IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

: PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI JITENDRA KUMAR MAHESHWAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11958 OF 2020

Between:

N.Satish Kumar, S/o. Late N. Madan, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Sr. Record Adminstration (L & E), R/o. Q.No. 222/B/B/XI, Ukkunagaram, Visakhapat Plant, Visakhapatnam- 530032 Petitioner

AND

• 1. Rastriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Visakhapatnam.
• 2. Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its Chief General Manager, Town Administration Department, Visakhapatnam
• 3. Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Vishakapatnam Steel Plant, Human Resources Department, Rep. by its HR Department Section, Visakhapatnam
• 4. The Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its General Manager, Finance Department, Visakhapatnam
• 5. The Deputy General Manager, Town Administration Department, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
• 6. Junior Manager, (Estate), Quarter Allotment Section, Town Administration Department.

Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in deducting the petitioner's salary amount every month as a part of recovery amount for company owned accommodation adjustments without issuing any notice, without following the due process of law as bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to deduct the petitioner's salary amount for recovery;

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 GP, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct the petitioner's salary amount for recovering amount for company owned accommodation adjustments, pending disposal of WP 11958 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated 22-07-2020 & 13-08-2020 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI.K.V.ADITYA CHOWDARY Advocate for the petitioner, and of Sri K.Sarvabhouma Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Respondents, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

"(Through Video Conferencing)

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Interim order passed earlier shall remain in operation until further orders.

Immediately on resumption of physical hearing, the case be listed for further orders."

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- M.Nageswara Rao DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

Τo,

One CC to SRI.K.V.ADITYA CHOWDARY Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI.K.SARVABHOUMA RAO, STANDING COUNSEL (OPUC)

3. One spare copy

$SP$

DATE: 01.10.2020

ORDER

WP.No.11958 of 2020

EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER