IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:rAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 5997 OF 2010

Between:

Varikuti Vamsha Vardhana Reddy, S/o. late Venkata Reddy, BUS OPERATOR, R/o. Sri Sai Homes, Flat No.205, Vidyanagar, 1st Lane, Guntur.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director Chiragalli Lane, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Senior Branch manager, A.p. State Finance Corporation, Guntur Branch, Amulya Towers, Ring Road, Guntur.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings dated 9-12-2009 and consequential proceedings dated 23-02-2010 threatening action by declaring the impugned action is illegal, arbitrary and violative of rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g) 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same coercive

I.A. NO: ¹ OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 7728 OF 20101

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant interim suspension of the proceedings NO. AFC/MR&R-AT&RIPL/MHSV/2009-10/2067 dated 9-6-2009 and consequent proceedings No. AFC/RIPL/MHSV/2009-10/2798 dated 23-02-2010 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI Counsel for the Respondents: G R SUDHAKAR The Court made the following: Order

APHC010246292010

▣✌▣

[3329]

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 5997/2010

Between:

Varikuti Vamsha Vardhana Reddy,

...PETITIONER

AND

...RESPONDENT(S) The Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation and Others

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1 G R SUDHAKAR

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Learned Standing Counsel for the Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation submitted the written instructions issued by the Respondent No.02 / the Senior Branch Manager, A.P. State Finance Corporation, Guntur dated 21.08.2024, wherein it is categorically stated that pending writ petition, the loan account of the petitioner had already been closed under One-Time Settlement (O.T.S) Scheme on 31.03.2012. In view of the closure of the entire loan transaction between the petitioner and the Respondents, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SEOTWOfFiCER //TRUE COPY//

To,

• 1. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Finance Corporation, Vijayawada
• 2. The Senior Branch manager, A.P. State Finance Corporation, Guntur Branch, Amulya Towers, Ring Road, Guntur.
• 3. One CC to SRI CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI Advocate [OPUC]
• 4. One CC to SRI G R SUDHAKAR Advocate [OPUC]
• 5. Three CD Copies

'X

HIGH COURT DATED:22/08/2024

ORDER

WP.No.5997 of 2010

DISMISSING OF THE WP WITH OUT COST