N Satish Kumar vs. Rastriya Ispat Nigam Ltd

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble K Manmadha Rao
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:22 Jul 2020
CNR:APHC010186692020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Admission (Service Matters)

Before:

Hon'ble T. Rajani

Listed On:

22 Jul 2020

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

:PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.RAJANI

WRIT PETITION NO: 11958 OF 2020

Between:

N.Satish Kumar, S/o. Late N. Madan, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Sr. Foreman Town Adminstration (L & E), R/o. Q.No. 222/B/B/XI Ukkunagaram, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam- 530032

Petitioner

AND

    1. Rastriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Visakhapatnam.
    1. Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its Chief General Manager Town Administration Department, Visakhapatnam
    1. Rastriva Ispat Nigam Limited, Vishakapatnam Steel Plant Human Resources Department, Rep. by its HR Department Section, Visakhapatnam
    1. The Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, General Manager, Rep. by its General Manager, Finance Department, Visakhapatnam
    1. The Deputy General Manager, Town Administration Department, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
    1. Junior Manager, (Estate) Quarter Allotment Section, Town Administration Department.

Respondents $\overline{\phantom{a}}$

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in deducting the petitioner salary amount every month as a part of recovery amount for company owned accommodation adjustments without issuing any notice, without following the due process of law is bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not deduct the petitioner salary amount for recovery;

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct the petitioner salary amount for recovering amount for company owned accommodation adjustments, pending disposal of WP 11958 of 2020, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI.K.V.ADITYA CHOWDARY Advocate for the petitioner and of Sri K.Sarvabhouma Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Respondents, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

Print the name of Sri K.Sarvabhouma Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited for the respondents.

Post on 29.07.2020.

In the meantime, no recovery shall be made from the petitioner towards the rent for the quarters.

SD/- K Venkaiah ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To,

    1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam.
    1. The Chief General Manager Town Administration Department, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam
    1. The HR Department Section, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Vishakapatnam Steel Plant Human Resources Department, Visakhapatnam
    1. The General Manager, Finance Department, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, General Manager, Visakhapatnam
    1. The Deputy General Manager, Town Administration Department, Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
    1. The Junior Manager, (Estate) Quarter Allotment Section, Town Administration Department (1 to 6 by RPAD)
    1. One CC to SRI.K.V.ADITYA CHOWDARY Advocate [OPUC]
    1. One CC to SRI.K.SARVABHOUMA RAO, STANDING COUNSEL (OPUC)
    1. One spare copy

SRL

HIGH COURT

$$

DATED:22/07/2020

NOTE: POST ON 29.07.2020

ORDER

WP.No.11958 of 2020

DIRECTION

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(8) - 25 Sept 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Sept 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 14 Aug 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 31 Jul 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 10 Jul 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 1 Oct 2020

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 13 Aug 2020

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 22 Jul 2020

Interim Order

Viewing