Shaik Abdul Sathar vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Extension Of Interim Orders
Before:
Hon'ble B V L N Chakravarthi
Listed On:
1 Nov 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3489 OF 2023
Between:
-
- Shaik Abdul Sathar, S/o Shaik Moiddin Saheb, Age. 76 years, Occ: Patient. R/o H-No-987, 9<sup>th</sup> Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur, Andhrapradesh.
-
- Shaik Nazeen Begam, w/oShaik Abdul Sathar, Age. 65 years, Occ: Patient. Rio H-NO-987, 9<sup>th</sup> Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur, Andhrapradesh.
Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P. At Amaravati.
Respondent/Complainant
- Shaik Parvin Sultana, D/o Shaik Subhani, Age. 40 years, Occ: house wife. R/o 3rd Lane, cobalt peta, Guntur, Guntur District. AP.
Respondent/de facto complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further Proceedings in C.C. No. 3962 of 2022 in crime No. 164 of 2022 Women PS Guntur, on the file of Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class For Prohibition and Excise court Guntur, Guntur District as against Petitioners/Accused Nos2 and 3 for the offences under Sections 498-A,509 of IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 and section 4 R/W sec 3 MWA against the petitioners/accused Nos. 2<sup>th</sup> and 3 herein, Pending disposal of CRLP No. 3489 of 2023, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Criminal Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated 11.05.2023, 01.08.2023, 29.08.2023. 13.10.2023, 24.11.2023, 12.01.2024, 26.03.2024 &08.05.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused and Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1 and Dr Sayyed Babu Shaik, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following
ORDER:
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s).
None appeared for the unofficial respondent.
List the matter on 16.12.2024 under the caption "For Hearing", finally.
Interim order granted earlier is extended till then."
SD/- P.VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
For
To,
-
- The Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class For Prohibition and Excise court Guntur, Guntur District.
- 2. The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Guntur.
-
- One CC to SRI. BH Rama Krishna Naik Advocate [OPUC]
-
- One CC to Dr. Sayyed Babu Shaik, Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh. $[OUT]$
-
- One spare copy
NSR
HIGH COURT
BVLNC,J
DATED: 20.11.2024
LIST THE MATTER ON 16.12.2024 UNDER THE CAPTION "FOR HEARING", FINALLY.
ORDER
CRLP.No.3489 of 2023
INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED