$\begin{bmatrix} 33681 \end{bmatrix}$

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION NO: 10648 OF 2018

Between:

1. B.Sathish, S/o Kesavalu, Aged about 30 years, R/o Eddulagattu Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District.

$\ldots$ PETITIONER(S)

AND

• 1. The State of A.P., Rep. by Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
• 2. The Inspector General of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
• 3. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor District.
• 4. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palamneru, Chittoor District.
• 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kuppam, Chittoor District.
• 6. The Station House Officer, Ramakuppam P.S., Chittoor District.
• 7. M. Muneppa, S/o Chengaiah, Aged about 60 years, R/o Rajupeta Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 6th respondent in registration of series of crimes against the petitioner which is illegal, improper and violation of Article 19 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 2nd respondent to entrust the investigation in Crime No.12 of 2018 of Ramakuppam P.S. to any other independent agency.

lA NO: ¹ OF 2018

%

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th and 6th respondents not to harass the petitioner by registering further false cases against the petitioner, pending disposal of above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. PRAKASH C .

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

APHC010240622018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3368]

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION NO: 10648/2018

Between:

B. Sathish

...PETITIONER

...RESPONDENT(S)

AND

The State Of A.P. and Others

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PRAKASH C

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR HOME (AP)

The Court made the following:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:-

"to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 6^th respondent in registration of series of crimes against the petitioner which is illegal, improper and violation of Article 19 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to entrust the investigation in Crime No.12 of 2018 of Ramakuppam Police Station to any other independent agency and pass such..."

$\overline{2}$ . Sri C.Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the State $3.$ would submit that the matter was already settled before the Lok Adalat.

In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. $4.$ There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA

ITRUE COPYII

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To.

• 1. One CC to SRI. PRAKASH C Advocate [OPUC]
• 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME (AP), High Court Of Andhra Pradesh.
• $[TUO]$
• 3. Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

BVLNC,J

DATED:23/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.10648 of 2018

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS