Dhanush Infotech Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State Of Andhar Pradesh
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Aug 2021
CNR:APHC010152202021
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Medical And Health)
Before:
Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao
Listed On:
4 Aug 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE No. W.P.Nos.8834 of 2021 & 12375 of 2021
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.<br>No | DATE | ORDER | Office<br>Note |
---|---|---|---|
04.08.2021 | RRR, J | ||
The subject matter of both these writ | |||
petitions is the contract for procurement of | |||
services for standardization and refurbishment | |||
of government owned telemedicine facilities at | |||
sub-centers in district of West Godavari, East | |||
Godavari, Visakhapatnam, Vizianagaram and | |||
Srikakulam (Zone-III) Andhra Pradesh, India, | |||
dated 12.01.2019. Under this contract, the | |||
petitioners were to offer services for 3010 sub | |||
centers in the State of Andhra Pradesh. It is | |||
agreed between both the parties that services | |||
were given by the petitioners in 502 sub | |||
centers. Thereafter there had been disputes | |||
between the parties as to whether the delay in | |||
implementing of services in 2508 centers is on | |||
account of the petitioners or on account of the | |||
$3rd$ respondent. These disputes have now | |||
culminated in the order of termination dated | |||
25.06.2021<br>by way of proceedings<br>in | |||
Rc.540/CHFW/NHM/2020-1. | |||
In the course of arguments, the attention | |||
of this Court was drawn to clause No.7 of the | |||
contract dated 12.01.2019. | |||
This clause stipulated that if there is any | |||
dispute or difference of any kind between the | |||
petitioners and $3rd$ respondent, in connection | |||
with or relating to the contract, the parties | |||
shall make every effort to resolve the same |
04-08-2021 (Contd..,)
amicably by mutual consultation.
There is every need to consider such | ||
---|---|---|
methods of alternative dispute resolution and | ||
the said need has resonated time<br>again with | ||
the Hon'ble Apex Court as well as this Court in | ||
various Judgments. | ||
In<br>the<br>circumstances,<br>I<br>deem<br>it | ||
appropriate<br>to<br>keep<br>these<br>writ<br>petitions | ||
pending and direct both the parties to make an | ||
attempt<br>at<br>resolving<br>their<br>differences<br>and | ||
disputes by way of mutual negotiations,<br>as | ||
required<br>under<br>clause<br>7<br>of<br>the<br>agreement | ||
dated 12.01.2019. | ||
Accordingly, the representatives of the | ||
petitioners as well as the representatives of | ||
respondent Nos.2 and 3, who are authorized to | ||
take decisions in this matter, shall meet on | ||
09.08.2021 at the office of the 2nd respondent | ||
at 11.00 a.m., as the first meeting for resolving | ||
their disputes. | ||
The time and venue for all subsequent | ||
meetings<br>will<br>be<br>decided<br>by<br>the<br>parties | ||
mutually. | ||
Post on 25.08.2021 in the 'Motion List'. | ||
_________<br>RRR, J | ||
SDP | ||
W.P.Nos.8834 of 2021 & 12375 of 2021
04-08-2021 (Contd..,)
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search