IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

$\mathbf{1}$

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

WRIT PETITION Nos: 4990, 14611, 18284, 28889 of 2016; 3182 of 2018; 4204, 10545, 11948, 12035, 17227, 19568, 19756, 20775 of 2019;560, 620, 22541, 24449, 25428 of 2020; 317, 787, 3169, 8207, 8516, 11009, 11844, 12911, 16844, 17414, 17439,17658, 18037, 18172, 18187, 19025, 20048, 20455, 20946, 26749, 29372 of 2021; 993, 3223, 3283, 4340, 6743, 6753, 7284, 7525, 7652, 8911, 11073, 11081, 11167, 11169, 11170, 11171, 11442, 18696, 23516, 23526 and 23541 of 2022.

WRIT PETITION No: 4990 OF 2016

Between:

Smt. A.Meena, W/o. Venkateswararao, aged about 34 years, D. No. 29-74/1, Vadderapalem, Chilakaluripet Town, Guntur District

AND

...Petitioner

1. The Station House Office, Urban P.S., Chilakaluripet, Guntur District Rep. by its Inspector of Police
1. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur.
1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction questioning the action of the Respondents No. 1 $&$ 2 in continuing suspected/rowdy sheet against the petitioner before the $1^{\ensuremath{\text{st}}}$ respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to close the suspected sheet pending before the $1^{st}$ respondent.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 6375 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to close the suspected sheet pending before the $1^{st}$ respondent against the

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 14611 OF 2016

Between:

Pasupuleti Rajesh Khanna, S/o. Prasad, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 47-2-57/A, Betlahempeta, Srinivasa Deluxe Back side, Palakol, West Godavari District.

AND

...Petitioners

1. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari District.
1. The Station House Officer, Palakol Town, Palakol, West Godavari District.

...Respondents

$\mathcal{A} = \mathcal{A}$ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Not and 3 in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner by the $3rd$ respondent is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet pending before the $3rd$ respondent.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 18189 OF 2016)

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18284 OF 2016

Between:

1. S.N. Madhu, S/o Late S. Nagaraju Aged about: 34 Yrs, Manager, Syndicate Bank, Singanamala Branch R/o D.No.17/825D, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District
1. S.N.Ramesh, S/o Late S. Nagaraju Aged about: 38 Yrs, Occ: Advocate R/o D.No.17/825D, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District
1. S.N. Padmavathi, W/o Late S. Nagaraju Aged about: 58 Yrs, Occ: Housewife R/o D.No.17/825D, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District.
1. The Station House Officer, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District
1. Vali Basha, S/o not known to petitioner The Sub Inspector of Police (SI-2823), Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police in harassing the petitioners requiring him to attend the police station every day without there being any reason and without any connected crime and to settle the civil disputes in between the family members of the petitioners and further proclaiming to open rowdy sheet against petitioner 1 and 2 without there being any cause and without following the Police Standing Orders is amounts to abuse of process, illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners by opening of rowdy sheet.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 22459 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners by opening rowdy sheet by calling them to sit in police station hours together, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 28889 OF 2016

Between:

Sri. Atmakuru Babu Rao, S/o Late Masthanaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Private Employee, Vavveru Village, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Present R/o D.No.12/1/101, Opp. Sivalayam, Guptha Park Centre, Santhapet, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of A.P., rep.by its Prl Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Rural, SPSR Nellore District.
1. The Station House Officer, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent in not closing the Rowdy Sheet opened in the name of the writ petitioner vide proceedings No.818/2011, dated 4th March, 201 land continuation of Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra virus to the A.P. Police Standing Orders.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 35768 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice vide Rc.D5 (S.R.)412011, dated 10.10.2014 and Another Notice 01.09.2015 said to have been issued under Revenue Recovery Act, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

IA NO: 1 OF 2017

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to close the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in W.P.No.28889 of 2016.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 3182 OF 2018

Between:

Soru Sambaiah, S/o. late. Appalaswamy Aged about 57 years, Occ Social Worker and Chief of Ambedkar Porata Samit, R/o.Sangam Street, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its. Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Guntur.
1. The Director General of Police, DGP, State of Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District.
1. The Station House Officer, Bobbili Police Station, Vizianagaram District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or orders more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents herein closing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein without reviewing the same and subject to physical and mental torture is illegal, arbitrary, discriminory violation of principles of natural justice and violation of rule of law and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially it is also prayed that this Honble court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 and 4 herein to close the Rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein.

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner herein register in the Respondent No.4 herein station and not to harass the petitioner without due process of law.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH BABU PEDAPALLI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 4204 OF 2019

Between:

G H Reddy, living by cultivation, Residing in Gorigenur Village, Jammalamadugu Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, A.P.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jammalamadugu Division, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Jammalamadugu Urban Police Station, Jammalamadugu Town, YSR Kadapa District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the proceedings vide memo C. No. 02/ SDPO-JMD/2018 passed by the 3rd Respondent herein dated 11.02.2018 directing the 4th Respondent to open rowdy sheet against the Petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, malafide and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and $\cdot$ consequently direct the Respondents herein to close the rowdy sheet, opened against the Petitioner and further direct not to interfere with the personal liberty of the Petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and insist the Petitioner to furnish photographs belonging to the Petitioner in pursuance of the Memo vide C. No. 02/ SDPO-JMD/2018.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 10545 OF 2019

Between:

Mulageri Chinna Lakshamanna @ Karem Lakshmanna, S/o. Late Chinna Thirumalaiah, aged 32 years, R/o. H.No.3/143, Chinnapendekal Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home
Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kunrool District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The SHO, Adoni Taluka Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 4th respondent police station as arbitrary illegal and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the police standing orders and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet continued against the petitioner in the 4th respondent police station.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to call petitioner to the police station without there being pendency of any crime till disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11948 OF 2019

Between:

Bathula Siva Prasad, S/o. Bhadrachalam, Hindu, Aged 27 years, Door No. 8-29-64, Ganesh Nagar, Agatha Varappadu Village, Peda Kakani Mandal, Guntur Dist.

...Petitioner

AND

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Prl. Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

1. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District, Nellore.
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Town Sub-Division, Nellore
1. The Station House Officer, IV Town Police Station, Nellore.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing Suspect Sheet No.8 of 2015 against the petitioner in Peda Kakani Police Station of Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also ultra virus the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to close the Suspect Sheet No.8 dated 21.08.2015.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 14.08.2019 for closure of Suspect Sheet No.8 dated 21.8.2015 on the file of PedaKakani Police Station, Pedakakani of Guntur District.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to correct the words as Rowdy Sheet in place of Suspect Sheet by amending the letters in the W.P.No.11948/2019.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the affidavit in the present Writ Petition on file.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH MARKONDAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 12035 OF 2019

Between:

