Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited vs. Musunuru Apparao
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Sumathi Jagadam
Listed On:
6 Jun 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAIV[
clvlL REVISION PETITION NO: 1172 OF 2024
Between :
t\caE=E= 'r,\
M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited, A Company incorporated under the companies Act,1956 Represented by its 'authorized Signatory, V.Ratna Kumar, S/o V.Lakshman Rao, Aged about 59 years, Oco: Employee, R/o 7-1- 413/1/A/401, Sri Durga VIhar Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Telanagana. ...Petitioner/
Petitioner/First Defendant
AND
- Musunuru Apparao, S/o late Narayanappa, Aged about 85 years, R/o Plot No.24 & 25, North Extension layout, Seethammadhara, VIsakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.
...Respondent/
Respondent/Plai ntiff
- Valluru Venkateswara Rao, (Not Necessary Party)
(second Respondent is not a necessary party to the Present revision petition)
...Respondent/
Respondent/Second Defendant
petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lnd-la, aggrieved by the Docket Order Dated. 10.05.2024 in OS No.409 of 2015 on the file of Vll Additional District and Sessions Judge, VIjayawada;
lA NO: 2 OF 2024:
petition under section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the civil revision pet'lt'lon, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in
O.S.No.409 of 2015 on the file of vll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, pending disposal of CRP.No.1172 of 2024, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri M.R.K.Chakravarthy, Advocate for the Petitioner and sri v.v.Ravi Prasad, Advocate for the Respondent, the court made the following; ORDER..
flThere shall be stay of all further proceedings in o.s.No.409 of 2015 for a period of three (o3) weeks.
ln the meantime, the learned counsel for the petitI-Oner/1st defendant is directed to file copies of the documents before the court, as the learned counsel for the respondent has expressed his no objection to bring the certified copies of the documents on record.
Post the matter on 24.06.2024."
sd/-M. SR!NIVAS I ASSIST-ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
o I,L, sECTlON OFFICER
For /
To,
-
The Vll Addl'tionaI District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada
-
Musunuru Apparao, S/o late Narayanappa, R/o PIot No.24 & 25, North Extension layout, seethammadhara, visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. (by RPAD)
-
One CC to Sri. M.R.K.Chakravlrthy, Advocate [OPUC]
-
One CC to Sri. V.V.Ravi Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]
-
One spare copy
MM
$\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$
$\mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}\left(\mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}\right)$
$\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \math$
$\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} \mid \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} }$ $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}(x)$ $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} \mid \mathcal{L} \in \mathcal{L} }$
$\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \mathcal{L} \right) \mathcal{L} \left$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}(x)$
$\label{eq:1} \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \right) \mathcal{L} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \mathcal{L}} \right) \mathcal{$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$
HIGH COURT
$JS,J$
DATED: 06/06/2024
NOTE: POST THE MATTER ON 24.06.2024
ORDER
CRP.No.1172 of 2024
STAY