A Venkataramana vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble T.C.D.Sekhar
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:25 Apr 2025
CNR:APHC010300942020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble T.C.D.Sekhar

Listed On:

25 Apr 2025

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

$[3505]$

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 20023 OF 2020

Between:

A. Venkataramana, S/o. Late A Venkatappa Naidu Aged about 47 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/O. L.M. Kandriga Village, Padiredu Post, Vadamalapet Mandal, Chittoor District. Now temporarily residing at R/o. Do. No. 1-100, Cherlopalli, Cherlopalle, Pudipatla post, Tirupati( Rural), Chittoor District-517505.

...Petitioner

AND

    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government Department of Revenue (Land Acquisition), Secretariat, at Amaravati, Guntur District.
    1. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District
    1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Tirupati Division, Chittoor District.
    1. The Tahsildhar, Vadamalapet Mandal Chittoor District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner without passing an award and without making payment of compensation as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act, 2013 in respect of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac. 5-66 cents in total, in Sy. No. 92/3, 92/5, 93/2B, 93/3, 93/5, 94/5 in Ac.0-84 cents, Ac.1-11 cents, Ac.0-16 cents, Ac.0-94 cents, Ac.2.01 cents, Ac.0.60 cents, situated at Srinivasapuram Village, Pathiredu aranyam, Vadamalapet Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and in violation of principles of natural justice and against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac. 5-66 cents in total, in Sy. No. 92/3, 92/5, 93/2B, 93/3, 93/5, 94/5 in Ac. 0-84 cents, Ac. 1-11 cents, Ac. 0-16 cents, Ac. 0-94 cents, Ac. 2.01 cents, Ac. 0.60 cents, situated at Srinivasapuram Village, Pathiredu aranyam, Vadamalapet Mandal, Chittoor District without payment of compensation as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and $\mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}$ Resettlement Act, 2013

<u>IA NO: 1 OF 2021</u>

Between:

The Tahsildhar, Vadamalapet Mandal Chittoor District

$\left{ \begin{array}{cc} \alpha & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta & \beta &$

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}^* \colon \mathcal{R}^* \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{W}(\mathcal{L})$

$\mathbb{R}^{n-1} \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n-1} \setminus \mathbb{R}^{n-1} \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n-1}$

$\label{eq:1} \begin{array}{ll} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} = \begin{array}{cc} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} & \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} \ \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} & \mathcal{L}_{\text{max}} \end{array} \end{array}$

$\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}$

...Petitioner/Respondent

$\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A} \mathbf{A} \mathbf{A} \mathbf{A}$

  1. A Venkataramana, S/o. Late A Venkatappa Naidu Age. 47 years Occ. Agriculture, R/O. L.M. Kandriga Village, Padiredu Post, Vadamalapet Mandal, Chittoor District. Now temporarily residing at R/o. Do. No. 1-100, Cherlopalli, Cherlopalle, Pudipatla post, Tirupati(Rural), Chittoor District-517505.

...Respondent/Writ Petitioner

    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government Department of Revenue (Land Acquisition), Secretariat, at Amaravati, Guntur District.
    1. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District
    1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Tirupati Division, Chittoor District.

· 南西 书上 me Fatte 🙌 B. Thomas

...Respondetns/Respondents

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition by vacating the interim orders dated 02-11-2020 in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.20023;bf 2020

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2020 .f

Petition under Section 15t CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the petitioners land admeasuring Ac. 5-66 cents in total, in Sy. No. 92/3, 92/5, 93/2B, 93/3, 93/5, *■ 94/5 in Ac. 0-84 cents, Ac. 1-11 cents, Ac. 0-16 cents, Ac. 0-94 cents, Ac. 2.01 cents, Ac. 0.60 cents , situated at Srinivasapuram Village, Pathiredu aranyam, Vadamalapet Mandal, Chittoor Districf without payment of compensation as per the provisions of Right to Fair tdmpensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA

Counsel for the Respondents: GP f^OR REVENUE

The Court made the following: Order

APHC010300942020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3505]

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 20023/2020

Between:

A Venkataramana ...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

  1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

ORDER:-

$1.$ It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.

$2.$ The said submission is placed on record.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as $3.$ infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

To,

  1. One CC to SRI KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Advocate [OPUC]

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}} \mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}} \mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$

  1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

  2. Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:25/04/2025

ORDER

WP.No.20023 of 2020

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(3) - 25 Apr 2025

Final Order

Viewing

Order(2) - 3 Apr 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 2 Nov 2020

Interim Order

Click to view