V vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
1 Jul 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$[3209]$
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3114 OF 2022
Between:
Mydala Nagamani, W/o. Panabakala Bharath, Aged 21 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Kalyani Nagar, B.V.Nagar, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP., at Amaravati, High Court Buildings at Nelapadu, Amaravati, Guntur District
-
- Panabakala Bharath, S/o. Rajaiah, Hindu, aged about 32 years, Kalyani Nagar, BV Nagar, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District (Defacto Complainant)
...Respondents
WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through her Advocate Smt KOPPARTHI SUMATHI presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C., and quash the F.I.R. in Cr.No.81/2022, dated 16-03-2022 on the file of Chinna Bazar Police Station, SPSR Nellore District registered based in the complaint for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC, so far as the petitioner is concerned.
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Smt Kopparthi Sumathi, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No.2 herein to show cause as to why this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted.
You viz:
Panabakala Bharath, S/o. Rajaiah, Kalyani Nagar, BV Nagar, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District (Defacto Complainant)
are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRLP should not be admitted.
The Court made the following: ORDER:
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of respondent No.1.
//TRUE COPY//
Issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable in two (2) weeks.
List this case after three (3) weeks."
Sd/- B.Narsingh Rao DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
$\mathsf{To},$
-
- Panabakala Bharath, S/o. Rajaiah, Kalyani Nagar, BV Nagar, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District (Defacto Complainant) (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)
-
- One CC to Smt Kopparthi Sumathi, Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT]4. One spare copy
$\boldsymbol{M}\boldsymbol{M}$
DATED:01/07/2022
NOTE: LIST THIS CASE AFTER THREE (3) WEEKS
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
CRLP.No.3114 of 2022