IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1700 OF 2024

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records and allow the Civil Revision Petition by directing the learned trial court to dispose of the suit in OS No. 229/2017 expeditiously, preferably within such time that the honourable court would deem fit and proper to stipulate

Between;

• 1. Smt. Atluri Jayaprada Devi, W/o late Raghavendra Rao, aged 85 years, resident of A-20, Organo Naandi, Bakaram Road, Aziznagar, Moinabad Mandal, Rangareddy District.
• 2. Smt. Anne Srilakshmi, W/o Srirama Gopal, 57 years resident of A-20, Organo Naandi, Bakaram Road, Aziznagar, Moinabad Mandal, Rangareddy District.
• 3. Smt. Potiuri Sridevi, W/o Rajasekhara Rao, aged 52 years, resident of 8-2-268/A/I/7, Plot No. 4, Road No. 13, Srinikethan Colony, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONERS

AND

• 1. Sri. Valluru Siddhartha, S/o Venkata Rama Krishna, aged about ³⁵ years, resident of Patamatalanka, Vijayawada, reptd., by his GPA Holder, Smt. Valluru Jyosthana, W/o Venkata Ramakrishna Valluruvari Street, Patamatalanka, Vijayawada. resident of
• 2. Sri, Valluru Ravi Teja, S/o Venkata Rama Krishna, years, resident of Patamatalanka, Vijyawada. aged about 30

...RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI. V V RAVI PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondents: —

The Court made the following: ORDER

APHC010300722024

■1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[2605]

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1700/2024

Between:

Smt.AtIuri Jayaprada Devi, and Others ...PETITIONER(S)

AND

Sri Valluru Siddhartha and Others

...RESPONDENT{S)

Counsel for the Petltioner(S):

1.VV RAVI PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.-NIL-

The Court made the following order:

Heard learned counsel for petitioners.

2. The grievance of the petitioners, who are defendants in O.S. No.229 of 2017, is that the 3^'^ petitioner herein is an aged lady and senior citizen and that the suit is of the year 2017 and the trial court unfortunately has not been conducting the trial in a reasonably quick manner and thereby, the petitioners are facing much hardship. The request of the petitioners now is that CRP is

filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court, is to direct the trial court to expedite the trial in O.S. No.229 of 2017.

3. When enquired, learned counsel for petitioners would submit that expedite petition has not been filed so far in the trial court.

In that view, this Court is of the considered view that liberty 4. can be given to the petitioners to move an expedite petition before the trial court.

5. Accordingly, this CRP is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to submit an expedite petition before the trial court to expedite the trail in O.S. No.229 of 2017, in which case, the trial court shall consider the said application and after hearing both sides, pass an appropriate order within one week from the date of filing of such application and proceed with the trial of the matter depending upon the result of the said petition. No costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.

SD/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /

//TRUE COPY//

S OFFICER

To,

1. The VII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District

2. One CC to SRI. V V RAVI PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies

2

HIGH COURT DATED: 31/07/2024

ORDER

CRP.No.1700 of 2024

DISPOSING OF THE CRP