N.Satyanarayana vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:14 Jun 2021
CNR:APHC010181032021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Admission (Municipal Admn.)

Before:

Hon'ble M.Satyanarayana Murthy

Listed On:

14 Jun 2021

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO: 10325 OF 2021

Between:

N.Satyanarayana, S/o. N.Kirshnamurthy, Aged 45 years, R/o.57-4-41, Durga Nagar Kancharlapalem Visakhapatnam.

...Petitioner

ana

ಭಾಷನೆ

$126071$

AND

    1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
    1. Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, rep. by its Commissioner.
    1. The Zonal Commissioner, Zone-IV, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF the impugned action of the Visakhapatnam Municipal MANDAMUS declaring $2<sup>nd</sup>$ the Proceedings in Corporation, the respondent herein, in issuing Rc.No.1700/2020/A7 of Greater Visakhapatham Municipal Corporation, Zone-IV, Visakhapatnam dated 20.11.2020 (Served and received on 24.11.2020) as arbitrary, illegal, capricious, high handed, violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 25 and the guarantee under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, the Statutory provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 as is made applicable to the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, the G.O. Ms. No. 56 of Municipal Administration and Urban Development (J1) Department of Government of Andhra Pradesh dated 05.02.2011 issued under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Municipalities (Regulation of Receipts and Expenditure) Rules, 1968 exercising the powers conferred under Section 326 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 and the principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere with his peaceful physical possession and continuous enjoyment in respect of Shop No.14, Wholesale Vegetable Market, Gnanapuram, (Popularly Known as Convent Junction Market), Zone IV, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam in any manner whatsoever including the pretext of nonpayment of the amounts demanded under the impugned proceedings.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Proceedings Rc.No.1700/2020/A7 dated<br>20.11.2020 (Served and received on 24.11.2020) of the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Zone-IV, Visakhapatnam, the 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent herein through the 3<sup>rd</sup> respondent, including not to seal the premises Shop No.14, Wholesale Vegetable Market, Gnanapuram, (Popularly Known as Convent Junction Market), Zone IV, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam in any manner whatsoever including under the pretext of nonpayment of the amounts demanded under the impugned proceedings, pending disposal of WP 10325 of 2021, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.S.Anand, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP for Municipal Administration & Urban Development for the Respondent No.1 and Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

"Learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents seeks time to file counter affidavit.

Post on 28.06.2021 for filing counter.

Till then, there shall be an order of status quo with regard to possession of the subject property."

IITRUE COPYII

To,

    1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District, State of Andhra Pradesh.
    1. The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam.
    1. The Zonal Commissioner, Zone-IV, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. (Addresses 1 to 3 by RPAD)
    1. One CC to Sri. T.S.Anand, Advocate [OPUC]
    1. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
    1. One CC to Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy, Standing Counsel [OPUC]
    1. One spare copy

MM

$\mathcal{G}$

SD/- T.Madhavi

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

HIGH COURT

MSMJ

DATED:14/06/2021

NOTE: POST ON 28-06-2021 FOR FILING COUNTER

ORDER

WP.No.10325 of 2021

STATUS QUO

$\mathfrak{t}^{\infty}_{\mathfrak{p}}\mathfrak{z}^{\star}$

$\mathbb{E} \leq \mathbb{E}$

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 20 Sept 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 2 Aug 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 19 Apr 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 26 Jul 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 28 Jun 2021

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 14 Jun 2021

Interim Order

Viewing