Shaik Abdul Sathar vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble B S Bhanumathi
Listed On:
11 May 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3489 OF 2023
Between:
-
- Shaik Abdul Sathar, S/o Shaik Moiddin Saheb, Age. 76 years, Occ: Patient. Rio H-N0-987, 9<sup>th</sup> Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur, Andhrapradesh.
-
- Shaik Nazeen Begam, w/oShaik Abdul Sathar, Age. 65 years, Occ: Patient. Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur. H-NO-987, $9<sup>th</sup>$ Rio Andhrapradesh.
Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Public Prosecutor, High court WATER of A.P. At Amaravati.
$\begin{array}{c}\n\begin{array}{c}\n\begin{array}{c}\n\begin{array}{c}\n\begin{array}{c}\n\end{array}\n\end{array}\n\end{array}\n\end{array}$
Respondent/Complainant
在自己任何
- Shaik Parvin Sultana, D/o Shaik Subhani, Age. 40 years, Occ: house wife. R/o 3rd Lane, cobalt peta, Guntur, Guntur District. AP.
EMB JUSTIC Respondent/de facto complainant CTITION NO
Whereas the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 3 above named through their Advocate Sri BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 3962 of 2022 in crime No. 164 of 2022 Women PS Guntur, on the file of Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class For Prohibition and Excise court Guntur, Guntur District against Petitioners/Accused i,, Nos 2 and 3for the offences under Sections 498-A,509 of IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 and section 4 RW sec 3 MWA against Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3 herein;
And whereas the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK Advocate for the Petitioners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No.2 herein to show cause as to why this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted. EXENTAL
$\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} } \cup { \mathcal{L} } \cup { \mathcal{L} }$
You viz:
Sed Nos.2 S. KINSHIP I
Shaik Parvin Sultana, D/o Shaik Subhani, Age. 40 years, Occ: house wife. R/o 3<sup>rd</sup> Lane, cobalt peta, Guntur, Guntur District. AP.
I that the state of
are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate on or before 21.06.2023 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the appeal and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRIMINAL RETITION should not be admitted.
THOM FEITH colony the arc lice that we will contractors and STORION SHOP
The Court made the following ORDER:
"Issue notice to the 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent/ complainant.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to $2<sup>nd</sup>$ respondent through RPAD and file proof of service.
Harch Sterlin the which de-
$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal$
電子記述の方式
$\sim$ process $\sim$ . $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}$
$\mathcal{M}{\mathcal{A}}:=\bigcup{\alpha\in\mathcal{A}}\mathcal{M}_{\mathcal{A}}\cup{\alpha}^{\mathcal{A}}$ $\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{2} \log \frac{1}{\epsilon} \left( \frac{1}{2} \log \frac{1}{\epsilon} \right) \log \frac{1}{\epsilon} \right) \log \frac{1}{\epsilon} \left( \frac{1}{2} \log \frac{1}{\epsilon} \log \frac{1}{\epsilon} \right) \log \frac{1}{\epsilon}$ $\mathcal{L} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{M} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{M}$
$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} + \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L} + \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L}$
计学学家
Post on 21.06.2023."
Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
-
- Shaik Parvin Sultana, D/o Shaik Subhani, Age. 40 years, Occ: house wife. R/o 3<sup>rd</sup> Lane, cobalt peta, Guntur, Guntur District. AP. (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)
-
- One CC to SRI. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh. $[TUO]$ COMPANY
and the state of contratures. was before MARTINE
家のことが
$\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n$
$\mathcal{F}^{(1)}(\mathcal{F})$ SAMORE
THE FEMALE
$\ldots \ldots$
- One spare copy ER
HIGH COURT
a martin di Partin $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L}$ $\mathcal{A} \sim \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A} \mathcal{A}$ but when the $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L}$
$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$
1985年
$\label{eq:1} \begin{array}{ll} \mathbf{w} & \mathbf{w} \ \mathbf{w} & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T \ \mathbf{w} & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T & \mathbf{w}^T \ \end{array}$
$\overline{a}$
BSBJ
DATED:11/05/2023
POST ON 21.06.2023
NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.2
CRLP.No.3489 of 2023
$\mathcal{P}_{\mathcal{P}}$