Kilari Venkateswarlu vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Revenue)
Before:
Hon'ble B Krishna Mohan
Listed On:
19 Apr 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION No.9728 of 2023
Kilari Venkateswarlu, S/o. Narayya, aged 54 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Vasudevapuram Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, Annamayya District.
…. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi and 3 others.
….Respondents
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents
-
The grievance of the writ petitioner is that, the 4th respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land in an extent of Acres 4.90 cents in Survey No.1150-8P of Pedda Orampadu Revenue Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, Annamayya District without following any due procedure.
-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the subject land in an extent of Acres 4.90 cents in Survey No.1150-8P of Pedda Orampadu Revenue Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, Annamayya District under patta No.622. The Form-1B (ROR) dated 28.03.2023 discloses the name of the petitioner for the subject land. The Adangal copy dated 02.04.2023 discloses the name of the petitioner for the subject land. The petitioner also availed loan from the Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank over the subject land. While so, now that, the 4th respondent is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following any due procedure and without issuing any notice to the petitioner.
-
On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits that, the 4th respondent would follow the due procedure in respect of the subject land.
-
In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the 4th respondent is directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land except by following the due process of law. However, it does not preclude for the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to recover/protect the subject land strictly in accordance with law.
2
- Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
19.04.2023 PGT