$[3208]$

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

:PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 11368 OF 2021

Between:

M/s.Harini Estates And Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Addala Venkata Varma Raju, S/o.A.Krishnam Raju, Aged 38 years, R/o.Imperial Heights Apartments, Flat No.FF-2, Chinna Bazar, Bheemunipatnam, Visaahpatnam District.

Petitioner

AND

• 1. The Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority, rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam.
• 2. The Estate Officer, Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Visakhapatnam.
• 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, A.P. Secretariat, Visahapatnam.

Respondents

$\overline{1}$

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the officials of the 1st and 2nd Respondents in threatening to dispossess the Petitioner form its property 444 sq. yds bearing Plot No.17 in TS No.1507/1 in Backward Class Welfare Association Lay out, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam, consequently direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners property of 444 sq. yds bearing Plot No.17 in TS No.1507/1 in Backward Class Welfare Association Lay out, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam in the interest of justice;

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents not to interfere with the property of the Petitioner admeasuring an extent of 444 sq. yds bearing Plot No.17 in TS No.1507/1 in Backward Class Welfare Association Lay out, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of WP 11368 of 2021, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri.G.Rama Gopal Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri. Surya Kiran Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for Respondent No.3, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

Learned Standing Counsel Sri Surya Kiran Kumar, takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 and requests time to get written instructions.

Post next week.

$\overline{c}$

In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the possession over subject property, of the petitioner.

//TRUE COPY//

1. The Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Visakhapatnam.

For

• 2. The Estate Officer, Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Visakhapatnam.
• 3. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Visahapatnam. (1 to 3 by RPAD)
• 4. One CC to SRI.G.RAMA GOPAL Advocate [OPUC]
• 5. One CC to SRI.Surya Kiran Kumar, Standing Counsel [OPUC]
• 6. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court of A.P. (OPUC)
• 7. One spare copy

SRL

To,

SD/- CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

HIGH COURT

DRJ

DATED:21/06/2021

NOTE: POST NEXT WEEK

ORDER

WP.No.11368 of 2021

DIRECTION

代

$\gamma^{\rm R}(\cdot)$

$\overline{\mathcal{O}}(1)$