Challa Mariya Dasu, S/o Veera Swamy, Hindu, aged about 33 years, R/o Door No.8-29-64/93, Ganesh Nagar, Agatha Varappadu Village, Peda Kakani Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District, Guntur.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur Urban District, Guntur.
1. The Station House Officer, Peda Kakani Police Station, Peda Kakni, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing Suspect Sheet No.7 of 2015 vide proceedings of the 4th respondent in C.No.129/SDPO NORTH DIV.I-GUNTUR URBAN/2015 against the petitioner in Peda Kakani Police Station, Guntur as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also ultra virus the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to close the Suspect Sheet No.7/2015 dated 21.08.2015.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 14.08.2019 for closure of suspect sheet No.7/15 dated 21.08.2015 vide Proceedings in C.No.129/SDPO NORTH DIV.I-GUNTUR URBAN/2015 issued by the 4th respondent pending on the file of the Peda Kakani Police Station, Guntur, pending disposal of the writ petition.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to correct the words as 'Rowdy Sheet' in place of 'Suspect Sheet' by amending the letters in the WP.No.12035/2019.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH MARKONDAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17227 OF 2019

Between:

Kampasati Satyanarayana, S/o. Nageswararao, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Chintalapudi V and, M, West Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, At Eluru.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem Division West Godavari District.
1. The Station House Officer, Chintalapudi West Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus by declaring that the action of the respondents opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner and continuing the same is illegal arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to lift the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the interest of Justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M P V N V SASTRI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 19568 OF 2019

Between:

Doopana Suryanarayana Reddy, S/o Neeladri Reddy, aged about 35 years, R/o Birlangi Village in Ichapuram Mandal, Srikakulam District.

AND

...Petitioner

1. The state of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. Superintendant of Police, Srikakulam.
1. Subdivisional Police officer, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District.
1. Inspector of police, Ichapuram, Srikakulam District.
1. SI of police Ichapuram Rural PS, Srikakulam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus and declaring the acts of respondents in opening Rowdy sheet No.96/2019 against the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against provisions of Police Standing orders and violative of Art. 21 of Constitution of India and set aside the rowdy sheet opened against petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to close rowdy sheet opened against petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWARLU KOLLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 19756 OF 2019

Between:

U Venkateswarlu, S/o Giddaiah, Aged about 36 years, resident of H.No. 4-96, Remata village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its.Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Guduru Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent not to harass me by insisting me to visit the Police Station and allegedly opening a rowdy sheet as illegal, as arbitrary, and unconstitutional and against to the principles of natural justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to call me to the police station pending disposal of aforesaid writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 20775 OF 2019

Between:

U.Durga Rao, S/o. Anjaneyulu, aged about 28 years, R/o. H.No. 8-11, Ambedkar Colony, R/o. B.Ndamanuru village, Naguluppalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It's Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole
1. The Station House Officer, Naguluppalapadu Police Station, Naguluppalapadu, Prakasam. Dist

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet No. 432/18 against him even after acquittal in the solitary crime registered against him by the learned Special Judge for Trial of Offences under Electricity Act Cases-cum- I Addl. Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole by a Judgment dated 1.7.2019 in POCSOA S.C.No. 35/2017 and making him to sit there for hours together offering threats to him on pretext of counselling time and again, requiring his bind over as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any crime registered against him on the pretext of continuance of rowdy sheet, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 560 OF 2020

Between:

Gorle Sekhar, S/o, Nookaraju Aged about 36 years, Occ. business, R/o D.No.7-6-10, Velupula Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amravati city, Guntur.

1. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam district, Visakhapatnam
1. The Dy. SP/ Sub Divisional Police Officer (SDPO), Anakapalalli Sub-Division Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam
1. The Station House officer, Anakapalli Town PS, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Dist.
1. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of police. Worked as SHO in Anakapalli Town PS, (In the elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam Dist
1. Vasadi Syamalarao, S/o Satya Rao Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.8-4-9, Kotniveedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari call for the record pertaining to Rowdy Sheet Proceedings vide.C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 on the file of the respondent No.3 and quashed the same by declaring the sane as illegal arbitrary, unwarranted, and violation of Art 14, 20 and 21 of Constitution of India and in Violation of PSO 601.

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the Rowdy Sheet Proceedings vide.C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019.

lA NO; 2 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 not to extension further the Rowdy Sheet of the Proceedings C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 issued by respondent No.3 pending disposal of the writ petition.

lA NO; 3 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the all the proceedings in C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 issued by respondent No.3 pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 620 OF 2020

Between:

Amarpalli Krishnaji, S/o late Ramadu Aged about 53 years, Occ: business, R/o D.No.6-5-9, Velupula Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amravati city, Guntur.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Dy. SP/ Sub Divisional Police Officer, (SDPO) Anakapalalli Sub-Division Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.
1. The Station House officer, Ariakapalli Town PS, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Distrist.
1. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of police, Worked as SHO in Anakapalli Town PS, (In the elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District.
- 1. Vasadi Syamalarao, S/o Satya Rao Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.8-4-9, Kotniveedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari call for the record pertaining to Rowdy Sheet Proceedings vide.C.No...9/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 on the file of the respondent No.3 and quashed the same by declaring the same as illegal arbitrary, unwarranted, and violation of Art 14, 20 and 21 of Constitution of India and in Violation of PSO 601.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

IA NO: 2 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the all the proceedings in C.No.19/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 issued by respondent No.3 pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 22541 OF 2020

Between:

1. Vishwanadham Subba Ramakrishna @ Chinna, S/o. Jagadeeswara Rao, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 6-9, Near Pedda Ramalayam, Thatiparthi Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, East.Godavari District, A.P.
1. Vishwanadham Purushottam, S/o.Jagadeeswara Rao, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 6-9, Near Pedda Ramalayam, Thatiparthi Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District, A.P.
1. Adapa Prakash Rao @ Prakashayya, S/o. Sesha Rao, Aged about. 48 years, Occ.Agriculture R/o. Chakalipeta, Thatiparthi Village, Gollaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District, A.P.

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District,
1. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavarai District, At Kakikanda, A.P.
1. The Station House Officer, Gollaprolu, East Godavari District, A.P.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declaring that the continuation of Rowdy-sheet No.263 in respect of petitioner No.1, i.e., Vishwanadham Subba Ramakrishna, Rowdy-sheet No.262 in respect of Petitioner No.2, i.e., Vishwanadham Purushottam and Rowdy-sheet No.261 in respect of petitioner No.3, i.e., Sri.Adapa Prakash Rao in spite of acquittal in SC No.371/201 on the file of XI Additional Sessions Judge, Pithapuram by judgment dated

24-01-2018 and registering binding over cases on the ground of Rowdy sheets in favour of the petitioners as illegal, untenable, unsustainable, motivated, against the law, and violative of the life and liberty as guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheets as against the petitioners and not to harass the petitioners in any manner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to call the petitioners to the Police Station under the guise of Rowdysheet No.263, 262 and 261 in the name of petitioners.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 24449 OF 2020

Between:

Parabathula Yesu Babu, S/o Late Krishna Murthy, Aged about 44 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o D.No. 2-42, Thondavaram Village, Ambajipeta Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Station Officer, Amalpuram Sub Division, East Godavri District.
1. The Station House Officer, Ambajipeta Police Station, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action on the part of the respondents herein opened and continuing the rowdy sheet vide H.S No. 150 dated 10.01.2015 (not served copy by the police) by 5th respondent police station contrary to the order No. 601 (A) of the A.P. Police Manual basing on the registration of crimes in property disputes between the family members on other than the petitioner and his sister( due to protecting the mother aged about 85 years by the petitioner as per registered will executed by his father dated 30.08.2000) as illegal arbitrary and violating the articles 14,19 and 21 of the constitution of India and set aside the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner to calling the police station every day on false crimes basing on the continuing the rowdy sheet vide H.S No. 150 dated.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner to calling the police station every day on false crimes basing on the continuing the rowdy sheet vide H.S No. 150 dated 10.01.2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOKKA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 25428 OF 2020

Between:

Linganeni Venkata Krishna, S/o. Nageswara Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Bandarupalli Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur.
1. Divisional Superintendent of Police, Guntur North, Guntur District.
1. Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein in not closing the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) opened against the petitioner inspite of the acquittal of the petitioner in SC.No.182 of 2011 on the file of the Court of Sessions Judge, Guntur, and without taking into consideration of the Orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.38170 of 2012 dated 14-03-2016, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to close the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) opened against the petitioner by the 4th respondent forthwith.

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to pay domiciliary visits to petitioner house nor insist upon petitioner appearance before them, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 317 OF 2021

Between:

Vaddeboina Venkata Krishna Reddy @ Nellore Kirshna Reddy, S/o. Panchatntram Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Vempalli Road, Yerraguntia Town, Kadapa District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District, Kadapa.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District.
1. The Station House Officer, Yerraguntla Police Station, Kadapa District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue Writ, direction or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the Orders in R.C.No.27/R.S./SDPO-KDP/14, dt.25-9-2014 Issued by the Respondent No. 3 and there by open rowdy sheet No- 351 against the petitioner is Illegal, arbitrary, violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, Violation PSO 601 and In

violation of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequences set aside the Rowdy sheet no-351 maintaining by Respondent No. 3.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to their police station by suspending the Operation of Rowdy sheet no-351 maintaining by Respondent No. 3 pending disposal above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 787 OF 2021

Between:

Chennu Chanti, S/o.Sri Ch.Perayya Hindu, aged 46 years Occ-Business, R/o.Door No.3-5-4 Chekkavari Street, Bhimavaram West Godavari District Andhra Pradesh

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P.Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Superintendent of Police, W.G.District, Eluru, AP.
1. The Sub. Divisional Police Officer, Narsapur, Sub.Division, Narsapur, W.G.District, AP.
1. The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the action of the 3rd Respondent in permitting the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner and opening of rowdy sheet vide Sheet No.3/ 2020 on the file of the 5th Respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to Police Standing Orders and also violative of Art.19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to remove the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner forthwith on the file of the 5th Respondent.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to interfere with petitioner's life and liberty under the quise of opening of a rowdy sheet against him on the file of the 5th Respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.CHIDAMBARAM

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 3169 OF 2021

Between:

Padala Abhi Ram, S/o Venkata Raml Reddy, Aged about 25 yrs, R/o Komaripalem Village, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secratary Home, Secratarait, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Gunturu District.
1. The Director General of Police, Govt. of A.P., Mangalagiri, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Superintending of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram Sub-Division,
Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District.
1. The SHO, Bikkavolu PS, East Godavari District.
1. The SHO, Bommuru PS, Rajamahendravaram Urban, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declare the proceedings of the 4th respondent opened and continuing the Rowdysheet against the petitioner in C.No.15/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020 dt 16.11.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the life and liberty as guaranteed the petitioner under the Provisions of the Constitution of India as well as the law laid down by the constitutional courts and contrary to the order No.601(A) of the AP Police Manual basing on the Registration of Crimes in between the two political parties and violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to close the Rowdy sheet against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the petitioner C.No.15/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020 dt:16.11.2020 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 8207 OF 2021

Between:

Yarra Srikrishna, S/o Chittibabu, Aged about 27 years, Near Zim, Kothamundu, Peddapuram, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer (D.S.P), Peddapuram, East Godavari District,
1. The Circle Inspector of Police, Peddapuram, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police (S.H.O), Peddapuram Police Station, Jaggampeta, East Godavari District.

...RESPONDENTS

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call me to the police station to the Police Station in connection with Rowdy Sheet No. 805 of 2018 in Peddapuram Police Station, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SUBBA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 8516 OF 2021

Between:

Sinka Ramarao, S/o. Pyddayya, Aged about 30 years, R/o Varisam Village, Vansthala Mandal, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh.

AND

...Petitioner

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Velagapudi Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District.

The Station House Officer, J.R Puram Police Station Srikakulam District.

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in opening Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner bearing No 42 on the file of the S.H.O J.R Puram Police Station, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO: 11009 OF 2021

Between:

Vangal Chandra Sekhara Reddy, S/o Baleeswara Reddy, Aged 48 years, Occ: Argiculturalist, R/o H.No.28/794-3-1, NGO's Colony, Nadyala, Near Om Shanthi Board, Nadyala Rural, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District, A.P.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Kurnool District, A.P.
1. The Circle Inspector, Panyam Village, Kurnool District, A.P.
1. The Station House Officer, Gadivemula Police Station, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the $4^{th}$ and $5^{th}$ respondent continuing the Rowdy Sheet bearing No.52 of 2005 issued vide proceeding no. C.No.875/SDPO-N/2005 based on the solitary instance even though the petitioner is acquitted in the said above case and even though the prescription under police standing order 601 and 742 are not fulfilled by yielding to the pressures brought out by the local political leaders and making him to sit there for hours together offering threats to him on pretext of counseling time and again, requiring his bind over as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of catena of Judgments rendered by Honourable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any crime registered against him on the pretext of continuance of rowdy sheet by calling him to the police station and making him sit hours together pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.NITESH

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11844 OF 2021

Between:

Pamu Kishore Kumar @ Pamula Kishore, S/o.Sreeramulu, Aged 24 years, Occ. Un-Employee, R/o.Somidavalasa Village, Therlam Mandal, Vizianagaram District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District.
1. Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bobbili Sub-Division, Vizianagaram District.
Station House Officer, Therlam Police Station. Vizianagaram District. Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam Sub-Division, Srikakulam District.
1. Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Srikakulam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to

issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6 on the petitioner's representations dated 19.01.2021 and 15.03.2021 submitted to close the Rowdy Sheet proceedings C.No.80/SDPO-S/H.S12015, dated 22.12.2015 and Rowdy Sheet No.112 issued by the 5th respondent and the same is transferred to the 3rd respondent and the said rowdy sheet proceedings and rowdy sheet which is pending and continuing against the petitioner's on the rolls of 4th respondent police station, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash Rowdy Sheet proceedings C.No.80/SDPO-S/H.S/2015, dated 22.12.2015 and Rowdy Sheet No.112 issued by the 5th respondent and directs the respondents not to interfere with his liberty in any manner in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2021 and 15.03.2021 submitted to close the Rowdy Sheet proceedings C.No.80/SDPO-S/H.S/2015, dated 22.12.2015 and Rowdy Sheet No.112 issued by the 5th respondent and the same is transferred to the 3rd respondent and the said rowdy sheet proceedings and rowdy sheet which is pending and continuing against the petitioner's on the rolls of 4th respondent police station and consequently directs the respondents not to pay domiciliary visits to the petitioner's house nor insist upon him appearance before them, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVAS AMBATI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 12911 OF 2021

