IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

TUESDAY .THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ^I

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

riwii RFVISION petition NO: 2671 OF 2019

Petition under Articie 227 of Constitution of india aggrieved by the order dated 07/06/2019 in lA No.581 of ²⁰¹⁶ in OS No.228 of ²⁰¹⁶ in CMA No.1 of the file of the Court of the Xlli"' Additional District Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District. 2017 on

Between:

Ramachandra Reddy, S/o. Rami Red^, aged about ⁶⁰ Holder, Reddy Ramakrishna s/o r/o D.No. 45-2-60/62, 1. Bommareddy years, rep. by his G.P.A. Appalaswamy, aged about ⁴⁸ years Ramachandra Nagar, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam.

...PETITIONER/PETITIONER

AND

• Mullapudi Ratnakara Rao, s/o Dattatreya Vara Prasad, aged ⁶⁴ years. 1.'
• ² Mullapudi Sailaja. w/o Mullapudi Ratnakara Rao aged ⁶¹ years Both are R/o. Flat No. 302, Sri Residency Apartments, Bhagyanagar Phase ³ Kukatpally. Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

X

lA NO: ¹ OF 2019

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order and passed in C.M.A.No. ¹ of ²⁰¹⁷ on the file of the XIII Addl. District Judge, Gajuwaka, pending disposal of the main C.R.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD

The Court made the following: ORDER

i

APHC010285662019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458]

TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2671/2019

Between:

Bommareddy Ramachandra Reddy ...PETITIONER ^f

I

AND

Mullapudi Ratnakara Rao and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

l.VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

l.SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD

2.SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD

The Court made the following:

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the Order dated 07.06.2019 in C.M.A.No.l of 2017, on the file of the XIII Additional District Judge, Gajuwaka, allowing the petition filed by the respondents, seeking to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.581 of 2016 in O.S.No.228 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka.

It is stated by Ms.Sivani, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, that the suit itself was allowed on 07.06.2019 and the matter has become infructuous. The Registry also put up a report 2.

obtained from the e-Courts website, which shows that the suit itself was decreed on 07.06.2019. In that view of the matter, the issue raised in the present Civil Revision Petition would not survive.

3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.

SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

/

//TRUE COPY//

^/SECTION OFFICER To,

• 1. The Xlll*^ Additional District Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
• 2. One CC to Sri. Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, Advocate [OPUC]
• 3. One CC to Sri. Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]
• 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi.
• 5. Three CD Copies

AL

HIGH COURT

DATED:19/03/2024

ORDER

$\mathsf{C}\xspace$

CRP.No.2671 of 2019

بحد

DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS

Lidiya 13/06/2024