, aged about 59 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech. Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (HandS) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor Ditrict District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21699 OF 2022

Between:

1. E.Aseervadamma, W/o Yespadam, aged about 57 years.
1. Smt.T.Padmamma, W/o Ramanaiah, aged about 55 years.
1. B.Venkateswar Reddy, S/o Pichi Reddy, aged about 55 years.
1. B.Masthanaiah, S/o Chinnaiah, aged about 53 years. (All are working as Field Assistant/Tech.Assistants under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents i;. ■not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and in the in pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble A.P. High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP.No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 'on or before 25.11.1993 for the years of service purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court i WP.No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported ALD P.422 and also in in 2021 (5) per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP as No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA.No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 22972 OF 2022

Between:

1. R.Krishnappa, S/o S.Venkatappa, aged about 60 years,
1. R.Harikumar, S/o T.Ramdass, aged about 56 years,
1. M.Nagaraja, S/o M.Thammanna, aged about 57 years,
1. D.R.Rajendra S, S/o D.Ramachandraiah Chetty, aged about 60 years, (All are working as Technical Assistants/Field Assistant under the control of Joint Director of Sericulture, combined Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh)

...Petitioners

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Special Chief Secretary, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
1. The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioner service for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 as followed by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020, dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years of service on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. 27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021.

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be .pleased to grant leave to the respondent No. 3 in the WP No. 22972 of 2022 • to file counter affidavit on behalf of all the respondents in the writ petition.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits i:: terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP.No.33936/2011 and batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported .in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 and also orders passed in WA No.414/2020 dt. ■27.8.2021 Reported in 2021 (5) ALD P.422 and also as per the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 4247/2019 and 4994/2019 dt. 6.11.2020 and WA.No.313/2020 dt. 22.1.2021 pending final disposal of the writ petition. on or in

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 28896 OF 2021

Between:

Pulibandia Venkateswarlu, S/o Krishnaiah, aged 59 years, Occ. Junior □fsTricr ' Grama Panchayath Kollipara Mandal, Guntur

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Guntur^Srict^^ Development Dept. Secretariat, Velagapudi,
'^'^hra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, State of A.P. Suryaraopet. Vijayawada, Krishna District.
. 4. The District Panchayath Officer, Guntur Dist. Guntur.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents herein not regularising the petitioner's service retrospectively from 25-11-1993 on par with others as illegal arbitrary and discrimination and in consequentially the Hon'ble Court may pleased to declare that, the petitioner is also entitled for retrospective regularization from 25-11-1993 on par with others, by extending the benefit of retrospective regulariation as considered in similar case by the Division Bench in W.P.No. 5402/2017, dt. 9.6.2016 and its consequential Government Memo.No. 24200/Est. III/A1/2012; dt. 13.12.2018.

lA NO: 1 OF 2n?l

Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to direct the respondents herein representation dated. 17.12.2020 submitted praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be to consider the petitioner's to the 3rd respondent for retrospective regularization Bench in W.P.No. as considered in similar cases by the Division 5402/2017, dt. 9.6.2016 and its consequential HUAI/2012, dt. 13.12.2018 pending Government Memo.No. 24200/Est. disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANING

WRIT PETITION NO: 16862 OF 2021

Between:

Akumalla Moulabee, W/o Y.S.Muneer Basha, Aged about 53 years Occ-AHender (Temp), B.T. College, Rio Bangalore Road, Madanapalle Town, Chittoor District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi ' Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of College Education, Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi, at Guntur, Guntur District.
1. Besant Theosophicai College, (Founded in 1915 Dr. Annie Besant) Rep. by its Correspondent, Madanapalle 517 325, Chittoor District. '

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 3 to regularize/ absorption the petitioner as attender in the light of the orders .in the W.P No.7588 of 2019 Dt, 04-02-2020 and to as per, Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2018 (8) SCC 238 from the date of 19.08.1990 from 30.06.1993 as per the representation dated 30.01.2001 22.03.2003 and 04.01.2012 and 25-02-2020 in the light of the directions i W.P.No.8299 of 2011 strictly on availability of clear vacancy 30.06.1993 itself as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of and also in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution initial appointment i.e. in as on natural justice of India and consequently to set aside the proceedings of the 2'"'^ respondent Dt. 27-32021 in the interest of the justice and direct the respondents to regularize/ absorb the petitioner services forthwith.

