Shaik Abdul Sathar vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Extension Of Interim Orders
Before:
Hon'ble K Sreenivasa Reddy
Listed On:
8 May 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3489 OF 2023 r
Betwee n :
.
-
- Shaik Abdul Sathar, S/a Shaik Moiddin Saheb, Age. 76 years, Occ: Patient. R/o H-No-987, 9th Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur, Andhrapradesh.
-
- Shaik Nazeen Begam, w/oShaik Abdul Sathar , Age. 65 years, Occ: Patient. Rio H-NO-987, 9th Lane, Anandapeta, Ponnuru Road, Guntur, Andhrapradesh.
Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3
AND
- The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Represented By Public Prosecutor, Hish court of A.P. At Amaravati.
Respondent/Complal-nant
- Shaik Parvin Sultana, D/o Sheik Subhani, Age. 40 years, Occ: house wife. R/o 3rd Lane, cobalt peta, Guntur, Guntur District. AP.
Respondent/de facto complaI-nant
Petition under Section 482 of Cir.P.C is filed praying that jn the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further Proceedings in C.C. No. 3962 of 2022 in crime No.164 of 2022 Women PS Guntur, on the file of Sp]. Judicial Magistrate of First Class For Prohibition and Excise court Guntur, Guntur District as against Petitioners/Accused Nos2 and 3 for the offences under Sections 498-A,509 of lPC, Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibmon Act 1961 and sectionl 4 RAN see 3 MWA against the petitioners/accused Nos. 2
and 3 herein, Pending disposal of CRLP No. 3489 of 2023, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the criminal Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier orders of the HI-gh Court dated ll.05.2023, 01.08.2023, 29.08.2023 , 13.10.2023, 24.ll.2023,12.01.2024 & 26.03.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of sri BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused and public prosecutor for Respondent No.1 and Dr Sayyed Babu Shaik, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following
OREER :
[[At request of learned counsel for the Petl-tioner(s), list the matter after Summer Vacation, 2024.
Interim order granted earlier is extended for a period of eI-ght (8) weeks."
sD/- v.SAVITHRI GOWRJ AS Ss =scTT: :T#th: :-TEUR:XKR
/ITRUE COPY//
ForAOOIOl^nl -`L_._.._._._
Tol
-
- The SpI. Judicial Magistrate of FI-rSt Class For Prohibition and Excise court Guntur, Guntur District.
- 2| The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Guntur.
-
- One CC to SRl. BH Rama Krishna Naik Advocate [opuc]
-
- One CC to Dr. Sayyed Babu Shajk, Advocate [opuc]
-
- Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP), High Court ofAndhra Pradesh. [ouT]
-
- One spare copy
KJ
HIGH COURT
VJP,J
DATE D.. 08/05/2024
LIST THE MATTER AFTER SUMMER VACATION, 2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.3489 of 2023
INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED