Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. State Rep Pp

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble K Sreenivasa Reddy
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:15 Nov 2022
CNR:APHC010160792019

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Extension Of Interim Orders

Before:

Hon'ble J K Maheshwari

Listed On:

1 Oct 2020

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

: PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI K SREENIVASA REDD

IA No. 3 OF 2019 $\mathbf{IN}$ CRLP NO: 3197 OF 2019

Between:

    1. M/s Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited, Rep. by it's General Manager, Telecom Department, Chuttugunta, Vijayawada-520 004, Krishna District.
    1. The Accounts Officer (Pay), M/s. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited, Office of General Manager, Telecom Department, Chuttugunta, Vijayawada-520 004 ...Petitioners/Accused

AND

    1. State, rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravati
    1. M/s. Padmavathi Residency Flat Owners Welfare Association, (Regd. No.289/2016), Represented by it's Authorised Person C.V. Krishna, Son of C.L. Narasimham, Resident of SF-4, 3<sup>rd</sup> floor, Padmavathi Residency, Ayodhyanagar, Vijayawada-520 003, Krishna District.

...Respondents

Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed in Crl.P., the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CC No 27/2019 on the file of First Special Magistrate, Vijayawada including the appearance of the accused till the disposal of the main quash petition, pending disposal of CRLP No. 3197 of 2019, on the file of the High Court.]

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memo of grounds filed herein, and the orders of the High Court dated 10-06-2019, 24-06-2019, 15-07-2019 & 01.10.2020 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ithapu Subrahmanyeswara Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1, the Court made the following

ORDER:

J

"Interim order granted earlier is extended for period of four (4) weeks. $\Lambda$

Post the matter after six (6) weeks."

Sd/- T. MADHAVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

$\mathcal{L} \leftarrow \mathcal{L}$

$25$ SECTION OFFICER To,

    1. The First Special Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District
    1. The 1<sup>st</sup> Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada.
    1. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court, Andhra Pradesh (OUT)
    1. One CC to Sri. Ithapu Subrahmanyeswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

$\mathcal{A}=\frac{\mathcal{A}+\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}+\mathcal{B}}\frac{1}{T}$

والجاب

Q.

$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$

    1. One spare copy
  • $\mathsf{E}\mathsf{R}$

$\mathbf{J}$

HIGH COURT

SRK, J

DATE: 15.11.2022

POST THE MATTER AFTER SIX (6) WEEKS

ORDER

IA. NO. 3 OF 2019 $\overline{in}$ CRLP.No.3197 of 2019

INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED

$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$