IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

1

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT ^

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

CONTEMPT CASE NOS:

1527,1792,20072008.2114.2115.2116.2117.2118,2120.2240.2247,2251, 225 2,2257.2294.2296.2373.2417.2517.2518.2519.2523.2525.2539.2752,2753,27 54.2755.2796.2798.2882.2932.2933.2950.3051.3053.3054.3064.3130,3131,3 167.3213.3278.3279.3286.3296.3298.3303.3639.4103.4395,4399,4511.4513, 4529.4530.4532.4534.4535.4536.4548.4549.4623.5098.5101,5245,5250 ,558 8.5589.5923.5995.5998 OF 2023

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1527 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 28-11-2022 in W.P.No. 38433 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Saiaboyina Raveendra Kumar, S/o.Krishnamurthy, aged about 46 years, Occ; Un employee, D.No.4-43 Mainroad, Nalluru, Kapileswarapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 2. Seelam Venkataramana, S/o.Apparao Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ; Un employee D.No.26-3-2/1 ,Patimeeda, Mandapata, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 3. Chintam Srinivasa Rao, S/o. late Venkataratnam Aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.1126, Satya Center, Kothapeta, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 4. Vegirouthu Ramachandra Rao, S/o. Vegirouthu Tata Rao Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 13-103,01 ^d Ramalayam Street, Kothapeta, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 5. Vegiroutu R.K.Prasad, S/o. Satynarayana Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. 13-114, Old Ramalayam Street, Kothapeta, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 6. Saladi N.D.Sai Kishor, S/o. Venkata Ramarao Hindu, aged about 45.years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No. 16-247, Saladi Swami Naidu Nagar, Near Pragna School, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

A

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1792 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to issue summons under Sections 10 to 12, 14, 15 and 16 of Contempt of Act and 17 of 1971, to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation of orders of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.No.39726 of 2022 dated 8.02.2023.

Between:

• 1. PW Satyanarayana, S/o Sruyanarayana, Aged about ⁵² years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o D.No. 2-32/1, Chinthalalanka Village, Inavilli Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 2. KW Satyanarayana, S/o Gangaraju, Aged about ⁴⁵ years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 8-314, Kandriga Village, Vaanapalli, Kothapeta Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 3. Perala Babji, S/o Raja Rao, Aged about 44 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o D.No. 2-52, Vinayaka Street, Muktheswaram Village, Inavilli Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 4. Kosana Gopi Venkata Satyanarayana, S/o Satyanarayana, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 1958/B, Vaanapalli Village, kothapeta Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 5. Yadia Raj Kumar, S/o Suranna, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 2-25, Nallavaripeta, Billakuru Village, Kothapeta Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 6. Paramata Yesubabu, S/o Tata Rao, Aged about 49 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o D.No. 4-28/1, Magam Road, Siripalli Village, Inavilli Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 7. Kola Satyavarma, S/o Gangadharam, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 11-46, Malakondaiah Nagar, Vaanapalli Village, Kothapeta Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 8. Guthula Dhanaraj Kumar, S/o Musalaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 7-164, Old Market Street, Vaadapalli, Kothapet Mandal, Konaseema District.
• 9. Pulligadda Lovaraju, S/o Eswara Rao, Aged about 42 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 2-61, Ramalayam Street, Sila Village, Kajuluru Mandal, Konaseema District.

• lO.Janga Veeravenkata Satyanarayana, S/o Satyanarayana, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o 29141, Sitaramapuram Village, Bhimanapalli Mandal, Konaseema District.

• II.Damisetti Nageswara Rao, S/o Sri Veeraju, Aged about 45 years, Occ:Unemployee, R/o H No. 10-26, (P) Kesavapuram Colony, Tallarevu Village and Mandal, Konaseema District.

• 12.Rambala Venkateswara Rao, S/o R. Surayanarayana, Aged about 47 years, Occ:Unemployee, R/o 9-18, Sakshivari Veedhi, Draksharama, Konaseema District.

...Petitioner/s

I

AND

1. Sri M.T. Krishna Babu, S/o Not known. Aged about major. Presently working as Principle Secretary,Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department,AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

4

• 2. Smt.Suhashini, D/o Not known, Aged about major, Presently working as Director of Medical and Health Services, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Sri Himamsha Sukla, S/o Not known. Aged about major, Presently working as District Collector,Konaseema District, Amalapuram.
• 4. Sri Durgarao Dora, S/o Not known. Aged about major. Presently working as District Medical and Health Officer, Konaseema District, Amalapuram.
• 5. Sri Kruthika Sukla, W/o Not known. Aged about major. Presently working as District Collector,East Godavari District, Kakinada.
• 6. Sri Dr.R.Ramesh, S/o Not known. Aged about major, Presently working as District Medical and Health Officer, East Godavari District, Kakinada. RR 5 and 6 Leave Granted. As per Court Order dt. 17/03/2023. Vide lA No.1 of 2023. In CC No.1792 of 2023.

...Proposed Respondent/s

(Respondents Nos.5 and ⁶ leave granted as per court order and on Dt.17.03.2023., vide I.A. No.1 of 2023 in C.C No.1792 of 2023)

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. Bokka Satyanarayana Kamla

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2007 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to Punish all the Respondents for willful

and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.41840 of 2022, dated 27-12-2022

Between:

Ethakota Venkateswarao, S/o. Thkkiyya, Hindu, aged about 42 Years, R/o. H.No. 4-4/2, Sakuru Post AND Village, AmalapuramMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioner

■r j

AND

• 1. M Tirumala Krishna Babu, I.A.S, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical AND Family Welfare, Secretariat,Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu,.The Director of Medical AND Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla I.A.S., S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Ch Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2008 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Honourable Court in W.P.No.1346 of 2023, dated 23-01-2023

Between:

• 1. Adabalakaruna Kumar, S/o. SeshasaiRangaRao, Hindu, aged about 41 Years, R/o. D.No. 2-8, YenumulavariMeraka, KesavadasuPalem Village, SakinetipalliMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. GuthikondaM.S.RaoBabjee, S/o. Rama Rao, Hindu, aged about 49 years. R/o. D.No.4-223/1, Salipeta, MalikipuramRamalayam, MalkipuramMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. ChelluboinaS.D.Prasad,S/o.RamaRao, Hindu, aged about 49 Years, R/o. D.No. 2-240/1, PleadergariMalupuVisweswarayapuram, MalikipuramMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 4. GummapuRambabu, S/o. Uma MaheswaraRao, Hindu, aged about 46 years. R/o. D.No.4-138, Near Venkateswara Temple, Mattaparru Village, MalikipuramMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 5. UndapalliHari Prasad, S/o. VenkateswaraRao, Hindu, aged about 48 Years, R/o. D.No. 1-29, UndapalliVarimeraka, KeshavadasuPallem, SakenitipalliMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

1. M Tirumala Krishna Babu, I.A.S, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare, Secretariat,Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

7

• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu. The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ^I
• 3. Smt. KrithikaShukla I.A.S., S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2114 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3725 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Kukkala Srinivas, S/o. Pedda Abbayi Hindu, aged about 52 years, R/o.D.No.1-124, Maredubaka Village, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Kondapalli Veera Venkata Satyanaraya, S/o.Chinna, Hindu, aged about 48 years, R/o.D.No.2-60, Ramalayam Veedhi, Rajakapet, Nelaturu Village, Kpeleswarapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

3. Gudimellanka Ganga Raju, S/o.Venkateswarlu Hindu, aged about 51 years, R/o.Kanakadurga Temple Veedhi Mattapparru Village, MalikipuramMandal, East Godavari District.AndhraPradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2115 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2900 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

• 1. Putta Dhana Raju, S/o. Soma Raju Hindu, aged about 42 years, R/o.D.No.2-41, Antarvedi Pallipalem, Sakinetipalli Mandal, East Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Malladi Narasimhai, S/o.Prasad Rao, Hindu, aged about 49 years, R/o.D.No.6-4-27/1/1,Mahipala Street, Opp:Venayaka Temple, Amalapuram Village and Mandal East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Malladi Kanaka Raju, S/o.Sriramulu Hindu, aged about 50 years, R/o.D.No.1-49, Antarvedi Pallipalem, Devastanam Post, Sakhinetipalli Mandal, East Godavari District.Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

^ ;

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2116 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2904 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

w

• 1. Kanchi Nagesh Kumar, S/o. Veera Raghavulu Hindu, aged about 40 years, R/o.D.No.4-55, Chinthala Thota Veedhi, Near Ramalayam Rayavaram Mandalam, Vedhurupaaka, East Godavari District.(formal ly Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema Dist)
• 2. Avidi Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Naeshwara Rao S/o.Chinna, Hindu, aged about 49 years,Occ Un employee R/o.D.No.5-53, Rajakpet, Avidi Village, Kothapeta, E.G.Dist( formally Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema Dist), East Godavari District.
• 3. Konala David Raju, S/o.Chittaya Hindu, aged about 57 years, cc. Unemployee R/o.D.No.14-30, Reddappa Vaari Peta, Kothapeta Mandal. E.G.Dist (formally Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema Dist).
• 4. Yedida Venkateshwara Rao, S/o.Chittaya, Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.4-177, Kammireddy Palem, Kothapeta, E.G.Dist(formally Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema Dist)
• 5. Medisetti Prasanna Vijay Kumar, S/o.Rama Rao Hindu, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.2-235, Sree Ramanagar, Kothapeta Mandal Kothapeta, E.G.Dist.
• V.G.D.Sudhakar, S/o.Satyanarayana Murthy Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.7-84/3, Kadali Vari Palem, Modekurru, Kothapeta Mandal, E.G.Dist. 6.

