G Munirathnam Achary vs. Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble A V Sesha Sai
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:24 Dec 2020
CNR:APHC010308702020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

4 Nov 2020

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER,

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

: PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1199 OF 2020

Between:

Sri G. Munirathnam Achary, S/o Govinda Achari.

...Petitioner

AND

    1. Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat, I.A.S., The State of Andhra Pradesh rep, by its Principal Secretary, Finance (HR.III) Secretariat, A.P. Velagapudi, Guntur District.
    1. Smt.Poonam Malakondaiah, I.A.S., Special Chief Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Cooperation (Sericulture) Dept., Secretariat, A.P. Velagapudi, Guntur District.
    1. Sri Chiranjeevi Choudhary, I.F.S., The Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

...Respondents/Respondent Nos.1. 2 and 3 in WP No.4593 of 2020

WHEREAS the petitioner has presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the above case through his counsel Sri A Phani Bhushan, praying the High Court to punish the respondents herein, for their willful disobedience and violation of the order dated 25-02-2020 passed by this Court in WP No.4593 of 2020, in the interest of justice.

WHEREAS the said case coming on for orders as to admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A. Phani Bhushan, Advocate for the petitioner, directed issuance of notice before admission to the respondent No.1 & 2 herein, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted.

Therefore, you namely;

    1. Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Finance (HR.III), The State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, A.P. Velagapudi, Guntur District. A.P.
    1. Smt. Poonam Malakondaiah, I.A.S., Special Chief Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Cooperation (Sericulture) Dept., Secretariat, A.P. Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P.

be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 22-01-2021, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/-- M. NAGESWAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR $<$ Am $-\mathop{\raisebox{1.5pt}{$\lt$}}\nolimits_\alpha$ SECTION OFFICER $\frac{1}{2}$

    1. The District Judge, Guntur, Guntur District, AP. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No.1 to 2 and to return to this Court before 22-01-2021).
    1. Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Finance (HR.III), The State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, A.P. Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P.
    1. Smt.Poonam Malakondaiah, I.A.S., Special Chief Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Cooperation (Sericulture) Dept., Secretariat, A.P. Velagapudi, Guntur District, A.P. (Addresses 2 & 3 By RPAD – along with a copy of petition and affidavit).
    1. Two Spare copies.

MSR

$To$

$\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}\left(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}\right)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}\left(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}\right)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} \mid \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} }$ $\mathcal{A} = {1,2,3}$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$ $\hat{\mathcal{A}}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}(x)$

HIGH COURT

AVSS, J & RRR, J

DATE: 24.12.2020

NOTE: POST ON 22-01-2021

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CC. NO. 1199 OF 2020

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(3) - 3 Sept 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 3 Sept 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 13 Aug 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 24 Dec 2020

Interim Order

Viewing