Between:

Guvvala Ramesh Reddy @ Chitti, S/o.Sri G.Rama Krishna Reddy Hindu, aged 42 years R/o.Thellanellapalle H/o.Gaddamvaripalli Pnr.Thayat Chowdepalle Mandal, Chittoor District, AP.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District, AP
1. The Superintendent, of Chittoor District, Chittoor AP
1. The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Palamaner, Chittoor District, AP
1. The Sub.Inspector of Police, Chowdepalle Police Station Chowdepalle, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in opening rowdy sheet No.13 of Chowdepalle Police Station, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh against the petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, malafide and violation. of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent herein to close the rowdy sheet, opened against the petitioner and further direct not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent herein not to call the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 16844 OF 2021

Between:

Vuyyuru Phaneendra Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, aged about 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-63, Nidamarru (V), Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District - 522 503

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P.
1. The Superintendent of Police, (Urban), Guntur District, AP.
The Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP
1. The Inspector of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, A.P.
1. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Rural Police Station, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, AP
1. Asodi Srinivasa Reddy, Sub Inspector of Police, Presently attached to Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings vide C.No.06/BCs/SDPO-NORTH/GTR(U)/ 2021, dated 10.04.2021, where under permission was granted to Respondent No.5 to open a Rowdy sheet against the petitioner and keep close watch over his movements and run him under Security Sections of law whenever necessary to curb his movements, as being illegal and arbitrary as well as against the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21, 19 (a), (b), (d) and (g) of the Constitution of India as well as the settled proposition of law laid down by the Constitutional Courts and consequently to set aside the same, in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings vide C.No.06/BCs/SDPO-NORTH/GTR(U)/2021, dated 10.04.2021 issued by the 3rd Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17414 OF 2021

Between:

Tanneru Uma Maheswara Rao, S/o late Venkateswarlu, aged about 65 years, R/o HIG-14, Midilapuri, Vuda Colony, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.

...Petitioner

AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Principal Secretary Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Inspector of Police, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Statlon, Visakhapatnam

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet No.1/2011, dated 4.1.2011 on the file of the 5th respondent Police Station, which is continuing against the petitioner, pending disposal of writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17439 OF 2021

Between:

Boya Shiva Kumar, S/o Boya Chinna Maddileti, Aged about 28 years, R/o D.No.8-108, B.C. Colony, Midthur village and Mandal, Kurnool District, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Deaprtment, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
1. The Station House Officer, Midthur Police Station Midthur, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in

continuing the Suspect/Rowdy Sheet No.276 in the name of the petitioner on the file of the Midthur Police Station, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to close the Suspect/Rowdy Sheet No. 276 in the name of the petitioner on the file of the Midthur Police Station, Kurnool District.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the $3rd$ Respondent to close the Suspect/Rowdy Sheet No. 276 on the file of the Midthur Police Station, Kurnool District forthwith pending disposal of the main W.P.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B S VENKATA RAMESH

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 17658 OF 2021

Between:

Penumaia Dharma, S/o Bojja, Working as teacher Mandal Praja Parishat Primary School, Nadimivalasa, Arma Panchayati, Dumbriguda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District

...Petitioner

AND

1. Station House Officer, Dumbriguda Police station, Visakhapatnam District
$2.$ The Inspector of Police, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents In directing the petitioner to appear before the police station and threatening to open a rowdy sheet against petitioner and threatening that petitioner should appear before him whenever they call and sit there from morning to evening, without there being any case or any report against petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust against my fundamental rights of living peacefully and respectably and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner peaceful daily life in any manner whatsoever such as calling to the police station and making to sit there without any legal proceedings.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction against the respondents not to call petitioner to the police station and to make to sit there and not to threaten petitioner of opening a rowdy sheet without any statutory proceedings during the pendency of this writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18037 OF 2021

Between:

Boya Sekhar, S/o. Boya Nallanna, aged about 26 years, R/o. H.No. 7-44, Boya Veedhi, C Belagal village and Mandal, Kurnool District

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It's Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secreteriait Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool.
1. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly that of $3rd$ respondent in continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioner and further binding him over before Special Executive Magistrate as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of Judgment a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court of AP in WA No. 1874/2003 dated 4.11.2003 and WP No. 11475/2020 and Batch dated 26.08.2020 as well catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to call the petitioner by infringing his personal liberty without there being any crime registered against him, pending disposal of the Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18172 OF 2021

Between:

Boya Tirumalesu, S/o. Boya Naganna, aged about 24 years, R/o. C Belagal village and Mandal, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It's Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool.
1. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly that of $3rd$ respondent in continuing rowdy

sheet against the petitioner and further binding him over before Special Executive Magistrate as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of Judgment a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court of AP in WA No. 1874/2003 dated 4.11.2003 and WP No. 11475/2020 and Batch dated 26.08.2020 as well catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18187 OF 2021

Between:

Boya Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. Chinna Muneppa, aged about 42 years, R/o. C Belagal village and Mandal, Kurnool District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It's Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool.
1. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly that of $3rd$ respondent in continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioner and further binding him over before Special Executive Magistrate as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of Judgment a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court of AP in WA No. 1874/2003 dated 4.11.2003 and WP No. 11475/2020 and Batch dated 26.08.2020 as well catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India. and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J U M V PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 19025 OF 2021

Between:

Meenuga Madhu Babu, S/o. M Nagendra Babu, aged about 42 years, Occ. RTI Activist 86 Para legal volunteer, R/o D.No. 10-1-32, 10th Ward, SC Colony, Uravakonda Town 86 Mandal, Ananthapur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Principal Secretary Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Uravakonda Police Station, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus calling for records pertaining to Rowdy Sheet No. 685/UKD before the Uravakonda Police Station, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh and quash the same as being arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires the provisions of the AP Police Standing order as well as in violation of Article 14, Article 19 86 Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the record pertaining to the opening and continuance of the rowdy sheet No 685/UKD pending before the Uravakonda Police station before this Honourable Court forthwith.

IA NO: 2 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the third respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station or harass the petitioner in lieu of the rowdy sheet No 685/UKD pending before the Uravakonda Police station.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HAMSA DEVINENI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 20048 OF 2021

Between:

Palanati Narendra Reddy, S/o. Gopal Reddy, Aged 32 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Budiapalem, Mogallur Panchayat, Veligandla Mandal, Prakasam District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, at Ongole.
1. Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District.
1. Sub inspector of Police, /Station House Officer, Kanigiri Police Station, Kanigiri, Prakasam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to

issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein in not closing the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) No.4, opened against the Petitioner on 23-10-2011 inspite of the acquittal of the petitioner in Sessions Case No.19 of 2012 dated 13-12-2018, on the file of the Special Judge for Trail of Offences under Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - cum- Additional District and Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to close the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) No.4 opened against the petitioner by the 4th respondent forthwith.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere in any manner into the personal life and liberty of petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 20455 OF 2021

Between:

Karri Soma Pocheswara Rao, S/o Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged 50 years, Occ. Government Servant, R/o 64-16-6/2, Pratap Nagar, Kakinad Urban, Gandhinagar, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District.
1. The Station House Officer, Biccavolu Police Station, Biccavolu, East Godavari District
- ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings C.No.18/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020dated 16.11.2020 in opening the Rowdy Sheet being illegal, arbitrary in contravention of provisions of Order 601 of AP Police Manual and Order 742 of AP Police Standing Orders and in violation of. Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents herein to quash the Rowdy Sheet.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the Proceedings C.No.18/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020dated 16.11.2020 issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SRINIVASA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 20946 OF 2021

Between:

Vemula Meera Vali, S/o Srinivasulu Aged about 28 years, R/o H.No.1/163, Vonipenta village, Mydukur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The Station House Office, Mydukur (U/G) police station Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddutur, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rept. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in opening the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner and continuing the same in the 1st respondent police station based on involvement in Cr.No.69/2012 and the same was closed in C.C.No.143/2012 on 20-02-2017 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to close Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station forthwith in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to disturb the personal liberty of the petitioner on the ground of pendency of Rowdy Sheet in the $1st$ respondent police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 26749 OF 2021

Between:

Gattupalli Panduranga Rao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Manager, Endowment Department, R/o. Chebrolu Village and Mandal, Guntur District

...Petitioner

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. Deputy Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (South), Guntur Urban, Guntur District.
1. Station House Officer, Chebrolu Police Station, Guntur District.

...Respondents

before his authority and fixed the petitioner photo on the notice board by indicating he is a rowdy sheeter, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner personal life and liberty and further direct to the 4th respondent to remove petitioner photo on the display board.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner by summoning the petitioner to appear before his authority and further direct to the 4th respondent to remove his photo forthwith on the display board by indicating he is a rowdy sheeter, pending disposal of main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SRIHARI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 29372 OF 2021

Between:

Katabathina Penchalaiah, S/o Ramarnurthi, aged about 20 years, R/o Kuricharlapadu village, Venkatachalam Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Women Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
1. The Station House Officer, V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner on the file of V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District and continuing the same as illegal, arbitrary and Violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on the file of V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District.

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on the file of the V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GANGA RAMI REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 993 OF 2022

Between:

PutsaJogaRao. $S/o.$ P. Nayakanna, Aged 30 years, $R/o.$ D.No.1-592. Peddamuraharipuram Village, VajrapukothuruMandal, Srikakulam District.
1. Putcha Ravi Teja, S/o. P. Paparao, Aged 23 years, R/o. D.No.2-587, Gandhi Veedhi, Peddamuraharipuram Village, VajrapukothuruMandal, Srikakulam District

...Petitioners

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam.
1. Deputy Superintendent of Police/Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District.
1. Sub inspector of Police/Station House Officer, Vairapukothuru Police Station, Vajrapukotturu Mandal, Srikakulam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 herein in not closing the Rowdy Sheet Nos.1 of 2017 and 5 of 2017, opened against the Petitioners, inspite of the acquittal of the petitioners in SC.No.2/2018 dated 30-11-2018, on the file of the Court off the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 cum - 1st Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheets opened against the petitioners by the 4th respondent, forthwith.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere in any manner into the personal life and liberty of petitioners, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 3223 OF 2022

Between:

Paila Yesu @ Paila Esu @ Shevag, S/o Mani Raju, 39 years, Occ: Daily Labour, Gowrinagar, NAD Kotta Road, Visakhapatnam (Urban), Visakhapatnam.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Kolanukonda, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada Krishna District.
1. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
1. The Station House Officer, Airport Police Station, Visakhapatnam.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening, continuing and transferring the Rowdy Sheet No. R12/2T/VC/2009 (C.No.405/ACP-WD/2009), dated 03-04-2009 on the file of 4th respondent-police station maintained by 3rd respondent, now trying to transfer the same to 5th respondent police station against the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to close and to quash the Rowdy Sheet No. R12/2T/VC/2009 (C.No.405/ACP-WD/2009), dated 03.04-2009 on $4^{th}$ respondent-police station maintained by $3^{rd}$ respondent against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 3rd and 4th respondents herein not to transfer the Rowdy Sheet No. R12/2T/VC/2009 (C.No.405/ACP-WD/2009), dated 03-04-2009 on the file of 4th respondent-police station maintained by 3rd respondent herein to the 5th respondentpolice station and not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of the rowdysheet, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHALLA AJAY KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 3283 OF 2022

Between:

Kanubuddi Ramana Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, Aged 36 years, R/o. Nandipalem Village, Podili Mandal, Prakasam District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District.
1. Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole.
1. Additional Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District.
1. Sub Divisional Police Officer-cum-Deputy Superintendent of Police, Darsi, Prakasam District.
1. Inspector of Police, Podili Circle, Podili, Prakasam District.
1. Station House Officer, Podili Police Station, Podili, Prakasam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly of the respondents 5 and 6 in continuing the Rowdy Sheet / Suspect Sheet opened against the petitioner on the rolls of 6th Respondent in spite of the predecessor of the 6th respondent sought permission by Letter dt. 20.09.2019 from the 4th respondent to close Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner and in insisting the petitioner to repeatedly appear before the 6th respondent once in every week under the guise of keeping his movements under close watch, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash lie said Suspect / Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner on the rolls of the $6^{\rm th}$

respondent and direct the respondents particularly the 6th respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's personal life and liberty in any manner in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 6th respondent not to pay domiciliary visits to the petitioner's house nor insist upon his appearance before them, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SARATH KUMAR D

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 4340 OF 2022

Between:

Shaik Nabi Rasool, S/o. Shaik Burhan, Aged about 22 years, D.No. 8/310, Near Old Anjineya Swamy temple, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, rep. by its Secretary.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool District.
1. The Station House Officer, Yemmiganur Town Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

...Petitioner

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No. 4 in entering the petitioner's name in the suspects list and continuing his name in the said list and harassing him by calling him to police station under the pretext of enquiry without any complaint against him, as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, unjust, and violative of Art., 14, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner from the suspects list and not to harass him.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to harass the petitioner, pending disposal of above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 6743 OF 2022

Between:

Bogathi Vijay Prathap Reddy, aged about 50 years S/o Bogathi Narayana Reddy, R/o 1-54-C, OC Colony, Vennapusapalli Yellanur Mandal, Anantapuramu District-515465

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi Village, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur District, Anantapuram, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tadipatri Division, AnantapuramDistrict, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Station House Officer, Yellanur PS, Anantapuramu District.5. The Station House Officer, Putlur P.S Anantapuramu District.
1. The Station House Officer, Tadipatri Town P.S. Anantapuramu District

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in continuing the name of petitioner on the rolls of Rowdy sheet vide No. 106/1998 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Police Standing Orders apart from violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents to forthwith remove the name of petitioner from Rowdy sheet.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents not to call and detain the petitioner as per the Rowdy sheet No.106/1998, pending disposal of main Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARISH KUMAR RASINENI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 6753 OF 2022

Between:

K Srinivasarao@ Vasu, S/o. Ramaiah, aged about 43 years, R/o. Pandillapalli, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The Station House Officer, Vetapalem, Prakasam District.
1. The Inspector of Police, Chirala, Prakasam District.
The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Chirala, Prakasam District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole.
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No. 1 in continuing rowdy sheet No. 52 dated 20 03 2019

against the petitioner before the 1st respondent Police Station as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet pending before the 1st respondent.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent not to interfere with petitioners life and liberty by calling petitioner to police station under guise of rowdy sheet pending before the 1st respondent against the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 7284 OF 2022

Between:

1. Naganandi Ramakrishna @ Pichiguntla Ramakrishna, S/o. Naganandi Venkateswarlu, @ Number Vekateswarlu Aged 31 Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Andhra Pradesh.
1. Naganandi Madhu @ Pichiguntla Madhu, S/o. Naganandi Ramudu @ Medimedde Ramudu, Aged 33 Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Andhra Pradesh.
1. Naganandi Sreenivasulu @ Seenu, S/o Naganandi Chinna Pullaiah @ Medimedde Chinna Pullaiah Aged 48 Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Andhra Pradesh.
1. Gadesina Nagasheshulu @ Pichiguntla Nagaseshulu, S/o. Gadesina Jammanna @ Pichguntla Jammanna, Aged 49 Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Deputy General of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.
1. Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.
1. Station House Officer, Pamulapadu Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the Respondent authorities in continuing-Rowdy Sheet No. 39, (II). Naganandi Madhu - Rowdy Sheet No. 40, (III). Naganandi Sreenivasulu @ Seenu -Rowdy Sheet No. 41 and (IV). Gadesina Nagasheshulu @ Pichiguntla Nagaseshulu -Rowdy Sheet No. 41, Rowdy Sheet opened in the year 2018, at Pamulapadu Police Station, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary and also contrary to the A.P Police Standing Orders and also against the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to close the Rowdy Sheet which was opened against the petitioners and also further direct the respondent Police to remove the names of the Petitioners from the Rowdy Sheet Board in Pamulapadu Police Station at Kurnool.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Police not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station, Pamulapadu, Kurnool District.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI Y.BALAJI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 7525 OF 2022

Between:

1. Chilukuri Prasad, S/o. Sri. Venkata Rao, Hindu, Aged about 55 Years, Occ- Business, R/o Door No. 13-105/1, Cotton Peta, 2nd Street, Dowlaiswaram - 533 125, East Godavari District.
1. Dasari Raj Kumar, S/o. Sri Krishna, Hindu, Aged about 28 years, Occ- Business, R/o.Door No. 109-2-26, Netaji Nagar, Bommuru - 533 124, Rajamahendravaram Rural, East Godavari District.

...Petitioners

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi - 522 237, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari District
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Zone, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari District
1. The Station House Officer, Dowlaiswaram P.S., Dowlaiswaram 533 125, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to summon the Petitioner to the police station pursuant to the 'Rowdy Sheet' opened against him on the file of the 4th Respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N.SIVA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO: 7652 OF 2022

Between:

M.Mallikarjuna, S/o M.Vannurappa, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o Pulagutta Palli, Guntakal Rural, Anantapur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary, Department of Home. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
1. The Superintend of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District
The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Guntakal, Anantapur District
1. The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to call the Petitioner to Police Station by assigning the reason that Petitioner being a Rowdy Sheeter they have to keep a vigilance on the petitioner.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 8911 OF 2022

Between:

Chekuri Sudhakar Raju, S/o. Puma Chandar Raju, Aged 51 years, R/o. Flat No. C-3, 3rd Floor, D. No. 8-2-468/A/1, Paradise Residency, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
1. The Inspector of Police, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
1. The Station House Officer, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Certiorari by calling for the entire records pertaining to the Rowdy Sheet/ History Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017 on the file of the P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District on the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and also in violation of the Police Standing Orders and consequently Quash and set-aside the Rowdy Sheet/History Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017 on the file of the P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District against the petitioner.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of a certified copy of Rowdy Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017.

IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to suspend the Rowdy Sheet/History Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017 on the file of the P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District against the petitioner, forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V VINOD K REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11073 OF 2022

Between:

Korugodu Veeranna @ Bujji, S/o. K. Chinna Veeranna, Hindu, aged about 24 years, R/o. 24-102, Vijaya Cloth Circle, Old Town, Anantapuram Town and District.

AND

...Petitioner

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Vetagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 611 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11081 OF 2022

Between:

Velur Shaik Sadiqu Vali @ Miah, S/o. V. Mahib Sab, Muslim, aged about 39 years, R/o. 28-113, Boya Street, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 601 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not, to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11167 OF 2022

Between:

Alishar Shaik Masoom Baba, S/o. A. Ismail Sab, Muslim, aged about 60 years, R/o. 12-3-899, 1st cross, Vidyuth Nagar, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of A.P, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Station House Officer, II Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 523 of II Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11169 OF 2022

Between:

Shaik Chetla Baba Vali, S/o. S.C. Fakruddin, Muslim, aged about 33 years, R/o. 25-309, Asar Street, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 600 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11170 OF 2022

Between:

Syed Mahaboob Basha, S/o. Sayed Shaiksha Vali, Muslim, aged about 26 years, R/o. 22-369, Gold Smith Street, Old Town, Anantapuram Town and District

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathl.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.

The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 602 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11171 OF 2022

Between:

Katika Babji Rao @ Babji, S/o. K. Venkat Rao, aged about 26 years, R/o. 26-255, Momeen Street, Old Town, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 603 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11442 OF 2022

Between:

Khaji Mahammad Jeelan Basha, S/o. K.M. Rafiq, Muslim, aged about 22 years, R/o. 12-3-899, 1St cross, Vidyuth Nagar, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, , Anantapuram.
1. The Station House Officer, II Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 524 of II Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon me to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner, pending the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18696 OF 2022

Between:

Mallam Vasu, S/o.Vasantha Rao, Aged about 29 years, Occ. unemployed, R/o.D.No.18-40-84, Redlla Bazar Main Road, Sangadigunta, Guntur, Guntur District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalli.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, A.P.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur West, Guntur
1. The Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Police Station, Pattabhipuram, Guntur.

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RATAN MOHAN MEDIDA

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 23516 OF 2022

Between:

Jujjavarapu Veerabhadram, S/o. J.Ramu, Aged about 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 2-64, Kongara vari Veedhi, Near Ramalayam, Pedapudi village, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari District.

AND

...Petitioner

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the History Sheet No.51 of 2011 in Pedapudi Police Station, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari district against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch dated 15.07.2022 and consequently set aside the same.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with History Sheet No. 51 of 2011, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.BALA MOHAN RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 23526 OF 2022

Between:

Jujjavarapu Srihari, S/o. J.Ramu, Aged about 48 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/ o. D. No. 2-64, Kongara vari Veedhi, Near Ramalayam, Pedapudi village, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari District.