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pass necessary orders to pay the minimum time scale of pay attached to the post of attender from 12.11.1998 keeping in view of the orders granted by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.23742 of 2018 dated 18.07.2018 along with due amount of the salary from 11-06- 2020 to till date, pending disposal of writ petition.

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings Dt. 27-03-2021 of the 2nd . respondent and direct the 2"^^ respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption in any of the existence vacancy of offender in the interest of justice.

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Recall the bailable warrant dated 21-04-2023 16862 of 2021 by granting time for filing of detailed counter by the petitioner / respondent no. 3 in the interest of justice. passed in WP No.

Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI G V RAVI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - IV

WRIT PETITION NO: 18832 OF 2021

Between:

1. K.Samuel, S/o Late K. Kotaiah, Aged 60 years, Retired Watchman-cum-Sweeper, R/o. Muthapalli Village, Harizanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal Guntur District.
1. Kokkiligadda Suvartha, W/o.(late) Kokkiligadda Samuel, Aged about 50 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17. Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada. Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.
1. Kokkiligadda Ramesh, S/o.(late) Kokkiligadda Samuel, Aged about 42 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17. Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.
1. Kondipati Jyothi, W/o. Kondipati Samuel, Aged about 40 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17. Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.
1. Paidipamula Rani, W/o. P.Nageswara Rao. Aged about 35 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17, Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.
1. Kokkiligadda Nani Babu, S/o.(late) Kokkiligadda Samuel, Aged about 31 years, R/o. H.No. 3-17, Mutthupalli Agraharam (V) Harijanawada, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 brought on record as L.Rs. of the deceased petitioner as per Court Order dated 07.12.2022 vide $1st$ 1.A.No.2/2021 in WP No. 18832 of 2021 in the petition and affidavit.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 522503.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.
1. The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Tadepallie, Guntur District.
1. The District Panchayat Officer, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in regularising the Petitioner's services with effect from date of issuance of G.O.Ms.No.

665, dt. 03.092020 and not from the date when he has completed five ■ of services i.e., 25.11.1993 in accordance with GO.Ms.No.212 Finance and years Planning (FW.PC.III) Department dt.22.4.1994 and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the purpose of pay and pension as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to regularize the services of the Petitioner with effect from the date when he has completed five years of service i.e., with effect from 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pay and with all consequential benefits. pension

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be 'Pleased to direct the Respondents to treat the Petitioner effect from 25.11.1993 for the as regularized with purpose of fixation of pay, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI M.SRIKANTH

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - I

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -IV

WRIT PETITION NO: 8768 OF 2021

Between:

nf S-'o.Adiseshu, Age 56 years, Occ Office Subordinate O/o.C.T.O Bapatia (Circle Office) Bapatia, Guntur District.
. 2. N.Srinivasa Singh, S/o.Hanman Singh, Age O/o.C.T.O Sattenepally, Guntur District 55 years, Occ Driver,
- ^/o-Raghuram Sharma, Age 56 years, Occ Junior Assistant, O/o.C.T.O Chilakaluripeta, Guntur District.
- 1. K.Chennakeshavulu, S/o.Chinna Venkateshwarlu, Age 52 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Tenali, Guntur District.
- 1. Ch^Siva Shankara Rao, S/o.Veeraiah, Age 59 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Main Bazar Circle, Guntur District.

♦

1. M.Veera Raghavaiah, S/o.venkateshwarulu, Age 60 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bapatia Circle, Guntur District.
1. R.Venkateshwarulu, S/o.Venkataramaiah, Age 56 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bapatia (Circle Office), Bapatia, Guntur District.
1. P.Mallikarjun Rao, S/o.Venkateshwarlu, Age 63 years, Occ Retd Office Subordinate, R/o.Jayanthanagar 2nd Lane, Flat No.201, JKC College Road, Guntur District.
1. N.Sri Haribabu, S/o.Venkateshwarulu, Age 60 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bradipeta, Guntur District.
P.Pullaiah, S/o.Lakshmaiah, Age 56 years, Occ Senior Assistant, O/o.C.T.O Narsaraopet (Circle) Narsaraopet, Guntur District. 10.
Annam Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Lakshmi Narsimha Rao, Age 58 years, Occ Office Subordinate, O/o.C.T.O Bradipet Circle, Guntur District. 11.
R.Malleswara Rao, S/o.Reddy Thirupathaiah, Age 62 years, Occ Office Subordinate(Retd), R/o.37-9-774, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, 9th lane. Bank Colony, Guntur District. 12.

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(C.T.III) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District
1. The Chief Commissioner (State Tax), Velagapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
1. The Joint Commissioner (State Tax), Guntur Division, Guntur District.

...Respondents

a) By declaring the entire action of the respondents, particularly the entire action of the 1®' respondent in regularizing the service of the petitioners with prospective effect vide GO.Rt,No.615 Revenue CT.III Department, dated 18-7-1995, instead of regularizing their either from the date of their initial appointment or w.e.f. services as on

completion 5 years of service as on cut of date 25.11.1993 while regularizing the services of others w.e.f. their date of joining vide G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance Admn.lll Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in a case between in B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.12432 of 2014,Dt 17- 08-2015 including recent judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) as well as orders issued in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt.

b) And consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for extending the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioners prior to their regularization for other benefits by duly extending the benefit which purpose of pension and was extended to other similarly situated persons in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance Admn.lll Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt. or alternatively for the purpose of pension and other pensionary benefits in terms of recent Judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s LB.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) without reference to the earlier regularization orders passed by the 1st respondent vide GO.Rt.No.615 Revenue (CT.III) Dept., dated 18-7- 1995 by duly keeping in view of recent orders of the Govt., issued in GO.Rt.NO.122 MA UD (G1) Dept., dated 22-3-2021.

lA NO: 1 OF ?n?i

Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith extend the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioners prior to their regularization by duly keeping in view of similar benefit that persons G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the praying that in the circumstances was extended to the similarly situated

Govt., as well as recent Division Bench Judgment of this Hon'ble Court reported in 2020(6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) i.e., State of AP and another VS L.B.M Krishna and also taking into consideration of recent orders of the Govt., issued in GO.Rt.N0.122 MA & UD (G1) Dept., dated 22-3-2021.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - I

WRIT PETITION NO: 13311 OF 2021

Between:

B.N.Purnachander Rao, S/o. Nancharaiah, Age 60 years Occ: Office Subordinate(Retired), O/o. Tahsildar, Bapatla, Guntur District, R/o. 4-1-67, S.N.T Agraharam, Bapatla, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State. of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The District Collector (Revenue), Guntur, Guntur District.
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenali, Guntur District.
1. The Tashildar, Bapatla, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus.

a) By declaring the entire action of the respondents, in not counting the past service rendered by him in the cadre of Grama Sevak/Village Servant in pursuance of appointment orders issued in R.Dis.No.916/87-B dated 18-1-1988 of MRO, Repalle, against a clear vacancy, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in a case between in

B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.12432 of 2014, Dt-17-08-2015 including recent judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) as well as orders issued in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt including Division Bench orders dated WP.No. 12572/2017 and batch in the same issue, 19-12-2018 in

b) And consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for extending the benefit of past service rendered by him in the cadte of Grama Sevak/ Village Servant in pursuance of appointment orders issued in R.Dis.No.916/87-B dated 18-1-1988 of MRO, Repalle, against a clear vacancy, for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of Division Bench Judgment dated 19-12-2017 in Wp.No.12572/2017 and batch r/w this Hon'ble court in a recent Judgment of case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB).

lA NO: 1 OF 2071

Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be extend the benefit of past . service rendered by the petitioner in the cadre of Grama Sevak/ Village Servant in pursuance of appointment orders issued in R.Dis.No.916/87-B dated 18-1-1988 of MRO, Repalle, against a clear vacancy, for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of Division Bench Judgment dated 19-12-2017 in Wp.No.12572/2017 and batch r/w recent Judgment of case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB). this Hon'ble court in a

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -1

WRIT PETITION NO: 24419 OF 2020

Between:

G.Syarnala Rao, S/o Late Venkanna, aged 57 years, Occ. Panchayath Secretary Gr-1, Veeravally Grama Panchayat, Bapulapadu Mandal Krishna District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj and Rural Development Dept. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, State of A.P. Suryaraopet, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
1. The District Panchayath Officer, Krishna Dist., at Mahcilipatnam.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not regularising the petitioner's service retrospectively from 25-11-1993 on par with others as illegal arbitrary and discrimination and consequentially the Hon'ble Court may pleased to declare that, the petitioner is entitled for retrospective regularization from 25-11-1993 on par with others by extending the benefit given vide Memo.No.6683/DPR and RD/G3/2016 dated 13-12-2018 and consequential orders passed vide Proc.Re.No.7/A/2019, dated 11-2-2019 following the orders passed in . WP.No.5402/2017, dated 9-6-2017.

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be

pleased to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner case for retrospective regularization from 25-11-1993 by extending the benefit given vide Memo.No.6683/DPR and RD/G3/2016 consequential orders passed vide Proc.Rc.No.7/A/2019, dated 11-2-2019 following the orders passed in WP.No.5402/2017, dated 9-6-2017. dated 13-12-2018 and

.Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M R TAGORE

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING

WRIT PETITION NO: 23863 OF 2020

Between:

P.Nageswar Reddy, S/o Venkateswar Reddy Age 51 years, Occ; Driver

...Petitioner

-I ^ and

Principal Secretary, RW and S Dept. Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District ^
Khlbna^SIm^ ^ Vijayawada,

...Respondents

India praying that in may more particularly one in the the entire action of the of the 1st respondent in petitioner in the cadre of driver with Panchayat Raj and Rural Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring respondents, particularly, the entire action regularizing the service of the prospective effect vide G.O. Rt No. 1126, Development (Estt.ll.A) Dept, dt 4.8.2009, instead of regularizing his . services either from the date of his initial appointment or w.e.f. as on

completion 5 years of service as on cut of date 25.11.1993 while regularizing the services of others w.e.f. their date of joining vide G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, is as highly illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex court in a case between in B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.12432 of 2014, Dt17-08-2015 including recent judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) as well as orders issued in G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt. b)And consequently to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for extending the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioner prior to his regularization for all the purpose by duly extending the benefit which extended to other similarly situated person G.O.Rt.No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, or alternatively for the purpose of pension and other pensionary benefits in terms of recent Judgment of this Hon'ble court in a case between State of AP and another V/s L.B.M. Krishna reported in 2020 (6) ALD 349 (AP) (DB) without reference to the earlier orders passed in G.O.Rt No. 1126 PR and RD (Estt.ll.A) Dept. dt. 4.8.2009 of the 1®' respondent. was

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith extend the benefit of past service rendered by the petitioner prior to his regularization by duly extending the same benefit that was extended to the similarly situated persons G.O.Rt No. 3072 Finance (Admn.lll) Dept. dt. 3.7.2010 by the Govt, pending disposal of W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 4976 OF 2020

Between:

1. M Venkata Reddy. S/o Gopi Reddy, aged about 54 years, Working as Work Inspector in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.
1. V.Jesudasu S/o Gopalam, aged about 57 years, Working as Lighter in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.
1. B.Sreerama Reddy, S/o Narasa Reddy, aged about 53 as Bill Collector in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District. years. Working
Venkatramaiah, aged about 55 years Working as rH Worker in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District.
1. I.Yehoshuva, S/o Immanial, aged about 57 Worker in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District years. Working as PH
1. N.China Nagaiah, S/o Peda Nagaiah, aged about 56 PH Worker in Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District. years. Working as
1. D.Ramanaiah, S/o Lakshmaiah, aged 55 years. Working as Sweeper i Tadepally Municipality, Guntur District. in

...Petitioners

AND

Irimfnklf,? Secretary. Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District.
Secretary. F and P Distdct ' Buildings. Velagapudi. Amaravathi, Guntur
1. The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration Guntur District. , Goratnal,
1. The Tadepally Municipality, Tadepally, Guntur District Commissioner. rep.by its

...Respondents

years on or before 25.11.1993 for counting of NMR service rendered prior to regularization of petitioners services for the purpose of pension and .pensionary benefits as held by the combined Hon'ble AP High Court in WP • No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 (Reported in 2018 4 ALT P.6) is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years on or before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318/2015 dt.17.8.2015 which followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 and Batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT 6 is illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the principles of natural justice. were

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for retrospective regularization from the date of completion of 5 years before 25.11.1993 for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits in terms of orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dt. 17.8.2015 which were followed by the combined Hon'ble High Court in WP No.33936/2011 & batch dt. 2.5.2018 Reported in 2018 (4) ALT P.6 pending final disposal of the writ petition. on or

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

The Court made the following common order:

APHC010366622022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3310]

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION NOs: 22180, 21579, 21585. 21587, 21588, 21589. 21591. ^597,21604, 21606, 21609, 21^77. 216S7> 21599, 22972 OF 2022, 28896^ 16862, 18832. 8768 and 13311 of 2021, 24419. 23863. 4976 of 2020

WRIT PETITION NO: 22180 OF 2022

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Between:

G. Anjaneyulu, and Others ...PETITIONER{S)

AND

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

The Court made the follov/ing:

COMMON ORDER:-

Since the facts and issue involved in ail the Writ Petitions. I find it expedient to decide these matters by a Common Order. For the sake of convenience, W.P.No.22180 of 2022 is taken as leading case.

The case of the petitioners in W.P.No.22180 of 2022 in short is that they were appointed as NMRs in the year 1981 onwards in the 4*^ respondent

corporation and they were working without any break. While the matter stood thus, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.11, dated 20.01.2017 have sanctioned 726 posts in the category of Field Assistants in Sericulture Department on supernumerary basis for regularization of services full time contingent employees, who have fulfilled the conditions stipulated in Government orders vide G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994, G.O (P).No.112 dated 23.07.1997 and G.O.Ms.No.11, dated 20.01.2017. Accordingly the Commissioner of Sericulture, Guntur issued proceedings dated 08.02.2017 has distributed 2970 posts to the Ananthapur District to regularize the fill time contingent employees in the District by giving temporary employment'in the category of Field Assistants. In view of the said G.Os, the services of the petitioners were regularized by appointing them as Field Assistants in Ananthapur District prospectively from the date of issue of orders without granting retrospective regularization from the date of completion of five years for counting of daily wage service rendered prior to their regularization of services for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits, without monetary benefits, as regularization orders were issued after more than 25 years service rendered by them on NMR basis. Further their probationary period was also declared vide proceedings dated 12.06.2019 and some of the petitioners were promoted as Technical Assistants from the category of Field Assistant vide proceedings dated 26.03.2021. Therefore, the petitioners are entitled retrospective regularization from the date of completion of five years. hence the present writ petitions came to be filed.

Heard Mr. K. Srinivasa Prasad, Mr. P. Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader, Services-I; learned Assistant Government Pleader, Services-ll for the respondents.
During hearing learned counsel for the petitioners reiterated the contents urged in the writ petitions and placed on record the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of the composite High Court at Hyderabad in Government of A.P rep., by its Principal Secretary, PR and RD Department, Hyderabad and Others v. N. Venkaiah and Others"'', wherein it was held as follows: if

"53. On the above analysis, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the authorities concerned to extend the benefit of B. Srinivasulu (1 supra) to the employees in this batch of cases by reckoning their services from the date of ' completion of five years in service, on or before 25.11.1993, for the purpose of their pension and pensionary benefits. They shall however not be entitled to actual monetary benefits for the said period, in the form of arrears of pay or allowances."

So also, the Division Bench of this Court following the decision of N. Venkaiah's case (cited supra) in A.P.Bevarages Corporation Limited, Vijayawada, Krishna District v. K. Kesava Narayana Reddy and Others"^, ti wherein it was held as follows:-
Following the Division Bench judgment in N. Venkataiah's ^case (supra), we hold that the services of respondent Nos. 1 to 60/ writ petitioners would be deemed to have been regularized from the cut-off date, i. e 25.11.1993, for the

'2018(4) ALT 6 (D.B)

^ 2021(5) ALD 422 (AP) (DB)

^ 2018(4) ALD 590 (DB)

purpose of fixation of pension and pensionary benefits. As held in the aforesaid judgment, respondent Nos. 1 to 60/ writ petitioners are not to be given any monetary benefits in the form of arrears of pay or otherwise from that date. Respondent Nos. 1 to 60/ writ petitioners will be entitled to salary in terms ofG.O.Ms.No.31. dated 28.02.2017.

And also, the Division Bench of this Court also followed the decision of N. Venkataiah's case cited supra in "The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture & Corporation (Sericulture) Department v. T.S.Gopalaiah"^, wherein it was held as follows:-

"12. We are of the considered opinion that ends of justice will be sub-served in the present case by moulding the relief by providing that though the writ petitioners would be deemed to have been regularized from the cut-off dated i.e 25.11.1993 for the purpose of fixation of pension and pensionary benefits, pension will be made available to them only from the date of filing of the writ petition i.e from 19.02.2020.

Learned Assistant Government Pleaders for the respondents vehemently opposed to allow the writ petitions.
Perused the record.
No doubt, the issue involved in these writ petitions are squarely covered by an order of this Court as cited supra, where under this Court passed several orders by following the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court and also the Government issued G.Os by granting retrospective regularizationfor the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits for the service rendered prior to regularization of their services. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in similar circumstances the Government

" W.A.No.483, 2021, dated 05.08.2021

issued G.O.Rt.No.664, dated 10.07.2018 granting relief of retrospective regularization in the case of employees working in Tirupati Muncipal Corporation. The Government also issued another G.O.Ms.No.8, Water Resources Department, dated 10.02.2020 extending the similar benefit to the employees working in irrigation department and that the petitioners in this writ petition also seeking similar relief for the said benefit.

Therefore, keeping in view of the ratio laid down by this Court in the decisions cited supra, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners with effect from the date of their completing their five year continuous service, on or before 25.11.1993 retrospectively for the purposes of their pension and pensionary benefits. They shall however not be entitled to actual monetary benefits for the said period, in the form of arrears of pay or allowances. The same order shall be applied in other writ petitioners in this batch writ petitions also.
With the above direction, all the writ petitions are disposed of by a Common Order. It is made clear that the directions contained in this order shall be implemented within three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur

$\mathsf{S}$

1. The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Principal Secretary Revenue(C.T.III) Department, State of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Special Chief Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Co.operation (H and S) Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat Buildings Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, Goratnal, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner, Tadepally Municipality, Tadepally, Guntur District.
1. The Principal Secretary, RW and S Dept., Govt, of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Engineer-in- Chief, RWS and S Dept. Gollapudi, Vijayawada Krishna District.
1. The Superintending Engineer, RWS and S Circle office, ZP Compound Guntur, Guntur District,
n * Secretary, Panchayath Raj and Rural Development D^trict Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur 10.
o* * Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development State of A.P. Suryaraopet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 11.
The District Panchayath Officer, Krishna Dist., at Mahcilipatnam. 12.
The District Collector (Revenue), Guntur, Guntur District. 13.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenali, Guntur District. 14.
The Tashildar, Bapatia, Guntur District. 15.
The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur. 16.
The Chief Commissioner (State Tax), Velagapudi, Vijayawada Krishna District. 17.
The Joint Commissioner (State Tax), Guntur Division, Guntur 18. District.
1. nonor+I*?® Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Tadepallie Gurntu District
1. The District Panchayat Officer, Guntur District.
The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, State of 21. Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of College Education, Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravathi, at Guntur, Guntur District.
$23.$ The Correspondent, Besant Theosophical College, (Founded in 1915 Dr. Annie Besant), Madanapalle 517 325, Chittoor District.
$24.$ The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
The Joint Director of Sericulture, Visakhapatnam District. 25.
The Joint Director of Sericulture, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 26.
The Joint Director of Sericulture, Ananthapuramu, 27. Ananthapuramu District.
The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Penukonda, 28. Ananthapuramu District.
1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Kadiri, Ananthapuramu District.
The Assistant Director of Sericulture, MFTU, Ananthapuramu, 30. Ananthapuramu District.
1. The Assistant Director of Sericulture, Tadakalapalli, Madakasira Mandal, Ananthapuramu District (presently Satya sai District)
1. One CC to Sri K Srinivasa Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to Sri P Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to Sri G V Ravi, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to Sri M R Tagore, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to Sri Santhapur Satyanarayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to Sri M Srikanth, Advocate [OPUC]
1. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
1. Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
1. Two CCs to GP for Services II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 41. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
1. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
1. Two CD Copies

RAM

DATED:23/08/2024

COMMON ORDER

WRIT PETITION Nos: 22180, 21579, 21585, 21587, 21588, 21589, 21591, 21597, 21604, 21606, 21609, 21677, 21697, 21699, 22972 of 2022; 28896 16862, 18832, 8768 and 13311 of 2021; 24419, 23863, 4976 of 2020;

DISPOSING ALL THE WPs WITHOUT COSTS

K.Samuel vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

AI Summary

Order Issued After Hearing

Original Order Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION Nos: 22180, 21579, 21585, 21587, 21588, 21589, 21591, 21597, 21604, 21606, 21609, 21677, 21697, 21699, 22972 of 2022; 28896 16862, 18832, 8768 and 13311 of 2021; 24419, 23863, 4976 of 2020

WRIT PETITION No: 22180 of 2022

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners; SRI K.SRINIVASA PRASAD

WRIT PETITION NO: 21579 OF 2022

Between:

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2023

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21585 OF 207?

Between:

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21587 OF 2022

Between:

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21588 OF 7099

Between:

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 21589 OF 2022

Between:

AND

...Respondents

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI <sup>P</sup> RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES -1

WRIT PETITION NO: 21591 OF 2022

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI <sup>P</sup> RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21597 OF 2022

Between:

AND

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI <sup>P</sup> RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21604 OF 2022

Between:

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

Ifk lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

WRIT PETITION No: 21606 of 2022

Between:

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II

WRIT PETITION NO: 21609 OF 2022

Between: