eCourtsIndia

Karuchola Venkateswara Rao vs. The State Of A.P.

Final Order
Court:High Court, Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Y. Lakshmana Rao
Case Status:Compromise
Order Date:2 Apr 2025
CNR:APHC010201552010

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Y. Lakshmana Rao

Listed On:

2 Apr 2025

Order Text

APHC010201552010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3521]

WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 756/2010

Between:

Karuchola Venkateswara Rao ...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of A P Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.B S REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

COMMON ORDER:

I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRL.R.C. No.756 of 2010

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and the leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

  1. I.A.No.1 of 2025 is filed to recall the order dated 05.03.2025 in Crl.R.C.No.756 of 2010.

  2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted a report stating that the petitioner and the respondent No.1 have entered into compromise the matter.

  3. In view of the same, the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against the petitioner herein is hereby recalled.

  4. I.A. No.2 of 2025 is filed to compound the offence and set aside the sentence passed in C.C. No. 306 of 2007, on the file of the learned V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur dated 07.08.2007 as confirmed in Crl.A.No.72 of 2008, on the file of the learned Special Sessions Judge-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur, dated 09.07.2008.

  5. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioner and the respondent No.2 are present before this Court and submitted that they have entered into compromise, at the intervention of elders. Learned counsels on both sides identified their respective parties.

  6. In view of the joint memo filed by the parties and for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the respondent No.1 is permitted to compound the offence as per Section 320(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity 'the Cr.P.C.') and Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

  7. Resultantly, the Judgment dated 09.07.2008 in Crl.A.No.72 of 2008, on the file of the learned Special Sessions Judge-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Guntur and the order dated 07.08.2007 in C.C. No.306 of 2007, on the file of the learned V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur are hereby set aside, acquitting the petitioner under Section 320(8) of 'the Cr.P.C'.

  8. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 are allowed and the Criminal Revision Case No.756 of 2010 is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J

Dt: 02.04.2025 SCH

232

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 756/2010

02.04.2025

SCH

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(7) - 2 Apr 2025

Final Order

Viewing

Order(8) - 2 Apr 2025

Final Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 2 Apr 2025

Final Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 Mar 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Mar 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Feb 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 20 Oct 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 4 Oct 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 6 Sept 2023

Interim Order

Click to view