B.Sunitha vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Arup Kumar Goswami , Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
8 Oct 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
W.A. No. 542 of 2021
(Taken up through video conferencing)
B. Sunitha D/o. B. Prabhakar Rao, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Pvt. Teacher, R/o. H.No.4-21A, Devanagaram village, Chinacumbam post, Cumbam Mandal, Prakasam District – 523 333 and others. .. Appellants
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, A.P. Amaravathi, and another. .. Respondents
Counsel for the appellants : Mr. T. Koteswara Prasad
Counsel for respondents : Mr. K. Bheema Rao
ORAL JUDGMENT
Dt: 08.10.2021
(per Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ)
Heard Mr. T. Koteswara Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the appellants/writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Bheema Rao, learned Government Pleader for Services-III, appearing for the respondents.
-
This writ appeal is preferred against an order dated 27.07.2021, whereby the learned single Judge expressed the opinion that no case was made out for suspending the G.O.Ms.No.39 School Education (Exams) Department, dated 21.06.2021 by way of an interim order. By the aforesaid order, the learned single Judge also directed the case to be listed for instructions and counter on 24.08.2021.
-
In the Writ Appeal a counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondents.
-
Having regard to the statements made in the affidavit that the appellants/petitioners do not come under the zone of consideration as per their merit, we are of the opinion that no interference is called for with the order under challenge. We, however, hasten to add that we have not expressed any conclusive opinion on such statement. We say no more, because any other observation by us may cause prejudice to either of the parties before the learned single Judge.
-
Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CJ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
GM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
W.A. No. 542 of 2021
(per Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ)
Dt: 08.10.2021
GM