11

...Petitioners

Q;

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2117 OF 2023

Petition under Sections TO to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3709 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act ^

• 1. Vanapalli Venkata Surya Chandra Rao, S/o.Surya Satyanarayaha Murthy, Hindu, aged about ⁵¹ years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.4- 87,Vedurupaka Post, Rayavaram Mandal,E.G, District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 2. Vanapalli Papayya, S/o.Surya Satyanarayana Murthy, Hindu, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.4-87,Vedurupaka Post, Rayavaram Mandal, E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District
• 3. Kudupudi Durga Prasad Rao, S/o. Suryanarayana Hindu, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.2-34/2,Knakamahalakshmi Temple Street, Nrendrapuram, P.Gannavaram Mandal, Narendrapuram, East Godavari District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District
• 4. Gompa Ramakrishna, S/o.Gompa Chandi @ Apparao Hindu, aged about 42 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 1-33, Kothapet, Chebrolu, Chebrolu Mandal, East Godavari District, Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

n

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2118 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 13-12-2022 in W.P.No. 40103 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Gubbala Srinivas, S/o.Naga Bushnam, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.4-135, Thota Meraka Visweswarayapuram Post Malkipuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramifeddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioner; Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2120 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 39956 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Kurakula Naga Satyam, S/o.Subbarao Hindu,aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.59-18-22/1 ,Marrivari Street, Kakinada, Kakinada District.
• 2. Chitikina Ganesh Gowd, S/o.Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 41 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.3-47,Penumalle Post and Village, Katrenikona Mandal, Amalapuaram East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 3. Isukapalli Srinivasu, S/o. Ramudu Hindu,Aged about 43 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.NO.6-175, Adivipet, Ramalayam, Dontikurru, Kandikuppa Post, Katrenikona Mandal Amalapuram, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 4. Reddi Yedukondalu, S/o. Krishna Murthy Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.4-12/1,Gaddanapalli Village and Post Katrenikona Mandal Amalapuram, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 5. Vanka Radhakrishna, S/o. Bhushanam Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.3-129/A, Penumalle Post, Goraganamudi Village,Katrenikona Mandal, Amalapuram, East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2240 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 31-01-2023 in W.P.No. 2183 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Nargana Ramu, S/o.Gopalam, Hindu, aged about ⁵² years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.3-74/b, Gavallagudem Penumanchili Mandal West Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• M Krishnababu, I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Prsanna Venkatesh, The District Collector Medical and Health Service. West Godavari Dist. At Eluru. 3.
• D.Asha, The District Medical and Health Officer Medical and Family Welfare Department, West Godavari District, at Eluru. 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2247 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3710 of 2023 under Set. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• Marellapudi Sateesh, S/o.Marellapudi Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.4-9,Gandredu, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari District. Formerly Kakinada District. 1.
• Katta Srinivas, S/o.Katta Krishna Hindu, aged about 44 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.1-94,Panchayat Street, Pedapudi Mandl, Gandredu, Kakinada District Old East Godavari District 2.

...Petitioners

P:

AND

• M Krishnababu, I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: ²²⁵¹ OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4504 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Kakarpalli Gangadhara Srinivasa Rao, S/o.late Maridayya, Hindu, aged about ⁵¹ years, Occ; Un employee, R/o. H.No.4-162/3, V.VS.Collee Backside, U Kothapalli, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District. 3.
• N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 20-01-2023 in W.P.No. 4029 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Vasamsetti Krishnarjun, S/o. Suryanarayana Hindu, aged about 55 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.69-7-10, Near Kankadurga Temple, Rajendra Nagar, Kakinada ,East Godavari Distrcit, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M..Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2257 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4442 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Manchimsetti Yedukondalu, S/o.Venkata Rama Rao Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.1-70, Bhatlapalika Village, K.Gangavaram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 2. Kadiyala Satyanarayana, S/o.Subba Rao Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No. 1-62, Unduru, Cheruvu Gattu Ramalayam, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 3. Kotipalli Kanta Rao, S/o. Veera Raju Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.10-165, Nunnavari Street, Drakasha Rama, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 4. Kanchi Prakasa Rao, S/o. Chandra Rao, Hindu, aged about 50 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 3-52 A, Kanchipeta, Pedda Tallapolam Post, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 5. Bonthu Veera Venkata Satyanarayana, S/o.Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No. 2-68, Navaratnala Garuvu, Pedda Tallapolam Post, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 6. Daki Vijaya Raju, S/o.D.lssac Patnaik Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.N.4-69, Gollala Cheruvu, Hasanabada Post, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

7. Chodi V.V.S.Srinivas, S/o.Tatabbai Hindu, aged about 50 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 1-95, Unduru Village, Cheruvu Gattu Ramalayam, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M..Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritik Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2294 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.3869 of 2023, dated 16-02-2023

• 1. Ramavarapu V.V. Ramachandra Rao, S/o. Venkata Ramana Murthy, Hindu, aged about 47 Years, R/o. D.No. 2-13/1, Main Road, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Boyidi Prasad, S/o. Raja Rao, Hindu, aged about 50 years. R/o. D.No.1- 8-9, Kondayyapeta, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Vasamsetti Srinu Babu, S/o. Venkata Rao, Hindu, aged about 45 Years, R/o. D.No. 1-101. Opp Elementary School, Z.Bhavaram Post, Goddatipalem, Karapa, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 4. Grandham Ravi Kumar, S/o. Chandra Rao, Hindu, aged about 47 years. R/o. D.No.2-151, Chakalipalem, P.Gannavararn Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 5. Ch.Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Maridayya, Hindu, aged about 50 years, R/o. D.No.19-1-287, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh
• 6. Meka Ramesh, S/o. Pulliah, Hindu, Aged about 52 years, R/o. 55-8-1, Subrahmanya Nagar, Near New C T R I, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

• 1. Sri M.Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla IAS, W/o. Himnshu Sukhia, The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2296 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W,P.No.3865 of 2023, dated 16-02-2023

Between:

• 1. Adari Sathi Babu, S/o. Apparao, Hindu, aged about 52 Years, R/o. D.No. 6-27, Kirlampudi Village, Kirlamupudi Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Kothapalli RajeSh, S/o.Balasundaram, Hindu, aged about 52 years. R/o. D.No. 1-2-1/I, Churuch Street, Kondayyapalem, Kakinada East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Sarakanam Govinda Rao, S/o. Pedanagesh, Hindu, aged about 43 Years, R/o. D.NO. 7-87. Chinnimpeta, Siripuram Post, Yeleswaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 4. Madireddy Ganapathi Rao, S/o. Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged about 45 years. R/o. D.No1-171, Jagapathi Nagaram, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District, .Andhra Pradesh.
• 5. Dadi Naidu., S/o. Venkanna, Hindu, Aged about 52 years, R/o. D.No.1- 118, Ramalayam, Geddanapalli Village, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 6. N.Rama Krishna, S/o. Subba Rao, Hindu, aged about 53 years, R/o. D. 1-101, Kothapeta, Ramalayam, Prathipadu Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shulda I.A.S., S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2373 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.4310 of 2023, dated 22-02-2023

Between:

• 1. S.Gangadhar, S/o. Suryanarayana, Hindu, aged about 47 Years, R/o. D.No. 115-5-165, Bommana Colony,Near 4th Bridge Road, Konthamuru, Raj amahendravaram Rural, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Inumarti V.T.Kiran kumar, S/o. Nageswara Rao, Hindu, aged about 46 years. R/o. D.No. 17^9-12, Seethampeta Rajamhendravaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. Near Ramalayam,
• 3. R.Chandra Raju, S/o. Suryanarayana Raju, Hindu, aged about 45 years, R/o. D.No.3-102, Near Sita Rama Raju Statue, Patchigoruvanipalem Village, Pedhamushidiwada Post, Paravada Mandal, Vishakapatnam District.

...Petitioners

• 1. Sri M.Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shulda I.A.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2417 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3710 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Kondra Venkata Mohanarao, S/o.Appa Rao Hindu, aged about 54 years. Occ; Un Employee R/o. D.No. 56-4-1, Trinadh Nilayam, Municif Junction,Jaganayakpur, East Godavari District, Formerly Kakinada District.
• 2. Gandreti Satyanarayana, S/o. Sathiraju Hindu, aged about 53 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.Pulimeru, Gandreti Van Veddhi, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Formerly Kakinada District.
• 3. Shaik Hussain, S/o. Shaik Madina Basha Aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 15-5-4, Gabhavari Street, Rck Rao pet Kakinada, Kakinada District.

4. Gunapalli Venkaeswara Rao, S/o. Satyam Hindu, aged about 58 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 2-68, Settibaliza Street, Near Raju Gari Hospital, Sarpavaram, Kakinada, Kakindada District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2517 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4444 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

• 1. Kadalisrinivasa Rao, S/o.KadaliV.V. Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged about 43 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.VeerannaMeraka, Allavaram Post AND Mandal E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.ArnbedkarKonaseema District.
• 2. VanacharlaSatyanarayana, S/o.Subrahmanyam, Hindu, aged about 52 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.Pcdagaruvu, Allavram Post and Mandal E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.ArnbedkarKonaseema District
• 3. Kasi Venkataramana, S/o. Appalaswami Hindu, aged about 51 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.Ainapuram Post, MummidavaramMandal, East Godavari District. Formerly Dr.Br.ArnbedkarKonaseema District
• 4. MekalaMeerasaheb, S/o.M.Verriyya Hindu, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.KandikuppaBojjavaripeta Post, KatrenikonaMandal East Godavari District, Formerly Dr. Br.ArnbedkarKonaseema District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.ShantiPrabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2518 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 02-01-2023 in W.P.No. 42507 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Ardhani Sri Venkata Satyanarayana Raju, S/o. Narasimha Murthy, Hindu, aged about 53 years Occ: Un employee, R/o.1-20, Dam Center, Pallam Post and Village, KatrenikonaMandal, E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.AmbedkarKonaseema District.
• 2. K.Suresh, S/o. Nageswararao Hindu, aged bout 45 years,Occ: Un employee R/o.Ainapuram Village, Mummidivaram Mandal, E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

4. N.ShantiPrabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2519 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4440 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Kudupudi Maharaj Kumar, S/o. Late Satyanarayana Murthy Hindu, aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.5-8,Vaidyanagar-3, Backside 3'^'^ APSP, Vakalapudi, Kakinada District.

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.

4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2523 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.5647 of 2023, dated 07-03-2023

Between:

• 1. Ganjsetti Venkata Ramana Lai, S/o. Narsimha Rao, Hindu, aged about 48Years, R/o. D.No,4-3-37/4, Kurasala Vari Street, Amalapuram, EastGodavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Tuttepu Surya Prakasa Rao, S/o. Satyam, Hindu, aged about 53 years. R/o. D.No. 10-106/1, Allavaram Polam, Allavaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Pappula Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Pattabhi Ramayya, Hindu, aged about 48 years, R/o. D.No. 2-21, Janupalli, Pedda Veedhi, Amalapuram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

• Sri M.Tiurmala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical AND Family Welfare,Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical AND Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla I.A.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalii Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2525 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.5244 of 2023, dated 02-03-2023

Between:

1. Gudala Srinivasa Rao, S/o. late China Narayana, Hindu, aged about 45Years, R/o. D.No.5-14,Geddanapalli village, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

• 2. Gudala Chandra Rao, S/o. Late Surya Rao, Hindu, aged about 53 years. R/o. D.No.5-21, Geddanapalli village, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Kurumella Veera Babu, S/o. Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged about 52 years, R/o. Q. No. 1-61 Divili Post, Chandramampalli Village,Peeddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 4. Kantiboina Nageswararao, S/o. Shambha Murthy, Hindu, aged about 47 years, R/o. D.No.2-177/1, Divili Post, Chandrramampalli Village, PeddapuramMandall, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

r ⁱ

AND

• 1. Sri M.Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare,Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. KrithikaShukla I.A.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

34

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2539 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and wantonly disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.4918 of 2023, dated 28-02-2023

Between:

( )

Divili Varaha Nageswara Rao, S/o. Veerabrahma Charyulu, Hindu, aged about 44 Years, R/o. D.No.6-100, Gowthuvari Veedhi, Kirlampudi Village, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. Sri M.Tiurmala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. KrithikaShukla I.A.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

-ri; Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapaili Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2752 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 28-11-2022 in W.P.No. 38500 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Nichenakolla Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Nageswara Rao Aged about 42 years, Occ; Un employee R/o. D.No.7-122, V.R.ColanyMagam Village AinavilliMandal, East Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh
• 2. Tottaramudi Eswara Rao, S/o.Krishnamurthy Aged about 44 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.4-111, Sakaraigudem, VTC Krapa, AinavilliMandal, East Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Veiagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2753 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 01-03-2023 in W.P.No. 10611 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Oleti Srinivasa Rao, S/o. MeerRaju Aged about 44 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.8-185, GollalaVeedhi, Sitharamapuram Village, h/o.Korangi, TallerevuMandal, East Godavari District.
• 2. K.Puma Chandra Srinivasa Rao, S/o.lateAppa Rao Aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. Flat No.T2, Kamala Residence, Near G.P.T. College Ashok Nagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Petitioners

• M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.

4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) mi'

...Respondents

.-1

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapaili Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2754 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3710 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Vadaparthi Venkateswarlu, S/o.Brahmayya Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 34-6-5/1,RamachandrapuramManda Muchimilli Village, Sivalayam Street, Kakinada, Kakindada District.

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishna Babu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.

4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2755 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 10-03-2023 in W.P.No. 5999 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. D.S.S. Vara Prasad, S/o.Abhimanyudu Aged about 54 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.2-150,Ganapathi Center, Bandarulanka Village AmalapuramMandal, East Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh
• 2. Rayudu Chandra Sekhar, S/o.Venkatarao Aged about 47 years, Occ; Un employee R/o. D.No.12-2, Near Verabhadra Swamy Temple, Bandarulanka Village, East Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2796 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2899 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Tadi Vasantha Rao, S/o. China Narasimha Murthy Aged about 52 years, R/o.D.No.4-34, Sankaraguptam Village, MallipuramMandal, East Godavari District

...Petitioner

AND

1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.ShantiPrabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2798 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 13-4-2023 in W.P.No. 9013 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

r

• 1. Pemmireddy Veera Ravindra Rao, S/o.Rama Rao Hindu, aged about 50 years, Occ; Un employee, R/o.D.No.9-140/1, PemmireddyPalem, Near Kanakadurgamma Temple, Kesanakurru, I.PolavaramMandal, Dr.B.R.AmbedkarKonasamaSeema Dist. Old East Godavari District.
• 2. Kemisetti Pardhasaradhi, S/o. K.RamaRao Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee D.No. 8-98, Near Margadarsi Convent, Seetharamapuram, Tallarevu(Post),and Mandal Kakinada District, Old East Godavari District.
• 3. Chodi Govindaraju, S/o.IateChodi Satyam Hindu, aged about 51 years Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.9-99, Kesavapuram, Tallarevu, Polekurru, P.Mallavaram, Kakinada District, Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Shaik Abdul Gafoor, S/o.ShaikValiSaheb Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.Rajavommangi Post and Mandal, Raj avommangi. East Godavari District. (presentlyA.S.R.District).

...Petitioners

'5:'-

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.ShantiPrabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2882 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders

⁴³ u

of this Hon'ble Court dated 16-03-2023 in W.P.No. 6359 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Vasamsetti Krishna Murthy, S/o.V.Subba Rao Hindu, aged about 54 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.7-145, Ravendra Nagar, Kakinada Rural, East Godavari District.
• 2. Ardhani Narasimha Murthy, S/o.Narasimha Murthy Hindu, aged about 46 Occ: Un employee R/o. D. No. 13-11 Pandi, Pallamkurru, Dr.B.R.AmbedkarKonaseema District. Old East Godavari District.
• 3. Kunche Maneswara Rao, S/o.Appa Rao Hindu, aged aboaut 47 years. Lampakalova Post, PrahipaduMandal Kakinada District, Old East Godavari District. Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.1-38,

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M..Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2; V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, KakinadaDistrict (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2932 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 16-03-2023 in W.P.No. 6359 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

P.Purushottam, S/o.Bhadra Rao Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.4-11, Brahimn Street, Near Shivlayam, PedapudiMandal, Peddada, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2933 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2904 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Godapatti Moses, S/o.Yeshayya Hindu, aged about 50 years, Occ: Un employee Surya Veedhi, Velampalem, RamachandrapuramMandal, Dr.B.R.AmbedkarKonaseema District Old R/o.D.No.1-95/2, E.G.District.

...Petitioner

AND

• M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada,_Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapaili Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2950 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 16-03-2023 in W.P.No. 6359 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Burri Raja Mohan Rao, S/o.B.Erakayya Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.9-18,Srinivasa Colony, Ramanayyapet, Kakinada, Kakinada District. Old East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

6

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3051 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 24-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4617 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Kunche Naga Babu, S/o.Surya Rao Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.2-284, Banduladoddi Street, Ramachodavaram Village and Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

^V J

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. VV Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3053 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of his Hon'ble Court dated 22-02-2023 in W.P. No. 4297 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• Y.V.V. Satyanaryana, S/o Ammiraju Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ R/o D.No. 2-301/1, Bonduladoddi Street, Ramapachodavaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 1.
• Nanduri Venkata Rao, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Hindu aged about 42 years, R/o Raghudevapuram Village, Seetha Nagaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 2.

...Petitioners

• M.Krishna Babu, The state of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh 1.
• V. Rami Reddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Krithika Shukla, The District Collector, Kakinada, Kakinada District, (Old East Godavari District) 3.

4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer, Kakinadd, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3054 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4440 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Thotakura Ramanna, S/o.Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.1-137, DhivanamVari Street, Kapileswarapuram, KapileswarauramMandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

f:

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3064 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 28-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4916 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Mukka Lakshmana Rao, S/o.Ramakrishna Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.18-7-38, Lingampeta, 1st Street. Aryapuram, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Athikari Satyanarayana, S/o.Durga Naidu Hindu, aged about 46 years, R/o.Dusaripamu Village, Thantikonda Post, RajavommangiMandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioners

AND

1. M..Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3130 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Honourable Court in W.P.No.7880 of 2023, dated 29-03-2023

Between:

• 1. Ravanam Surya Bhaskara Rao, S/o.Kanaka Raju, Hindu, aged about 50 Years, R/o.H.No. 2-8/1, Edarapalli Village, Amalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Dandem Rajubabu, S/o. Seetharamayya, Hindu, aged about 49 years, R/o.D.No.2-125, RamalayamVeedhi Srungarayunipalem Village, Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District,Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Kolia Siva Kumar, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, Hindu, aged about 46 years, R/o. D.No.1-108, GubbalaVari Group, Malikipuram Village and Mandal, East Godavari Mandal, Andhra Pradesh.

AND

• 1. Sri M Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla I.A.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3131 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.8377 of 2023, dated 04-04-2023

Between:

• 1. Yandamuri Satish Kumar, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Hindu, aged about 48Years, R/o. D.No.4-2-21. Kothapeta, Pithapuram, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Devisetty Satish, S/o. Raja Rao, Hindu, aged about 46 years. R/o. D.No. 1-2, Divill, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 3. Anusuri Ananda Rao, S/o. Late Sitaramayya, Hindu, aged about 57 years, R/o. D.No. 12-373, A.S.R.Colony, SRMT Tank Street, Turangi, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. Sri M Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla I.A.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

53

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3167 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 16-03-2023 in W.P.No. 6359 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Medapati Bhavani Prasad, S/o. Varahalu Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.6-44-1,Adarsa Colony, Tuni, Kakinada District, Old East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M.Krishna Babu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical AND Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical AND Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical AND Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3213 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 29-03-2023 in W.P.No. 7850 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Vanacharla Srihari, S/o.Gopalakrishna Venkateswara Rao Hindu, aged about 41 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.Gangalakurru Agraharam, Rachapalem, Ambajipet Mandal, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, Old East Godavari District.
• 2. Sudarsanam Satya Srinivasa Charyulu, S/o. Sudarsanam Anthacharyulu Hindu, aged about 52 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.3-79,Pasarlapudi, Sivalayam Veedhi, Mamidikuduru Mandal, East Godavari District.
• 3. Kaligineedi Saheb Kapu, S/o. Satyanarayana .Rao Hindu, aged about 54 years, Occ, Un employee R/o.D.No. 5-142, Gopinath Nagar, Sarpavaram Mandal, Panasapadu Village, Kakinada Rural, Kakinada Dist Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Koduri Suresh Kumar, S/o. Sesha Ratnam Hindu, aged about 52 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.4-130, Main Road, Bodasakuru, Allavaram Mandal, Dr.B.R:Ambedkar Konasaseema District Old East Godavari District.
• 5. Maddula Balarama Murthy, S/o. Veerabhadra Rao Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 25-5-60/1, lind Floor, Vinukonda Vari Street, Near Ramalayam, Kakinada, Kakinada District Old East Godavari District.

(P

AND

• 1. M Krishnababu.I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3278 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 01-03-2023 in W.P.No. 5039 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

1. Beera Mohan Vijaya Kumar, S/o.Saheb Hindu, aged about 52 years Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.2-109,Domada Village,Pedapudi Mandal Kakinada District.

• Pasagadugula Rambabu, S/o. late Chinna Nookaraju Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.7-110,Opp: Post Office, Indrapalem, Kakinada District. 2.
• 3. Datia Ramesh Varma, S/o. Krishnam Raju Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.68-10A-20,Rajeswari Nagar, Near JNTU Engineering College, Kakinada Urban Kakinada District

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M Krishanbabu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District. 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3279 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders

of this Hon'ble Court dated 01-03-2023 in W.P.No. 5046 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• Mathireddy Sominaidu, S/o.late Tatabbai Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ; Un employee R/o.D.No.3-74,Labbarthi Village, Rajavommangi Mandal, Alluri Sitaramaraju District, Old East Godavari District. 1.
• Golla Ananda Raja Kumar, S/o.Venkataratnam Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ; Un employee R/o.D.No.64/A,Kusumarai Village, Gangavaram Mandal Alluri Sitharama Rajju District, Old East Godavari District. 2.

...Petitioners

#;

AND

• M Krishna Babu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District. 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3286 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 29-03-2023 in W.P.No. 7850 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Kakada Chitibabu, S/o.Kakada Seshuvudu Hindu, aged about 44 years Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.6-4-55/1,lndhiranagar, Pithapuram, Kakinada District. Old East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V. Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3296 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 01-03-2023 in W.P.No. 5042 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Koppisetti Venkata Pallamsetti, S/o.late Naga Venkateswara Rao, Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.11- 295/3,Konkapalli, Near Ramakrishna Samithi Down Amalapuram,Old East Godavari District, Presently Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 2. Shaik Gouse Mohiddin, S/o.Ahmad Vali Hindu, aged about 54 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.69-29-9, Afreen Plaza, Gandhi Park Road, Lalacheruvu Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.

...Petitioners

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat^ Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3298 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4440 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

%

Tadi Haribabu, S/o. Tadi Mohana Rao Hindu, aged about 42 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.4-137, Unduru Village, Ramaraopet, Samalakota, Kakinada District.

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishna babu. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4, Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3303 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 03-05-2023 in W.P.No. 11611 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Rambala Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 40 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.1-116, Uppudi Village, Near Ramalayam, Katrenikona Mandal Uppudi, East Godavari District.
• Sarat,Kumar Singarati, C/o.Paidayya Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.2-99, Water Tank Street, Ganganapalli Village, Ganganapalli, East Godavari District. 2.
• 3. Koppisetti Srinivas, S/o. Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.1-42, Dontikurru Village, Katrenikona Mandal, Dontikurru, East Godavari District. Old East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. M Krishnababu,I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

• 2. V Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shulda, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3639 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4444 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Ilia Naga Rama Krishna, S/o. Prakasham, Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ; Un employee R/o. D.No. 11-73, M.K.Nagar, Vanapalli, Kothapeta Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. M Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsellor the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalii Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4103 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 25-04-2023 in W.P.No. 10391 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Tadi Rambabu, S/o.Verriyya Hindu, aged about 43 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No. 3-47, Chinapeta, Near Ramalayam Ganti, Kothapeta Mandal, Kothapeta, Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District. Old East Godavari District.
• 2. Mummidivarapu Venkateswara Rao, S/o.BuHiabbai Hindu, aged about 55 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.10-511/A, Eswar Nagar Ramanayyapeta, Kakinada Rural, Mandal Godavari District. Kakinada. Old East

...Petitioners

AND

• M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District. 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4395 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Honourable Court in W.P.No.13094 of 2023, dated 12-05-2023

Between:

Miriyala Suresh Kumar, S/o. Moola Swamy, Hindu, aged about 47 Years, R/o. Flat No.D2, 4th floor, Lakshmi Enclave, FCI Colony, Boat Club back side street, Ramanayyapeta, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

AND

• 1. Sri M.Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla LA.S., W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalii Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4399 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the Respondents for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 12340 of 2023, dated 09-05-2023

Between:

Kamana Lakshmana Rao, S/o. Sree Ramulu, Hindu, aged about 45 Years, R/o. D.No.4-89, Main Road, Marlava Village and post, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. Sri M.Tirumala Krishna Babu, S/o. Not know to the Petitioner, Hindu, Principal Secretary to Government, Health Medical and Family Welfare Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Smt. Krithika Shukla I.A.S,, W/o. Himnshu Sukhla. The District Collector East Godavari Kakinada, East Godavari District.
• 4. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. CH Naga Mehar Baba

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4511 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 23-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4440 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Pediredia Nageswara Rao, S/o. Manikyam Hindu, aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. 1-23,GORSA, U.Kothapalli Mandal, Kakinada District

...Petitioner

K

AND

• 1. M Krishnababu.I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4513 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 03-05-2023 in W.P.No. 11606 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Pasagadugula Giri Babu, S/o.Tatabbai Hindu, aged about 52 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No. 1-26, Krishnadevipeta, Golugonda Mandal, Anakapalli Dist, Old Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M Krishanbabu,I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Pattaneshettey Ravi Subhash, The District Collector Anakapalli Anakapalli District
• 4. Dr.A.Hemanth Kumar, The District Medical and Health Officer Anakapalli, Anakapalli District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4529 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 10-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3320 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

• 1. Kandregula Murali Mohana Krishna, S/o. Veeram Setti Hindu, aged about 47 years, R/o.D.No.3-76/1, Nadimianka, Edarad Village, Mamidikudhuru Mandal, East Godavari Distict, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. Molleti Koteswara Rao, S/o.Bhaskar Rao Hindu, aged about 47 years, R/o.D.No.1-57/1, Lutukuru Village, Mamidikudhuru Mandal, East. Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M. Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical AND Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical AND Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical AND Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalii Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4530 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 29-03-2023 in W.P.No. 7850 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• Barla Babaji, S/o.B.Devudubau Hindu,aged about 53 years, Occ:Un employee, R/o .D.No .18- 16-1 1/1,Mantri Pragadavari Street,Suryanarayanapuram, Kakinada, Kakinada District. Old East Godavari District. 1.
• Vande Joshi Varaprasad, S/o. Subba Rao Hindu, aged about 56 years, Occ; Un employee R/o.D.No.1-4-103/8,Chittodu Thota, Pitapuram, Kakinada District, Old East Godavari District. 2.

...Petitioners

AND

• M. Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4532 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 39982 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Kala Lova Raju, S/o.Veerraju, aged about 42 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.5-62, Cheruvugattu Center, Tallarevu, Tallarevu Mandal Kakinada District
• 2. Chodi Balakrishna, S/o.Venkata Reddy Hindu, aged about 41 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.9-100, Tallarevu, Kesavapuram Tallarevu Mandal, Kakinada District.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M. Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. VV Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4534 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 08-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3040 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Pichika Peda Vera Venkata Bulliya, S/o.Gandhi Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No.6240/1, Erla Cheruvu, Near M.P.P.School, Mamidikuduru Village and Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

• M Krishnababu,I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioner; Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4535 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 14-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3604 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Balia Raju, S/o. Ganapathi Hindu, aged about 42 years, R/o.D.No.1- 41/a,Magallamuru Village, Allavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

• 1. M Krishnababu,I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. VV Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4536 OF 2023

75

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 02-01-2023 in W.P.No. 42507 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Kada Venkata Rao, S/o.K.Krishna Murthy, aged about 51 years, Occ; Un employee, R/o.D.No.1-71 Ramalayam Street, Kurakallaalli, Rayavaram Mandal, Ramachandrapuram, E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 2. Chollangi Sree Rmbabu, S/o.Narasimha Murthy Hindu, aged about 47 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.1-68, Durgamma Gudi Street, Kuralapalli, Rayavaram mandal, Ramachandrapuram, E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.
• 3. Pithani Prasad, S/o. Satyanrayana Aged about 45 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.1-110, Main Road, Rayavaram Mandal, Kuralapalli, Ramachandrapuram, E.G. District. Formerly Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

• 1. M..Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary. Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector, Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada kakinada District(Old East Godavari District)

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4548 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 15-02-2023 in W.P.No. 39982 of 2022 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Ilia Srinivas, S/o. Seshagiri Rao Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.2-22,Kurakallapalli Village, Rayavaram Mandal, Kuramapuram Post, East Godavari District. Presently Dr.Br.Ambedkar Konaseema District.

...Petitioners

• M. Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. VV Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapaili Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4549 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 29-03-2023 in W.P.No. 7850 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Nanaparapu Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Uri employee R/o.D.No.31-2-8/8A, Bradipeta, Pydarao Gari Veedhi, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District.

...Petitioners

AND

• M. Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4623 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 08-02-2023 in W.P.No. 3035 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Chellingi Jagan, S/o. Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 43 years, R/o D.No .3 -109,Ayyavaritippa, Gudimellanka Village, Malikipuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

78

...Petitioner

• 1. M.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4; Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5098 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2899 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Sabbathi Hari Krishna, S/o. Subba Rao Hindu, aged about 46 years, Occ Un employee R/o.MuchammaAgraharam, Konkapalli Post, AmalapuramMandal, East Godavari District
• 2. Nela Johnson Babu, S/o. Surya Rao Hindu, aged about 51 years, Occ Un employee R/o. D.No.4-166/1 Behind Panchayathi,

ThumalapalliVillage.AllavaramMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M Krishna Babu.I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5101 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2875 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. Ramakurthi Nookaraju, S/o. Someswara Rao Hindu, aged about 53 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.MerakaChamavaram Post, SrungavaramNearSaibaba Temple, RouthulapudlMandal, Kakinada District.
• KalagaSrinivasa Prasad, S/o. Anjaneyulu Hindu, aged about 50 years, Occ: Un employee R/o. D.No.7-3-2, Prakasam Street, RamaraoPeta, Kakinada, Kakinada District. 2.

...Petitioners

AND

• 1. M Krishna Babu,l.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5245 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders

of this Hon'ble Court dated 10-08-2023 in W.P.No. 20406 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Yallapu Siva, S/o.Rambabu Hindu, aged about 43 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No. 2-12-9/20A, Peddapuram. Kakinada District,Old East Godavari District

...Petitioner

AND

• M Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shulda, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5250 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 24-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4304 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Pallisyamasundara Kumar, S/o.Krupanandam Hindu^ aged about 56 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No. 3-17,Panchayathi Canal Road, Podalada Village, RazoluMandal, East Godavari District Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

• M. Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District 4.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5588 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High

Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 16-03-2023 in W.P.No. 6359 of 2023 under So... 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Govvala Satyanarayana, S/o.Veeranna Hindu, aged about 52 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.Ranupalli (PO) Amalapuram Mandal Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District. Old East Godavari District..

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M Krishnababu,I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.hy its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• Krithika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District. 3.
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5589 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 24-02-2023 in W.P.No. 4304 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Bonam Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana Hindu, aged about 49 years, Occ: Un employee, R/o.D.No. 1-89, Sevalayam Veedhi, Vanapalli Village Kothapeta Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M Krishna Babu.I.A.S, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District ( Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5923 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2875 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Danduprolu Srinivasa Rao, S/ovenkanna Aged About 47 years Occ: Un Employee R/o D No 23134 Frezer Peta 10th Street G G H Backside Kakinada Kakinada District.

...Petitioner

AND

• 1. M Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)
• 4. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5995 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 07-02-2023 in W.P.No. 2875 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

• 1. B Sukumar, S/o. late Sundara Rao Hindu, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 16-36-21.4th Street, Sambamurthi Nagar, Kakinada Kakinada District. (Formerly E.G. District.)
• 2. B.Suresh Babu, S/o. late Sundara Rao Hindu, aged about 50 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No. 16-36-21.4th Street, Sambamurthi Nagar, Kakinada Kakinada District. (FormerlyE.G. District.)
• Guthurti Dhana Nooka Raju, S/o.Suryanarayana Hindu, aged about 51 years, Occ; Un employee R/o.D.No.5-8, Parrakalava, Suryapeta, Thammavaram, Kakinada Rural, Kakinada District. 3.

...Petitioners

• M Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 1.
• V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh; Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2.
• Kritika Shukla, The District Collector,Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.
• Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 4.

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao

Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5998 OF 2023

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 02-03-2023 in W.P.No. 5143 of 2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act

Between:

Balia Venkata Siva Nageswara Rao, S/o.late Veeraju Hindu, aged at 48 years, Occ: Un employee R/o.D.No.6-24-1,Gowridevi Temple Street, Tuni, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioner

• 1. M..Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
• 2. V.Ramireddy, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 3. Kritika Shukla, The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District)

5. Ronanki Ramesh, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. V V Prabhakara Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh

Court made the following:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

CONTEMPT CASE Nos.1527. 1792. 2007, 2008. 2114, 2115. 2116. 2117, 2118, 2120, 2240, 2247, 2251. 2252, 2257.2294, 2296. 2373, 2417, 2517, 2518, 2519, 2523. 2525. 2539, 2752. 2753, 2754, 2755, 2796, 2798, 2882.2932. 2933, 2950. 3051. 3053. 3054, 3064. 3130. 3131, 3167, 3213, 3278, 3279, 3286, 3296, 3298. 3303, 3639. 4103. 4395, 4399, 4511, 4513, 4529. 4530. 4532. 4534. 4535, 4536. 4548. 4549, 4623, 5098, 5101, 5245. 5250. 5588, 5589. 5923. 5995. 5998 of 2023

COMMON ORDER:-

As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is inter-related, all these writ petitions are taken up together and are disposed of through this common order. C.C.No.2007 of 2023 is taken as ^a leading case. 1.

This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the alleged willful disobedience in implementing the order dated 28.11.2022 by this 2. Court in V/.P.No.38433 of 2022.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned 3. counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in pursuance 4. of Lr.Rc.No.091/E4-A/2022 dated 16.07.2022, the Government issued Notification dated 20.07.2022 for recruitment to the posts of 2324 Multipurpose Health Assistants (Male) in all the districts along

with some other paramedical posts. As per the notification, the qualification required is a pass in S.S.C. With reference to the said notification, some of the candidates invoked the remedies available by approaching the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, but the O.As filed by them were dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, ^a batch of Writ Petitions vide W.P.No.15107 of 2002 etc., were filed. A Division Bench of the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad by an order dated 11.09.2003 disposed of the matters, with a direction to the Government to prepare the select list of candidates in accordance with the rules who possessed S.S.C and Diploma Certificates either from Government institutions or four private institutions and issue appointment orders, within a period of four weeks, duly terminating the services of those candidates, who were appointed by virtue of the interim orders passed by the High Court. The said order was carried in appeal to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, wherein by an interim order, dated 06.02.2004 in S.L.P(C) No. 1925-44/2004, the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to issue directions not to make any fresh appointments in pursuance of the judgment of the High Court in W.P.No.15107 of 2002 and that the appointments which

2

3

have already been made shall not be disturbed. As there is an acute need to fill up the posts of MPHAs (Male), the Government of Andhra Pradesh filed an interlocutory application in the batch of S.L.Ps mentioned supra. The Hon'ble Supreme Court by an order, dated 07.08.2006 was pleased to vacate the orders granting stay and permitted the State Government to fill up the vacancies from the selected candidates, subject to the outcome of Special Leave Petitions. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also recorded the statement made by the learned Additional Solicitor General that the candidates who were already appointed shall not be reverted. Pursuant to the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, dated 07.08.2006, Government issued G.O.Rt.No.1234, dated 15.09.2006 for filling up of the posts of MPHAs (Male). Though the Government is permitted to fill up the posts from the merit list of 2002 written examination, it did not fill up the posts from the merit list and made appointments, as per its whims and fancies.

5. The S.L.Ps preferred by the Government of Andhra Pradesh were dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by judgment dated 09.08.2011 and thus the orders passed by the Division Bench, dated 11.09.2003 in W.P.No.15107 of 2002 and batch were

confirmed. In view of the orders of dismissal by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the persons who were appointed in terms of G.O.Rt.No.1234, dated 15.09.20G6 as also by virtue of the interim orders passed by the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad based on Intermediate as educational qualification were terminated as per Government Orders in G.O.Rt.No.273, dated 16.02.2012. A fresh list was drawn as per the orders in W.P.No.15107 of 2002. The candidates whose services were terminated by virtue of G.O.Rt.No.273, dated 16.02.2012 made representations to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, which in turn, appointed a group of Ministers to take action on the said representations: On the advice of group of Ministers, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Rt.No.1207, dated 09.10.2013 to take back all the 1200 MPHAs (Male). Aggrieved by the said action of the Government in issuing G.O.Rt.No.1207, dated 09.10.20213, some of the candidates filed O.A.No.7441/2013 etc. before the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal seeking suspension of the G.O.Rt.No.1207, dated 09.10.2013. By an order dated 28.11.2013, the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad dismissed O.A.No.7441/2013 and batch

4

against which, the petitioners therein filed W.P.No.38060 of 2013 etc., before the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

6. The Hon'ble High Court was pleased to grant stay of appointments made pursuant to G.O.Rt.No.1207, dated 09.10.2013. Seeking to vacate the said interim orders, the respondents therein filed a vacate stay petition vide W.P.M.P.No.1015/2014. After hearing the parties concerned, the Hon'ble High Court was pleased to issue directions dated 15.09.2015 to the respondent authorities therein to make efforts to implement the judgment of High Court, dated 09.11.2003 in W.P.No.15107 of 2002 and batch.

7. Pursuant to the above referred orders, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued Memo No.7342/G2/2015-08, dated 24.05.2016, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:-

"The attention of the Director of Public Health & Family Welfare, A.P. Hyderabad is invited to the references cited and the Government after careful examination of the request in the reference 3rd cited hereby direct the Director of Public Health & Family Welfare A.P., 5 Hyderabad to take necessary action as per the orders of Hon'ble High Court, dated 15.09.2015 in W.P.No.38060 of 2013, 3178/2014 & 2504/2015 to appoint the candidates who are remained in

5

6

the Common Seniority List (SSC & Inter) prepared as per the orders of High Court/Apex Court after filling up of the 2324 posts of MPHA(M) and having merit over the individuals appointed through G.O.Rt.No.1207, HM&FW Dept, dated 09.10.2013 at first instance by terminating the individuals if necessary, those appointed in G.O.Ms.No.1207, dated 09.10.2013 and having lesser merit among the individuals who appointed so and thereafter, keeping in view of the observation of the Hon'ble High Court, take action to accommodate such terminated individuals as per their merit subject to availability of vacancies of MPHA(M) with the prior permission of Government only after completion of the above task.

Upon hearing both the parties, W.P.Nos. 17665 of 2021 were disposed of by this Court on 27.12.2021 with the following directions: 8.

i) The respondents shall consider cases of the Writ Petitioners for appointment as MPHAs within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in terms of Memo No.7342/G2/2015-8, dated 24.05.2016 based on their merit, if any candidate less meritorious than the Writ Petitioners are appointed;

• ii) If any of the Writ Petitioners have not submitted the relevant certificates/documents they should be called upon to submit the same by granting reasonable time of not less than four (04) weeks;
• iii) In the event of any genuine objection for considering the case of any of the Writ Petitioners, they shall be notified the same by issuing appropriate notice/communication and afforded an opportunity before taking further action in the matter.

The order challenged in the W.P.No.38433 of 2022 was passed 9. on the basis of the similar orders passed in common judgment W.P.No.17665 of 2021 & batch.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, the common order in W.P.No.17665 of 2021 & batch was challenged before the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.432 & 450 of 2022, wherein, the Division Bench vide common order dated 20.09.2022 dismissed the appeals, confirming the common order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.17665 of 2021 & batch dated 27.12.2021.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that, pursuant to the common order passed by the Division Bench of this Court, the 11. Government issued Memo No.7342/G2/2015-8 dated 24.05.2016 directing the Director of Public Health & Family Welfare and all District Medical Officers to implement the orders of this Court. Even then, the respondents did not appoint the petitioners as Multi Purpose Health Assistants though the candidates with lesser merit were appointed. Learned counsel would submit that, the respondents had no intention to implement the orders of this Court and deliberately flouting the orders of this Court on one pretext or the other. The failure on the part of the respondents in implementing the orders of this Court would amount to disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court and, therefore, liable for punishment under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Complaining the same, the petitioners had filed the present Contempt Case.

Respondent No.2 - Director of Public Health and Family Welfare filed counter affidavits in ail the contempt cases, admitting about non-compliance of numerous orders passed by this Court caused due to administrative delay and tendered unconditional apology to this Court for non-compliance/non-implementation of the 12.

8

m

m.

orders. In Paragraph No. 17, it is submitted that, Respondent No.2 directed the Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, Vijayawada to take immediate steps to again re-consider the cases of the petitioners in terms of the orders passed in W.P.No. 17665 of 2021. Immediately, the Director of Public Health and Family Welfare, Vijayawada issued proceedings dated 30.08.2023 directing the 4*^^ respondent to re-consider the cases of the petitioners immediately for complying the orders of this Court. Accordingly, the 4^^^ respondent vide proceedings dated 02.09.2023 issued notices and the petitioners attended the office of the 4*^ respondent on 13.09.2023. The 4*^ respondent explained to the petitioners about the difficulty in considering their cases for appointment to the post of MPHA due to pendency of W.P.No.21 of 2022 and also in view of the services related to communicable and non-communicable diseases. It is submitted that the 4**^ respondent being the appointing authority re-considered the issue and issued speaking orders vide proceedings dated 19.09.2023 informing about pendency of the writ petition and in view of no necessity of work for the MPHA at present, as such the candidature for appointment as MPHA is not feasible.

Further, it was informed that the cases of the petitioners would be

9

considered in future basing on the necessity of work of MPHA as per their merit and as per rules, as such, prayed to close the Contempt Case against Respondent No.2.

13. Respondent No.3 - The District Collector, Kakinada filed counter affidavits in all the contempt cases, admitting that the order of this Court passed on 28.11.2022 was supposed to be implemented in four weeks, but the same could not be implemented in true spirit due to numerous orders due to administrative delay.

14. It is submitted that, after receipt of orders from this Hon'ble th Court, the Government had conducted meeting and directed the 4 respondent - Appointing Authority to implement the orders of this Court in W.P.No. 17665 of 2021. Accordingly, the 4^^ respondent issued speaking orders to the petitioners on 19.07.2023. It is submitted that, a review meeting was conducted on 29.08.2023 and th after verifying the proceedings dated 19.07.2023 issued by the 4 respondent, it was noticed that the proceedings are not in consonance with the directions issued by the Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No. 17665 of 2021 dated 27.12.2021.

