Shaik Abdul Sathar vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission
Before:
Hon'ble K Sreenivasa Reddy
Listed On:
29 Aug 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$[3311]$
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY
IA NO.2 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3489 OF 2023
Between:
-
- Shaik Abdul Sathar, S/o Shaik Moiddin Saheb, Age. 76 years, Occ: Patient. Río H-N0-987, 9<sup>th</sup> Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur, Andhrapradesh.
- Shaik Nazeen Begam, w/oShaik Abdul Sathar, Age. 65 years, Occ: Patient. Anandapeta, Ponnuru Lane, Road, Andbrapradesh. Guntur.
AND
Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Public Prosecutor, High court
Respondent/Complainant
- Shaik Parvin Sultana, D/o Shaik Subhani, Age. 40 years, Occ: house wife. R/o 3rd Lane, cobalt peta, Guntur, Guntur District. AP.
Respondent/de facto complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further Proceedings in C.C. No. 3962 of 2022 in crime No. 164 of 2022 Women PS Guntur, on the file of Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class For Prohibition and Excise court Guntur, Guntur Petitioners/Accused Nos2 and 3 for the offences under Sections 498-A,509 of IPC, against Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 and section' 4 R/W sec 3 MWA against the petitioners/accused Nos. 2 and 3 herein, Pending disposal of CRLP No. 3489 of 2023, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Criminal Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier Order of the High Court dated 11.05.2023 & 01.08.2023 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused and Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1 and Dr Sayyed Babu Shaik, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following ORDER:
"Interim order granted earlier is extended for a period of six weeks.
Post after four weeks."
//TRUE COPY//
$\mathsf{Fc}^\centerdot$
To,
SECTION OFFICER
Sd/- A: VIJAY BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
$\overline{1}$
The Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class For Prohibuon and Excise court 2. The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Guntur.
-
One CC to SRI. BH Rama Krishna Naik Advocate [OPUC]
-
One CC to Dr. Sayyed Babu Shaik, Advocate [OPUC]
y. Che Co is a service of a service of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Two-CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
- One spare copy $\frac{1}{2}$ psk
HIGH COURT
SRK,J
DATED:29.08.2023
ORDER
POST AFTER FOUR WEEKS
IA NO.2 OF 2023
IN
CRLP.No.3489 of 2023
INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED