IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 18878 OF 2020

Between:

• 1. Pappula Apparao, S/o. (L) Simhachalam.
• 2. Pappula Koteswar Rao, S/o (L) Simhachalam.
• 3. Pappula Rama Malleswar Rao, S/o (L) Simhachalam.

.... Petitioners

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
• 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
• 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (RDO) Visakhapatnam.
• 4. The Tahsildar (MRO), Sabbavaram, Visakhapatnam District.
• 5. Village Revenue Officer, Aripaka Village, Sabbavaram Mandal Visakhapatnam District.

.... Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the matter of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents particularly $4^{th}$ and $5^{th}$ Respondents in trying to dispossession/evict the petitioners from their land possession and enjoyment in Sy.NQ.180/3 nd 180/5 of Aripaka Village, Sabbaravarm Mandal in that thretend even without issuing any Notice nor anything without following the due process of law consequently to direct the respondents not to dispossession or evict the petitioners from their properties.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order to direct the respondents not to evict or disposessoin of the petitioners from their properteis coverered under SY NO. 180/3, 180/5 of Aripaka Village, Padmanabham Mandal Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of WP 18878 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R Siva Sai Swarup Advocate for the Petitioners, and of GP for Revenue for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and the Court made the following. ORDER:

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that the respondents are trying to dispossess them from the subject matter property, which is in their possession and enjoyment for the last several decades.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are availing electricity service to the subject matter property and the same is assessed to property tax by the Grama Panchayat. While so, the respondents are now trying to dispossess the petitioners from the subject matter property without following due procedure and in high-handed manner. Learned counsel submits that if the petitioners are dispossessed from the subject matter property, they will be deprived of their valuable rights.

Considering the submissions made and perusing the material available on record, there shall be interim direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject matter property without following due procedure as contemplated under law.

List the matter after three weeks."

//TRUE COPY//

$\mathsf{F}_\mathsf{C}$

Sd/-T.Madhavi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

To,

• 1. The Principal Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat, Velagapudi, State of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi.
• 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
• 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, (RDO) Visakhapatnam.
• 4. The Tahsildar (MRO), Sabbavaram, Visakhapatnam District.
• 5. Village Revenue Officer, Aripaka Village, Sabbavaram Mandal Visakhapatnam District.(RR 1 to 5 by RPAD) $\frac{1}{2}$
• 6. One CC to Sri. R Siva Sai Swarup Advocate [OPUC]
• 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

8. One spare copy

$pr$

$\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 &$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}})$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$ $\begin{array}{c}\n\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} = \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}} \mathcal{L}{$ $\label{eq:1} \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} = \mathcal{L}{\text{max}} \end{aligned}$ $\mathcal{A} = {1,2,3,4}$ $\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \left( \mathcal{L$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L}$ $\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \left{ \begin{array}{ll} \mathcal{L} & \text{if } \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} \ \mathcal{L} & \text{if } \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} \ \mathcal{L} & \text{if } \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} \end{array} \right.$

HIGH COURT

NJSJ

DATED:12/02/2021

LIST THE MATTER AFTER THREE WEEKS

ORDER

WP.No.18878 of 2020

INTERIM DIRECTION