IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT

WRIT PETITION NO: 31930 OF 2015

HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

Between:

M.Krishna Rao, S/ o Loka Raju Aged about 58 years, working as Assistant General Manager District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Central Office Eluru, West Godavari District.

<u>...PETITIONER</u>

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar, of Cooperative Societies, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 3. The District Co-operative Central Bank,, Rep., by its Chief Executive Officer, Central Office, Eluru, West Godavari District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in issuing retirement notice of the petitioner is contrary to Act 4 of 2014 dated 27-06-2014 and also in violation of Proceedings dated 10-08-2015, 12-08-2015 and 22-08-2015 arbitrary and illegal and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the

petitioner in service in view of the Proceedings dated 10-08-2015, 12-08- 2015 and 22-08-2015 in the interest of justice. ^ "

lA NO: ¹ OF 2023

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave for filing counter affidavit in the writ petition No.31930/2015.

I.A. NO: ¹ OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 41261 OF 2015)

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in accordance with Act 4 of 2014 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. ' service in

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER

APHC010260002015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3333]

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

WRIT PETITION NO: 31930/2015

Between:

M.Krishna Rao ...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Ap Rep By Its PrI Secretary And ² Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.M SHALINI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

• 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI
• 2.GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
• 3.SURAGANI VIJAYA KUMAR

The Court made the following:

ORDER

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

"....to issue appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing retirement notice of the petitioner is contrary to Act 4 of 2014, dated 27.06.2014 and also in violation of Proceedings dated 10.08.2015, 12.08.2015 and 22.08.2015 arbitrary and illegal and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in view of the Proceedings dated 10.08.2015, 12.08.2015 and 22.08.2015....''

2. When the matter came up for admission on 30.09.2015, this Court passed the following interim order:

" In view of the proceedings dated 10.08.2015 issued by the A.P. Co-operative Banks' Association unanimously resolving to enhance the retirement age limit from 58 years to 60 years, there shall be interim direction to the respondents to continue the petitioner in service until further orders, if the petitioner has not been retired so far. "

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance of the 3. interim order granted by this Court on 30.09.2015, the grievance of the petitioner was considered and requested to close the matter as no further orders are necessary.

4. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

SOI- ^K KASIRAO ACHARI assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

SECfl OFFICER

To,

• 1. One CC to Smt. M Shalini, Advocate [OPUC]
• 2. One CC to Smt. Bobba Vijayalakshmi, Advocate [OPUC]
• 3. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation (AP), High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
• 4. One CC to Sri. Suragani Vijaya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
• 5. Three CD Copies

SS

HIGH COURT DATED:08/08/2024

ORDER

WP.No.31930 of 2015

rf

V

CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS