Vadde Ramanna vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Panchayat Raj)
Before:
Hon'ble Battu Devanand
Listed On:
3 Aug 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 10019 OF 2021
Between:
-
- Vadde Ramanna, S/o Vadde Nettikallu, Age 56 Years, 0cc Cultivation, R/o 10/1/3A, Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District
-
- Vadde Saraswathamma, w/o Vadde Ramanna, Age 50 Years, Occ Cultivation, R/o 10/1/3A, Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District
Petitioners
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayath Raj Rural Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
-
- The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District
-
- The District Panchayath Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District
-
- The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Maddikera Mandal, Kurnool District
-
- The Maddikera Gram Panchayath, Rep. by its Panchayath Secretary, Maddikera (v) (M), Kurnool District.
-
- Vadde Uliganna S/o.V.Uliganna, Age 50 years, Occ:Cultivation, R/o.Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District.
-
- Vadde Nagaraju S/o.Vadde Thimmaiah, Age 50 years, Occ:Cultivation, R/o.Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District.
RR 6 to 7 Implead as per court order, Dt.26.07.2021 in I.A.2/21 in W.P.10019/2021.
Respondents
WHEREAS the Petitioners above named through their Advocate SRI.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of on the part of Respondents 4 and 5 in taking necessary steps for laying concrete public road along with drainage system near Petitioners House bearing No. 10/1/3A, Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District leading to the Sri Rama Temple Street is illegal, arbitrary, violation of provision 45 of THE ANDHRA PRADESH PANCHAYAT RAJ ACT, 1994 and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to take necessary steps for laying concrete public road along with drainage system near Petitioners' House bearing No.10/1/3A, Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District, leading to the Sri Rama Temple Street;
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri.N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondent Nos.6 & 7, herein to show cause as to why this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted.
You viz:
-
Vadde Uliganna S/o.V.Uliganna, R/o.Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District.
-
Vadde Nagaraju S/o.Vadde Thimmaiah, R/o.Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District
are directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted on or before 17.08.2021, on which date the case stands posted for hearing.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 4 and 5 to take necessary steps for laying concrete public road along with drainage system near Petitioners' House bearing No. 10/1/3A, Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District, leading to the Sri Rama Temple Street, pending disposal of WP No. 10019 of 2021, on the file of the High Court.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:
Issue notice to the respondents 6 and 7.
Learned counsel for petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents 6 and 7 and file proof of service.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 4 and 5 sought time to get instructions with regard to the action taken on the representation submitted by the petitioners.
Post after two weeks.
SD/-T.MADHAVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
- Vadde Uliganna S/o.V.Uliganna, R/o.Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District.
//TRUE COPY//
-
- Vadde Nagaraju S/o.Vadde Thimmaiah, R/o.Vadde Street, Maddikera (V) (M), Kurnool District. (1 to 7 by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and affidavit)
-
- One CC to SRI.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- One spare copy
SRL
HIGH COURT
DEVJ
DATED:03/08/2021
NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
WP.No.10019 of 2021