10

m

15. Respondent No.4 District Medical & Health Officer, Kakinada filed counter affidavits in all the contempt cases, denying material allegations. It is contended in that the final order dated 22.02.2023 of this Hon'ble Court was communicated to the office of the DM&HO on 15.03.2023 immediately, steps were taken to implement the directions of the Hon'ble Court. Accordingly, after taking into consideration of all the above facts and also in view of the present status that at present there is no necessity to appoint the MPHAs in view of the establishment of Village Secretariats and most of the field activities like MCH Services, Immunization, NCD screening is being carried out by ANMs in each village secretariat, now forced to appoint them by virtue of orders of this Hon'ble Court. By virtue of disposing the writ petition at admission stage if the petitioners are to be accommodated there will be a huge financial loss to the Government. Had this Hon'ble Court provided an opportunity to file counter affidavit all the above facts could have brought by way of counter and the matter have been decided on merits and requested to dismiss the contempt case.

16. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the record.

17. Before adverting to the facts of the case, ^I find it apposite to narrate the legal position for better appreciation of the case and application of law.

18. The Contempt of Court is defined under Section 2(a) as follows; "contempt of court means, civil contempt or criminal contempt". Whereas clause (b) of Section 2 defines Civil Contempt as "willful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order. writ or other process of a court or willful breach of an undertaking given to a court.

19. The Contempt jurisdiction is not conferred on the Subordinate Courts and it is only conferred on the Court of record, ih view of Article 215 of the Constitution of India. According to it, the High Court shall be ^a Court of record and shall have all the powers of such a Court, including the power to punish for contempt of itself. The jurisdiction of contempt is independent jurisdiction of its original nature. Therefore, this Court is competent to exercise such power to punish a person, who is guilty of contempt and this jurisdiction is

NV,J CC No.2007 of 2023

13

enjoyed by Courts, is only for the purpose of upholding the jurisdiction of the judicial system that exists. While exercising this power, the Court must not react by the emotion, but must act judicially. Contempt proceedings are intended to ensure compliance of the orders of the Court and strict adherence of rule of law. Once, the essentials for initiation of contempt proceedings are satisfied, the Court shall initiate action, uninfluenced by the nature of direction in a pending lis before the Court vide judgment in Priya Gupta and others vs. Additional Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and others^), Contempt jurisdiction enjoyed by the Courts is only for the purpose of upholding the majesty of judicial system that exists. While exercising this power, the Courts must not be hyper sensitive or swang by emotions, but must act judicially (Vide: Chairman, West Bengal Administrative Tribunal vs. SK. Monobbor Hossain^).

20. Contempt" is disorderly conduct of contemnor causing serious damage to the institution of justice administration. Such conduct, with reference to its adverse effects and consequences can be discernibly classified into two categories one which has a

^{^} 2012 (12) SCALE 289

^{^} (2012)3 SCALE 534

transient effect on the system and/or the person concerned and is likely to wither by the passage of time while the other causes permanent damage to the institution and administration of Justice (Vide: Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and others^).

On perusal of the entire material placed before this Court along with the counter affidavit, it is observed that the respondents 21. neither initiated proper steps for implementation of the orders of this Court, nor kept quiet without there being any appointments. In fact. the respondents are appointing other than the writ petitioners in the existing vacancies in utter disobedience of the orders of this Court.

22. The petitioners filed appointment orders issued by the respondents, pending contempt cases, substantiating their claim that others have been. appointed on the guise that other persons are meritorious candidates, denying the right of the petitioners herein.

It appears that, on the guise of the compliance of orders of this Court, the respondents are appointing their interested persons on the ground of meritorious candidates by ignoring the petitioners 23. even after filing contempt cases.

^ (2011) 6 SCALE 220

14

NV,J CC No.2007 of 2023

24. The other contention of the learned Government Pleader that, in view of the orders of this Court dated 04.01.2022 in W.P.No.21 of 2022, the respondents are not in a position to implement the orders of this Court is only an invention and to defeat the interest of the petitioners and to invent a legal reason to drag over the matters without implementing the orders of this Court.

25. On perusal of the counter affidavit, it appears that, keeping the orders of this Court aside. Respondent No.4 took a decision on his own that, there was no necessity to appoint the MPHAs in view of the establishment of Village Secretariats since most of the field activities like MCH Services, Immunization, NCD screening were being carried out by ANMs in each village secretariat, thereby. Respondent No.4 is being forced to appoint the petitioners by virtue of orders of this Hon'ble Court. Respondent No.4 also opined that there would be huge financial loss to the Government, if the petitioners are appointed. Such callous attitude of the officer in disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court, taking his own decisions is highly reprehensible and it is also contrary to the method and manner, as directed by this Court. But, without following the method

15

16

and manner as directed by this Court and without undertaking any exercise to draw the merit list. Respondent No.4 acted as per her whims and fancies to favour the interested candidates, which is nothing but willful disobedience of the orders of this Court.

26. In the present facts of the case, Respondent No.4 with scant respect to the order passed by this Court, exhibited callous and negligent attitude in complying with the order, knowing the illconsequences that flow from such violation i.e. conscious violation of the order of this Court, which amounts to violation of Rule of Law. Therefore, the act of Respondent No.4 by her disorderly conduct caused serious damage to the institution of justice administration. Such conduct, with reference to its adverse effects and consequences, can be discernibly classified into two categories one which has a transient effect on the system and/or the person concerned and is likely to wither away by the passage of time while the other causes permanent damage to the institution and administration of justice, (vide Kalyaneshwari vs. Union oflndia'^).

27. When once an order is passed, it is the duty of the authorities to implement the same without giving any interpretation and if the " (2011) 6 SCALE 220

order is contrary to law, they are at liberty to file appropriate appeal before the appellate authority. But, without preferring an appeal, the respondent/contemnor cannot interpret the order and give different meaning to the order passed by the Court, which is sought to be implemented, as directed by this Court. In fact, Respondent No.4 neither preferred writ appeal nor filed any vacate petition and also did not file any petition for modification either for exemption of time or for reduction of any liability amount to be paid. Such act of the respondent/contemnor is illegal in view of the law declared by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Commissioner, Karnataka Housing Board vs. C. Muddaiah^$5$, wherein, it is held as follows:

31. We are of the considered opinion that once a direction is issued by a competent Court, it has to be obeyed and implemented without any reservation. If an order passed by a Court of Law is not complied with or is ignored, there will be an end of Rule of Law. If a party against whom such order is made has grievance, the only remedy available to him is to challenge the order by taking appropriate proceedings known to law. But it cannot be made ineffective by not complying with the directions on a specious plea that no such directions could have been issued by the Court. In our judgment, upholding of such argument would result in chaos and confusion and would seriously affect and impair administration of justice. The argument of the Board, therefore, has no force and must be rejected.

$5(2007)$ 7 SCC 689

32. The matter can be looked at from another angle also. It is true that while granting a relief in favour of a party, the Court must consider the relevant provisions of law and issue appropriate directions keeping in view such provisions. There may, however, be cases where on the facts and in the circumstances, the Court may issue necessary directions in the larger interest of justice keeping in view the principles of justice, equity and good conscience. Take a case, w3here ex facie injustice has been meted out to an employee. In spite of the fact that he is entitled to certain benefits, they had not been given to him. His representations have been illegally and unjustifiably turned down. He finally approaches a Court of Law. The Court is convinced that gross injustice has been done to him and he was wrongfully, unfairly and with oblique motive deprived of those benefits. The Court, in the circumstances, directs the Authority to extend all benefits which he would have obtained had he not been illegally deprived of them. Is it open to the Authorities in such case to urge that as he has not worked (but held to be illegally deprived), he would not be granted the benefits? Upholding of such plea would amount to allowing a party to take undue advantage of his own wrong. It would perpetrate injustice rather than doing justice to the person wronged. We are conscious and mindful that even in absence of statutory provision, normal rule is 'no work no pay'. In appropriate cases, however, a Court of Law may, nay must, take into account all the facts in their entirety and pass an appropriate order in consonance with law. The Court, in a given case, may hold that the person was willing to work but was illegally and unlawfully not allowed to do so. The Court may in the circumstances, direct the Authority to grant him all benefits considering 'as if he had worked'. It, therefore, cannot be contended as an absolute proposition of law that no direction of payment of consequential benefits can be granted by a Court of Law and if such directions are issued by a Court, the Authority can ignore them even if they had been finally confirmed by the Apex Court of the country (as has been done in the present case). The bald

contention of the appellant-Board, therefore, has no substance and must be rejected.

The same view is expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Prithawi Nath Ram vs. State of Jharkhand and others^, where the Court held that, while dealing with an application for contempt, the Court is really concerned with the question whether the earlier decision which has received its finality had been complied with or not. It would not be permissible for a Court to examine the correctness of the earlier 28. decision which had not been assailed and to take the view different than what was taken in the earlier decision If any party concerned is aggrieved by the order which in its opinion is. wrong or against rules or its implementation is neither practicable nor feasible, it should always either approach to the Court that passed the order or invoke jurisdiction of the Appellate Court. Rightness or wrongness of the order cannot be urged in contempt proceedings. Right or wrong the order has to be obeyed. Flouting an order of the Court would render the party liable for contempt. While dealing with an application for contempt the Court cannot traverse beyond the order, non-compliance of which is alleged It cannot traverse beyond the order. It cannot test correctness or otherwise of the order or give additional direction or

® (2004) 7 see 261

delete any direction. That would be exercising review jurisdiction while dealing with an application for initiation of contempt proceedings. The same would be impermissible and indefensible.

29. In The State of Bihar vs. Rani Sonabati Kumarf, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while dealing with violation of order passed under Order XXXIX Rules ¹ & ² of Civil Procedure Court, held that, a party proceeded against Order XXXIX Rule 2(3) of C.P.C for disobedience of an order of injunction cannot be held to have willfully disobeyed the order provided two conditions are satisfied viz., (1) that the order was ambiguous and was reasonably capable of more than one interpretation (2) that the party being proceeded against in fact did not intend to disobey the order, but conducted himself in accordance with his interpretation of the order. The question whether a party has understood an order in a particular manner and has conducted himself in accordance with such a construction is primarily one of-fact, and where the materials before the Court do not support such a state of affairs, the Court cannot attribute an innocent intention based on presumptions, for the only reason, that ingenuity of Counsel can discover equivocation in the order which is the subject of enforcement.

^ AIR 1961 see 221

NV,J CC No.2007 of 2023

Though undoubtedly proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2(3) of C.P.C have a punitive aspect - as is evident from the contemnor being liable to be ordered to be detained in civil prison, they are in substance designed to effect the enforcement of or to execute the order. This is clearly brought out by their identity with the procedure prescribed by Order XXI Rule 32 of C.P.C for execution of a decree for permanent injunction. No doubt the State Government not being a natural person could not be ordered to be detained in civil prison, On the analogy of Corporations: for which special provision is made in Order XXXIX Rule V C.P.C, but beyond that, both when ^a decree for ^a permanent injunction is executed and when an order of temporary injunction is enforced the liability of the State Government to be proceeded against appears to us clear.

30. While dealing with an application for contempt, the Court is really concerned with the question as to whether the earlier decision which has received its finality had been complied with or not. This Court is primarily concerned with the question of conduct of the party who is alleged to have committed default in complying with the directions in the judgment or order. If there is any ambiguity or indefiniteness in the order, it is for the concerned party to approach the Higher Court, if

NV,J CCNo.2007 of 2023

22

according to him/her the same is not legally tenable and such a question has necessarily to be agitated before the Higher Court. Assuming that a question arose about impossibility of complying with the order, if that was the case, atleast Respondent No.2 could have done was to assail correctness of the order/judgment before the Higher Court. If any party concerned is aggrieved by the order which in its opinion is wrong or against rules or its implementation is neither practicable nor feasible, it should always either approach the Court that passed the order or invoke jurisdiction of the Appellate Court. Rightness or wrongness of the order cannot be urged in contempt proceedings. Right or wrong the order has to be obeyed. Flouting an order of the Court would render the party liable for contempt.

31. Applying the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to the present facts of the case, this Court can safely conclude that. Respondent No.4, in utter disobedience of the order passed by this Court, consciously violated the order passed by this Court and did not implement the order, as directed by this Court. Such conduct would not only impede the rule of law, but also cause serious damage to the judicial institution and judicial administration. Therefore, such conduct of Respondent No.4 cannot be encouraged by this Court, taking lenient

view against such person who caused serious damage to the judicial institution itself.

32. On perusal of the counter affidavits/replies filed by Respondent Nos.1 to 3, indicates that they instructed Respondent No.4 about the orders of this Hon'ble Court and for implementation of the same, since Respondent No.4 is the-appointing authority. As such, there have not violated nor disobeyed the orders of this Court, as such they are not liable for contempt, since they have taken all steps for implementation of the orders of the Hon'ble Court and pressed for closure of contempt proceedings against them. From the above analysis, this Court finds that Respondent Nos.1 to 3 being highest statutory authorities and Head of Department, they discharged their duties in short of compliance of the orders of this Hon'ble Court. Once after receipt of orders of this Court, it is the prime and mandatory duty on the part of the respondents that thby collectively and individually are required to take all necessary steps to comply the orders of the Court in Letter and Spirit and also in all respects. But, contrary to the said settled principle the acts and omissions of Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are only'throwing the burden upon Respondent No.4 by issuing letters/proceedings, without taking required steps or without guiding Respondent No.4 is nothing

but violation and disregard towards the orders of this Court. Mere issuing proceedings instructing Respondent No.4 to comply the orders is not compliance. Being authorities, having knowledge about orders of this Court, they shall under statutory obligation to take all steps and also see that the orders of this Court should be implemented with concerned authority. In the instant case, Respondent Nos. ¹ to 3 neither acted as statutory higher authorities nor taken any steps with due indulgence in compliance of the orders of this Court, except through instructions the respondent for implementation of the orders of this Court. Hence, Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are also liable for contempt.

In view of offering unconditional apology by Respondent Nos. ¹ to ³ to the Court and also in view of the issuance of proceedings instructions to Respondent No.4, who is an appointing authority for implementation of the orders, the Court took lenient view against Respondent Nos.1 to 3, but they have committed contempt of court. Hence, they are liable for punishment under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. 33. or

NV,J CCNo.2007 of 2023

As discussed above, and in view of the findings recorded by this Court in the above paragraphs, Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are liable for punishment as per Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and thereby they are punished to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousands Only) and Respondent No^4 - N. Shanti Prabha, District Medical & Health Officer, Kakinada is liable for punishment as per Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, in all the contempt cases, and thereby she is punished sentencing her to undergo simple imprisonment for a term of six months (06) and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only). 34.

In the result, contempt cases are allowed, directing Respondent Nos.1 to ³ to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) each and Respondent No.4 to undergo simple imprisonment for a term of six (06) months and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only). 35.

X

36. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed.

After dictating the above order, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/Contemnors requested this Court to suspend the above order, so as to enable them to prefer an appeal. 37.

38. At request of the learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/ Contemnors, the above order is suspended for a period of six (06) weeks to prefer an appeal. In case no appeal is preferred or no stay is granted by the Appellate Court in the appeal if any preferred. Respondent Nos.1 to 4/Contemnors shall surrender before Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh on 19.08.2024 before 05.00 p.m to undergo sentence.

SD/-K.TATA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR •\

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

\

• 1. The Registrar Judicial, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati

• Sri. M.T.Krishnababu, The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2.

• Smt. Kritika Shukla, I.A.S,The District Collector Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District) 3.

• 4. Sri. N.Shanti Prabha, The District Medical and Health Officer Kakinada, Kakinada District (Old East Godavari District
• 5. Smt.Suhashini, D/o Not known, Aged about major, Presently working as "Director of Medical and Health Services, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 6. Sri Himamsha Sukla, S/o Not known. Aged about major. Presently working as District Collector,Konaseema District, Amalapuram.
• 7. Sri Durgarao Dora, S/o Not known. Aged about major. Presently working as District Medical and Health Officer, Konaseema District, Amalapuram.
• 8. Sri Dr.V.Rami Reddy, S/o. Not known to the petitioner Hindu, The Director of Medical and Health Service Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
• 9. Sri. Ronanki Ramesh, S.o. Not known to the Petitioner The District Medical and Health Officer East Godavari District, Kakinada, East Godavari District

• 10.Sri. Prsanna Venkatesh, The District Collector Medical and Health Service. West Godavari Dist. At Eluru.

• II.D.Asha, The District Medical and Health Officer Medical and Family Welfare Department, West Godavari District, at Eluru.

• 12.Pattaneshettey Ravi Subhash, The District Collector Anakapalli Anakapalli District

• 13.Dr.A.Hemanth Kumar, The District Medical and Health Officer Anakapalli, Anakapalli District.

• 14.Dr.R.Ramesh, District Medical & Health Officer, Kakinada,E.G.District.

• 15.The Section Officer,Accounts Section, High Court of A.P., Amaravathi.

16.The Registgrar(Judicial),High Court of A.P., Amaravathi.

17.One CC to Sri. Bokka Satyanarayana Kamala Advocate [OPUC]

18. One CC to Sri. VV Prabhakara Rao Advocate [OPUC]

19.One CC to Sri. Vadapalli Ramesh Advocate [OPUC]

20.One CC to Sri. Ch Naga Mehar Baba Advocate [OPUC]

21.Three CD Copies

SAM

(Notice: AH Respondents to be sent via RPAD)

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/07/2024

ORDER

SAM

CC.Nos.1527,1792,2007,2008,2114,2115,2116,2117, 2118,2120,2240,2247,2251,2252,2257,2294,2296,2373, 2417,2517,2518,2519,2523,2525,2539,2752,2753,2754, 2755,2796,2798,2882,2932,2933,2950,3051,3053,3054, 3064,3130,3131,3167,3213,3278,3279,3286,3296,3298, 3303,3639,4103,4395,4399,4511,4513,4529,4530,4532, 4534,4535,4536,4548,4549,4623,5098,5101,5245, 5250,5588,5589,5923,5995,5998 of 2023

ALLOWING THESE CONTEMPT CASES

93