...Petitioner

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the History Sheet No.52 of 2011 in Pedapudi Police Station, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari district against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch dated 15.07.2022 and consequently set aside the same.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with History Sheet No. 52 of 2011, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S BALA MOHAN RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 23541 OF 2022

Between:

Jujjavarapu Srinivasa Rao @ Nallabbu, S/o. J.Ramu, Aged about 42 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 2-64, Kongara vari Veedhi, Near Ramalayam, Pedapudi village, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari district

AND

...Petitioner
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada. $\overline{2}$ .
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the History Sheet No.53 of 2011 in Pedapudi Police Station, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari district against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch dated 15.07.2022 and consequently set aside the same.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with History Sheet No 53 of 2011, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S BALA MOHAN RAO

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON ORDER;

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH RQY

Writ Petition NOS.4990, 14611, 18284, 28889 of 2016; 3182 of 2018; 4204, 10545, 11948, 12035, 17227, 19568, 19756, 20775 of 2019; 560, 620, 22541, 24449; 25428 of 2020; 317, 787, 3169, 8207, 8516, 11009, 11844, 12911, 16844, 17414, 17439, 17658, 18037, 18172, 18187, 19025, 20048, 20455, 20946, 26749, 29372 of 2021; 993, 3223, 3283, 4340, 6743, 6753, 7284, 7525, 7652, 8911, 11073, 11081, 11167, 11169, 11170, 11171, 11442, 18696, 23516, 23526 and 23541 of 2022

COMMON ORDER:

In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners sought either to quash the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets that are opened against them or to direct the respondent police officials to close the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/historysheets.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.
These Writ Petitions are being disposed of without going into the merits of the cases on the ground of legal validity of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened by invoking the provisions of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, in view of the recent common order of this High Court, dated 15.07.2022, in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, whereby this Court held that the Standing Orders of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuation of -FOK^dy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and keeping^

surveillance on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, in terms of Chapter-37 of the aforesaid Standing Oi-ders, are void.

The rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histor3t-sheets against the petitioners in all tliese Writ Petitions i Chapter-37 of the A.P. Manual. were opened in terms of Police Standing Orders or A.P. Police
The legal validity of Chapter-37 of the said A.P. Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, said Police on the basis of which the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened, has been questioned and challenged before W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, order, dated 15.07.2022, being are this Cour t in This court, by its passed in the above batch of Writ common Petitions, after considering the law on the issue elaborately with reference to the earlier judgment rendered by the Apex Court and, more particularly, with reference to the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of K.S. ts Puttaswamy v. Union of Indiai, held that Chapter-37 of the Police Manual or A.P. A.P. Police Standing Orders on the basis of which the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histor^-sheets are being opened and surveillance is being kept on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets At para.45 of the said common order, it is held as follows: , as void.

'45) Hence, the Writ Petition No..3568 of 2022 declaring the Standing Orders of .A.P. Police Standing Orders to the is allowed Police Manual / A.P. extent of opening/continuation

(2017) 10 se e 1

of Rowdy Sheet, Suspect Sheet, History Sheet etc., and on that basis the surveillance of the individual (in -terms of Chapter 37 of the above said Standing Orders) as void. All the other Writ Petitions are also allowed. All the rowdy sheets opened in this batch of Writ Petitions are directed to be closed immediately. The police cannot open or continue a rowdy sheet or collect data pertaining to a person without the sanction of Collection of personal data amd its usage for prevention of crimes also can only be in accordance with a crosses the thresholds mentioned in the Constitution of India law". law'' which and the various judgments including K.S.Puttaswamy case (2 supra) since 'privacy' is now a Fundamental Right as per Part-Ill of the Constitution of India. It is reiterated that the police cannot (under the existing orders) indulge in night visits; domiciliary visits to the houses of a suspect or accused. They cannot take or demand the photographs, fingerprints etc., except under the procedure established by a 'law' and if the conditions laid down are satisfied. Accused or suspects cannot be summoned or called to the Police Station or an3rwhere else either during festivals/elections/weekends etc. They cannot be made to wait at the Police Stations for any reason or seek permission to leave the local jurisdiction."

Therefore, as the very Chapter-37 in the A.P. Police Manual and A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which all the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets suiweillance is being kept on the petitioners on the basis of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the ssme are being continued, is now declared as void, the opening of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners and continuing the same is clearly unsustainable under law. They have no legal sanctity and they cannot be sustained under law and they cannot be allowed to be in force and continued any longer. are opened and V V.

CMR, J. W.P.No.4990 of 2016 & Batch

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid common order, dated 15.07.2022, of this Court and for the reasons stated therein, these Writ Petitions rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheet allowed declaring the opening of the ts/ hi s tory- sh eets are against the petitioners, which are all impugned in these Writ Petitions, illegal and unconstitutional, sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets. as Consequently, all the ro wdj'- opened against petitioners in these Writ Petitions, stand closed forthwith. the The respondents in all these Writ Petitions' are directed to close the the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets in their records which are opened against the petitioners. No surveillance shall be kept on the petitioners herein on the basis of the said the rowdysheets/.suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the petitioners shall not be called to the Police Station in connection with any such rowdy-sheets/su.spect-sheets/histor>'--sheets. which are now declared as illegal and unconstitutional and which are closed. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if shall also stand closed. any.

Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 'i N OFFICER

To

1. Mr. Vali Basha, S/o not known to petitioner Sub Inspector of Poiice (51-2823), Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
1. Mr.Vasadi Syamalarao, S/o Satya Rao Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.8-4-9, Kotniveedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District.
1. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of police. Worked as SHO in Anakapalli Town PS, (In elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam Dist
1. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of poiice. Worked as SHO In Anakapalli I own PS, (In elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District.
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Guduru Police Station, Kurnool District Andhra Pradesh.
/. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur West, Guntur
1. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District, Guntur.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari District
IS. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District.
1. The Asodi Srinivasa Reddy, Sub Inspector of Police, Presently attached to Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P,
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada Krishna District.
1. The Circle Inspector of Police, Peddapuram, East Godavari District.
1. The Circle Inspector, Panyam Village, Kurnool District, A.P.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Deputy General of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.
2b. The Deputy Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (South), Guntur Urban, Guntur District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kunroot District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem Division West Godavari District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Kurnool District, A.P.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddutur, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Women Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police/Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kasibuqqa, Srikakulam District.
1. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Kolanukonda, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
1. The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Guntur North, Guntur District.
1. The Dy. SP/ Sub Divisional Police Officer (SDPO), Anakapalalli Sub-Division Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam
1. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Chirala, Prakasam District.
1. The he Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Zone, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari District
1. The Inspector of Police, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam District.
1. The Inspector of Police, Chirala, Prakasam District
1. The Inspector of Police, Ichapuram, Srikakulam District.
1. The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam
1. The Inspector of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, A.P.
1. The Inspector of Police, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
1. The Inspector of Police, Podili Circle, Podili, Prakasam District.
1. The SHO, Adoni Taluka Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The SHO, Bikkavolu PS, East Godavari District.
1. The SHO, Bommuru PS, Rajamahendravaram Urban, East Godavari District.
1. The SI of Police, Ichapuram Rural PS, Srikakulam District.
1. The Station House Office, Mydukur (U/G) Police Station Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The Station House Office, Urban P.S., Chilakaluripet, Guntur District Rep. by its Inspector of Police
1. The Station House Officer, Airport Police Station, Visakhapatnam.
1. The Station House Officer, Ambajipeta Police Station, East Godavari District.
1. The Station House officer, Anakapalli Town PS, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Dist.
1. The Station House Officer, Biccavolu Police Station, Biccavolu, East Godavari District
1. The Station House Officer, Bobbili Police Station, Vizianagaram District.
1. The Station House Officer, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District
1. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.
1. The Station House Officer, Chebrolu Police Station, Guntur District.
1. The Station House Officer, Chintalapudi West Godavari District.
1. The Station House Officer, Dowlaiswaram P.S., Dowlaiswaram 533 125, East Godavari District
1. The Station House Officer, Dumbriguda Police station, Visakhapatnam District
1. The Station House Officer, Gadivemula Police Station, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P.
1. The Station House Officer, Gollaprolu, East Godavari District, A.P.
1. The Station House Officer, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
1. The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
1. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.
1. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.
The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Srikakulam District.
1. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
2. The Station House Officer, II Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.
1. The Station House Officer, IV Town Police Station, Nellore.
2. The Station House Officer, J.R Puram Police Station Srikakulam District.
3. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Rural Polic
1. The Station House Officer, Naguluppalapadu Police Station, Naguluppalapadu, Prakasam Dist
1. The Station House Officer, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 78. The Station House Officer, Palakol Town, Palakol, West Godavari District.
1. The Station House Officer, Pamulapadu Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh
The Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Police Station, Pattabhipuram, Guntur. The Station House Officer, Peda Kakani Police Station, Peda Kakni, Guntur District. The Station House O
The Station House Officer, Putlur P.S Anantapuramu District. The Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District. The Station House Officer, Tadipatri Town
1. The Station House Officer, Therlam Police Station. Vizianagaram District.
1. The Station House Officer, V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District.
The Station House Officer, Vetapalem, Prakasam District
1. The Station House Officer, Yellanur PS, Anantapuramu District.
1. The Station House Officer, Yemmiganur Town Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District
1. The Station House Officer, Yerraguntla Police Station, Kadapa District.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer (D.S.P), Peddapuram, East Godavari District,
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Guntakal, Anantapur District
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District.95. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Rural, SPSR Nellore District.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Officer-cum-Deputy Superintendent of Police, Darsi, Prakasam District.
1. The Sub Divisional Police Station Officer, Amalpuram Sub Division, East Godavri District.
1. The Sub inspector of Police, /Station House Officer, Kanigiri Police Station, Kanigiri, Prakasam District.
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Jammalamadugu Urban Police Station, Jammalamadugu Town, YSR Kadapa District.
1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Uravakonda Police Station, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Sub inspector of Police/Station House Officer, VajrapukothuruPolice Station, Vairapukotturu Mandal Srikakulam District.
1. The Sub. Divisional Police Officer, Narsapur, Sub.Division, Narsapur, W.G.District, AP.
1. The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Palamaner, Chittoor District, AP
1. The Sub.Inspector of Police, Chowdepalle Police Station Chowdepalle, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bobbili Sub-Division, Vizianagaram District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur Urban District, Guntur.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jammalamadugu Division, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Town Sub-Division, Nellore
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram Sub-Division, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam Sub-Division, Srikakulam District.
1. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tadipatri Division, Anantapuram District, Andhra Pradesh.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police (S.H.O), Peddapuram Police Station, Jaggampeta, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.
1. The Superintendant of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District
1. The Superintendent of Police, (Urban), Guntur District, A.P.124. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, At Kakikanda, A.P.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, at Ongole.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural
1. The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District.
1. The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, At Eluru.
1. The Superintendent, of Chittoor District, Chittoor A.P.
1. The Station House Officer, Midthur Police Station Midthur, Kurnool District.
1. One CC to Sri Butta Vijaya Bhasker, Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. M CHALAPATHI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. VENKATESWARLU KOLLA Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. M P V N V SASTRI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. CH MARKONDAIAH Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. RAMESH BABU PEDAPALLI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. N SRIHARI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. SARATH KUMAR D Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. K SRINIVASA PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. J U M V PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 155. One CC to SRI. HAMSA DEVINENI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Advocate [OPUC] 157. One CC to SRI. Y BALAJI Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. V VINOD K REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
1. One CC to SRI. ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI Advocate [OPLIC]
1. One CC to SRI. RATAN MOHAN MEDIDA Advocate [OPUC]

One CC to SRI, S BALA MOHAN RAO Advocate [OPUC] 163. One CC to SRI. N SIVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 164. One CC to SRI. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 165. One CC to SRI. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI Advocate [OPUC] 166. One CC to SRI. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 167. One CC to SRI. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Advocate [OPUC] 168. One CC to SRI. T.V.JAGGI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 169. One CC to SRI. SRINIVAS AMBATI Advocate [OPUC] 170. One CC to SRI. V NITESH Advocate [OPUC] 171. One CC to SRI. K CHIDAMBARAM Advocate [OPUC] 172. One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Advocate [OPUC] 173. One CC to SRI. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA Advocate [OPUC] 174. One CC to SRI. K B RAMANNA DORA Advocate [OPUC] 175. One CC to SRI. P NARAHARI BABU Advocate [OPUC] 176. One CC to SRI. RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Advocate [OPUC] 177. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 178. Two CD Copies

RAM

Note: The typographical mistake in incorporating the case WP.No.17439 of 2021 in batch cases is rectified. Substitute this amended order in place of earlier order which was dispatched on 16-09-2022.

Sd/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

HIGH COURT

DATED:01/08/2022

AMENDED COMMON ORDER

WRIT PETITION Nos: 4990. 14611. 18284. 28889 of 2016; 3182 of 2018: 4204, 10545, 11948, 12035, 17227, 19568. 19756, 20775 of 2019:560, 620, 22541, 24449, 25428 of 2020; 317. 787. 3169, 8207, 8516, 11009, 11844, 12911. 16844, 17414, 17439,17658, 18037. 18172, 18187, 19025, 20048, 20455. 20946, 26749, 29372 of 2021; 993. 3223, 3283. 4340, 6743, 6753, 7284, 7525. 7652. 8911, 11073, 11081, 11167. 11169. 11170, 11171, 11442, 18696, 23516. 23526 and 23541 of 2022.

ALLOWING THE ALL WP's WITHOUT COSTS

Pamu Kishore Kumar At Pamula Kishore vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh

AI Summary

Order Issued After Hearing

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

WRIT PETITION No: 4990 OF 2016

Between:

AND

...Respondents

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 6375 OF 2016)

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 14611 OF 2016

Between:

...Respondents

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 18189 OF 2016)

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 18284 OF 2016

Between:

...Petitioners

AND

...Respondents

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 22459 OF 2016)

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 28889 OF 2016

Between:

AND

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 35768 OF 2016)

IA NO: 1 OF 2017

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 3182 OF 2018

Between:

...Petitioner

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH BABU PEDAPALLI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 4204 OF 2019

Between:

...Petitioner

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 10545 OF 2019

Between:

...Petitioner

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 11948 OF 2019

Between:

...Petitioner

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH MARKONDAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 12035 OF 2019

Between:

...Petitioner

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

WRIT PETITION NO: 17227 OF 2019

Between:

AND

...Respondents

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M P V N V SASTRI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION NO: 19568 OF 2019

Between:

AND

...Petitioner