Pandraju Krishna Kumari vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble T Mallikarjuna Rao
Listed On:
25 Mar 2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .-PRESENT.-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I MALLIKARJUNA RAO IA No. 2 OF2025
lN
CRLRC NO.I 386 OF 2025
Between.-
I
- 1, PandraJ'u Krishna Kumari, w/o Late Anjaneyulu, Aged about 55 years, R/o Parasupet, MachI-Iipatnam, KrI-Shna District.
- 2, Meruva veera Nagamani, w/o Naga Naresh, Aged about 40 years, By 1.L-_-._I_ ~ -___ the side ofAPSP Camp, Mangalagjrl', Guntur DI'StriCt. J -----I I-J
...petitioners/Appellants No.2 and 3 in CRLA No.101 of 2019/ Accused No. 2 & 4 I-n C.C.No.546 of 2017
AND
-
- The state ofAndhra pradesh, Rep. by l'ts publ,'c prosecutor, High court of A. P. , Amaravath,a.
-
- PandraJ'u Pavanl-, w/o Naga Gopala Srl'kanth, Aged about 30 years, R/o. Bhaskarapuram, opp Three sakthj peetem, Mach"l'patnam, KrI-Shna Distrl-ct.
...Respondents/Respondents/complaI-nants
petition under sectl-on 397" of cr.p.c./sectl'ons 438(1) of BNSS, praying that l'n the circumstances stated in the affl-davit fI'led l'n support of the petition, the Hl-gh Court may be pleased to suspend the judgment of convI'Ctl-On and fine sentence was l'mposed in Judgment dated 15.07.2019 jn c.c.No.546 of 2017 passed on the file of Learned " Additional JudI-C,-al Magistrate of I class, MachI-ljPatnam, Krl'shna District which was confirmed I'n the judgment dated 21.03.2025, passed I'n CRL-A, No,101 of 2019 on the fl'le vI Addl'tjonaI sessI'OnS Judge, Krishna DI'StrI'Ct at Machilipatnam and release the
petitioners/Accused No. 2-and 4 on bail , Pending disposal of + CRLRC No. 386 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s Shaik Asif, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Publ-lc Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following
ORDER:
[lLeamed counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioners herein are mother and sister of Al who is the husband of LW|1^^,ife| Leamed counsel for the petitioners further Submits that the Petitioners herein are in bail throughout the trial proceedings and the trial Court without proper appreciation~of the material on record convicted the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners have got fair chances to succeed in the revision.
Considering the submjssions made by the learned COunSel for the petitioners, the Sentence of imprisonment imposed by the Court below alone is suspended pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case. The petitioners herein shall be enlarged on bail on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned lI Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Machilipatnam, Krishna District."
sd/-+ p.u.v. BHASKAR RAG ASSISTANT
/ITRUE COPY// sEC"ON OFFICER
To,
-
- The lI Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.
-
- The VI Additional Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam.
-
- The Superintendent, Nellore Central Jail, Nellore.
-
- One CC to SRI SHAIK AJ+slF Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs toPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P., Amaravati. [ouT]
-
- One spare copy.
PSD
HIGH COURT
TMR,J
DATED:25/03/2025
ORDER
I.A.NO.2 OF 2025 lN CRLRC.No.386 of 2025
SUSPENSION