L. Jhansi Rani W/O Srinivasarao vs. The Govt.

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble D Ramesh
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:9 May 2023
CNR:APHC010195062012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble D Ramesh

Listed On:

9 May 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR^Ti: (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY. THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 40228 OF 2012

Between:

Smt. L. Jhansi Rani, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Occ: Fair Price Shop Dealer, Gogulamudi Village, Pedanandipadu Mandal, Guntur District.

...PETITIONER

AND

    1. The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Ex-Officio Secretary, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.
    1. The District Collector (Civil Supplies), GunturDistrict.
    1. The Joint Collector (Civil Supplies), Guntur District, Guntur.
    1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur, Guntur District.
    1. The Tahsildar, Pedanandipadu Mandal, Guntur District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the orders in proceedings Rc.No.1998/2010-G, dt.10-1-2010 issued by the respondent and consequential orders in proceedings ACD. No. 42/2010-S7, dt.17-02-2011 passed by the 3^*^ respondent and the proceedings in Revision Case No.1 of 2011-S7, dated 04.04.2012 passed by the 2"'* respondent and the proceedings in Memo No.1136/CS-1(1)/2012-13, dated 01.12.2012 passed by the 1®' respondent confirming the cancellation of the authorization of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and against to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of APPDS control Order 2008.

I.A. NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 51057 OF 2012)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos. 4 and 5 to supply the Essential Commodities to the petitioner for distributing the same to the card holders by suspending the orders in proceedings Rc.No.1998/2010-G, dt.10-1-2010 issued by the 4'^ respondent and consequential orders in proceedings ACD. No. 42/2010-S7, dt.17-02-2011 passed by the 3"* respondent and the proceedings in Revision Case No.1 of 2011-S7, dated 04.04.2012 passed by the 2"'^ respondent and the proceedings in

Memo No.1136/CS-1(1)/2012-13, dated 01.12.2012 passed by the $1<sup>st</sup>$ respondent confirming the cancellation of the authorization of the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP. NO: 571 OF 2013)

Between:

  • The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Ex-Officio Secretary, Consumer Affairs,<br>Food and Civil Supplies, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. The District Collector (Civil Supplies), Guntur District.

...Petitioner/Respondent

AND

Smt. L. Jhansi Rani, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Occ: Fair Price Shop Dealer, Gogulamudi Village, Pedanandipadu Mandal, Guntur District.

...Respondent/Petitioner

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in W.P.M.P.No.51057 of 2012 in W.P.No.40228 of 2012 dated 31-12-2012.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI

Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH •?

WRIT PETITION No. 40228 of 2012

ORDER:

t

Constitution of India seeking to declare the orders in proceedings NO.42/2010-S7, dated 17.02.2011 passed by the 3"* respondent and the proceedings in Revision Case No.l of 2011-S7 dated orders as the Court may deem fit. the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of APPDS Control Order 2008 and to pass such other order or 4th 04.4.2012 passed by the- 2"'^ respondent and the proceedings in Memo No.ll36/CS-l(l)/2012-13 dated 01.12.2012 passed by the 1^. respondent confirming the cancellation of the authorization of The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the 10.01.2010 issued by the respondent and consequential, orders in proceedings ACD Rc.No.1998/2010-G, dated

  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents.

  2. direction as prayed for. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the record, this Court passed interim order on 31.12.2012 granting interim

<sup>&</sup>gt; ...

  1. stay petition and the same was also considered by this Court on 07.6.2013 and the vacate stay petition was dismissed by making the interim order dated 31.12.2012 as absolute. Subsequently the respondents have filed counter and vacate

  2. In view of the same, the petitioner has been continuing as fair price shop dealer as on today. As contended by the learned »cpunsel for the.petitioner that the respondents have passed the impugned orders only basing on the show cause notice and explanation that to without conducting any enquiry as per clause V(v) of Control Orders 2008 correspondent (4)(8) of Control Orders of 2018.

  3. 04.4.2012 and contrary to the directions of this Court. Hence, the impugned orders dated 10.01.2010, 04.4.2012 and However, liberty is Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned orders dated 10.01.2010, 17.02.2011, 01.12.2012 of the respondent nos.4 to <sup>1</sup> respectively are set aside and the respondents are directed to continue the petitioner as Fair Price Shop Dealer of Gogulamudi Village, Pedanandipadu Mandal, Guntur District. 17.02.2011, 01.12.2012 of the respondent nos.4 to <sup>1</sup> respectively are

2

aiven to the respondents to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action in the matter.

$\mathbf{7.}$ Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any,

shall also stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- N.NAGAMMA

SECTION OFFICER

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Tiplique

To.

    1. The Ex-Officio Secretary, Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies, Govt., of A.P., Secretariat Building, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
  • A.P., Secretarial Building, Amaravanii, Guindi District. The District Collector (Civil Supplies), Guntur District. The Joint Collector (Civil Supplies), Guntur District, Guntur.

    1. One CC to Sri. koti Reddy Idamakanti Advocate [OPUC]
  • Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] $\mathbf{7}.$ 8. Two CD Copies

$PV$ gl

Bhangara

DATED:09/05/2023

ORDER

WP.No.40228 of 2012

DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS