[{"_1":2,"_389":-5,"_390":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4},"routes/cnr.$cnr.$order",{"_5":6,"_167":168,"_387":388,"_254":260,"_256":-5},"caseData",{"_7":8,"_237":238,"_246":247,"_368":369,"_386":-5},"courtCaseData",{"_9":10,"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":22,"_23":24,"_25":26,"_27":28,"_85":86,"_87":88,"_90":91,"_92":93,"_94":95,"_96":97,"_98":99,"_167":168,"_169":170,"_171":170,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":177,"_178":179,"_180":181,"_182":183,"_184":185,"_186":183,"_187":41,"_188":41,"_189":190,"_191":192,"_194":195,"_197":198,"_200":201,"_203":204,"_205":206,"_207":208,"_209":210,"_225":226,"_227":228,"_229":230,"_235":236},"caseNumber","202100035142022","district","YSR KADAPA","state","AP","caseTypeSub","Category CRLP ( 41 ) Sub Category CRIMINAL PETITION ( 1 ) Sub Sub Category U/s.482 Cr.p.c under sec.138 and 142 ( 68 )","causelistType","DAILY LIST","courtName","APHC","courtNo",3396,"firDetails",{},"judicialSection","UNKNOWN","historyOfCaseHearings",[29,38,43,44,48,53,57,59,62,65,67,69,71,73,75,78,81,84],{"_30":31,"_32":33,"_34":35,"_36":37},"causeListType","CAUSE LIST MOTION HEARING","judge","D RAMESH","hearingDate","2022-05-05","purposeOfListing","FOR ADMISSION",{"_32":39,"_40":41,"_36":42},"VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA","businessOnDate","2025-02-18","Disposed",{"_30":31,"_32":33,"_40":35,"_36":37},{"_30":18,"_32":45,"_40":46,"_36":47},"NINALA JAYASURYA","2022-07-04","FOR EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDERS",{"_30":18,"_32":49,"_40":50,"_34":51,"_36":52},"B S BHANUMATHI","2024-02-16","2024-02-19","ADMISSION",{"_30":18,"_32":54,"_40":55,"_34":56,"_36":47},"K SREENIVASA REDDY","2024-02-27","2024-03-19",{"_30":18,"_32":54,"_40":58,"_36":47},"2024-04-16",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":60,"_34":61,"_36":47},"2024-07-10","2024-07-16",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":61,"_34":63,"_36":64},"2024-07-23","FINAL HEARING",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":63,"_34":66,"_36":47},"2024-08-05",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":66,"_34":68,"_36":47},"2024-08-13",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":68,"_34":70,"_36":47},"2024-08-21",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":70,"_34":72,"_36":47},"2024-09-06",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":72,"_34":74,"_36":47},"2024-09-10",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":76,"_34":77,"_36":47},"2024-09-11","2024-09-26",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":79,"_34":80,"_36":64},"2024-10-16","2024-10-17",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":82,"_34":83,"_36":64},"2024-10-29","2024-11-07",{"_30":18,"_32":39,"_40":83,"_36":64},"filedDocuments",[],"judgeCode",[89],"1041","subordinateCourt",{},"linkCases",[],"benchName","Single Bench","purpose","FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDERS","interimOrders",[100,106,108,110,113,115,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,141,143,145,147,149,151,153,155,157,159,161,163,165],{"_101":35,"_102":103,"_104":105},"orderDate","description","View Spl Cell Orders","orderUrl","order-1.pdf",{"_101":35,"_102":103,"_104":107},"order-2.pdf",{"_101":35,"_102":103,"_104":109},"order-3.pdf",{"_101":46,"_102":111,"_104":112},"View Court Proceedings","order-4.pdf",{"_101":46,"_102":103,"_104":114},"order-5.pdf",{"_101":116,"_102":111,"_104":117},"2022-07-05","order-6.pdf",{"_101":50,"_102":111,"_104":119},"order-7.pdf",{"_101":50,"_102":111,"_104":121},"order-8.pdf",{"_101":55,"_102":103,"_104":123},"order-9.pdf",{"_101":58,"_102":111,"_104":125},"order-10.pdf",{"_101":58,"_102":103,"_104":127},"order-11.pdf",{"_101":60,"_102":111,"_104":129},"order-12.pdf",{"_101":60,"_102":103,"_104":131},"order-13.pdf",{"_101":61,"_102":103,"_104":133},"order-14.pdf",{"_101":63,"_102":111,"_104":135},"order-15.pdf",{"_101":63,"_102":103,"_104":137},"order-16.pdf",{"_101":66,"_102":139,"_104":140},"View Digi-Interim Order","order-17.pdf",{"_101":66,"_102":111,"_104":142},"order-18.pdf",{"_101":68,"_102":103,"_104":144},"order-19.pdf",{"_101":68,"_102":139,"_104":146},"order-20.pdf",{"_101":70,"_102":111,"_104":148},"order-21.pdf",{"_101":70,"_102":139,"_104":150},"order-22.pdf",{"_101":72,"_102":111,"_104":152},"order-23.pdf",{"_101":76,"_102":139,"_104":154},"order-24.pdf",{"_101":76,"_102":111,"_104":156},"order-25.pdf",{"_101":79,"_102":111,"_104":158},"order-26.pdf",{"_101":79,"_102":139,"_104":160},"order-27.pdf",{"_101":82,"_102":111,"_104":162},"order-28.pdf",{"_101":83,"_102":139,"_104":164},"order-29.pdf",{"_101":83,"_102":111,"_104":166},"order-30.pdf","cnr","APHC010231002022","cnrCourtCode","APHC01","courtCode","cnrCaseNumber","023100","cnrYear","2022","caseType","ABA","caseStatus","DISMISSED","filingNumber","4401/2022","filingDate","2022-05-04","registrationNumber","3514/2022","registrationDate","nextHearingDate","decisionDate","judges",[39],"petitioners",[193],"Sew Infrastructure Limited","petitionerAdvocates",[196],"D S SIVADARSHAN","respondents",[199],"The State of Andhra Pradesh","respondentAdvocates",[202],"PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)","actsAndSections","03-CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - 482","taggedMatters",[],"earlierCourtDetails",[],"interlocutoryApplications",[211,221],{"_212":213,"_214":215,"_216":217,"_218":219,"_182":183,"_220":42},"regNo","IA/1/2022 Classification : Stay Petition","particular","Stay Petition","remark","18-02-2025","filedBy","SEW Infrastructure Limited","status",{"_212":222,"_214":223,"_216":217,"_218":219,"_182":224,"_220":42},"IA/1/2024 Classification : Extension Petition","Extension Petition","2024-02-15","listingDates",[],"notices",[],"judgmentOrders",[231],{"_101":41,"_232":233,"_104":234},"orderType","Final Order","order-31.pdf","caveatDetails",[],"entityInfo",{"_167":168,"_239":240,"_241":240,"_242":243,"_244":245},"nextDateOfHearing","2025-02-18T00:00:00Z","lastDateOfHearing","dateCreated","2025-07-04T07:48:30.333205Z","dateModified","2025-08-22T02:55:01.481637Z","files",{"_246":248},[249,257,261,265,269,273,277,281,285,289,293,297,301,305,309,313,317,321,325,329,333,337,341,345,349,353,356,360,364],{"_250":251,"_252":253,"_254":255,"_256":-5},"pdfFile","APHC010231002022-order-1.pdf","markdownFile","APHC010231002022-order-1.md","markdownContent","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No. CRL.P.No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 1. | 05.05.2022 | DR, J | |\r\n| | | CRLP.No.3514 of 2022 | |\r\n| | | Notice. | |\r\n| | | Learned counsel for the petitioner/s
is | |\r\n| | | nd
permitted to take out personal notice on the 2 | |\r\n| | | respondent,
through RPAD and file proof of | |\r\n| | | service. | |\r\n| | | Learned
senior
counsel appearing
on | |\r\n| | | behalf of the petitioners submitted that the 2nd | |\r\n| | | respondent
herein/defacto
complainant,
who | |\r\n| | | has issued the notice under Section 142 of N.I. | |\r\n| | | Act, 1881 is a holder of the cheque and is not | |\r\n| | | entitled
to
file
any
complaint
against
the | |\r\n| | | petitioner under the Act, 1881. | |\r\n| | | Considering the submissions made and | |\r\n| | | on perusal of the material on record, there shall | |\r\n| | | be stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.202 | |\r\n| | | of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of | |\r\n| | | First Class, Mydukur for a period of eight (08) | |\r\n| | | weeks. | |\r\n| | | Post after Summer Vacation 2022,
for | |\r\n| | | filling proof of service. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ________
DR, J | |\r\n| | | Pnr | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |","aiAnalysis",{"_250":258,"_252":259,"_254":260,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-10.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-10.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No.: Criminal Petition No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| $\\overline{\\text{SL.}}$
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|--------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|\r\n| $5.$ | 16.04.2024 | SRK, J | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended for a | |\r\n| | | period of twelve $(12)$ weeks. | |\r\n| | | Post the matter after eight (08) weeks. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | SRK, J | |\r\n| | | $\\mathsf{DN}\\mathsf{B}$ | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":262,"_252":263,"_254":264,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-11.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-11.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\nTUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n### :PRESENT:\r\n\r\nTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n### Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n# Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n# Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n# **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial\r\n\r\nMagistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n## **IA NO: 1 OF 2022**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, & 27.02.2024, made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n## ORDER:\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended for a period of twelve (12) weeks.\r\n\r\nPost the matter after eight (08) weeks.\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nSd/-B.CHITTI JOSEPH **ASSISTANT REGISTRAR** \r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\n $\\mathbf{V}\\mathsf{O},$ \r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n $\\sim -\\omega_{-2}$ \r\n\r\n**PSR** \r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nSRK,J\r\n\r\nDATED: 16.04.2024.\r\n\r\nNOTE: POST THE MATTER AFTER EIGHT (08) WEEEKS.\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":266,"_252":267,"_254":268,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-12.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-12.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 06. | 10.07.2024 | VJP, J | |\r\n| | | Heard Sri Avinash Desai, leaned Senior | |\r\n| | | Counsel
representing
Sri
D.S.Sivadarshan, | |\r\n| | | learned counsel for the Petitioner(s). | |\r\n| | | At
request
of
learned
counsel
for | |\r\n| | | Respondent
No.2,
list
the
matter
on | |\r\n| | | 16.07.2024. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended | |\r\n| | | till then. | |\r\n| | | _______ | |\r\n| | | VJP, J
Dinesh | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":270,"_252":271,"_254":272,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-13.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-13.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n## THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n### Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n### Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial\r\n\r\nMagistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n## IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, 27.02.2024 & 16.04.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"Heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri D.S.Sivadarshan, learned counsel for the Petitioner(s).\r\n\r\nAt request of learned counsel for Respondent No.2, list the matter on 16.07.2024\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\nSd/- U. SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR AS\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER SECTION UFFICER** \r\n\r\n## To,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n\r\n $\\sim$ \r\n\r\n $\\cdot \\in \\mathbb{N}$ \r\n\r\n5. One spare copy\r\n\r\nksr\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nVJP, J\r\n\r\nDATED: 10.07.2024.\r\n\r\nlist the matter on 16.07.2024.\r\n\r\nORDER\r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":274,"_252":275,"_254":276,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-14.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-14.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n### :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n## Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n## **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial\r\n\r\nMagistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n## IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, 27.02.2024, 16.04.2024 & 10.07.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n### **ORDER:**\r\n\r\n\"At request of learned counsel for Respondent No.2, list the matter on 23.07.2024.\r\n\r\nSd/- U. SRI DEVI\r\n\r\nSECTION OFFICER\r\n\r\n $\\sim$ \r\n\r\nASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\n $\\mathbf{1}$ \r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n# To,\r\n\r\n1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n\r\n2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n\r\n3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n\r\n4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n\r\n5. One spare copy\r\n\r\nksr\r\n\r\n $\\frac{1}{2}$ \r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nVJP, J\r\n\r\nDATED: 16.07.2024.\r\n\r\nlist the matter on 23.07.2024.\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":278,"_252":279,"_254":280,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-15.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-15.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## Crl.P.No..3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| SI.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|-------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|\r\n| 08. | 23.07.2024 | $VJP,J$ : | |\r\n| | | Heard Sri Venkata Challa, learned counsel | |\r\n| | | for respondent No.2. | |\r\n| | | At request of learned counsel for the | |\r\n| | | petitioner(s), list the matter on $05.08.2024$ , for | |\r\n| | | giving reply. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended till | |\r\n| | | then. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | VJP,J | |\r\n| | | $\\mathsf{M}\\mathsf{H}$ | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":282,"_252":283,"_254":284,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-16.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-16.md","## IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY\r\n\r\n**SALES** \r\n\r\n**OAR** \r\n\r\nTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n#### :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n $\\mathbb{P}(\\{1\\} \\cup \\{1\\})$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA® CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n#### $\\rightarrow$ Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016 $\\mathcal{M}_{\\mathcal{M}} \\cong \\mathcal{M}_{\\mathcal{M}} \\oplus \\mathcal{M}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ \r\n\r\nPetitioner No.1/Accused No.1 2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 1210年 016\r\n\r\nPetitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n### $\\mathsf{AND}$\r\n\r\nState 1\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial\r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} \\mathcal{L} \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\nMagistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n#### IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, 27.02.2024, 16.04.2024, 10.07.2024 & 16.07.