M Devamma vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Subba Reddy Satti
Listed On:
22 Apr 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.8673 of 2024
M.Devamma, W/o late M.Bhaskar, aged about 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, Nandanpalli village, Bhopalnagar, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District.
… Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District and four others.
… Respondents.
| Counsel for the petitioner | : | Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for respondents 1 to 4 | : | GP for Revenue |
ORDER
The Writ Petition is filed to declare the inaction of respondents 2 to 4 in deleting the name of 5th respondent from the revenue records and canceling the pattadar passbook of 5th respondent for an extent of Ac.4.09 cents in S.No.722/1 of Rudravaram village, Kurnool Rural Mandal, Kurnool District and to mutate the name of petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.
-
Heard Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 4.
-
When the matter was listed on 16.04.2024, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue produced the endorsement issued by the 4th respondent-Tahsildar vide Rc.B.18/2024 dated 01.04.2024. A copy of the endorsement is also handed over to learned counsel for petitioner today in the Court.
-
As seen from the endorsement, pursuant to Spandana complaint made by the petitioner on 09.11.2023, an enquiry was conducted, and the Tahsildar issued endorsement on 01.04.2024. In view of the endorsement dated 01.04.2024 issued by the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, the prayer sought for in the writ petition is misconceived and hence, it is liable to be dismissed. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to challenge the endorsement.
-
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the endorsement issued by 4 th respondent-Tahsildar, if he is aggrieved. No costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
22nd April, 2024 PVD