Shaik Nagul Meera vs. State Sub Inspector Of Police

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Judge:Hon'ble Harinath.N

Case Status:Unknown Status

Order Date:9 May 2024

CNR:APHC010224522024

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Get a certified copy of this order

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT AMARAVATI

SL.<br>NO.	DATE	ORDER	OFFICE<br>NOTE
01.	09.05.2024	SRK, J

		Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice
		for respondent No.1 and seeks time to<br>get instructions
		in the matter.
		Issue notice to respondent No.2.
		Learned counsel for the petitioners<br>is permitted
		to take out personal notice on respondent No.2 by
		registered post with acknowledgment due and file
		proof of service before the Registry within a period of
		three (3) weeks.
		Heard. Perused the record.
		Learned counsel for the petitioners<br>submits that
		petitioner<br>No.1<br>herein/A1<br>filed F.C.O.P.No.422 of 2022
		on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Guntur
		District under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act. By
		Judgment dated 28.11.2023, the learned Judge, Family
		Court, Guntur District decreed the suit declaring that
		defendant therein/respondent No.2 herein is not a
		legally wedded wife of the plaintiff therein/petitioner
		No.1 herein/A1. Further, the entries made in the
		Marriage Book No.11324 and in Dusther No.11324
		issued by Qazi Government<br>are<br>held not valid. Thus,
		the marriage between the plaintiff therein/petitioner
		No.1 herein/A1<br>and defendant<br>therein/respondent No.2
		herein held not valid. Thereafter, respondent No.2	Cont…

SL.<br>NO.	DATE	ORDER	OFFICE<br>NOTE
		herein lodged a complaint against all accused before
		Edlapadu Police Station, Guntur District, and the same
		was<br>registered<br>vide<br>FIR.No.248<br>of<br>2021<br>for<br>the
		offences<br>punishable under Sections 420, 494 &<br>498A
		IPC. After investigation, a charge sheet was filed and
		the same<br>was<br>taken on file<br>as C.C.No.47 of 2022 on
		the file of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge,
		Chilakaluripet. Since, the marriage between petitioner
		No.1<br>herein/A1<br>and<br>respondent<br>No.2/defacto
		complainant is held not valid, the question of filing
		complaint<br>against the petitioners herein/A1 to A7<br>under
		Section<br>498A<br>IPC<br>would<br>not<br>attract.<br>The<br>matter
		requires examination.
		In view of the said reason, there shall be a stay
		of all further proceedings in C.C.No.47 of 2022 on the
		file<br>of<br>the<br>learned<br>Additional<br>Junior<br>Civil<br>Judge,
		Chilakaluripet, Palnadu District<br>for a period of twelve
		(12) weeks.
		List the matter after eight (08) weeks.
		______
		SRK, J<br>DNV