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1. and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"Heard Sri Venkata Challa, learned counsel for respondent No.2.\r\n\r\nAt request of learned counsel for the petitioner(s), list the matter on 05.08.2024, for giving reply.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\n**SD/-B.CHITTI JOSEPH** ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\n $\\langle \\rangle$ \r\n\r\n### To,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkata Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nVJP, J\r\n\r\nDATED: 23.07.2024.\r\n\r\n**LIST THE MATTER ON 05.08.2024.** \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{H}^{\\text{max}}$ \r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\n $\\frac{1}{2}$ \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":286,"_252":287,"_254":288,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-17.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-17.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR\r\n\r\n# MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST\r\n\r\n## TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n### :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA **CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n## **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable\r\n\r\nInstruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n## IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, 27.02.2024, 16.04.2024, 10.07.2024 & 23.07.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"At request of learned counsel for the Petitioner(s) for reply, list the matter on 13.08.2024.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\nSD/- B.PRASAD RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n $\\mathsf{A}$ \r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nVJP,J\r\n\r\nDATED: 05/08/2024\r\n\r\nLIST THE MATTER ON 13.08.2024\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":290,"_252":291,"_254":292,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-18.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-18.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 09. | 05.08.2024 | VJP, J | |\r\n| | | At request of learned counsel for the | |\r\n| | | Petitioner(s)
for
reply,
list
the
matter
on | |\r\n| | | 13.08.2024. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended | |\r\n| | | till then. | |\r\n| | | _______ | |\r\n| | | VJP, J
Dinesh | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":294,"_252":295,"_254":296,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-19.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-19.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 10) | 13.08.2024 | VJP,
J
At request of the learned counsel for the
petitioners for filing material documents relating | |\r\n| | | to present case, list the matter on 21.08.2024.
The
interim
order
granted
earlier
is
extended till then. | |\r\n| | | ________
VJP,J
PGR | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":298,"_252":299,"_254":300,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-2.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-2.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No. CRL.P.No.3516 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE |\r\n|-----------|------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|\r\n| No.
1. | 05.05.2022 | DR, J | NOTE |\r\n| | | Notice. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | Learned counsel for the petitioner/s
is | |\r\n| | | permitted to take out personal notice on the | |\r\n| | | respondents 1 and 2,
through RPAD and file | |\r\n| | | proof of service. | |\r\n| | | Post after Summer Vacation 2022. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ________ | |\r\n| | | DR, J | |\r\n| | | Pnr | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":302,"_252":303,"_254":304,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-20.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-20.md","## IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT\r\n\r\n# TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n## :PRESENT:\r\n\r\nTHE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n## Between:\r\n\r\nDirector V. 1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagariuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n### **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n#### IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated $05.05.2022, \\ 04.07.2022, \\ 27.02.2024 \\ , \\ 16.04.2024 \\ , \\ 10.07.2024 \\ , \\ 23.07.2024$ & 05.08.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"At request of the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing material documents relating to present case, list the matter on 21.08.2024.\r\n\r\nThe interim order granted earlier is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\nSd/-B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n $79 - 978$ \r\n\r\n## **HIGH COURT**\r\n\r\nVJP,J\r\n\r\nDATED:13/08/2024\r\n\r\nLIST THE MATTER ON 21.08.2024\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":306,"_252":307,"_254":308,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-21.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-21.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.Nos.3392, 3858 & 4208 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 18. | 21.08.2024 | VJP, J | |\r\n| | | At request of the learned counsel for the | |\r\n| | | Petitioner(s), Interim order granted earlier is | |\r\n| | | extended till 06.09.2024. | |\r\n| | | _______ | |\r\n| | | VJP, J
Dinesh | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":310,"_252":311,"_254":312,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-22.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-22.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n#### :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\n $\\vec{c}$ \r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n示比如\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n### Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n## **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial\r\n\r\nMagistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n### IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated $05.05.2022, \\ 04.07.2022, \\ 27.02.2024 \\ , \\ 16.04.2024 \\ , \\ 10.07.2024 \\ , \\ 23.07.2024$ 05.08.2024 & 13.08.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"At request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner(s), Interim order granted earlier is extended till 06.09.2024.\"\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nSD/- P.VINOD KUMAR **ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\nFOR ADDIO ........\r\n\r\n### To,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n## **HIGH COURT**\r\n\r\nVJP,J\r\n\r\nDATED:21/08/2024\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_6.jpeg)",{"_250":314,"_252":315,"_254":316,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-23.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-23.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE NO.: Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | Date | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 12. | 06.09.2024 | VJP,J | |\r\n| | | At
request
of
learned
counsel
for
the
Petitioner(s), list the matter on 10.09.2024. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended till | |\r\n| | | then. | |\r\n| | | ______
VJP, J
JLV | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":318,"_252":319,"_254":320,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-24.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-24.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA\r\n\r\nWEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER\r\n\r\n# TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n## IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, 27.02.2024, 16.04.2024, 10.07.2024, 23.07.2024 05.08.2024 13.08.2024 & 06.09.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"At request of the learned counsel for the Petitioners on the ground that compromise talks are going on, list the matter 26.09.2024.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier shall stand extended till then.\"\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nFC\r\n\r\n**SD/- A. VIJAYA BABU** ASSISTANT REGISTRAR **SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\n1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D. Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n# **HIGH COURT**\r\n\r\nVJP,J\r\n\r\nDATED:11.09.2024\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nLIST THE MATTER 26.09.2024\r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_6.jpeg)\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED**",{"_250":322,"_252":323,"_254":324,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-25.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-25.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## Main Case: Criminal Petition No. 3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| $S1.$
$No.$ | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|----------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|\r\n| 13. | 11.09.2024 | VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J | |\r\n| | | request of learned counsel for
$\\mathop{\\mathrm{At}}\\nolimits$ | |\r\n| | | Petitioners on the ground that compromise | |\r\n| | | talks are going on, list the matter 26.09.2024. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier shall stand | |\r\n| | | extended till then. | |\r\n| | | VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J | |\r\n| | | $Mjl$ /* | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":326,"_252":327,"_254":328,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-26.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-26.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022** 55\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | Date | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| | 16.10.2024 | VJP, J
At request of learned
counsel for the petitioner,
for reply, list the matter
on 17.10.2024.
Interim order granted earlier is extended till
then. | |\r\n| | | ______
VJP,J | |\r\n| | | Rns | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":330,"_252":331,"_254":332,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-27.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-27.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATION\r\n\r\n#### WEDNESDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER\r\n\r\n# TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR\r\n\r\n### :PRESENT:\r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n#### Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1^st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n### Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n- 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n- **Respondent No.1** 2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is filed, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable\r\n\r\nInstruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n# IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated 05.05.2022, 04.07.2022, 27.02.2024, 16.04.2024, 10.07.2024, 23.07.2024 05.08.2024 13.08.2024, 06.09.2024 & 11.09.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Venkat Challa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2, the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"At request of learned counsel for the petitioner, for reply, list the matter on 17.10.2024.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till then.\" $\\stackrel{\\smile}{\\sim}$ \r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nFOR\r\n\r\n**SD/- M.PRABHAKARA RAO** ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER\r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D. Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n# **HIGH COURT**\r\n\r\nVJP,J\r\n\r\nDATED:16/10/2024\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nLIST THE MATTER ON 17.10.2024\r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_250":334,"_252":335,"_254":336,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-28.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-28.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 15. | 29.10.2024 | VJP, J | |\r\n| | | At
request
of
learned
counsel
for | |\r\n| | | petitioner(s),
list the matter on 07.11.2024. | |\r\n| | | _______ | |\r\n| | | VJP, J | |\r\n| | | sj | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":338,"_252":339,"_254":340,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-30.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-30.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## Main Case: Criminal Petition No. 3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| $S1.$
$No.$ | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|----------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|\r\n| 16. | 07.11.2024 | VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J | |\r\n| | | Heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned Senior | |\r\n| | | Counsel who argued through V.C. assisted by | |\r\n| | | Sri G.Rohith, learned counsel for Petitioners. | |\r\n| | | Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel for | |\r\n| | | Respondent
$\\mathrm{No.2}$
and
Ms.K.Priyanka | |\r\n| | | Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor | |\r\n| | | submitted arguments. | |\r\n| | | Orders reserved. | |\r\n| | | VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
$Mjl$ /* | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":342,"_252":343,"_254":344,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-31.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-31.md","**APHC010231002022**\r\n\r\n![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)\r\n\r\n#### **IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396]**\r\n\r\nTUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY\r\n\r\nTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE\r\n\r\n# **PRESENT**\r\n\r\n# **THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA**\r\n\r\n# **CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514/2022**\r\n\r\n### **Between:**\r\n\r\n- 1. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 6-3-871, SNEHALATA, 1ST FLOOR, GREENLANDS ROAD, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD 500 016\r\n- 2. V. RAJASEKHAR, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, 6-3-871, SNEHALATA, 1ST FLOOR, GREENLANDS ROAD, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD 500 016\r\n\r\n# **...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)**\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n- 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, . REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD, AMARAVATHI.\r\n- 2. PUTTA SUDHAKAR SUDHAKAR YADAV, MANAGING PARTNER OF M/S. P.S.K. INFRASTRUCTURES AND PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, FLAT NO. 51, NAGARJUNA HILLS, PUNJAGUTTA, HYDERABAD\r\n\r\n## **...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):**\r\n\r\n## **Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):**\r\n\r\n1.D S SIVADARSHAN\r\n\r\n## **Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):**\r\n\r\n1.VENKAT CHALLA\r\n\r\n2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)\r\n\r\n# **The Court made the following:**\r\n\r\n# **ORDER**:\r\n\r\nThe instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure,\r\n\r\n1973¹ has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, seeking to\r\n\r\nquash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.202 of 2019 on the file of the\r\n\r\n 1 for short \"Cr.P.C\"\r\n\r\nCourt of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur, which was registered for the offence punishable under Sections 138, 139 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881² .\r\n\r\n**2.** Heard Sri Avinash Desai, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Sri Venkat Challa, learned counsel for Respondent No.2. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.\r\n\r\n**3.** Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the present complaint, which has been filed by Respondent No.2, who is neither payee nor holder of the subject cheque, is not maintainable under Section 138 of N.I.Act. Learned counsel would further submit that the payee of the subject cheque neither issued any statutory notice nor filed any complaint and hence, the cognizance taken by the learned Magistrate is an abuse of process of law. Learned counsel would submit that, Respondent No.2 has no *locus standi* and is not entitled to file the present complaint against the Petitioners. Learned counsel would finally submit that there is no legally enforceable debt against the Petitioners. Hence, prayed for quashment of the proceedings against the Petitioners. In support of his contentions, learned counsel has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon\"ble Apex Court in **National Small Industries Corporation Limited vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Others³ .** \r\n\r\n**4.** Contrasting the same, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 would submit that the exemption under Section 200(a) Cr.P.C can be given to a public servant only. Learned counsel would further submit that there is no\r\n\r\n² for short \"NI Act\"\r\n\r\n³ (2009) 1 SCC 407\r\n\r\ndispute about the issuance of the subject cheque by the Petitioners. It is submitted the present complaint has been filed by Respondent No.2, who is the Managing Partner of the Complainant-Company and as such, the same is maintainable under law. Learned counsel would finally submit *prima facie* case is made out against the Petitioners and, as such, at the threshold, the case against the Petitioners cannot be quashed. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the petition. In support of his contentions, learned counsel has placed reliance on the judgments of the Hon\"ble Apex Court in **TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited vs. SMS Asia Private Limited and another⁴ ,** wherein,\r\n\r\nit was held as under:\r\n\r\n*\"In that view, the position that would emerge is that when a company is the payee of the cheque based on which a complaint is filed under [Section 138](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1823824/) of N.I. Act, the complainant necessarily should be the Company which would be represented by an employee who is authorized. Primafacie, in such a situation the indication in the complaint and the sworn statement (either orally or by affidavit) to the effect that the complainant (Company) is represented by an authorized person who has knowledge, would be sufficient. The employment of the terms \"specific assertion as to the knowledge of the power of attorney holder\" and such assertion about knowledge should be \"said explicitly\" as stated in [A.C. Narayanan](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/47858029/) (supra) cannot be understood to mean that the assertion should be in any particular manner, much less only in the manner understood by the accused in the case. All that is necessary is to demonstrate before the learned Magistrate that the complaint filed is in the name of the \"payee\" and if the person who is prosecuting the complaint is different from the payee, the authorisation therefor and that the contents of the complaint are within his knowledge. When, the complainant/payee is a company, an authorized employee can represent the company. Such averment and prima facie material is sufficient for the learned Magistrate to take cognizance and issue process. If at all, there is any serious dispute with regard to the person prosecuting the complaint not* \r\n\r\n⁴ (2022) 7 SCC 612\r\n\r\n*being authorized or if it is to be demonstrated that the person who filed the complaint has no knowledge of the transaction and, as such that person could not have instituted and prosecuted the complaint, it would be open for the accused to dispute the position and establish the same during the course of the trial. As noted in [Samrat Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd.](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/142692/) (supra), dismissal of a complaint at the threshold by the Magistrate on the question of authorisation, would not be justified. Similarly, we are of the view that in such circumstances entertaining a petition under Section 482 to quash the order taking cognizance by the Magistrate would be unjustified when the issue of proper authorisation and knowledge can only be an issue for trial.*\r\n\r\nLearned counsel for Respondent No.2 has further relied on the\r\n\r\njudgment of the Hon\"ble Apex Court in **Bhupesh Rathod vs. Dayashankar** \r\n\r\n**Prasad Chaurasia and another⁵ ,** wherein, it was held as under:\r\n\r\n> \"*17. We must say at the inception that the respondent not having disputed his signatures on the cheques, it was for the respondent to show in what circumstances the cheques had been issued, i.e., why was it not a cheque issued in due course. The words of [Section 139](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/268919/) of the NI Act are quite clear that unless the contrary is proved, it shall be presumed that the holder of the cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in [Section 138](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1823824/) for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability. The respondent has not set up a case that the nature of transaction was of the nature which fell beyond the scope of [Section 138.](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1823824/) Other than taking a technical objection, really nothing has been said on the substantive aspect.*\r\n\r\n> *18. The only eligibility criteria prescribed under [Section 142\$1\$\$a\$](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/138175145/) is that the complaint must be by the payee or the holder in due course.*\r\n\r\n> *22. It is also relevant to note that a copy of the Board Resolution was filed along with the complaint. An affidavit had been brought on record in the trial court by the Company, affirming to the factum of authorisation in favour of the Managing Director. A Manager or a Managing Director ordinarily by the very nomenclature can be taken to be the person in-charge of the affairs Company for its day-to-day management and within the activity would certainly be calling the act of approaching the*\r\n\r\n⁵ (2022) 2 SCC 355\r\n\r\n*court either under civil law or criminal law for setting the trial in motion.4 It would be too technical a view to take to defeat the complaint merely because the body of the complaint does not elaborate upon the authorisation. The artificial person being the Company had to act through a person/official, which logically would include the Chairman or Managing Director. Only the existence of authorisation could be verified.*\r\n\r\n*26. In our view, one of the most material aspects is, as stated aforesaid, that the signatures on the cheques were not denied. Neither was it explained by way of an alternative story as to why the duly signed cheques were handed over to the Company. There was no plea of any fraud or misrepresentation. It does, thus, appear that faced with the aforesaid position, the respondent only sought to take a technical plea arising from the format of the complaint to evade his liability. There was no requirement of a loan agreement to be executed separately as any alternative nature of transaction was never stated.\"*\r\n\r\n#### **Point for determination:**\r\n\r\n**5.** Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel representing both\r\n\r\nthe parties, now the point that would emerge for determination is:\r\n\r\n*Whether there are any justifiable grounds for quashment of the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.202 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur?*\r\n\r\n#### **Determination by the Court:**\r\n\r\n**6.** A bare perusal of Section 482 Cr.P.C makes it clear that the Code envisages that inherent powers of the High Court are not limited or affected so as to make orders as may be necessary; (i) t*o give effect to any order under the Code or, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or, otherwise* (iii) *to secure ends of justice.* A court while sitting in Section 482 Cr.P.C jurisdiction is not functioning as a court of appeal or a court of revision. It must exercise its powers to do real and substantial justice, depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. These powers must be invoked for compelling reasons of abuse of process of law or glaring injustice, which are against sound principles of criminal jurisprudence.\r\n\r\n**7.** The case of Respondent No.2/Complainant, in brief, is that, the Complainant is the sub-contractor and has been doing contract works. Accused No.1 is the Company and Accused No.2 is its Managing Director. Accused got tender work for widening to 4/6 lanes and upgrading of the existing 2-lane road including minor bridges, service roads and auxiliary works in A.P between Km 49 (Champavali River) and Km 97 (Srikakulam) of the Visakhapatnam to Itchapuram Section of NH-5. As the Accused have no sufficient man power, material and machinery, Accused No.2 had given subcontract to the Complainant to execute the said works on back to back basis and there exists an agreement dated 26.12.2005 between them to that effect. After completion of the said works, Complainant requested the Accused to pay the bill amount of Rs.7,20,00,000/-, but the Accused postponed the same. Thereafter, inspite of several demands, Accused had given seven post dated cheques bearing Nos.591341 to 591346 for Rs.1,00,00,000/- each and 591347 for Rs.1,20,00,000/- drawn on Punjab National Bank, Somajiguda Branch, Hyderabad in favour of the Complainant. On presentation of the 1st cheque, as the same was dishonoured, the Complainant got issued a registered legal notice to the Accused and on receipt of the said notice, the Accused have paid the 1st and 2nd cheques amount to the Complainant.\r\n\r\nSubsequently, on presentation of the third cheque before Andhra Bank, Muydukur, the said cheque was returned with an endorsement \"Account Closed\". Then the Complainant got issued a statutory notice dated 23.04.2018 to the Accused demanding to pay the cheque amount. Having received the said notice, the Accused have not repaid the amount. Hence, the complaint.\r\n\r\n**8.** On a bare perusal of the copy of the complaint, it clearly shows that, in the title of the complaint, the Complainant is described as Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s.P.S.K.Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited. The cheque in question was issued in favour of the Company and it was forwarded for encashment in the account of the said Company. On an overall consideration of the said facts, it can be inferred that the Complainant has filed the complaint on behalf of the Company in his capacity as its Managing Partner and not in his personal capacity. Had the complaint been filed by the Complainant in his personal capacity, there was no occasion for him to mention his status in M/s.P.S.K.Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited. The Petitioners are trying to take advantage of the fact that, instead of describing the Complainant as M/s.P.S.K.Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited through the Managing Partner, in the title, name of the Complainant is mentioned as Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s.P.S.K.Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that, it is a technical issue and it is also apparent that for all practical purposes, the complaint has been filed in\r\n\r\nthe name of the Company through the Managing Partner Putta Sudhakar and not in his personal capacity.\r\n\r\n**9.** Further, the Accused have not denied the issuance of the subject cheque. Such being the case, the contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioners that there is no legally enforceable debt between the Accused and the Complainant has no force. There is no plea of any fraud or misrepresentation. The Petitioners only have taken a technical plea arising from the format of the complaint, to evade their liability. The judgments relied on by the learned counsel for Respondent No.2 are helpful to his case.\r\n\r\n**10.** In view of the foregoing discussion and the judgments referred to *supra,* this Court is of the view that there are no valid grounds emanating from the record warranting interference of this Court to quash the case against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2. The Petition lacks merit and hence, the same is liable to be dismissed.\r\n\r\n**11.** In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.\r\n\r\nPending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.\r\n\r\n#### \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ **Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA**\r\n\r\nDate:18.02.2025 *Dinesh*\r\n\r\n#### **HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA**\r\n\r\n## **CRIMINAL PETITION No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n#### **Dt.18.02.2025**\r\n\r\n*Dinesh*",{"_250":346,"_252":347,"_254":348,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-4.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-4.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No: Crl.P. No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SI.
$\\boldsymbol{\\mathsf{No}}$ | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE. |\r\n|-----------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|\r\n| $\\overline{2}$ . | 04.07.2022 | NJS, J
Despite service of notice, none entered
appearance on behalf of the respondents.
Interim order granted on the earlier occasion
is extended until further orders.
List this case in the usual course.
$\\mathsf{NJS},\\,\\mathsf{J}$
$\\mathsf{BLV}\\,$ | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":350,"_252":351,"_254":352,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-5.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-5.md","$[3209]$ \r\n\r\n## IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATION\r\n\r\nMONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY,\r\n\r\nTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO\r\n\r\n:PRESENT:\r\n\r\n# THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n### Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n#### Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### $\\Delta$ ND\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n# **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n#### IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Avinash Desai, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following.\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"Despite service of notice, none entered appearance on behalf of the respondents.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted on the earlier occasion is extended until further orders.\r\n\r\nList this case in the usual course\"\r\n\r\nSd/- V. SATYANARAYANA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\n $\\mathsf{To},$ \r\n\r\nThe Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur.\r\nOne CC to Sri Avinash Desai Advocate [OPUC]\r\nTwo CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n\r\n4. One spare copy\r\n\r\n $\\,M\\hskip-.7ptM\\hskip-.7pt$ \r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\n**NJSJ** \r\n\r\nDATED:04/07/2022\r\n\r\n# NOTE: LIST THIS CASE IN THE USUAL COURSE\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRLP.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_6.jpeg)\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED**",{"_250":354,"_252":355,"_254":348,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-6.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-6.md",{"_250":357,"_252":358,"_254":359,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-7.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-7.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE : Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No | Date | ORDER
OFFICE | | |\r\n|-----------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|--|--|\r\n| (2) | 16.02.2024 | BSB, J | | |\r\n| | | Post
this
matter
on
22.02.2024
for | | |\r\n| | | presence of the parties before this Court. | | |\r\n| | | ________________
B.S.BHANUMATHI, J
RAR | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |\r\n| | | | | |",{"_250":361,"_252":362,"_254":363,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-8.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-8.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.3514 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 03. | 16.02.2024 | BSB, J | |\r\n| | | List on 19.02.2024. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended | |\r\n| | | till then. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ______________________
B.S.BHANUMATHI, J | |\r\n| | | K M S | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_250":365,"_252":366,"_254":367,"_256":-5},"APHC010231002022-order-9.pdf","APHC010231002022-order-9.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT\r\n\r\n## TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUAR TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT:\r\n\r\nTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2022\r\n\r\n## Between:\r\n\r\n1. SEW Infrastructure Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director V. Rajasekhar, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n## Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1\r\n\r\n2. V. Rajasekhar, Managing Director of SEW Infrastructure Limited, 6-3-871, Snehalata, 1st floor, Greenlands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016\r\n\r\n# Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Amaravathi.\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.1**\r\n\r\n2. Putta Sudhakar @ Sudhakar Yadav, Managing Partner of M/s. P.S.K. Infrastructures and Projects Private Limited, Flat No. 51, Nagarjuna Hills, Punjagutta, Hyderabad\r\n\r\n#### **Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant**\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur for the offenses under Suction 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and consequently quash the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 in CC No. 202 of 2019 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mydukur thereby set aside the congnizance order dated 12-04-2019 as the same is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and abuse of process of law.\r\n\r\n#### IA NO: 1 OF 2022\r\n\r\nPetition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in CC No. 202 of 2019 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of CRLP No.3514 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court order dated 05.05.2022 & 04.07.2022 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sri D.Sivadarshan, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following.\r\n\r\n## ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"Interim order granted earlier is extended for a further period of $six(06)$ weeks.\r\n\r\n# List the matter after four (04) weeks.\"\r\n\r\nSd/- U. SRI DEVI **ASSISTANT REGISTRAR** \r\n\r\n#### //TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nFor $A$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathbf{A}$ \r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n- 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mydukur.\r\n- 2. One CC to Sri D.Sivadarshan Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 3. One CC to Sri Venkat Challa Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT]\r\n- 5. One spare copy\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nSRK,J\r\n\r\nDATED: 27.02.2024\r\n\r\nLIST THE MATTER AFTER FOUR (04) WEEKS\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nCRL.P.No.3514 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)","descriptions",{"_370":371,"_374":375},"enumFields",[176,178,171,25,372,373],"caseCategory","benchType","enumLookup",{"_176":376,"_178":378,"_171":380,"_25":382,"_372":384,"_373":385},{"_177":377},"Anticipatory Bail Application",{"_179":379},"Dismissed",{"_170":381},"High Court of Andhra Pradesh",{"_26":383},"Unknown Section",{},{},"caseAiAnalysis","order","order-10","actionData","errors"]

$\overline{\text{SL.}}$<br>NO.	<b>DATE</b>	<b>ORDER</b>
$5.$	16.04.2024	SRK, J
		Interim order granted earlier is extended for a
		period of twelve $(12)$ weeks.
		Post the matter after eight (08) weeks.

		SRK, J
		$\mathsf{DN}\mathsf{B}$

Sew Infrastructure Limited vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

AI Summary

Order Issued After Hearing

Original Order Copy

Order Text

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI

MAIN CASE No.: Criminal Petition No.3514 of 2022

PROCEEDING SHEET

Share This Order

Order(31) - 18 Feb 2025

Order(29) - 7 Nov 2024

Order(30) - 7 Nov 2024

Order(28) - 29 Oct 2024

Order(26) - 16 Oct 2024

Order(27) - 16 Oct 2024

Order(24) - 11 Sept 2024

Order(25) - 11 Sept 2024

Order(23) - 6 Sept 2024

Order(21) - 21 Aug 2024

Order(22) - 21 Aug 2024

Order(19) - 13 Aug 2024

Order(20) - 13 Aug 2024

Order(17) - 5 Aug 2024

Order(18) - 5 Aug 2024

Order(15) - 23 Jul 2024

Order(16) - 23 Jul 2024

Order(14) - 16 Jul 2024

Order(12) - 10 Jul 2024

Order(13) - 10 Jul 2024

Order(10) - 16 Apr 2024

Order(11) - 16 Apr 2024

Order(9) - 27 Feb 2024

Order(7) - 16 Feb 2024

Order(8) - 16 Feb 2024

Order(6) - 5 Jul 2022

Order(4) - 4 Jul 2022

Order(5) - 4 Jul 2022

Order(1) - 5 May 2022

Order(2) - 5 May 2022

Order(3) - 5 May 2022

Same Parties

Lawyers

Judges

Acts & Sections

Search in District Courts Data